Comments posted organically
Homepage

Top Contributors Articles by: Curt_Anderson Donna HatetheSwamp Indy! islander meagain myce Navy2711 oldedude Ponderer ROB3RT tuk22

Recent Article Activity Most Commented Articles Highest Rated Articles All Articles Most Viewed Articles Articles Without Comments

What do these Bible verses mean...?
Religion by Ponderer (0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (98 comments)

Uh-oh... America loses war in Iran
Fact Check by Indy! (0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (20 comments)

Gay Palestinian living under asylum in Israel murdered, beheaded in Hebron
Gay & Lesbian by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments)

Bill Maher makes fool out of Adam Schiff
Humor by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (10 comments)

Trump Is Obsessed With $145 Shoes—and Won’t Let Anyone Leave Without a Pair
Weird by Donna (0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (3 comments)

The link between COVID vaxes and anxiety disorders
Medical by oldedude (0.0) Last comment by: meagain (39 comments)

Iran’s impotent new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei is a no-show at his own succession rally: ‘The charisma of a boiled potato’
International by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (3 comments)

Mamdani Condemns New Yorkers For Making Muslims Throw Bombs At Them
Media by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (4 comments)

Woke Jesus Returns
Religion by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (2 comments)

So already, much to the shagren of the right, gas is back down to $90
Alcoholic Beverages by oldedude (0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (7 comments)

CNN Reports On Japanese Teenagers Who Came To Hawaii For What Could've Been Beautiful Day At Beach
Crime by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (2 comments)

Iran Warns U.S. It Has Huge Stockpile Of Supreme Leaders
Military by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (1 comments)

So... Are We Living Under a Fascist Regime Yet...? By Ponderer January 30, 2026 8:34 am Category: History (0.0 from 0 votes) Rules of the Post & Tips. Write & edit articles How To Post Here

I guess that this is a question just for our resident MAGA Hats, pedophile's bitch and olde dude, since I think the rest of us are aware of and recognize all the vast and equitable similarities.

I'm just curious as to what it will take before these pig-ignorantly stubborn, religiously devoted rubes will catch on to the reality that's slapping this country in the face.

I would really like to hear either or both of them explain how this Regime shouldn't be considered "fascist" yet.


My heart kinda goes out to them. It's gotta be rough seeing your cult's Leader turn into the tool of our country's destruction and still support Him.

Or maybe that's just what they actually want...?

