Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

Legitimate polling after the verdict is not looking good for Trump
Fact Check by Curt_Anderson     June 1, 2024 2:03 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [9 views]


Musical interlude
Music by Indy!     May 31, 2024 9:34 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (4 comments) [75 views]


Okay. So let me get this straight... The trial was a TRAVESTY?
Crime by Ponderer     May 31, 2024 2:45 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (11 comments) [109 views]


Norm McDonald
Comics by Indy!     May 31, 2024 8:46 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [9 views]


CRAZED MAGA MOB RIOTS BURNS DOWN MANHATTAN POLICE STATION
Politics by HatetheSwamp     May 31, 2024 9:02 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (6 comments) [45 views]


So... How do you think it all went?
Crime by Ponderer     May 30, 2024 5:35 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (11 comments) [106 views]


Daily Mail Poll: Trump Support Rises After Guilty Verdict
Media by HatetheSwamp     May 31, 2024 1:10 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [20 views]


Joe Manchin leaves the Democratic Party, files as independent
Politics by HatetheSwamp     May 31, 2024 11:05 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (4 comments) [28 views]


Remember how much progressives loved Joe's State of the Union speech? His 538 approval in lower than before
President by HatetheSwamp     May 31, 2024 7:27 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (4 comments) [32 views]


Anonymous comments regarding the Presidential Candidate Selector and the election
President by Curt_Anderson     March 19, 2024 10:10 am (Rating: 2.5) Last comment by: Indy! (89 comments) [2712 views]


Law selectors, pages, etc.
In Documents Review, Special Master Tells Trump Team to Back Up Privilege Claims
By Curt_Anderson
October 18, 2022 1:45 pm
Category: Law

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

WASHINGTON — The special master reviewing materials seized by the F.B.I. from former President Donald J. Trump’s compound in Florida expressed skepticism on Tuesday about early claims by Mr. Trump’s lawyers that certain documents were privileged and thus could be withheld from a Justice Department investigation.

In a phone conference, the special master, Judge Raymond J. Dearie of Federal District Court in Brooklyn, complained that the log of an initial batch of documents over which Mr. Trump is seeking to claim privilege lacked sufficient information to determine whether the arguments were valid.

Judge Dearie encouraged Mr. Trump’s lawyers to give him a better sense of why they believed the documents could be lawfully shielded from the Justice Department’s inquiry into whether Mr. Trump unlawfully kept classified records at his estate and obstructed the government’s repeated efforts to retrieve them.

“It’s a little perplexing as I go through the log,” Judge Dearie said. “What’s the expression — ‘Where’s the beef?’ I need some beef.”


Cited and related links:

  1. nytimes.com

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "In Documents Review, Special Master Tells Trump Team to Back Up Privilege Claims":

Be the first to comment on this article.


Comment on: "In Documents Review, Special Master Tells Trump Team to Back Up Privilege Claims"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page