Comments posted organically
Homepage

Top Contributors Articles by: Curt_Anderson Donna HatetheSwamp Indy! islander meagain myce Navy2711 oldedude Ponderer ROB3RT tuk22

Recent Article Activity Most Commented Articles Highest Rated Articles All Articles Most Viewed Articles Articles Without Comments

Wow. He was right! We are sick of all the winning.
Dance by Ponderer (0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (8 comments)

Fairfax Virginia School district is on the hotseat. One for curt
Science & Nature by oldedude (0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (36 comments)

Chilling interrogation shows trans killer blaming gender surgery for executing both parents
Gay & Lesbian by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (26 comments)

Do You Know Your 2026 Congressional Candidates?
Politics by Curt_Anderson (0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (6 comments)

Alabama set to gerrymander away a Dem House district
Government by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (2 comments)

They wanted a "businessman"...? They should have researched what his "business" was...
Crime by Ponderer (0.0) Last comment by: Navy2711 (22 comments)

Can an FPJ win the Dem nomination in 028
Opinion by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (5 comments)

Ana rocks the Megyn Kelly show
Media by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (10 comments)

Ben Shapiro's Empire is Crumbling
News by Indy! (0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments)

South Carolina, our winter home, jumps on the gerrymander bandwagon
Politics by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments)

Question for Pondy, Donna, perhaps others...
Medical by Indy! (0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (15 comments)

po, Whadaya think: Retired pastor, 78, convicted and fined for preaching Bible verse near Northern Ireland hospital
Religion by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: myce (42 comments)

The 13yr Trump raped in 1994, spills the beans on the Predator-in-Chief By Indy! April 12, 2026 12:14 pm Category: Crime (0.0 from 0 votes) Rules of the Post & Tips. Write & Comment How To Post Here

She also exposes some of T rump's personality - like how racist he is behind closed doors. Ironically, there's even a moment where he says it would be a good idea to get rid of all the "towel heads" - referring to muslims. Now - keep in mind, and doing the math - this interview took place in 2016. Ten years later in 2026 - T rump literally threatens to wipe out and "entire civilization" of muslims. She also explains how T rump claimed she reminded him of his daughter and threatened her with deportation if she didn't comply with his sick, psycho, sexual perversions.

Be aware - this is a graphic description of sexual assault and forced rape. There is also a lot of T rump's racist slurs being repeated, which should keep OD and Brown Shorts interested - but others will probably find offensive.

