Comments posted organically
Homepage

Wow. He was right! We are sick of all the winning.
Dance by Ponderer (0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (8 comments)


Fairfax Virginia School district is on the hotseat. One for curt
Science & Nature by oldedude (0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (36 comments)


Chilling interrogation shows trans killer blaming gender surgery for executing both parents
Gay & Lesbian by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (26 comments)


Do You Know Your 2026 Congressional Candidates?
Politics by Curt_Anderson (0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (6 comments)


Alabama set to gerrymander away a Dem House district
Government by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (2 comments)


They wanted a "businessman"...? They should have researched what his "business" was...
Crime by Ponderer (0.0) Last comment by: Navy2711 (22 comments)


Can an FPJ win the Dem nomination in 028
Opinion by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (5 comments)


Ana rocks the Megyn Kelly show
Media by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (10 comments)


Ben Shapiro's Empire is Crumbling
News by Indy! (0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments)


South Carolina, our winter home, jumps on the gerrymander bandwagon
Politics by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments)


Question for Pondy, Donna, perhaps others...
Medical by Indy! (0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (15 comments)


po, Whadaya think: Retired pastor, 78, convicted and fined for preaching Bible verse near Northern Ireland hospital
Religion by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: myce (42 comments)


Politics selectors, pages, etc.
Eric Swalwell is rapidly becoming a #metoo-ed Andrew Cuomo 2.0
By HatetheSwamp
April 11, 2026 3:59 am
Category: Politics
(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post & Tips.

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


So, you wokes and progressives?, is this story being reported by po's The Rachel, Donna's The Ben or Curt's Holy Trinity? If so, we know that the Dem smoke-filled room has moved on from Swalwell. Then, what's next? Katie Porter?

Could a GOP actually win in California in 026?

pb thinks that Swalwell should hold on and attempt to ride this out. That strategy has worked for Trump since the escalator in 015.

My quotes are extensive but far less than half of the whole, fact-filled article.

Bad news from Politico:


Swalwell campaign imploding after new sexual assault allegation

Multiple people resigned in advance of a report that an ex-staffer accused him of sexual assault.

The exodus, which began just before the San Francisco Chronicle published a report detailing a former staffer’s claims, jolted California’s marquee race just weeks before ballots start landing in voters’ mailboxes. The former staffer told the newspaper that Swalwell had sexual encounters with her while working for him, and that he sexually assaulted her twice when she was too drunk to consent.

Hours later, CNN reported on that ex-staffer and three additional women who accused Swalwell of making sexual advances and sending explicit photos and messages. And POLITICO reported that a former Swalwell employee had signed an agreement over an employment discrimination claim that included confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses, despite his campaign saying no one on his staff signed an NDA during his tenure.

The dominoes tumbled quickly...

Swalwell’s two campaign co-chairs, Reps. Jimmy Gomez and Adam Gray, called on Swalwell to drop out...

California Sen. Adam Schiff, who along with Gomez had made calls pitching Swalwell to key labor unions, also called on Swalwell to leave the race...

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called for an investigation and said she spoke to Swalwell about leaving the race.

... Swalwell released a statement broadly denying the allegations.

“These allegations are false and come on the eve of an election against the frontrunner for governor,” it said. “For nearly 20 years, I have served the public — as a prosecutor and a congressman and have always protected women. I will defend myself with the facts and where necessary bring legal action. My focus in the coming days is to be with my wife and children and defend our decades of service against these lies.”

Just a few weeks ago, Swalwell’s bid seemed to be gathering the kind of momentum that would have allowed him to pull ahead of a muddled Democratic field. He secured valuable endorsements from labor unions as deep-pocketed interests launched a super PAC for him.

Anticipating a race-rewriting event, multiple of Swalwell’s rivals have assailed him in recent days and accused him of hypocrisy given his past statements in support of the woman who accused Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault ahead of his confirmation hearing.

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Eric Swalwell is rapidly becoming a #metoo-ed Andrew Cuomo 2.0":

  1. by HatetheSwamp on April 11, 2026 4:13 am

    Katie Porter's Greatest Hits, bahaha ha:

    youtu.be
    youtu.be


  2. by oldedude on April 11, 2026 6:11 am
    I've been watching this for a few days now. I'm waiting to see when the acts took place. More than a decade? It's political and BS. In the last few years? I'm obligated hear her out.

    That said, obviously there are issues regarding his sexual habits. The first is bang bang, a Chinese agent that was his toy while he was the useful idiot. In addition, there are three other women that give the same story of being too drunk to say no, etc. sounds like a serial rapist if those hold true. It also sounds like he drugged the women. According to a CNN interview, she was left beaten and raped.