Comments Start Below

by Ponderer on January 30, 2026 9:17 am There may actually be nothing that Trump could ever do that would sway these MAGA Hat Lifers from their religious devotion to Trump. I guess that's just what we'll have to assume if they can't even respond to this thread. Respond with an actual answer I mean. by Curt_Anderson on January 30, 2026 9:38 am It is definitely fascisty. by Navy2711 on January 30, 2026 2:57 pm One hundred MAGA were surveyed and asked the question, "So... Are We Living Under a Fascist Regime Yet...?" My answer: "No, because I don't see the smokestacks of the crematoriums yet." *Richard Dawson turns to the board*I "Show me, 'No, because I don't see the smokestacks of the crematoriums yet!' " DING!! Number one answer!! by oldedude on January 30, 2026 7:50 pm Po. a general question for right now. Who is your reference for the "Christian" "Questions" you ask. Only to ask the obvious question. And just a question. It truly asks the questions about calvanism, and a whole bunch of questions we don't kneed to argue with if I know where you're coming from. by Ponderer on January 31, 2026 7:30 am Ignoring your obfuscation for the moment, od, a more apt question might well be that in your estimation, do you think we are we living under a Fascist Regime yet. So... Are We Living Under a Fascist Regime Yet...? Answer that question first and I will then answer yours... by Ponderer on January 31, 2026 8:22 am I think that it's quite telling that our resident MAGA Hats, pedophile's bitch and olde dude, can't even just say "No". by Ponderer on January 31, 2026 8:24 am "My answer: "No, because I don't see the smokestacks of the crematoriums yet."" -Navy Navy, was that serious? That can't possibly be your minimum requirement for a regime to be considered "fascist". Can it...? by HatetheSwamp on January 31, 2026 9:36 am po, You're a dog with a bone. Please please please please please, don't EVER change. Go to this Curt's Holy Trinity video to 30:00 and watch for a minute. View Video by Ponderer on January 31, 2026 9:43 am Okay. Done. And.........? by HatetheSwamp on January 31, 2026 9:49 am po, And you call ME stoopid, baha by Ponderer on January 31, 2026 9:52 am Yeah, I do. Because you are. So what was I supposed to see in that minute that you think is useful in your argument? Whatever your argument is? by HatetheSwamp on January 31, 2026 10:32 am C'mon. Gimme a break, man. Y'ain't that stoopid! by Ponderer on January 31, 2026 2:29 pm Well then... so... Was your point in having me watch that video... sitting somewhere behind the guy that said that night of the election over a year ago before Trump was even back in office when that clip was shot that he didn't think Trump deserved the label of fascist...? by HatetheSwamp on January 31, 2026 3:39 pm C'mon, po, y'ain't that stoopid. This is the NYT guy. He couldn't possibly be more unMAGA. He's no fan of Trump. He's simply splainin that for all you can say about Trump, you can't be a thinking person and think Trump is a fascist. He's the opposite of what a fascist is. And, he said that during the part of the evening that the GOP landslide was becoming an undeniable reality. The point? Those moderate and independent common sense voters who settle elections, realized that you're a fool to accuse Trump of being a fascist... ... and you are. by Ponderer on January 31, 2026 4:36 pm And I really didn't want to think you are really this stupid, but you are. That was over a year ago before Trump got in and even started actually being a fucking fascist for fucksake. by HatetheSwamp on February 1, 2026 2:54 am Real-world to po. Trump had already been President for a full term by then. We know that fascist is your second fave eff-word but Trump's not a fascist. He's lots of things. I think that Trump is despicable. But, a fascist?, nuh-uh, baha by Ponderer on February 1, 2026 8:07 am I know I know. The Dictionary is one of those sources that you just laugh at. But I still think it's relevant in this discussion... fascism [fash-iz-uhm] noun 1. (sometimes initial capital letter) a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism. 2. (sometimes initial capital letter) the philosophy, principles, or methods of fascism. 