Comments Start Below

by Donna on April 12, 2026 2:33 pm No proof (there's hardly ever proof) but I think she's probably telling the truth. And I think that trump would literally destroy the world to keep from being charged and prosecuted for committing sex crimes against minors. by HatetheSwamp on April 12, 2026 4:21 pm Donna, Few in the world are less objective about Trump than you. And, I'm not a former Supreme Court clerk, but ain't there a statute of limitations on that crime? by Indy! on April 12, 2026 4:31 pm Classic MAGAt... "aint dere a statuuuuuue of limitators on dat?" Like I keep saying - anything to protect their orange ass monkey pedophile daddy. by Curt_Anderson on April 12, 2026 4:36 pm HtS, There is no statute of limitations for civil actions based on childhood sexual abuse. Not sure about criminal charges, especially if they were previously brought up. But it's funny that your "defense" of Trump is to hopefully invoke the statute of limitations. by Donna on April 12, 2026 5:31 pm If you haven't watched it yet, you should. If that had been broadcast on 60 Minutes before the 2024 election, trump would have lost badly. Reeeeally damaging stuff. by Navy2711 on April 12, 2026 5:59 pm Yeah, does anyone know what the statute of limitations is? Don't really care that it HAPPENED. Happened, schmappend. No, what's important is, if the statute has run out, then no harm no foul. by oldedude on April 12, 2026 6:13 pm There is no statute of limitations for civil actions based on childhood sexual abuse. Not sure about criminal charges, especially if they were previously brought up. and others.... first, Katie Johnson dropped the charges against trumpster. Generally, the only reason to do that is a lack of evidence, or a really weak case. So trumpster didn't have to do anything. This case is dead. Done. Trump is absolved. And with her dropping everything, is even more on trumpster's side. Statute of Limitations. 7 years for criminal charges except for murder. No statute of limitations for civil cases. So she was within her rights to use the civil case where it is generally much easier than a criminal case. Apparently, the jury didn't believe her. dailymail.co.uk by Donna on April 12, 2026 6:20 pm As I said, few cases like this are provable. With that said, I watched the entire video, and I don't have any doubt that she's telling the truth. by Indy! on April 12, 2026 6:25 pm Her family was threatened with harm. To Señorita Snowflake that means his daddy is not guilty. He didn't watch the video because it's too damning - even more damning than OD's obsession with sexualizing children at every opportunity. by oldedude on April 12, 2026 7:13 pm Then why didn't she do anything about that legally? Those are criminal charges, or a great threat to ruin trumpster and walk with the money? There are a lot of unanswered questions about this. The issue to me is that in that "interview" she can say anything she wants. She went to court and lost. The other thing I'm thinking are names like Kavanaugh, et al, which are actually paid by the dims to file charges (and several have reneged on their stories) when questioned. You've (libturds) have proven to the world you're willing to lie under oath. I find it funny that you can't accept that. You had said before that if the "crime" isn't proved, you okay with that. You just lied like you usually do. The other thing I'm thinking are names like Kavanaugh, et al, which are actually paid by the dims to file charges (and several have reneged on their stories) when questioned. You've (libturds) have proven to the world you're willing to like under oath. Oh concha sin pelo, YOU'RE the one that has NEVER argued against sex trafficking and the rape trees. Along with that, You've never condemned 10/7. You know, you're butties, Hamas raping children, women, and dead women, and men. And as one member of the police onscene afterwards, ""It's clear now that sexual crimes were part of the planning and the purpose was to terrify and humiliate people." I know you've seen these pictures. They're in your snuff films you got as a pledged member of Hamas. Also, you might want to check out [2], Although you've seen most of that in the making. timesofisrael.com hamas-massacre.net en.wikipedia.org by Indy! on April 12, 2026 8:35 pm You made up about 15 lies about me in that one post - as you usually do, so I'm not even going to bother addressing them because we all agree you are the Official Board Liar. I'll only address the one that actually applies here.... Queen Odorous: She went to court and lost. No, she did not. She dropped the charges the day before going to court because of Trump and his goons threatening her life. by HatetheSwamp on April 13, 2026 2:27 am "But it's funny that your "defense" of Trump is to hopefully invoke the statute of limitations." I wasn't defending Trump. I was observing that there's not an objective bone in Donna's body about Trump, baha by HatetheSwamp on April 13, 2026 2:31 am "As I said, few cases like this are provable. With that said, I watched the entire video, and I don't have any doubt that she's telling the truth." Donna, Again. Will you admit that you're not objective about Trump? And, let not your heart be troubled. A woman can accuse Trump of sexual misconduct and not even name the year it allegedly happened and win... ... in Manhattan, bahahahahahahahahahaha by HatetheSwamp on April 13, 2026 2:51 am Ole pb'll stick with his standard argument. The Biden lawfare Mafia had access to all of this. It