    Obviously, the best case scenario was for them to get rape kits done immediately. The issue is they sound like their jobs were on the line.

    So we'll see.
    cnn.com
    fox5dc.com


  3. by HatetheSwamp on April 11, 2026 6:19 am

    OD,

    My educated guess is that the fact that so many prominent Dems turning on him suggests it's real. He'd been their Golden Boy very recently.


  4. by oldedude on April 11, 2026 8:31 am
    Well, yes. AND it sounds like he's a serial rapist to me. I'm very interested in how this pans out. And I think there was good reason to have his clearance ripped from him.


  5. by HatetheSwamp on April 11, 2026 8:46 am

    And, apparently, po's The Rachel, Donna's The Ben and Curt's Holy Trinity ain't interested. Always believe the woman? NOT!


  6. by oldedude on April 11, 2026 9:49 am
    That's one of the bigger disappointments for the left. The talk crap about standing up for women, yet when it comes down to it, they fail to tell you how much they either dismiss or hate women that actually are victims. I don't hold my breath about them ever supporting anyone that isn't "them."


  7. by Indy! on April 11, 2026 9:56 am

    Something happened?


  8. by Indy! on April 11, 2026 7:44 pm

    We're you a victim, Seńorita?


  9. by Navy2711 on April 12, 2026 2:16 am

    OD,

    1. You've acknowledged that forced digital penetration is rape.

    2. A New York jury found that Trump committed forced digital penetration.

    Is Trump a rapist?

    (He still wont' say it. Even on a thread where he's condemning others for how they address the topic of rape. He'll start tap-dancing, just watch.)


  10. by Navy2711 on April 12, 2026 2:19 am

    Oh, and Idiot you can chime in too, while you're moralizing about rape.

    Is Trump a rapist?


  11. by HatetheSwamp on April 12, 2026 3:25 am

    From pb's Legal Goober #2:

    "Truman said, if you want a friend in Washington, get a dog. This week, however, Eric Swalwell would be hard pressed to find a willing canine outside of a taxidermist. Fox40 just released a statement from "senior staff" in his offices that is crushing...

    ...According to the host of "Inside California Politics," the Swalwell staffers declared that "Any decision of staff members to remain in their roles in the interim should not be viewed as support for Eric Swalwell...We, more than he, understand that we have obligations to the people we lead and to the constituents of California’s 14th Congressional District.""
    x.com


  12. by HatetheSwamp on April 12, 2026 3:28 am

    Whadamaroon!

    Hakeem Jeffries slammed for demanding Eric Swalwell drop out of Calif. gov race – but not resign from Congress

    nypost.com


  13. by Navy2711 on April 12, 2026 4:12 am

    *holds arms out in a "See? What did I tell you?" gesture*


  14. by oldedude on April 12, 2026 6:24 am
    So here's something I don't know was purposeful or not. April is Sexual Assault Awareness Month. Good job for the victims!

    Seems like his entire campaign departed ways. Again, the same story where these women all of a sudden can't remember anything. Drug-Facilitated Sexual Assault (DFSA) apparently a real issue and there's lots of references on it. There are also federal laws that add 20 years of federal time to the rape charges. State's will vary of course.

    So along with having a Chinese Spy for a "girlfriend" wasn't bad enough, he's a serial rapist. And at least in one case, he also beat the victim. So add that to the crimes.

    My bet? nothing will happen. The dims will circle around him like a wagon train in the old west. Jefferies should be ashamed of himself. Big black-eye for the dims on this already.
    rainn.org
    dea.gov


  15. by Navy2711 on April 12, 2026 7:53 am

    "The dims will circle the wagons ..."

    - The Guy Who, In This Very Thread, Gave Republicans A Pass On Rape

    Absolutely incredible. Seriously, is OD leaning into this? Is this satire?


  16. by oldedude on April 12, 2026 8:20 am
    The Guy Who, In This Very Thread, Gave Republicans A Pass On Rape

    Interesting🤔. I read through the entire thread and I didn't find any such fiction you're lying about.🙄 🙄


  17. by Navy2711 on April 12, 2026 10:08 am

    Yeah, you never do. Every time I rub your face in it, you claim to be mystified. Or, you just scurry away and don't answer at all.

    Keep protecting your rapist daddy, scumbag.



  18. by Indy! on April 12, 2026 10:34 am

    The Stalwell thing is being reported everywhere. You know what's not being reported on Fox? Trump raping a 13 year old.

    Indy's take for the record? Same as always...