3. (initial capital letter) a political movement that employs the principles and methods of fascism, especially the one established by Mussolini in Italy 1922–43. Please... PLEASE, pedophile's bitch... Explain how the very top definition doesn't match with what Trump is doing and/or is actively trying to do to this country. Try to look beyond your willful ignorance... look beyond your religious MAGA indoctrination to actually think through the actual realities on the ground for once..... dictionary.com by meagain on February 1, 2026 9:02 am As I posted in the other thread. There is no question that it is a Fascist regime. Beware that it does not deteriorate into Naziism. While Eco is firm in claiming “There was only one Nazism,” he says, “the fascist game can be played in many forms, and the name of the game does not change.” Eco reduces the qualities of what he calls “Ur-Fascism, or Eternal Fascism” down to 14 “typical” features. “These features,” writes the novelist and semiotician, “cannot be organized into a system; many of them contradict each other, and are also typical of other kinds of despotism or fanaticism. But it is enough that one of them be present to allow fascism to coagulate around it.” The cult of tradition. “One has only to look at the syllabus of every fascist movement to find the major traditionalist thinkers. The Nazi gnosis was nourished by traditionalist, syncretistic, occult elements.” The rejection of modernism. “The Enlightenment, the Age of Reason, is seen as the beginning of modern depravity. In this sense Ur-Fascism can be defined as irrationalism.” The cult of action for action’s sake. “Action being beautiful in itself, it must be taken before, or without, any previous reflection. Thinking is a form of emasculation.” Disagreement is treason. “The critical spirit makes distinctions, and to distinguish is a sign of modernism. In modern culture the scientific community praises disagreement as a way to improve knowledge.” Fear of difference. “The first appeal of a fascist or prematurely fascist movement is an appeal against the intruders. Thus Ur-Fascism is racist by definition.” Appeal to social frustration. “One of the most typical features of the historical fascism was the appeal to a frustrated middle class, a class suffering from an economic crisis or feelings of political humiliation, and frightened by the pressure of lower social groups.” The obsession with a plot. “Thus at the root of the Ur-Fascist psychology there is the obsession with a plot, possibly an international one. The followers must feel besieged.” The enemy is both strong and weak. “By a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak.” Pacifism is trafficking with the enemy. “For Ur-Fascism there is no struggle for life but, rather, life is lived for struggle.” Contempt for the weak. “Elitism is a typical aspect of any reactionary ideology.” Everybody is educated to become a hero. “In Ur-Fascist ideology, heroism is the norm. This cult of heroism is strictly linked with the cult of death.” Machismo and weaponry. “Machismo implies both disdain for women and intolerance and condemnation of nonstandard sexual habits, from chastity to homosexuality.” Selective populism. “There is in our future a TV or Internet populism, in which the emotional response of a selected group of citizens can be presented and accepted as the Voice of the People.” Ur-Fascism speaks Newspeak. “All the Nazi or Fascist schoolbooks made use of an impoverished vocabulary, and an elementary syntax, in order to limit the instruments for complex and critical reasoning.” by Ponderer on February 1, 2026 11:36 am All quite right, meagain. Trump is absolutely and unquestionably following a specific fascist template here. No two fascist regimes are ever going to be identical. Because they all have to work within a given nation and its given population in ways that are however the situation and state of the nation and its people demand. Trump is running the playbook in a situation that I think has never happened before. Taking a country that was literally the democratic envy of the planet and turning it into a fascist dictatorship of corruption and cruelty. But again, yes. All of the red fascist flags are there here. by oldedude on February 1, 2026 11:45 pm Both of us have been continual critics of trumpster. I know that nobody on this site would be able to read that, but that's your blindness, not mine. I have been extremely vocal about how ICE has been used. I stated at the beginning of these, there would be trouble. I said DHS is escalating the threat where there shouldn't be, and that's going to cause blowback (you know, like people getting dead). THAT is just going to escalate the threat higher for the DHS side, which is even a larger problem. Long story short. If we keep going like it's laid out now, we will get to fascism, my guess sooner than later. I'll give that a definite possibility. The government needs to pull back the en masse responses. It's only pissing people off. If this isn't changed, we'll see their methods get sucked down a typical toilet that starts every civil war. So I'm still in a very wary future tense about this. Explanation if you want to read it. So right now, the government. Again, instead of fighting this low intensity battle with a shredded, low intensity response, the government is meeting force with force. Never the best thing to do. It needs to pull back the agents and retrain