Aims to analyse the consequences of a series of decisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N is fully indemnified by Party
| YES
|
Party has to pay £
| YES
|
Party changes rule to eliminate imdenification
| NO
| |
| |
NO
|
|
|
|
YES
|
NO
|
|
|
|
N is not indemnified by Party at all
| NO
|
N is partially indemnified by Party
|
|
Rule change has retrospective effect
| YES
|
Rule change has no retrospective effect
|
| |
YES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restrictions are placed on N before election
| NO
|
No restrictions are placed on N before election
| NO
|
Restrictions are placed on N after election
| NO
|
N is not re-elected
| YES
|
N retires as candidate
|
|
|
|
|
YES
|
|
YES
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
N is re-elected
| YES
|
N resigns in favour of another on list
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YES
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
N is removed from office
| YES
|
Another on list takes place of N
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NO
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
No one else takes place of N
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|