Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

Clueless Sen. Tuberville 'running in circles' in response to IVF question
Politics by Curt_Anderson     February 23, 2024 12:53 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (9 comments) [111 views]


Donald Trump's Weekend Gaffes: Accidentally Endorses Biden, And More
Humor by Curt_Anderson     February 25, 2024 6:56 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (4 comments) [60 views]


Pro-Palestinian advocates urge 'uncommitted' vote during Michigan presidential primary
Politics by HatetheSwamp     February 26, 2024 3:30 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [14 views]


Disney Stock Jumps on “Epic” Quarter
Disney by Indy!     February 24, 2024 10:55 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (11 comments) [71 views]


Republicans are terrible at investigations and prosecutions.
Government by Curt_Anderson     February 25, 2024 3:12 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (7 comments) [76 views]


TAFKAP is going to fight this, but here's the reality
Disney by oldedude     December 25, 2023 8:54 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (5 comments) [141 views]


Obsequious Sen. Graham (R-SC) booed by South Carolina Republicans
Politics by Curt_Anderson     February 24, 2024 7:03 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (5 comments) [47 views]


Trump’s new appeal to Black voters: I am a criminal too!
Crime by Curt_Anderson     February 24, 2024 9:08 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (9 comments) [103 views]


South Carolina primary vote count:
Politics by HatetheSwamp     February 25, 2024 3:52 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [17 views]


You don't have to be crazy to attend CPAC ...okay, you pretty much do.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     February 24, 2024 10:45 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (10 comments) [100 views]


Politics selectors, pages, etc.
Justice Department sues Texas over 6-week abortion ban that empowers legal ‘vigilantes’
By Ponderer
September 9, 2021 9:28 pm
Category: Politics

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

WASHINGTON — The Biden administration went to federal court Thursday hoping to block Texas’ ban on abortion as early as six weeks, blasting the state for deputizing legal “bounty hunters” to deter a procedure that remains legal, technically, under state law and Supreme Court precedent.

The ban on abortion as soon as a fetal heart beat can be detected — “months before a pregnancy is viable,” Attorney General Merrick Garland noted in announcing the challenge — clearly violates the constitutional rights of women in Texas, he said.

“Texas does not dispute that its statute violates Supreme Court precedent,” Garland added, but rather has crafted the measure “to thwart judicial review for as long as possible” by shifting enforcement from government to individuals.

“It is settled constitutional law that ‘a state may not prohibit any woman from making the ultimate decision to terminate her pregnancy before viability,’” according to the suit filed in Austin, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. “But Texas has done just that.”

Gov. Greg Abbott is confident the law will be upheld in court, said spokeswoman Renae Eze.

“The most precious freedom is life itself,” she said. “Texas passed a law that ensures that the life of every child with a heartbeat will be spared from the ravages of abortion. Unfortunately, President Biden and his administration are more interested in changing the national narrative from their disastrous Afghanistan evacuation and reckless open border policies instead of protecting the innocent unborn.”

The new Texas law seeks to sidestep Roe vs. Wade, the Supreme Court ruling that has limited governmental restrictions on abortion since 1973, by deputizing enforcement to individuals and groups that oppose abortion.

Senate Bill 8 bars health care providers from performing an abortion once a fetal heartbeat is detected. And it offers a $10,000 bounty for lawsuits against providers or anyone who “aids or abets” and abortion, a private enforcement action that could even target an Uber driver who transports a woman to a clinic.

If courts allow the Texas law to survive, it will signify the end to the Roe era.


Cited and related links:

  1. dallasnews.com

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Justice Department sues Texas over 6-week abortion ban that empowers legal ‘vigilantes’":

  1. by Curt_Anderson on September 9, 2021 9:43 pm
    My entirely I-am-not-a-lawyer opinion is that this law will be struck down not because of the precedence of Roe v Wade or anything to do with abortion pro or con. I suspect that SCOTUS will rule against Texas because it allows anybody with or without standing to sue the provider, any facilitator, etc. simply because they are offended.

    That is crazy. I can't think of any other situation where a person is unharmed and not even involved is allowed to sue. I might have case against a store if I slipped on their wet floor. I can't sue the store simply because I think it's terrible that some other person slipped on their wet floor.


Go To Top

Comment on: "Justice Department sues Texas over 6-week abortion ban that empowers legal ‘vigilantes’"

* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page