was bringing civil and criminal actions against Trump all up and down the east coast from New York to Florida. The Biden string-pullers didn't do a thing with this. That suggests to me that, even the Lawfare Mafia, couldn't find a there there. Also, from AI, note the Hillary 016 dirty trick connection: Legal Timeline (2016) April: A pro se lawsuit filed in California was dismissed. June/September: The case was refiled in New York as "Jane Doe" with counsel. November: The lawsuit was abruptly withdrawn shortly before the election, with attorney Lisa Bloom citing credible death threats against the accuser. [baha] (And,)... Reports surfaced questioning the involvement of an anti-Trump activist reportedly selling video testimony, raising concerns about the motivations behind the case. Gang, I despise Trump. But, I've managed not to contract TDS. But, TDS-watching has become a hobby of mine. Some of you seem to have advanced to Stage 4. Go for it! More fun for me. I don't know what I'll do if I'm still around in 029 when Trump is not President. by oldedude on April 13, 2026 5:45 am concha fin pelo- No, she did not. She dropped the charges the day before going to court because of Trump and his goons threatening her life. Okay, I'll play your silly fucking game. funny. She had a lawyer that is known for using the media to take rich people down, and the lawyer didn't do anything about the goons. That is extremely suspicious. And, the story had to be ironclad. Something they didn't have. And again, it's TPS... by oldedude on April 13, 2026 6:34 am donna- As I said, few cases like this are provable. With that said, I watched the entire video, and I don't have any doubt that she's telling the truth. I agree with that. I'm just looking at how a court handles it. In the court of public opinion? I don't think anyone will change their thoughts on this. by Ponderer on April 13, 2026 8:52 am So, just to recap, by their unbiased, hyper-objective analysis, olde dude and pedophile's bitch will in no way even accept the possibility that Trump ever raped an underage girl. Because they are so objective and unbiased. Couldn't have ever happened. Trump is their inerrant, immaculate, blemish-free Golden God/King. (I love how the guy He's curing looks just like Jeffrey Epstein.) by Donna on April 13, 2026 9:16 am olde dude agrees that she was telling the truth, though 👍. by HatetheSwamp on April 13, 2026 9:16 am "... will in no way even accept the possibility that Trump ever raped an underage girl." Possibility? Yup. Two factors in this dialog: 1. The Biden string-pullers had this every moment of their regime, they ran lawfare scams all the way up and down the east coast, but they didn't pull this trigger. Ole pb's merely wondering why. 2. T'only people on board with this that pb's aware of, are people with Stage 4 TDS. Please, po, Donna, Indy, Curt. If you are aware of someone preaching this gospel who's rational about Trump, link us to that article or video. I have trouble believing this based on who the True Believers are. He'p me out. by Ponderer on April 13, 2026 9:33 am Yeah. I guess we are all just exaggerating about Trump. by HatetheSwamp on April 13, 2026 9:49 am "We" "all?" As far as I can tell, yinz are going where no Dem smoke-filled room string-puller has gone before. "That feckless dementia-ridden piece of crap's" thugs had this for four years. They barraged Trump with lawfare in NYC, DC, Atlanta and Florida... ... but they didn't touch this. Why? by Indy! on April 13, 2026 10:14 am Neither one of them will watch the video because they know the woman's story is accurate in regards to who we all know T rump is as a person and too richly detailed and accurate in regards to the timeline, the other people involved on T rump's end and the survivor end to be false. They're afraid of being convinced. by oldedude on April 13, 2026 10:26 am Yeah. I guess we are all just exaggerating about Trump. po- That's not it at all. I'm looking at what someone said that has no skin in the game, you, concha fin pelo, and the nonce are overlooking facts, to have your own little private discussion with the voices in all y'alls heads. I was the one that wanted to actually wanted to wait on swallowswell information to actually "condemn" him. Lead was a couple of steps ahead of me. In that case. 1. the original woman (not a "victim" yet. She has a story that hadn't been heard) said her peace. 2. Then afew more chimed in and their stories were the same enough to raise an eyebrow. 3. Now with what happened, I carefully agree there is viability to the stories. And it took this long to do it. thebastionusa.com by oldedude on April 13, 2026 10:32 am I have watched it. I still go back to "that's her 'story'" great. What about the story of the woman that was supposed to be gang raped by Kavanaugh? Well, we do know you absolutely supported her. And then STFU when she said she LIED about the whole thing. I don't have anyone swimming around in my head like y'all do. It's hatred without any base except for the phobias you've created in your heads. Bless your pea pickin' heart. by Indy! on April 13, 2026 10:40 am So 32yrs later she's sticking to her story and yet you think she's going to wake up one day and say "Oh yeah, I lied about all that stuff that dovetailed perfectly with all the things the world has learned about Trump in the last 32 years." Got get yourself a hot breakfast - you're off your game again. by oldedude on April 13, 2026 10:58 am Again. Everything I said is based in facts. You, too are too ignorant of the worst word you've ever heard "FACTS." Here's me using the same reasoning for pedojoe. Woman Claims Biden Sexually Harassed Her When She Was 14, But New Documents Cast Doubt on Timing Much the same story. So I'll start out with, "Where the fuck were her parents?" She said it happened in 2008. In 2020, it's out. RED FLAG #1. She even said it was at a formal dinner (again where the fuck were her parents, AND how did she get into a formal dinner like that? Maybe if she was 16? 