    Investigate the situation, if a crime was committed - prosecute the guilty.

    That goes for Stallwell, Trump, everybody. That's the only difference here - we have two MAGAts who will never offer anything other than full throated support when it comes to Trump's crimes.


  19. by oldedude on April 12, 2026 10:40 am
    You mean that one where the charges were dropped? Those? Oh. yeah. You don't get that on TikTok, do you.... That's been known for months now.


  20. by HatetheSwamp on April 12, 2026 10:53 am

    "Trump raping a 13 year old."

    Kammy stole not only your heart. She also swiped your brain.

    But, I gotta aks: Does what Trump did justify Swalwell’s abuse of those women? If so, then what Swalwell’s doing excuses what Trump did.


  21. by oldedude on April 12, 2026 11:24 am
    What happens when there is no crime in a court of law?


  22. by oldedude on April 12, 2026 11:34 am
    You mean that one where the charges were dropped? Those? Oh. yeah. You don't get that on TikTok, do you.... That's been known for months now.

    What happens when there is no crime in a court of law?


    Answer to our own convict in the class. #'s 9, 10, 13, 15, and 17.
    Again, you aren't living in any semblance of the real world. You HATE the US, you love terrorists. Your psychosis is the worst on this site, where you form a story in the psychosis, and believe it to be true, when nothing like that happened.


  23. by oldedude on April 12, 2026 11:54 am
    concha sin pelo- Investigate the situation, if a crime was committed - prosecute the guilty. The problem is if they're conservatives, you convict fully, and even if they're found not guilty, you keep on saying that if they're charged, that's equal to a conviction. If they're libturds, they're innocent.


  24. by Indy! on April 12, 2026 12:02 pm

    The girl in question dropped the charges back in the day because her and her family were threatened with bodily harm if she didn't. I know that's probably what Fox is feeding you (why do you think they call it "programming"?) By all accounts there was plenty of evidence to continue the criminal investigation. Your daddy could easily clear this case up by releasing all the Epstein files - but he continues to refuse to do so. In the meantime? The evidence is pretty clear he's a pedophile just like you, Seńorita Snowflake.

    Video of the woman in 2016 explaining what happened with your pedo daddy. She explains how the orange ass monkey took a shine to her "because she looked like his daughter, Ivanka". What a sleazebag.

    Anyway - the real story straight from the victim...

    https://tinyurl.com/bdn8p2ab



  25. by Navy2711 on April 12, 2026 12:04 pm

    Idiot,

    "Does what Trump did justify Swalwell’s abuse of those women?"

    What did Trump do?


  26. by Navy2711 on April 12, 2026 12:06 pm

    OD,

    You mean that one where the charges were dropped?

    Let's try it again.

    No one is talking about charges.

    We're talking about what Trump DID.

    A jury agreed that Trump committed the act of forced digital penetration.

    YOU agreed that forced digital penetration is rape.

    I ask you again:

    Is Trump a rapist?


  27. by HatetheSwamp on April 12, 2026 1:10 pm

    "What did Trump do?"

    He raped a 13 year old girl, per Indy.


  28. by Indy! on April 12, 2026 4:36 pm

    Multiple times. And you and Queen Dark Odor are perfectly fine with that.


  29. by HatetheSwamp on April 13, 2026 3:08 am

    Swalwell just dropped out.

    A good day in HatetheSwamp-land!


  30. by HatetheSwamp on April 13, 2026 3:34 am

    From pb's Legal Goober #2:

    "Regardless of the merits of these allegations, Swalwell was always a notorious figure in Washington, constructed by Pelosi and others to serve their interests. As these figures now seek to destroy him, they cannot escape their hand in his creation...

    ...Mary Shelley made the point most vividly in Frankenstein that there is little difference between the creators and the monsters in such moments: “It is true, we shall be monsters, cut off from all the world; but on that account we shall be more attached to one another.”
    x.com


  31. by HatetheSwamp on April 13, 2026 3:36 am

    Swalwell in his own words (glass houses)...

    x.com


  32. by oldedude on April 13, 2026 5:16 am
    Farante- The charges and what happened are EXACTLY the issue. If I accuse you of something. According to you, you are automatically guilty, even though I LIED about the charges. If there are no facts to back up my story (believability such as you don't know what year it was, what time of year it was, or what happened when you assaulted me, the case is dropped for lack of evidence. I don't have an issue with "unnamed" victims, especially in sexual assaults. So there's that.