them. The cities/states MUST work with the feds for this to work. That's a problem also. It's going to take some time to change the methodology. I'm going to say this again, because this can blow up in the nation's face. Then we will slip right in to a fascist state. That's the path of least resistance unfortunately. So it actually takes work NOT to do that. Everyone that is arrested, needs to be known to the locals. Help them out by getting rid of their trash. You don't detain 100 and arrest 5. That's just F***ing stupid. That's also where people get hurt. If they detain 12, and arrest/charge 10, the public will (hopefully) understand the people arrested have these violent charges against them. As they "said" when they started this, "we're after the worst of the worst." Then do that. And the methods the feds are employing are over-riding all the chaos they're creating. I have restated this in different ways for the last few months. I also don't have TPS, so I don't make up stories about what is happening. You're turn, po. by HatetheSwamp on February 2, 2026 3:48 am "Both of us have been continual critics of trumpster." Bang on, OD. I think that I have offered more specific opposition to Trump than everyone here. I railed against tariffs long before the 024 election and I was viciously opposed to Trump's OBBB, for specific reasons. I sided with Elon Musk in his disagreement with Trump... AND, ole pb has been HatetheSwamp for years! pb's been saying that all of DC is a mess for a long time. Including Trump and MAGA. My theory is that po just loves eff words. EffYou and fascist, especially. Clearly, IMO, this regime ain't what Jefferson envisioned when he penned Declaration of Independence nor Madison in leading the creation of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. It's a mess. All of it is. But, fascist? I don't think that is the adjective that applies. po's interesting. po's mind is rigid and incapable of absorbing information at odds with predetermined thoughts. I'm not saying that po has dementia but po's brain works like my dad's did when he was about half way into dementia. If po ever develops dementia? HolyfreakinfrigginEFFINcow! po will be impossible to be around!!!!! by Ponderer on February 2, 2026 6:45 am "po's interesting. po's mind is rigid and incapable of absorbing information at odds with predetermined thoughts." -pedophile's bitch Mmmm, no... I just refuse to absorb information that is provably wrong and not based on any actual evidence or proof whatsoever is all. by Ponderer on February 2, 2026 6:47 am Wouldn't it be incredible if pedophile's bitch actually backed up his opinion by addressing the points made in the definition of what fascism is and explain why they don't apply to this current Fascist Reich...? by HatetheSwamp on February 2, 2026 8:15 am "Mmmm, no... I just refuse to absorb information that is provably wrong." Right dad was the same way about half way through dementia. by Ponderer on February 2, 2026 8:24 am And you were able to show him how he was wrong? Because you've never done that with me. Because you can't. by HatetheSwamp on February 2, 2026 8:33 am po, That's precisely the point. By that time, he, like you now, was incapable of engaging reality. Before the dementia, he could,... and wanted to. by Ponderer on February 2, 2026 10:18 am Oh right. Because I'M the one who can't recognize reality. I see. I see. by HatetheSwamp on February 2, 2026 10:39 am It's your narcissism,... prisoner of the preferences and prejudices that you bring with you to every moment of your life... thing. by Ponderer on February 2, 2026 11:15 am So... your willful ignorance of and ignoring of all this fascistic bullshit going on around you... is because of my narcissism.....? by oldedude on February 2, 2026 11:39 am I think it's pretty apparent that we don't agree with your pants on fire theory. by Ponderer on February 3, 2026 5:43 am "I think it's pretty apparent that we don't agree with your pants on fire theory" -olde dude That's because you are fascist-compliant, od. As is pedophile's bitch. Someone who is fascist-compliant isn't going to go around declaring how much they love fascists. They will of course deny any connection to the term. As tghey turn their backs on or defend or support or excuse or champion whatever fascist outrage this Regime foists on this once great country. From the way this authoritarian regime is acting in our cities and in our streets, many people in this country are feeling like they are in a burning building with their clothing on fire, so it's gone past the theory stage. Not that you two unamerican sociopaths would give a flyingfuck. by Ponderer on February 3, 2026 5:59 am I mean Jesus, od! You're supposedly a veteran forfucksake! And you're just gonna compliantly spectate as a fascist psychopath rips what America