This flowchart shows the referral process.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student presents an academic concern in the classroom. For example, does not pass a grade level DRA and is not passing weekly comprehension checks.
|
|
Teacher tries in class, Tier One interventions. Teacher also checks the cumulative file as well as with the health office regarding the student.
|
|
Student responds as expected to Tier One interventions.
| YES
|
Student would continue on with the class, intervention is considered successful.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
NO
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Teacher would call parent to set up a meeting to discuss the concerns and set up a plan and a due date for the level two intervention(Swaney,2008).
|
|
Student responds to Tier Two interventions.
| YES
|
Student continues on with successful interventions, no further interventions are added.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NO
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
Teacher would set up a meeting with parents again and set up a level three intervention. At this time another goal and due date would be set(Swaney, 2008). Did student respond?
| YES
|
Process would stop here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NO
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
Student Assistance Team would set up an MDT 1 to look at testing or checklists that may need to be done. Team can utilize that information along with RTI data to look at verifying a student with a learning disability.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|