18?, but she claimed 14? Again, red flags dropping all over the place. My immediate thought, and as much as I loathe pedojoe, her story sounds like bullshit. Are we good so far? A couple of journalists checked her story, and guess what! In this case, pedojoe didn't do anything of the sort to her! Waddaconcept! Different facts, same logic! Same result! Do I leave it open for awhile? Absolutely, as long as I need for proving innocence. If not, there's something (like the multiple accusations about swallwell). AND it wasn't 20 years later that will convince me otherwise. lawandcrime.com by Curt_Anderson on April 13, 2026 11:14 am OD, Re: your comment #24. Christine Blasey Ford did NOT recant her under oath testimony. Nor did she claim to be gang-raped. Ford alleged that Kavanaugh had sexually assaulted her when both were in high school in Bethesda, Maryland. Ford took a polygraph test that was administered by a former FBI agent, who concluded Ford was being truthful when attesting to the accuracy of her allegations. by Indy! on April 13, 2026 11:26 am I didn't even bother with that one, Curt because Señorita Falsehood gets her "info" from Fox. Then there is the other obvious problem - whatever happened with Bretty Boof or Joe Biden has nothing to do with what happened with Trump. I'm not going to play whataboutism with a confused person when I'm not even a Democrat. by oldedude on April 13, 2026 11:26 am first, "lie detectors" are not admissible in court because anyone that knows how they work can beat them. And you've really got nothing else? by Curt_Anderson on April 13, 2026 11:54 am Yes, OD, I have the fact that made this unsubstantiated and false claim: "What about the story of the woman that was supposed to be gang raped by Kavanaugh? Well, we do know you absolutely supported her. And then STFU when she said she LIED about the whole thing." And I know you will never provide a credible link that supports your false claims (aka lies) about Blasey Ford. Incidentally, you could probably pass a lie detector test because you believe your falsehoods. by oldedude on April 13, 2026 12:16 pm This doesn't excuse trumpster "IF" there are further grounds and facts that will hold up in court (ala E. Jean Carroll). This is where there is a lot of confusion. The cases are not the same. Carroll's evidence was much stronger. So Ms Katie was a prostitute, Correct? She was working for Epstein, and she describes the "orgy" going on and didn't bat an eye. Same question as before. Where the fuck were her parents? Was she a "runaway? did her parents take her to the "parties" without checking them out? Were they paid by Epstein to have their daughter service adults during these "parties." Just a 13 y/o getting gangbanged? I can hear them now, "our little katie gets the shit fucked out of her! Aren't we proud! Those are the nights she gets to stay late! and Tiffiny, her "owner" teaches her how go give head sooooo well! We both are impressed with her skills because when she gets home, we get to have a threesome with her! It's soooo exciting! Johnson's lawsuit against Epstein/trumpster was never resolved on its merits because federal judges could not find enough in the complaint to file a valid federal legal claim (her evidence didn't meet the standard). She then went to a second district where the judge found a "substantive legal insufficiency." AND "the filings did not meet the legal standards required to keep the case alive." I'll make it easy for everyone. The COURTS/FEDERAL JUDGES found there wasn't enough evidence to pursue the court case. TWICE. courtlistener.com by oldedude on April 13, 2026 12:42 pm Okay. I haven't seen these for a while. mea culpa. Let's just go with "Christine Blasey Ford was 'devastated' by investigations finding no evidence to support Kavanaugh accusations. Whelan suggested (in a Twitter thread including maps and floor plans) that there is a case of mistaken identity going on and even named one former classmate of Kavanaugh’s in particular while saying, “To be clear, I have no idea what, if anything, did or did not happen in that bedroom at the top of the stairs, and I therefore do not state, imply or insinuate that [this person] or anyone else committed the sexual assault that Ford alleges.” by Curt_Anderson on April 13, 2026 1:00 pm OD, Why is it surprising that Blasey Ford would be unhappy that the investigation (which as I recall was rushed and "completed" in a few days) didn't confirm her allegations? They didn't refute her claims or exonerated Kavanaugh. The "Whelan" you quoted is the right wing conspiracy theorist, Ed Whelan. He recanted and apologized for comments you quoted. "Whelan has now issued a statement that “I made an appalling and inexcusable mistake of judgment in posting the tweet thread in a way that identified Kavanaugh’s Georgetown Prep classmate. I take full responsibility for that mistake, and I deeply apologize for it. I realize that does not undo the mistake." ---Jonathan Turley jonathanturley.org by HatetheSwamp on April 