by HatetheSwamp on July 3, 2023 5:15 am
So apparently, a made up, fictitious, and hypothetical case was heard before the Supreme Court.
For someone who claims to know so much about what's constitutional, you don't know much.
As that gay Guy Curt never heard of retweeted:
"2) Both sides (including Colorado) stipulated to the facts to the District Court. The SCOTUS opinion assumes those stipulations." It's a done deal, po.
And, as I noted to Donna. THE NEW REPUBLIC? C'mon man. Gimme a break and, while you're at it, save the Queen, man!
If you wanted to quote legitimate authority, why not cite THE WEEKLY WORLD NEWS? Baha baha.
by oldedude on July 3, 2023 5:38 am
That's why I left the citations in the Gorsich paper. It actually states the background and support for the decision based on not only what was presented to them, but also the prior levels from the original case through the appeals process. It has far more depth than I originally thought.