    In this case, there is nothing to back her story up. You (et al) believe her ONLY because it's against trumpster. Thusly the psychosis. That wouldn't be bad, except this has been tried several times on GOP folks. FALSE charges has been a dim mo for awhile now and used only to defame the GOP member. Think Kavanaugh. The dims "insisted" he was a serial rapist since college. And yet charges were dropped. After that, she admitted she had made up the story.

    I'm really sorry if you (et al) can't buy a clue about our justice system. I have said the same thing when dims were accused. Are there any supporting documents? no. This was all going on within 7 years, nothing was done. She waited. This isn't about justice, it's about political gain. Nothing from Epstein, nothing from anything else.

    Gaetz, was different. That was extremely evident and had the supporting documents that he should have gone to prison. That didn't happen😕. Yes, I've "hoped" people would get caught (pedojoe for example), no charges? let it go.


  33. by Navy2711 on April 13, 2026 9:44 am

    Oh, look at that. OD ignored me again. Seems to happen every time I ask him a certain question.


  34. by oldedude on April 13, 2026 10:11 am
    pedófila, I did answer your fucking question. You're just too stupid to understand it. Should I take it down to 2nd grade? eh cabrón?

    Let's try it again.

    No one is talking about charges.
    I realize even with you're criminal career, you have no concept of the law. You should have listened when you "had" to raise your hand when you were sworn in. I'll answer it again for you. You are taking one person's "word" for it. Got it. She went to court. Twice. She had no follow-through so she gave up the first time. The second round wasn't successful either. and she had a high priced lawyer on her side that couldn't even get the case in to New York. That tells me she can't convince anyone about the FACTS in the case. Is it her word? Has she lied to the courts? I dunno. If no one will hear the case, I discard it because the people that HAVE heard her evidence say it's not enough to waste the court's time with. Which is NOT usually done. Your and my opinion don't matter here. These are the facts. Grow the fuck up.

    We're talking about what Trump DID. I'll agree with that. Except you're expected to bring "evidence" to the court. Obviously she can't.
    Example. I say you're a child rapist. Wouldn't you expect that if I go to court, I would have "evidence" to what I'm saying?

    A jury agreed that Trump committed the act of forced digital penetration.
    You're confusing the cases. Two separate things. I'm a tad shocked that you can't tell the difference between the two cases. So fucking much for our judicial process (according to you).

    YOU agreed that forced digital penetration is rape. The law doesn't say "forced" numbnuts, It says "unwanted." There's a difference there, slick.

    I ask you again:

    Is Trump a rapist? In one case, that's what a jury said. Is he responsible for going to Chad and raping school children? No. Or renting a 13 year old migrant that you won't defend? No. And the courts (who actually understand what evidence she has) say no. So pissoff, Nonce.

    There. I answered all your questions. For the second time.


  35. by Navy2711 on April 13, 2026 3:58 pm

    OD,

    Once AGAIN, I'm not asking if Trump committed a crime, or that he was found liable of anything. I'm simply talking about what happened.

    _____________________________

    1. "Forcibly" includes the element of non-consent:

    S 130.05 Sex offenses; lack of consent.
    1. Whether or not specifically stated, it is an element of every
    offense defined in this article that the sexual act was committed
    without consent of the victim.
    2. Lack of consent results from:
    (a) Forcible compulsion;


    https://ypdcrime.com/penal.law/article130.php?

    _____________________________


    2. It is a fact that the jury decided that Trump forcefully penetrated E. Jean Carrol with his finger.

    "The federal jury implicitly found that Trump deliberately and forcibly penetrated Ms. Carroll with his fingers in the 1990s."

    https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dis-crt-sd-new-yor/114642632.html

    ____________________________

    Therefore, this establishes that 12 men and/or women listened to the testimony / evidence, under the controlled conditions of the court, and decided that Trump did, in fact, digital penetrate E. Jean Carroll without her consent.

    THAT is the thing that I'm presenting to you, and asking your opinion about: The decision, not "Trump committed rape." Just that.

    I'm simply saying that a jury decided that he did, in fact, commit the ACT of nonconsensual digital penetration, and I'm asking you ...

    Does that make Trump a rapist in your mind?


    caselaw.findlaw.com
    ypdcrime.com


  36. by oldedude on April 13, 2026 6:07 pm
    Lead- so apparently swalwell still kept in contact with at least a couple of the women. This brings a whole dynamic into the accusations. Are they calling rape, then still seeing him? Anyway, just some news. You're usually digging up stuff before I do and I didn't see this on there. What I'm thinking. If it were mutual, that's one option. If it weren't mutual, why didn't one of them block the (mostly) texts. Many of these are dick shots from swalwell, and asking for nudes of the women. Again. Pretty easy to block a number. I'm sure more in the next few days. AND he said he's going to resign from congress also.