13, 2026 1:01 pm Interestingly, that gay Guy Curt never heard of is winding up a half hour monolog on the lib press protecting Swalwell for years and supporting unfounded accusations against Brett Kavanaugh. Good stuff!, bahaha by Curt_Anderson on April 13, 2026 1:14 pm Your gay friend is wrong, HtS, on two counts. First, the allegations against Kavanaugh were NOT unfounded. The evidence presented by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford in her 2018 accusation of sexual assault against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh primarily consisted of her sworn testimony, therapist notes, polygraph results, and testimony from witnesses she told about the incident years before it became public. Second, as for Swalwell, unless you can cite examples of the conservative media reporting on cases of sexual assault by Swalwell for years, then his attack on liberal press is laughable. by Indy! on April 13, 2026 1:45 pm This is the other thing about the women not coming forward... "Whelan has now issued a statement that “I made an appalling and inexcusable mistake of judgment in posting the tweet thread in a way that identified Kavanaugh’s Georgetown Prep classmate. I take full responsibility for that mistake, and I deeply apologize for it. I realize that does not undo the mistake." ---Jonathan Turley A "mistake of judgement"? Please. This is GOP standard operating procedure. They ALWAYS reveal the names they want harassed and DON'T release the names of the criminals. Donald Rumsfeld named the guy who blew the whistle on Abu Ghraib on national TV THE DAY HE FOUND OUT ABOUT IT. The guy was still in the army in Iraq - still surrounded by the people he was accusing. You think the Epstein/Trump victims want their names out in the public when there are people like OD and Brown Shorts who froth at the mouth over INTERNET POSTS telling the truth about their Daddy? That's like putting a gun to your head because some psycho MAGAt out there is probably googling your personal info the minute you open your mouth. by HatetheSwamp on April 13, 2026 1:45 pm If what you're suggesting is true, is true, Dems should have impeached him after they controlled the House and the Senate when "that feckless dementia-ridden piece of crap achieved a record setting 81,000,000 vote election victory. If what you believe is true is true, Senate GOPs would have faced serious pressure to vote to remove him. by oldedude on April 13, 2026 2:32 pm curt-Look. I know your panties are wet and in a wad right now. They didn't find sufficient "evidence" of a crime, at the lowest bar. Congressional hearing. You're beating a dead fucking horse, and it doesn't change the verdict. Just like you said over and over again about your pedophile hero, joe. by oldedude on April 13, 2026 2:40 pm curt- okay, instead of a "mea culpa," that's in the thread above (first line). It's a big fuck you cabron, You're nothing but a loser. You've ALWAYS supported the human trafficking rape and sexual slavery. For that, you're nothing but supportive of what epstein was doing. You're that lowlife that is no better than the fuckwads that break the women and children for your gratification. by Curt_Anderson on April 13, 2026 3:20 pm OD, As I predicted a few comments up, you cannot back up your claims about Blasey Ford with credible citations. You were wrong, and my well-known support of human trafficking rape, sexual slavery and of what epstein was doing (and rape trees!) does not make anything you said about Blasey Ford true. by oldedude on April 14, 2026 7:02 am corudacurt- I also gave you a mea culpa, which you then continued you usual stupid rhetoric. You haven't been right in so fuckiing long, you needed this to feed your self esteem. Then I mentioned that you missed it. STILL you're being your usual dikead self. just your normal self. nothing more than an unsanctimonious cuckhold asshole that has to make itself feel big. Had you actually been a real adult and quit hiding, you maybe should have gone back and acknowledged that you missed something. by HatetheSwamp on April 14, 2026 7:27 am "As I predicted a few comments up, you cannot back up your claims about Blasey Ford with credible citations." If that's to pb, I stopped trying years ago. You are every bit as imprisoned by your subjectivity as is po. It's a different subjectivity, but it's overpowered your ability to reason,... ... and, that gay Guy you never heard of made an indisputable case for the Kavanaugh thing yesterday. If you care to stretch your subjectivity, it'll be the second half-hour of his podcast from yesterday, but, that's okay. We know. by Ponderer on April 14, 2026 8:36 am "OD, As I predicted a few comments up, [...]" -Curt "If that's to pb, [...]