![]()
How states can keep Donald Trump off the ballot in 2024
Aug. 21 (UPI) -- After three indictments of former President Donald Trump, the fourth one in Georgia came not as a surprise but as a powerful exposition of the scope of his efforts to remain in power despite losing the 2020 presidential election.
New conservative legal scholarship spells out how and why those actions -- which were observed by the public over many months -- disqualify Trump from serving in the presidency ever again. And our read of the Georgia indictment, as longtime lawyers ourselves, shows why and how that disqualification can be put into effect.
The key to all of this is the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which states that "No person shall ... hold any office, under the United States ... who, having previously taken an oath ... to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof."
Trump took that oath at his inauguration on Jan. 20, 2017.
Trump's Georgia indictment and his federal indictment in Washington cite largely public information -- and some newly unearthed material -- to spell out exactly how he engaged in efforts to rebel against the Constitution, and sought and gave aid and comfort to others who also did so.
Legal scholars William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen, conservatives themselves and members of the conservative Federalist Society, have recently published a paper declaring that under the 14th Amendment, Trump's actions render him ineligible to hold office.
We believe the Georgia indictment provides even more detail than the earlier federal one about how Trump's actions have disqualified him from office and shows a way to keep him off the ballot in 2024.
Disqualification is automatic
Trump's supporters might argue that disqualifying him would be unfair without a trial and conviction on the Jan. 6 indictment, and perhaps the Georgia charges.
But Baude and Paulsen, using originalist interpretation -- the interpretive theory of choice of the powerful Federalist Society and Trump's conservative court appointees, which gives full meaning to the actual, original text of the Constitution -- demonstrate that no legal proceeding is required. They say disqualification is automatic, or what's known in the legal world as "self-executing."
Recent public comments from liberal constitutional scholar Laurence Tribe and conservative jurist and former federal judge Michael Luttig -- who has characterized the events before, during and since Jan. 6 as Trump's "declared war on American democracy" -- suggest an emerging bipartisan consensus supporting Baude and Paulsen.
Backed by history
This is not a theoretical bit of technical law. This provision of the 14th Amendment was, in fact, extensively used after the Civil War to keep former Confederate leaders from serving in the federal government, without being tried or convicted of any crime.
Few former Confederates were charged with crimes associated with secession, rebellion and open war against the United States. And most were pardoned by sweeping orders issued by President Andrew Johnson.
But even though they had no relevant convictions, former Confederates were in fact barred from office in the United States.
