Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

Anonymous comments regarding the Presidential Candidate Selector
President by Curt_Anderson     March 19, 2024 10:10 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (23 comments) [1073 views]


Russia is even more furious over vote by Congress to support Ukraine than MTG.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 21, 2024 6:09 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (1 comments) [243 views]


Minutes after Trump said he wouldn’t run and hide, he runs and hides.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 21, 2024 5:13 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [49 views]


I don't care what anybody says. Trump's trials won't help his poll numbers.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 21, 2024 9:46 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (11 comments) [200 views]


We don’t really know Joe Biden or Donald Trump. Maybe we should listen to those who do.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 21, 2024 1:23 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (4 comments) [182 views]


According to Frank Luntz, pb is young at heart and ahead of his time
Politics by HatetheSwamp     April 20, 2024 12:52 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (3 comments) [243 views]


The Oval Office Oaf is starting to win me over. I...DO...choose freedom over democracy.
President by HatetheSwamp     April 21, 2024 6:36 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (2 comments) [486 views]


Politifact finally gets one right...
President by HatetheSwamp     April 19, 2024 1:39 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (2 comments) [206 views]


House passes HR 8035...$60 Billion Ukraine Aid Package
Government by HatetheSwamp     April 20, 2024 11:15 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (2 comments) [55 views]


Israel has carried out a strike inside Iran, US official tells CNN, as region braces for further escalation
Military by HatetheSwamp     April 19, 2024 3:31 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (2 comments) [329 views]


Media selectors, pages, etc.
PolitiFact roasted for previous 'fact-check' claiming Kyle Rittenhouse's possession of weapon wasn't legal
By HatetheSwamp
November 16, 2021 5:26 am
Category: Media

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

"Critics railed against PolitiFact for publishing false information in the wake of the shootings.

"This fact check was always wrong, but now that the weapons charge has been dropped it's officially PANTS ON FIRE," RealClearInvestigations senior writer Mark Hemingway reacted."

Bahahahahahahaha.

You Blue MAGAs treated your biased, filthy fact checkers as if their words are Holy Writ.

NOT!!!!!


Cited and related links:

  1. foxnews.com

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "PolitiFact roasted for previous 'fact-check' claiming Kyle Rittenhouse's possession of weapon wasn't legal":

  1. by Donna on November 16, 2021 7:34 am
    Not so fast, McGraw.
    politifact.com


  2. by HatetheSwamp on November 16, 2021 8:00 am

    Defending much maligned and thoroughly assailed PolitiFact with PolitiFact. Hmmm.

    This is the sort of thing that causes some, not me of course, to guffaw at you Blue MAGA progressives. Bahahahahahahaha.

    I don't want to say you got nuthin but it's hard not to...


  3. by Donna on November 16, 2021 8:05 am
    That's quite a long way of saying "nuh uh".


  4. by HatetheSwamp on November 16, 2021 8:59 am

    The point I've made repeatedly here is that Blue MAGA progressives cite your highly biased, alleged FACT checkers as if they're reliable.

    Yet, the FACT is that, beyond your tight little community, they're distrusted, maligned and mocked.


  5. by Donna on November 16, 2021 9:13 am
    They are generally very reliable.


  6. by HatetheSwamp on November 16, 2021 9:21 am

    Generally.

    Thing is, when the Dem and or Blue MAGA agenda is at risk, they tend toward unreliability...even advocacy.

    Beyond your woke, elitist circle, they are mistrusted and, worse, ignored...

    ...as the news reporting illustrates.


  7. by Curt_Anderson on November 16, 2021 9:30 am
    HtS,
    So you believe that if it judge dropped a certain lesser charges against the defendant it meant that that action was legal?

    "Wisconsin law says that "any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor."

    In our fact-check, we cite the possibility of an exception for rifles and shotguns. The exception is aimed at letting children ages 16 and 17 hunt." --PolitiFact


    Rittenhouse arguably was hunting...for humans.


  8. by HatetheSwamp on November 16, 2021 9:45 am

    Curt,

    I'm not well read on Pennsylvania gun law, let alone Wisconsin's.

    What I revel in is the broad based expression of distrust in one of the Blue MAGAs' pet fact, bahahahahahahaha, checkers.


  9. by Curt_Anderson on November 16, 2021 10:07 am
    HtS,
    That's not news. Conservatives famously reject facts and naturally are suspicious of fact checkers.


  10. by HatetheSwamp on November 16, 2021 10:24 am

    Good'ne!

    And you claim subjectivity ain't truth.


  11. by Curt_Anderson on November 16, 2021 10:38 am
    Subjectivity isn't truth necessarily. Your favorite philosopher to cite, Kierkegaard, said "truth is subjectivity". But he distinguished objective knowledge from subjective knowledge.

    The fact checker sites which you disdain focus on objective facts.


  12. by HatetheSwamp on November 16, 2021 12:55 pm

    Curt,

    The fact checkers you cite focus on objective facts...

    ...from the perspective of their own extreme bias.


  13. by Donna on November 16, 2021 2:48 pm
    Well since everyone has biases, why don't we just do away entirely with our justice system?


  14. by HatetheSwamp on November 16, 2021 3:06 pm

    The "jury of 12 of your peers" is our attempt to address the reality that all of us have our own biases. It's not perfect of course.

    As will be demonstrated if Kyle Rittenhouse is found guilty. Bahahahahahahaha.


Go To Top

Comment on: "PolitiFact roasted for previous 'fact-check' claiming Kyle Rittenhouse's possession of weapon wasn't legal"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page