." -pedophile's bitch His dementia is really getting out of hand, folks. I wonder how long he's got until he can't even manage to log onto the computer anymore. by oldedude on April 14, 2026 9:45 am You just can't find new material. by Ponderer on April 14, 2026 9:46 am pedophile's bitch's dementia is not getting any better. by oldedude on April 14, 2026 3:46 pm I decided to actually look into this. There were too many red flags. I've already raised a few. How was a 13 year old working for anyone without the knowledge of their parents. "Assuming" the parents did know (pretty far fetched), were the parents working for Epstein? If this is true, what would make trumpster boot Epstein off Mar a Lago for epstein sexually harassing the "towel girl" at the Spa. If epstein had the goods on someone, there would have been a threat back from epstein. We know pedojoe had the files for four years. Had trumpster been in the files, why wouldn't pedojoe or his handlers, or the DOJ/FBI use those records to sink trumpster, in the same way that if any of the high-ranking dims that trumpster hates were in there. If everyone chose to not to out any politicians, That's one story that might make sense. With leaks being so prevelant in congress, someone would have figured it out. The Guardian said that the lawsuits appeared to be organized by Norm Lubow, who has been associated in the past with a range of disputed claims involving celebrities. Lubow confirmed to Snopes in August 2024 that he played a role in filing the lawsuit and had done so under a false name Al Taylor. In 2016, investigative reporters tied the Taylor persona to a former "Jerry Springer Show" producer, Norm Lubow. For this story, Lubow confirmed to Snopes he had acted as Taylor and played a role in filing and promoting the Johnson claims. Lubow’s involvement does not disprove that Johnson is a real person, but it does show that those claims were aggressively promoted and aided by someone who has a professional history of using individuals to create fictional salacious drama. I already spoke to the high pressure lawyers Johnson employed. Why didn't those lawyers use the media to charge this? The case had multiple red flags: Initial filing included unverifiable contact information Changed attorneys multiple times Dropped days before the 2016 election Promoted by someone using a false identity Le Coup de grâce Nearly a decade after her allegations briefly captured national attention, the name Katie Johnson still resurfaces online—often as a symbol of a testimony that never happened, a voice swallowed by fear, and a case that evaporated before the public could fully understand it. Thusly, it never had any evidence needed for charging in either criminal court or litigation. allaboutlawyer.com newsweek.com by HatetheSwamp on April 15, 2026 2:51 am po'd be the first SSer to join a lynch mob. by oldedude on April 15, 2026 4:33 am And when I was doing some research on this, the major media agreed. There's NO CREDABLE EVIDENCE. That really says something when only youtube will be your sounding board and not even mother jones, the rolling stone, MSN, or any of the far left stations would take it. by Indy! on April 15, 2026 9:28 am Well everyone would expect you and the GOP to defend Trump's criminal actions. You pedophiles have to stick together, OD. by oldedude on April 15, 2026 10:38 am Actually, I tried to get a smattering of FACTS. I know you hate them, But these are journalists explaining the risks of running the story. If it were true, and she was abducted at the age of 13, wouldn't there be a bunch of media across the board the would have been on top of it, like Elizabeth Smart? And I'm glad you made the connection between your inability to actually investigate a story and come to a logical end that an 8th grader would. I'm not faulting anyone that read this. Just the poser poster of the video. If I were them though, I'd be very careful about anything you fall for and post ever again. It makes them look really gullible and small minded. by Indy! on April 15, 2026 11:47 am Comical that you think of yourself as this worldly person and yet you have no idea how the real world works. Stick to peeling potatoes and policing up cig butts. by oldedude on April 15, 2026 1:31 pm And keep these videos coming!!!! I need a great laugh that you have no idea how to factcheck!!!!!!!!! stupdim***erf******... by Donna on April 15, 2026 1:46 pm She was scared to death go pursue her case against trump. I'd be too. In the video Indy posted, though, she said that now, she'd lay down her life to put trump behind bars but as in most of these kinds of cases, it's her word against his, so there probably will never be a court case, but I believe her. by Indy! on April 15, 2026 2:20 pm OD lives in a Hallmark world where everything is fine and dandy and everyone gets a hot breakfast. The military... soft. 😂 by oldedude on April 16, 2026 9:48 am donna- find 2 reputable sources that says her claims are valid and admissible. That's all. Maybe your good fairy will give you a quarter for your tooth. by Donna on April 16, 2026 9:56 am I already stated in my previous post that her claims aren't provable, which is why no one is being charged or prosecuted. I believe her though. by HatetheSwamp on April 16, 2026 9:57 am Why do you believe her, Donna? by Donna on April 16, 2026 10:06 am Because she sounds to me like she's telling the truth. by oldedude on April 16, 2026 10:12 am Lead- it's the usual "I feel therefore I'm right" thing. FACTS BE DAMNED! FULL SPEED AHEAD! by Donna on April 16, 2026 10:15 am I think I'm right. Do you not think you're right? by HatetheSwamp on April 16, 2026 10:22 am More often than not, I acknowledge that I don't have access to enuff data to pose an opinion. This is such an occasion. I'm agnostic about many things. That's the mark of a person with an open mind. by Donna on April 16, 2026 10:29 am Well that's why they're called opinions. You've never held an opinion? by HatetheSwamp on April 16, 2026 10:32 am Oy, Donna. This is a big diff between you and me. Most of the time, when I hold an "opinion," it's with humility. Nearly always, I don't think I'm right. by Donna on April 16, 2026 10:38 am Okay by Donna on April 16, 2026 10:45 am I'm puzzled, though, why anyone would ever voice an opinion