Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

Matt Gaetz says his GOP colleagues pushing the now indicted "highly credible confidential" source were a little "over-sauced".
Politics by Curt_Anderson     February 22, 2024 10:53 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (5 comments) [77 views]


So we're in the market for a house...
Nonprofit by Ponderer     February 4, 2024 6:09 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (39 comments) [473 views]


The infamous FD-1023 form: Biden $10M bribe file released: Burisma chief said he was Ďcoercedí to pay Joe, Ďstupidí Hunter in bombshell allegations
Crime by HatetheSwamp     July 20, 2023 3:47 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (32 comments) [557 views]


Clueless Sen. Tuberville 'running in circles' in response to IVF question
Politics by Curt_Anderson     February 23, 2024 12:53 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [9 views]


Tulsi Gabbard is a transformative political leader... speaking at EFFIN CPAC
Politics by HatetheSwamp     February 23, 2024 10:04 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (5 comments) [38 views]


Joe Manchin interview: Electing Trump would be very detrimental to US, world. Biden too liberal now.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     February 22, 2024 12:48 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (2 comments) [61 views]


THE DRINKS ARE ON ME, BOYS!!!
Alcoholic Beverages by Ponderer     February 21, 2024 6:50 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (7 comments) [145 views]


What to expect from Jim Biden's testimony before the House Oversight Committee...
Government by HatetheSwamp     February 21, 2024 8:24 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (32 comments) [299 views]


To set the record straight, GOPs are stoked for impeachment after Jim Biden's lies under oath
Crime by HatetheSwamp     February 22, 2024 6:57 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [25 views]


The truth about Alexander Smirnov and the GOP push to impeach the Doddering Old Fool
Politics by HatetheSwamp     February 22, 2024 6:43 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [13 views]


News selectors, pages, etc.
NARA MAY HAVE PRE-EXISTING LEGAL OBLIGATIONS WITH RESPECT TO DOCUMENTS COVERED BY AILEEN CANNONíS ORDER
By islander
September 7, 2022 2:39 pm
Category: News

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)


Judge Cannon may have taken on something that is way over her head!

"On Monday, Aileen Cannon told the government that it can only access 11,282 documents legally owned by the National Archives and currently possessed by DOJ to do an assessment of the damage Trump did by storing those records in a poorly-secured storage closet and desk drawer.

Weíll learn more in coming days about how the government will respond to Cannonís usurpation of the Presidentís authority over these documents.

But I want to note that there may be competing legal obligations, on NARA at least, that may affect the governmentís response.

NARA has been responding to at least four pending legal obligations as the fight over Trumpís stolen documents has gone on:


A series of subpoenas from the January 6 Committee that the Supreme Court has already ruled has precedence over any claims of privilege made by Trump

Two subpoenas from DOJís team investigating January 6, one obtained in May, covering everything NARA has provided to the J6C, and a second one served on NARA on August 17; these subpoenas would also be covered under SCOTUSí ruling rejecting Trumpís privilege claims

Discovery in Tom Barrackís case, whose trial starts on September 19 (DOJ informed Barrack they had requested Trump White House materials from NARA on April 5)

A subpoena from Peter Strzok in his lawsuit over his firing and privacy act violations

For all of them, NARA has a legal obligation that precedes Judge Cannonís order. So if any of the material owned by NARA that Cannon has enjoined for Trumpís benefit is covered by these subpoenas and the Barrack discovery request, it will give NARA an additional need to intervene, on top of the fact that Cannon has made decisions about property owned by NARA.

I donít hold out hope that the August 8 seizure has much pertaining to either January 6 investigation. Given that none of the boxes include clippings that post-date November, its unlikely they include government documents from the same period.

Plus, given the timing, I suspect the more recent subpoena from Thomas Windom to NARA pertains to materials turned over to NARA by Mark Meadows after the Mar-a-Lago search. Because Meadows originally turned those communications over to J6C directly, they would not have been covered by the prior subpoena, which obtained everything NARA turned over to J6C, which wouldnít have included Meadowsí texts.

