Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

Good news for Kamala and the Ds
Astrology by Indy!     July 26, 2024 1:07 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (5 comments) [77 views]


So is Trump too much of a pants-pissing coward to debate Harris?
Politics by Ponderer     July 26, 2024 5:31 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (7 comments) [38 views]


Six House Dems vote with GOP to condemn Kamala Harris for 'border czar' role
Government by HatetheSwamp     July 26, 2024 4:26 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (13 comments) [108 views]


Benjamin Netanyahu's historic and heroic speech before the US Congress
Government by HatetheSwamp     July 24, 2024 12:37 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (26 comments) [203 views]


A landslide I'm still tellin' ya
Politics by Ponderer     July 26, 2024 3:39 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (2 comments) [21 views]


Usha Vance's perfect speech introducing JD
Politics by HatetheSwamp     July 18, 2024 7:50 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (14 comments) [190 views]


A better indicator than national polls and even better than swing state polls
Politics by Curt_Anderson     July 24, 2024 8:37 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (17 comments) [149 views]


Anonymous comments regarding the Presidential Candidate Selector and the election
President by Curt_Anderson     March 19, 2024 10:10 am (Rating: 2.5) Last comment by: Indy! (107 comments) [3133 views]


Did the woman behind Trump know what was going down?
Entertainment by Indy!     July 25, 2024 3:40 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (4 comments) [48 views]


538's Harris versus Trump polls
Politics by Curt_Anderson     July 25, 2024 12:45 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (4 comments) [41 views]


Government selectors, pages, etc.
Federal appeals court pauses release of Trump White House records ahead of Friday deadline
By HatetheSwamp
November 11, 2021 3:10 pm
Category: Government

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

A federal appeals court on Thursday granted former President Donald Trump's request to pause the release of key White House records from his presidency to the House select committee investigating the January 6 attack on the US Capitol, as he appeals a lower court's decision that he can't claim executive privilege to keep them secret.

The US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit set oral arguments for a hearing on November 30. Judges Patricia Millett and Robert Wilkins, both Obama appointees, and Ketanji Brown Jackson, a Biden appointee, sat on the appellate panel considering Trump's request.

"The purpose of this administrative injunction is to protect the court's jurisdiction to address appellant's claims of executive privilege and should not be construed in any way as a ruling on the merits," the panel wrote in a brief two-page order.

Judge Tanya Chutkan [a certifiable TDS sufferer] twice rejected Trump's bid for a preliminary injunction to prevent the National Archives from complying with document request, noting in a Wednesday night ruling that Trump's attorneys did not put forward new legal arguments or new facts to alter her previous ruling that held executive privilege belongs to the office -- not the individual.

"In this appeal, the Court will consider novel and important constitutional issues of first impression concerning separation of powers, presidential records, and executive privilege," Trump's attorneys wrote Thursday.

In a ruling Tuesday, Chutkan wrote, "Presidents are not kings, and Plaintiff is not President."

Let not your heart be troubled, TDSers. This stuff is nuthin new. It has to be done. You who suffer from TDS aren't big on the Constitution but it's our best bet.

It would be a bad thing if the courts refused to settle this tussle between the legislative and executive branches of government.

I'm still guessing that, in the end, Trump'll lose this one, though I'm not certain it will be a good thing if he does.

Congress has the duty to try the President if he's accused of high crimes and misdemeanors. But, to investigate a former President?

It seems to me that that task might more appropriately be the task of the FBI, etc..

But, as I say, Trump'll probably lose in the end.


Cited and related links:

  1. cnn.com

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Federal appeals court pauses release of Trump White House records ahead of Friday deadline":

  1. by Curt_Anderson on November 11, 2021 8:45 pm
    Any constitutional issues raised won't help Trump's case. The will of a past president does not trump (pun intended) the will of a current president in our non-monarchal system.


Go To Top

Comment on: "Federal appeals court pauses release of Trump White House records ahead of Friday deadline"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page