they didn't think was right. That is what trolls do, though, so coming from you, that makes perfect sense. by Ponderer on April 16, 2026 11:04 am Like pedophile's bitch's opinion about Kamala Harris being a worse candidate than Donald trump was. He knows that's wrong. He knows that is far from reality. But he held that wrong because he believed it was what his orange God/King wants him to think, so he thinks it. When pedophile's bitch holds an opinion that he knows is wrong, he's holding that opinion for some other reason than the truth. by HatetheSwamp on April 16, 2026 11:50 am "Like pedophile's bitch's opinion about Kamala Harris being a worse candidate than Donald trump was. He knows that's wrong." Sadly, a majority of voters didn't know it's wrong, baha by oldedude on April 16, 2026 12:30 pm Well, and they so naive to believe anything even if it is impossible to do. There's that also. by Indy! on April 16, 2026 12:53 pm by HatetheSwamp on April 16, 2026 10:32 am Oy, Donna. This is a big diff between you and me. Most of the time, when I hold an "opinion," it's with humility. Nearly always, I don't think I'm right. And that makes perfect sense, Brown Shorts because we know - nearly always - that you ARE wrong. by oldedude on April 16, 2026 7:22 pm Especially when you completely LIE about the evidence that's available. by oldedude on April 16, 2026 7:24 pm I'm going to pull a fucking poser. You still refuse to answer my question. You're less than dogshit. by Indy! on April 16, 2026 8:22 pm What question was that, Señorita Official Board Liar? by Donna on April 17, 2026 8:38 am I think they're feeling conflicted because they think she's telling the truth too. by Ponderer on April 17, 2026 8:47 am When a Democrat or Progressive hears about one of their favorite politicians being accused of a heinous act or crime that is likely true, our entire outlook of the person changes. We no longer see them as a favorite politician but as a criminal who we no longer want to have anything to do with. Many of us still feel that way about Bill Clinton in fact. But a MAGA Hat, upon hearing of one of their beloved politicians committing heinous acts or crimes, reflexively denies any and all allegations. The accusers are automatically lying. And it's all a set-up by the Democrats to make MAGA and Trump look bad. Perish the thought that any of their folks could ever commit crimes or rape anyone. Such an accused politician is heralded and defended without question. All condemnation is reserved for Democrats and progressives. by Donna on April 17, 2026 9:21 am I haven't commented on Swalwell yet, but the accusations must be true for him to fold so quickly. Disappointing, but at this point we're not at all shocked as we've all seen so many cases over the years of what Sheri and I refer to as testosterone poisoning. by HatetheSwamp on April 17, 2026 9:28 am "I haven't commented on Swalwell yet, but the accusations must be true for him to fold so quickly." What you're seeing is the power of the Dem smoke-filled room. It was beginning to look like a GOP would win the California Gov election. The smoke-filled room took advantage of Swalwell to remove a contender from the field. by HatetheSwamp on April 17, 2026 9:30 am "When a Democrat or Progressive hears about one of their favorite politicians being accused of a heinous act or crime that is likely true, our entire outlook of the person changes." Baha. Two words: bubba Clinton!!!!! by oldedude on April 17, 2026 9:44 am That's interesting. I didn't use anything except for court facts to make my decision. I've explained these in pretty good detail. The courts actually have all the paperwork, which you and I don't have. That's what they said. Not me. You case is ONLY built on hatred for trumpster. I don't give two fucks who it is. I'm the one looking at the facts. Concha, you, et.al. WERE FUCKING DUPPED OVER THIS. I've made an offer to anyone. If you can provide a story from a reputable source that counters what I produced, go for it. View Video by Indy! on April 17, 2026 10:14 am Already did, Señorita Pedo. And the fact you're still trying to spin out of it a week later tells me you believe the victim too. Just as Donna supposed a few posts up. by oldedude on April 17, 2026 10:19 am donna- I think they're feeling conflicted because they think she's telling the truth too. I think she's a pathological liar, just like you and concha. by Indy! on April 17, 2026 12:06 pm Just because you're the Official Board Liar doesn't give you any special powers to decide who's lying or not. Your problem identifying the truth for your own responses would certainly limit your ability to identify it in others. Besides, we all know you watched the video and believe that woman too. by oldedude on April 17, 2026 1:13 pm I still say, if you can show me a reliable source that it's true, YOU'RE A FUCKING LIAR. And it's obvious you can't. You can't even be a shred of anything to support what you LIED about. by Donna on April 17, 2026 1:54 pm I think you're a poor judge of character, olde dude. by oldedude on April 17, 2026 3:12 pm I think your hatred of trumpster allows for you to fall for anything so fucking stupid! Especially things that have no logical way of being true. I think it's pretty funny you'll fall for such stupid shit, especially something that no media will post because it's JUST NOT TRUE. No one believes this but YOU! How does it feel to be taken for a FOOL!