  37. by HatetheSwamp on April 14, 2026 3:38 am

    Megyn Kelly, yesterday, didn't defend Swalwell but she held the to-this-point most public accuser to account.

    These are difficult times. If you believe these Swalwell accusers, you really should have believed Tara Reid when she accused the Doddering Old Fool. But, Curt, especially, defended him tenaciously!

    Typical woke and progressive hypocrisy.


  38. by oldedude on April 14, 2026 4:55 am
    Concur. Without more info, the women may have teed him up on this. If they were responding to him, then they either had Stockholm syndrome or that was their game. One shows him as a serial rapist (dexter without the scalpel), the other pretty much absolves him.


  39. by Ponderer on April 14, 2026 7:10 am

    I really liked Swalwell. Damn it. He was so good at his job. He was one of my favorites.

    But if the claims are true and he has committed acts of sexual misconduct, then off to The Cornfield with him.

    I suppose he could switch over to the Republican party. They'd be happy for the increase in their numbers, and his sexual crimes will not be seen of him there.


  40. by HatetheSwamp on April 14, 2026 7:18 am

    When the dust settles, he'll be remembered best for farting at Chris Matthews live on MSNBC! Every I watch it I guffaw.

    youtu.be


  41. by oldedude on April 14, 2026 8:10 am
    So I listened to a statement/ interview with the victim. Fairly quiet. No threats. Pretty low key. She was adamant and stands by her earlier statements. They're not cookie cutter, canned answers (which indicates she's speaking to the question, not to her talking points). She just wanted him out so he wouldn't do this to anyone else in his office. Obviously, she has little control of him.

    I hope they actually charge him. I wouldn't say that if they both had a little too much to drink and they got laid. None of my concern. The fact he had date rape drugs and used them more than once shows a different psyche. He's a predator. And in one case, he beat his victim while she was drugged. That's a bunch of felonies just waiting to be charged. I really feel sorry for his wife and kids.


  42. by Ponderer on April 14, 2026 8:33 am

    "I hope they actually charge him. I wouldn't say that if they both had a little too much to drink and they got laid." -olde dude

    ...or if he was a Republican.


  43. by HatetheSwamp on April 14, 2026 8:38 am

    po,

    Hate absolutely is your love language. Yourahoot!

    From what I've gleaned... from this victim... prosecutors couldn't get a conviction from the story she's slinging.


  44. by Ponderer on April 14, 2026 8:41 am

    Hmmm. That's a lot less than what the FBI thought about the testimony of the 13-year-old girl that Trump raped.


  45. by oldedude on April 14, 2026 8:42 am
    Okay, if you're wanting to charge consenting adults be my guest.

    My point is that He'll get off. He's a fucking serial rapists. If he wasn't a prominent politician (of either party) he'd be doing at least 100 years just on using the drugs. But since he is a prominent politician (of any fucking party) my bet is he'll walk. Nice defending him though...


  46. by Ponderer on April 14, 2026 8:44 am

    "My point is that He'll get off. He's a fucking serial rapists." -olde dude

    Are you basing that at all on the fact that the serial rapist Donald Trump has been getting out of having any legal responsibility for the serial rapes he performed...?


  47. by HatetheSwamp on April 14, 2026 9:14 am

    po,

    Your "feckless dementia-ridden piece of crap's" string-pullers had four years to make sumpthin of Trump’s malfeasance. Nada.


  48. by Ponderer on April 14, 2026 9:37 am

    Geez. Now he's talking in irrelevant non sequiturs and meaningless gibberish. He's pretty far gone, folks. He's reached the Babbling Idiocy Phase.


  49. by HatetheSwamp on April 14, 2026 10:02 am

    Ahhhhhhhh, yes. Your 3rd grade level reading comprehension, one of my favorite things about SS!


  50. by oldedude on April 16, 2026 10:08 am
    po- I'm saying that so far no member of congress or an administration has spent time in jail. Lots of arrests, charges, etc. Bob Menendez may be a first, but that's still up in the air.

    And I'm not saying it's right. It's just the facts. I also think you're hopes of having trumpster go to jail is a lot of energy that will never happen. It won't pass procedural requirements at least (statute of limitations for one, the fact the case has been refused by the courts is the other).


  51. by Indy! on April 16, 2026 10:13 am

    The wealthy don't do jail time.


Go To Top

Comment on: "Eric Swalwell is rapidly becoming a #metoo-ed Andrew Cuomo 2.0"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page