Comments posted organically
Homepage

Top Contributors Articles by: Curt_Anderson Donna HatetheSwamp Indy! islander meagain myce Navy2711 oldedude Ponderer ROB3RT tuk22

Recent Article Activity Most Commented Articles Highest Rated Articles All Articles Most Viewed Articles Articles Without Comments

I forgot. Writers wrote po into a scene of THE NAKED GUN.
Entertainment by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments)

Trump Tacos Again!
Humor by Donna (0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (11 comments)

More good news concerning Platner
Politics by Indy! (0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (15 comments)

GOP cannot point to any misbehavior by Graham Platner...
Politics by Curt_Anderson (0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (19 comments)

Today launches Woke Hegemony is Dead PRIDE Month
Media by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (88 comments)

P-Hussle wins Maine Dem Primary with 72% of the vote
Celebrities by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (11 comments)

"pedophile's bitch is a Flaming MAGA Hat Cult Member in good standing"
Religion by Ponderer (0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (13 comments)

Trump finally realizes: "They're playing us for suckers!"
Fact Check by Indy! (0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (3 comments)

Ghetto
Humor by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: myce (3 comments)

Spencer Pratt Fails To Advance In Los Angeles Mayor’s Race
Politics by Curt_Anderson (0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (13 comments)

Pending Supreme Court decision on TQ issue
Law by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments)

P-Hustle appears on Morning Joe
Media by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (3 comments)

I am predicting that it's gonna be 8-0 finding that Trump is fullashit. By Ponderer December 12, 2023 7:10 pm Category: Law (0.0 from 0 votes) Rules of the Post & Tips. Write & Comment How To Post Here

The Supremes will be unanimous in denying that a former president has legal immunity after leaving office. And that there was no double jeopardy, since he hasn't been criminally tried for anything about 1/6 before.

Comments Start Below

by Curt_Anderson on December 12, 2023 7:15 pm I am watching Lawrence O’Donnell now. 25 years ago Justice Kavanaugh wrote an opinion that directly contradicts Trump’s hope and his lawyers' arguments on immunity and double jeopardy. by HatetheSwamp on December 13, 2023 1:44 am There's such a sweet naive hope about your TrumpHate. Jack Smith's Desperate Gamble at SCOTUS After falsely pretending that Trump is being prosecuted like any other defendant, Biden's henchman Jack Smith just proved what a liar he is. On Monday Smith filed an unusual emergency appeal directly to the U.S. Supreme Court, which would be laughed out of court if Smith were treated like any other litigant there. While the 3-justice liberal wing of the Supreme Court will surely grant whatever Smith wants, and perhaps Roberts will too, that totals only 4 votes when he needs 5 to obtain fast-track review in bypass of the intermediate appellate court. Smith appears to be one vote short, which liberals recognize by baselessly demanding recusal of conservative Justice Thomas. Bahahahahahahahahahaha ha! townhall.com by islander on December 13, 2023 7:25 am Ponderer, I'm not worried about the vote on this. I'm just curious as to how many, if any, would actually vote to give a president that kind of power especially as, I hope, most Americans are beginning to see that we need to start limiting the president and Supreme Court's power. It's gonna' be interesting. by Curt_Anderson on December 13, 2023 9:23 am Legal pundit Andrew Weissmann pointed out an inconsistency in Donald Trump’s arguments of presidential immunity. Trump argues that as a one-time president he should not be subjected to the intrusive and time-consuming aspects of a criminal trial, which interferes with his political campaign. However, that does not square with his delaying tactics and his numerous and frivolous appeals which consume time and overshadow his political campaign. I will add my own thought: when has an innocent person ever been so insistent on delaying the wheels of justice and the opportunity to be found not guilty in a court of law? by HatetheSwamp on December 13, 2023 10:09 am Curt, I'd hardly call Weissmann an unbiased legal scholar. isle, This decision is purely a matter of answering the question of where the appropriate boundaries are in the Constitution's separation of powers. This GOP nominees are Originalists. That's all that will matter to them, either way. Gang, Unlike po, I ain't a law school professor and a former Supreme Court clerk, however, my sense is that Trump's lawyers are merely throwing up Hail Marys which have little chance of scoring. I can't see that my Legal Goobers have weighed in on this specifically but... ...#3, Andy McCarthy, actually predicts that Trump will be in prison on election day... ...and, #1 Alan Dershowitz, continues to predict that Trump will be convicted on the DC charges and that conviction will be overturned after the election. by islander on December 13, 2023 11:13 am Curt, In my opinion of course Trump is right. His indictment and trial will interfere with his campaign. I doubt there are many who could possibly argue against that. When a person is indicted for a crime it’s going to interfere with virtually every aspect of their life including running for a public office. There is no precedence or law that I've ever heard of that would make a former president immune from or give him the power or the right to delay a criminal trial any more than any other private citizen. Whether or not he has chosen to run for public office again or not is irrelevant. An ex-president is still a private citizen just like you or me. Even if the court chooses not to take the case which I guess could happen...I doubt Trump could delay the trial until after the election, which is as we all know, exactly what he’s trying to do. by HatetheSwamp on December 13, 2023 11:35 am When a person is indicted... Apparently, when a person is indicted, it's as if s/he is given a bag of gold. When these indictments began to pile up, Trump had a slight lead over Ron DeSantis. Now, his lead is historic and insurmountable...over the whole GOP primary field. ...AND, stunningly, he has caught and passed the Doddering Old Fool in head to head match up as well. I think most people assumed that the indictment would impact Trump's candidacy...just not as it has. by Curt_Anderson on December 13, 2023 11:49 am "When a person is indicted for a crime it’s going to interfere with virtually every aspect of their life including running for a public office." --islander Exactly. Indictments and trials would get in the way of anyone's professional and personal life. For Sherlock Holmes an indictment would be detection interference. For would-be parents an indictment would be conception interference. For wedding planners an indictment would be reception interference. For the sexually active an indictment would be erection interference. For Donald Trump, the one thing an indictment is NOT is deception interference. by islander on December 13, 2023 11:55 am Just saw the news that the Supreme Court has accepted the case !! by Curt_Anderson on December 13, 2023 12:06 pm Are you sure Islander? I think it will be weeks before the decide. SCOTUS has just agreed to hear the abortion pill case. by islander on December 13, 2023 12:51 pm You might be right Curt. We had just been talking about this case and I might have jumped the gun !! The abortion pill case will be another good one. yY by oldedude on December 13, 2023 6:54 pm 😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴 Go To Top

Find old posts & articles

Show Most Recent Articles Articles by category: Politics+ Religion+ Law & Crime Military News Media History Health Sports+ Humor Entertainment Misc.

Report spam & abuse SelectSmart.com home page