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 FYI- I've got a couple of bridges down here I'm trying to sell. They're going pretty cheap. Interested??🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 by Indy! on April 17, 2026 5:53 pm by Donna on April 17, 2026 1:54 pm I think you're a poor judge of character, olde dude. It's the end result of not spending much time in the real world. When you're biggest concern is getting a hot breakfast every day? You've lived a pretty pampered and sheltered life. by oldedude on April 17, 2026 8:08 pm You STILL haven't shown me ANY media source that will cover the story of your fucking LIE. You fell for it hook, line, and sinker. And now you're pulling down good people (donna for one) into your stupid ass bullshit. You still can't cite ANY news source that will cover that story. That's really fucking telling. And you're not adult enough (because you have never been a "man" enough) to step up and admit any LIE YOU'VE TOLD. You're still a fucking child that tells their parents they don't know what happened to the chocolate (in you're case that's cum) with it all over your face. Grow the fuck up. Sprout some fucking hair on the little pussy you have. by Indy! on April 17, 2026 8:14 pm So in your upside down world, nothing is true unless the media covers it? As I always say - you are so comically naive about the real world, it's almost hard to believe. But it does explain why you had to join the army. You need adults to take care of you at all times. by oldedude on April 17, 2026 8:18 pm The difference is that I believe in FACTS. You stupid shit that you "invented" was so stupid (like you) that not ONE of the media sources would run it because IT DOESN'T FUCKING EXIST AND THEY SAID THAT. That's reality. The world of lawyers taking charge of networks. If you don't believe that you should just go away and take a LOT of drugs and quit wasting our time. by Indy! on April 18, 2026 11:12 am So now Epstein doesn't exist. Got it - you'll believe anything to protect your Daddy. by oldedude on April 18, 2026 11:57 pm Actually, it's just plain logic about what you hear, and putting a story together. Logic. You know, that course that none of you had to take going to college? Logic. It's really obvious the people whining and falling for this don't have kids that grew up healthy. Like if she was "Kidnapped" but there were no reports of her missing. That doesn't make sense if she was 13. Unless her parents were her pimps. In which case, there are lots of other stories she should be telling. Her "testamony" was also about things trumpster had never talked about, the Muslim countries. That's a new thing the libturds have put into their rhetoric. She also said that she hates trumpster that she'll do anything to ruin him. So her TDS is in line with all the TDSrs and they are relating back to that TDS and empathetic to the TDS, therefore the "story" "must be true." In intelligence, the report has a minus 3 in believability (out of 0-4). Also, as loose as the media is with ANYTHING that would hurt trumpster. Everyone sould be on it. You can't find anything from any source (minus youtube) this actually happened. Even mother jones won't run it. or MSN, or anyone else. So THEY looked at the information and drew the same conclusion. And they ARE TDS! And it's so outrageous they won't/ haven't covered it. That confirms my suspicion that nothing could be verified. by Donna on April 21, 2026 8:40 am I believe her. I can sense when someone is lying, which is why I didn't vote for trump once let alone 3 times. by Ponderer on April 21, 2026 12:08 pm I believe her too. And I believe the accusers of Swalwell too. The 13-year-old girl probably reminded Trump so much of his daughter that he just couldn't keep himself from raping her. by HatetheSwamp on April 21, 2026 2:25 pm po, That's part of your being so anxious to join a lynch mob. You have no information upon which to base a rational opinion. All you have is your love language: hate. by myce on April 21, 2026 3:10 pm Trump boasted about grabbing women by the pussy and "inspecting" teen models in the dressing room. He was found guilty of sex assault or rape by civil trial. The law recognizes that sex offenders are likely to repeat. I believe this woman's testimony is probably true because Trump has a documented record of sexually predatory behavior on top of his numerous other civil and criminal offenses. Oldedude it's ironic how much you talk about horrific crimes then change your tune when it's Trump being accused. You talk about infanticide but you protested when I cited an allegation of infanticide from the Epstein library. I don't think your logic is as logical as you think. You're as biased as anyone else. In a court of law the only thing that matters is what can be proven. A lack of proof of the allegations does not mean they're false. by Navy2711 on April 21, 2026 3:32 pm "Oldedude it's ironic how much you talk about horrific crimes then change your tune when it's Trump being accused." - myce This. Again and again and again ... THIS. Nothing matters when it's Trump. And they say we're the delusional ones. by Indy! on April 21, 2026 6:11 pm I don't remember anything about the woman claiming to be "kidnapped" as Señorita Falsehood keeps claiming - but maybe I'm wrong and she's right for once. 🤔 Wait... that's impossible. 😂 Go To Top

Find old posts & articles

Show Most Recent Articles Articles by category: Politics+ Religion+ Law & Crime Military News Media History Health Sports+ Humor Entertainment Misc.

Report spam & abuse SelectSmart.com home page