was created to be and what you supposedly swore to defend to shreds...??? ..... by Ponderer on February 3, 2026 6:00 am ..... by Ponderer on February 3, 2026 6:00 am ..... by oldedude on February 3, 2026 7:55 am po again I don't believe that rapists, wife beaters, assholes that sexually assault children should be roaming around on our streets. That's the difference between you and me. See [1] #12 selectsmart.com by Ponderer on February 3, 2026 8:15 am "po again I don't believe that rapists, wife beaters, assholes that sexually assault children should be roaming around on our streets. That's the difference between you and me." -olde dude But od, I don't believe that rapists, wife beaters, or assholes that sexually assault children should be roaming around on our streets either. Take them off the streets! Of course! Obviously! But that job requires Nazi Gestapo Goon Squads with a license to kill...??? The difference between us is that you approve of all these Wholesale Fascist Gestapo Goon tactics while they use the lame excuse of going after rapists, wife beaters, and assholes that sexually assault children... when all they are doing is detaining Americans citizens, even killing them, and yanking any brown person they have a mind to out through busted car windows or in the middle of their gardening jobs or while dropping their kids off at school or showing up for scheduled amnesty hearings and throw them in one of Trump's fascist concentration prison camps. I don't approve of any of that. And you do. You defend it, support it, excuse it, and champion it. That's the big difference between us here, od. Sugarcoat it as you may try. by oldedude on February 3, 2026 8:17 am Please read my citation. We'd both be happy with that. I hope. by Ponderer on February 3, 2026 9:22 am By "citation", I'm going to assume you meant your post #20. "Long story short. If we keep going like it's laid out now, we will get to fascism, my guess sooner than later. I'll give that a definite possibility. The government needs to pull back the en masse responses. It's only pissing people off. If this isn't changed, we'll see their methods get sucked down a typical toilet that starts every civil war. So I'm still in a very wary future tense about this." -olde dude Well, it's encouraging to hear that from you. So, you are aware of what's going on. Do you think that if things you speak of happen in the near future to the point where the fascism is inarguable... that it might have all been built upon the foundation of everything that you've been telling us to chill out about all this time...? by HatetheSwamp on February 3, 2026 9:38 am I'm looking forward to OD's reply. However, for myself, our national salvation is in those moderate and independent common sense voters who keep us from falling off the deep end in either direction. Yinz were morons in 024, attempting to repeat the 020 Biden scam, then hoping that the smoke-filled room's string-pullers could successfully foist the Dingbat on voters. Donald Trump is the weakest candidate ever to be elected President but yinz gave common sense voters no legitimate option. by Indy! on February 3, 2026 9:47 am "Military veterans fought for FREEDOM not FASCISM"... Nice sign, Pondy. Of course we have to keep in mind that OD never saw any action in the military so maybe he wasn't there to fight for freedom. 🤔 Speaking of which... by oldedude on February 3, 2026 7:55 am po again I don't believe that rapists, wife beaters, assholes that sexually assault children should be roaming around on our streets. Notice what's missing from that list? Cop killers. Because OD is perfectly fine with cop killers roaming our streets. 😂 by Ponderer on February 3, 2026 1:58 pm Plus, some of the J6 felons who beat cops and were released by Donald Trump went on to commit more crimes after Trump's pardon like burglary, domestic abuse, sexual assault, and sexual abuse of children. Thanks, Donald Trump! by oldedude on February 3, 2026 2:16 pm I find it funny "that's all you got. LIES." You're must be at the end of anything original. It's YOU both that are supporting the pedophilia, and cop killers. Look at your last posts regarding MN. For me, you have to lie about things that happened six years ago. I have to look back the last two weeks for a continual barrage of cop hating. by Ponderer on February 5, 2026 6:38 am "It's YOU both that are supporting the pedophilia, and cop killers.' -olde dude Explain exactly how we are doing that... by Ponderer on February 5, 2026 8:47 am Oh, and ICE ain't "cops". They are an unconstitutional private Gestapo Goon Squad that acts upon the wishes of our Great Golden Leader in violation of everything that is American. by Navy2711 on February 5, 2026 9:12 am "Donald Trump is the weakest candidate ever to be elected President but yinz gave common sense voters no