Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

Anonymous comments regarding the Presidential Candidate Selector
President by Curt_Anderson     March 19, 2024 10:10 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (31 comments) [1413 views]

New poll reveals demographic voter shifts. Biden leads Trump, especially among "definitely voting" voters.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     May 2, 2024 11:04 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (4 comments) [64 views]

Professor who correctly predicted 9 presidential elections weighs in on Biden vs. Trump
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 30, 2024 9:33 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (3 comments) [46 views]

The pro-Palestinian campus protests are not very well thought out.
Opinion by Curt_Anderson     May 1, 2024 10:21 am (Rating: 5.0) Last comment by: Indy! (13 comments) [268 views]

Baha. Pro-Israel and Pro-Palestine protesters join in chanting "Eff Joe Biden!"
Politics by HatetheSwamp     May 2, 2024 3:34 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [13 views]

Our President speaks about college unrest
President by HatetheSwamp     May 2, 2024 9:32 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [20 views]

Trump court situation must be REALLY boring
Soap Opera by Indy!     May 1, 2024 2:08 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (4 comments) [71 views]

The WA GOP put it in writing that they’re not into democracy
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 30, 2024 8:55 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (13 comments) [286 views]

Fox News anchor Maria Bartiromo pressed House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) on Sunday about the lack of headway in House Republicans’
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 29, 2024 9:23 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (3 comments) [151 views]

Michael Moore appears on CNN to appeal directly to Joe Biden
Politics by HatetheSwamp     April 30, 2024 4:49 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [48 views]

Law selectors, pages, etc.
Supreme Court puts Trump back on Colorado Republican primary ballot
By HatetheSwamp
March 4, 2024 7:13 am
Category: Law

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post
SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

You were sooooooo wrong, po.

"The unanimous decision in Trump's favor by the Supreme Court — which means votes he garners on Tuesday's ballot will count for him — was not a surprise."

An unelected bureaucrat or state judge can remove a candidate from a federal ballot.

Yeah, right. Baha.

Oh. And, pb nailed it.

Cited and related links:

  1. cnbc.com

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Supreme Court puts Trump back on Colorado Republican primary ballot":

  1. by HatetheSwamp on March 4, 2024 7:25 am

    In Major Blow To Democracy, Supreme Court Rules Voters Can Vote For Favorite Candidate

    You wokesters are mo-rons.

    babylonbee.com

  2. by Indy! on March 4, 2024 8:24 am

    Actually we can't vote for who we want. Not because of any laws or states standing in the way - because the parties will never nominate anyone who doesn't work for the corporate masters.

  3. by HatetheSwamp on March 4, 2024 8:40 am

    You do have a point.

  4. by oldedude on March 4, 2024 9:01 am
    So SCOTUS did this in a 9-0 ruling. This was just an example of SCOTUS having to make stupid rulings because democrat, billionaire-dick-sucking, Constitutional duty-screwing, corrupt, despicable whores use SCOTUS' time on stupid "stuff."

    They could have been taking on of Trump's immunity case instead.

  5. by HatetheSwamp on March 4, 2024 9:04 am

    Here's analysis of the decision by pb's Legal Goobers #s 2 and 3... and Fox's Shannon Bream who's at least as insightful as any of pb's Legal Goobers.

    BTW, the Court settled the case, essentially, exactly, the way pb said it would!

    Good stuff.

    View Video

  6. by HatetheSwamp on March 4, 2024 10:59 am

    pb's Legal Goober #1 and friends on the 9-0 Supreme Court decision:

     View Video

  7. by HatetheSwamp on March 4, 2024 11:39 am

    CNN Legal Eagles on the 9-0 decision:

     View Video

  8. by HatetheSwamp on March 4, 2024 11:43 am

    "The people who keep telling you “Democracy is on the ballot” are mad because the Supreme Court didn’t ban their political opponent." ~ Jimmy Failla

  9. by HatetheSwamp on March 4, 2024 12:37 pm

    Megyn Kelly: woke meltdown...

    Baha baha!

     View Video

  10. by islander on March 4, 2024 1:28 pm

    The 9-0 SCOTUS decision was correct in my opinion. While I can fully understand why those of us who saw Trump and his supporter’s criminal actions on and before Jan 6, believe that morally and ethically Trump should not be on the ballot, and I’m one of them, an individual state should not have the authority to to enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment for "Federal" candidates.

    “Federal election rules and regulations”, in my opinion, should be uniform across all 50 states. Since, in a Federal election, unlike local state, county, or town elections, which only affect the residents in that state, a person’s vote in a Federal election, no matter what state the person lives in, directly affects all of us. no matter which state we live in.

  11. by Indy! on March 4, 2024 1:35 pm
    by oldedude on March 4, 2024 9:01 am

    So SCOTUS did this in a 9-0 ruling. This was just an example of SCOTUS having to make stupid rulings because democrat, billionaire-dick-sucking, Constitutional duty-screwing, corrupt, despicable whores use SCOTUS' time on stupid "stuff."

    They could have been taking on of Trump's immunity case instead.


    You spelled "wasting" wrong, OD.

  12. by HatetheSwamp on March 4, 2024 1:38 pm

    Bang on, isle.

    As pb's Legal Goober #1 pointed out from the beginning, Section 5 of the 14th Amendment is clear and simple:

    "The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article."

    po's knickers got soiled over protestations that Section 3 is self-executing, and that's horsepucky. The Amendment could not possibly more direct and clear.

    I'm curious, isle, what the response is in Maine since it was an unelected Maine bureaucrat who was leading the charge?

  13. by oldedude on March 4, 2024 1:38 pm
    no, I said what I wanted to.

  14. by islander on March 4, 2024 2:08 pm

    "Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows had ruled that Trump was ineligible for the Maine ballot, although she held off enforcing the decision while the courts considered the issue. Bellows reversed course on Monday and modified her ruling hours after the Supreme Court decision.

    “The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that individual states lack authority to enforce Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment with respect to federal offices,” Bellows said in a statement. “Consistent with my oath and obligation to follow the law and the Constitution….I hereby withdraw my determination that Mr. Trump’s primary petition is invalid."
    pressherald.com

Go To Top

Comment on: "Supreme Court puts Trump back on Colorado Republican primary ballot"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
 SelectSmart.com home page