Meadowsí submission to the Archives was part of a request for all electronic communications covered under the Presidential Records Act. The Archives had become aware earlier this year it did not have everything from Meadows after seeing what he had turned over to the House select committee investigating January 6, 2021. Details of Meadowsí submissions to the Archives and the engagement between the two sides have not been previously reported.

ďIt could be a coincidence, but within a week of the August 8 search on Mar-a-Lago, much more started coming in,Ē one source familiar with the discussions said.

The possibility that some of the documents seized on August 8 would be discoverable in Barrackís case is likely higher, particularly given the news that Trump had hoarded at least one document about ďa foreign governmentís nuclear-defense readiness.Ē Barrack is accused of working to influence White House policy on issues pertaining to UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar that might be implicated by classified documents. If the date of clippings in a particular box reflect the age of the government documents also found in that box, then about 18 boxes seized in August (those marked in purple, above) include records from the period covered by Barrackís superseding indictment.

That said, whether any such materials would count as being in possession of DOJ is another issue. They are currently in possession of team at DOJ that significantly overlaps with the people prosecuting Barrack for serving as an Agent of the Emirates without telling the Attorney General.

Strzokís subpoena may be the most likely to cover materials either turned over belatedly or seized on August 8 (though his subpoena was scoped, with DOJ involvement, at a time after the FBI was aware of Trumpís document theft). It asks for:

Records concerning Sarah Isgurís engagement with reporters from the Washington Post or New York Times about Peter Strzok and/or Lisa Page on or about December 1 and 2, 2017.

Records dated July 1, 2017 through December 12, 2017 concerning or reflecting any communications with members of the press related to Peter Strzok and/or Lisa Page.
Records dated July 1, 2017 through December 12, 2017 concerning or reflecting text messages between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.

Records dated July 1, 2017 through August 9, 2018 concerning Peter Strzokís employment at the FBI.
That materials covered by this subpoena made their way at some point to Mar-a-Lago is likely. Thatís because of the obsession with records relating to Crossfire Hurricane in the days when Trump was stealing documents ó virtually all of those would ďconcernĒ Strzokís FBI employment."

For those who want to be well informed, click on the link to read the rest:



Cited and related links:

  1. emptywheel.net

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "NARA MAY HAVE PRE-EXISTING LEGAL OBLIGATIONS WITH RESPECT TO DOCUMENTS COVERED BY AILEEN CANNONíS ORDER":

  1. by Curt_Anderson on September 7, 2022 4:35 pm
    In her decision, Judge Cannon wrote:
    "Furthermore, in natural conjunction with that appointment, and consistent with the value and sequence of special master procedures, the Court also temporarily enjoins the Government from reviewing and using the seized materials for investigative purposes pending completion of the special masterĀfs review or further Court order."




    It strikes me that NARA could review documents for purposes other than "investigative purposes". Archive preservation purposes for example. For that matter, the DOJ could review the materials for preparation of a legal case against Trump. The CIA could review materials to determine what national secrets may have seen by enemy spies.


  2. by islander on September 8, 2022 4:10 am

    This is why I think Cannon's decision was so amateurish and will not hold up when appealed. It is, like all of Trump's legal tactics, an attempt to delay. It has worked for him a lots of times in the past, but it won't work this time.


  3. by HatetheSwamp on September 8, 2022 7:19 am

    Bahahahahahahahahahaha.

    You Trumpaphobes are soooooooooooo cute.

    Here's to guessing that if this judge had rendered a critized decision that went agin Orangey you'd be silent as lambs!


Go To Top

Comment on: "NARA MAY HAVE PRE-EXISTING LEGAL OBLIGATIONS WITH RESPECT TO DOCUMENTS COVERED BY AILEEN CANNONíS ORDER"

* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page