legitimate option." Anything is an option, when compared to an authoritarian takeover of our democracy. Even woke-ism. Yeeesss, that right, Idiot, even woke-ism is OBVIOUSLY better than fascism. This was the easiest election ever. And somehow ... SOMEHOW, in the midst of your incessant, swirling, gibbering dumbassery ... you managed to make the wrong choice. by HatetheSwamp on February 5, 2026 9:14 am Tell that to the moderate and independent common sense voters who chose Trump by a huuuuuuuuuge margin! by Indy! on February 5, 2026 9:34 am Find me one and I'll tell him. by oldedude on February 5, 2026 3:17 pm po- "It's YOU both that are supporting the pedophilia, and cop killers.' -olde dude Explain exactly how we are doing that... 10/7. Belittling Lakin Reilly within the past 10 days. by Ponderer on February 5, 2026 3:47 pm "Belittling Lakin Reilly within the past 10 days." -olde dude I of course never did any such thing in the last ten years. And you couldn't prove it to get the hamsters out of your ass. by Curt_Anderson on February 5, 2026 3:54 pm "Belittling Lakin Reilly within the past 10 days." ---OD It's Laken Riley! She gave her life to help Republicans get elected. The least you could do is to show some respect and spell her name correctly! by Ponderer on February 5, 2026 4:21 pm (Just so you know, od, Curt is belittling YOU, not anyone else.) by Indy! on February 5, 2026 5:25 pm Lackin Who? by oldedude on February 5, 2026 7:27 pm My point exactly. You completely support the gangs, pedophiles, and rapists! Which is something you support already. Someone trying to make a life being a nurse, and doing good was beaten to death, stabbed and raped while they were breathing their last breaths, and already dead, you sick motherfucker. I know you get off on that. You're nothing but a piece of shit that should be extinguished from the fucking earth. An any woman that agrees with me should be murdered in the same way. Questions? If anyone in the world has an ounce of humanity, YOU are NOT in it. You and your antichrist deserve to life in your life. Burn in hell bitch. by Curt_Anderson on February 5, 2026 7:36 pm "any woman that agrees with me should be murdered in the same way. Questions?" ---OD Um, yeah. Too many to list. by Ponderer on February 6, 2026 8:30 am Was od talking about women who voted for Trump like he did...? I agree that it was a stupid thing for any self-respecting American woman to do, but I think od's punishment is a bit harsh. by Ponderer on February 7, 2026 6:10 am "You completely support the gangs, pedophiles, and rapists!" -olde dude Of course I don't. But you actually voted for and support, defend, excuse, and champion an actual pedophile and rapist who currently has a gang of roving Gestapo goons kidnapping and murdering American citizens. by oldedude on February 7, 2026 6:27 am If you can show me where trumpster showered with his 14-year-old daughter, I'll yield. by myce on February 7, 2026 7:05 am Pedojoe is a creepy fucker that everyone should steer their kids away. I've not heard of any mention of him in the Epstein files, however. I've never heard him brag about sexually assaulting women, nor inspecting teenage models. I'm not aware of him being found civilly liable for rape, nor accusations of raping and threatening a 13 year old, nor confessing to witnessing infanticide in his accusations against his opponents. A child has no choice but to love the parents even if they are shit. Who can the child turn to, if s/he hates the parents?? A child cannot hate the parents because s/he needs them. MAGAs carry their Stockholm syndrome from childhood throughout life. Stockholm Christians love/fear a malevolent diety like they loved and feared their parents as children. MAGAs think Trump can do no wrong, like Daddy can do no wrong, like their god can do no wrong. by Donna on February 7, 2026 7:29 am Project Veritas, which allegedly discovered Ashley Biden's diary apparently dropped that case a few years ago and no one left or right is even discussing it anymore. That's why I haven't said more about it. Maybe it turned out to be fake - idk. But it's clear that President Von Schitzenpantz along with his entire regime and the Republican Party re trying to cover up his complicity in Eostein's international child sex ring. Don't tell us that you can't see that that's what they're doing. He won't even allow Bill Clinton to testify in public about what he knows.They aren"t even trying to cover up the cover up. I want to know more about why Noam Chomsky told Jeffrey Epstein in 2019 to ignore all the probing questions from the media. I'd also like to know why Bill Clintin, Woody Allen and Bill Gates were such close friends with Epstein. Sounds like a typical good 'ol boys pedo network like the Catholic Church ran for centuries and no doubt still runs. by oldedude on February 7, 2026 7:30 am Well, that said. From the time I was 16 I was a Shambahla Buddhist. My parents didn't have much to say about it. I also joined the military which they were much more against. Until the jobs market dropped down the toilet and I was still working and they "made me" live in Germany for four years. I was getting promoted regularly, had health care, and a paycheck. That's when they turned that around. I came home on leave every once in awhile, but as much as I liked CO, their politics suck. I've recently "converted" back to Christianity. No fault, no foul on anything, it was just my path. by Ponderer on February 7, 2026 8:12 am "If you can show me where trumpster showered with his 14-year-old daughter, I'll yield." -olde dude Why is it that MAGA Hats always seem to believe that if they can show that someone else did something wrong, it exonerates their Golden God Trump of any wrongdoing? I think it may be somehow connected to how they are incapable of ever making an equitable comparison or even knowing what one even is. by Navy2711 on February 7, 2026 8:51 am OD, "If you can show me where trumpster showered with his 14-year-old daughter, I'll yield. Will a jury finding Trump liable for rape do the trick? by HatetheSwamp on February 7, 2026 9:37 am If a jury ever finds Trump guilty of rape that'd do. For now, watch that or you may end up owing Trump $14,000,000 too. baha by Indy! on February 7, 2026 9:42 am by oldedude on February 5, 2026 7:27 pm My point exactly. You completely support the gangs, pedophiles, and rapists! Which is something you support already. Someone trying to make a life being a nurse, and doing good was beaten to death, stabbed and raped while they were breathing their last breaths, and already dead, you sick motherfucker. I know you get off on that. You're nothing but a piece of shit that should be extinguished from the fucking earth. An any woman that agrees with me should be murdered in the same way. Questions? Yes, I have a question, Señorita... If I'm the one who "gets off on that" how come you're the one always posting about it? 🙂 by myce on February 7, 2026 10:32 am HatetheSwamp, Trump was found liable for rape. But if he raped you, then you would just delete it from your brain and there would be another hole where the neurons don't connect. by Navy2711 on February 7, 2026 11:12 am HtS, that's nice, but what about the actual question that I asked? by HatetheSwamp on February 7, 2026 11:37 am "HatetheSwamp, Trump was found liable for rape." Bull$#!t. And, George Stephanopoulos had to pay Trump $15,000,000 after he claimed Trump was. So watch out! by oldedude on February 7, 2026 12:01 pm concha- If I'm the one who "gets off on that" how come you're the one always posting about it? Because every time I do, you try to cover for yourself, the perfect example of what pedophiles do. by Navy2711 on February 7, 2026 1:05 pm Idiot, "Bull$#!t. And, George Stephanopoulos had to pay Trump $15,000,000 after he claimed Trump was." We are not in a court of law and we are not members of the press. We are not bound by the rules that guide those forums. We do not have to, and indeed we are not, construing the word "rape" in any sense but its common usage. We are just talking casually. I said that a jury found Trump liable of rape. Those words are true. Now ... will that "do," as you claimed it would in post #63? Or are you going to keep trying, unsuccessfully, to play semantics? ... OR are you now going to claim that digital penetration does not constitute rape? by myce on February 7, 2026 1:17 pm HatetheSwamp: Bull$#!t. And, George Stephanopoulos had to pay Trump $15,000,000 after he claimed Trump was. So watch out! (Was this one of the situations when the "swamp media" gave the bully the lunch money instead of punching him in the face??) Why yes, yes it was. That was a settlement, because the terror baby always gets his way, not because ANY of his false claims about everybody being mean to him have EVER had any merit at all. I'm not able to copy/paste from the source, but Trump was indeed found liable for sexual abuse and defamation, ie. forcibly putting his fingers in Carroll's vagina and then defaming her. The only issue with the word "rape" is that Carroll did not prove that Trump put his penis in her. storage.courtlistener.com by HatetheSwamp on February 7, 2026 1:23 pm "I'm not able to copy/paste from the source, but Trump was indeed found liable for sexual abuse..." Bingo. Not rape. And that cost Stephanopoulos/ABC huuuuuuuuuge $$. keehee ha, baha by Donna on February 7, 2026 1:26 pm From AI: In short: A jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, and the presiding judge clarified that this constituted rape under a common, non-legal definition. by myce on February 7, 2026 1:33 pm And that cost Stephanopoulos/ABC huuuuuuuuuge $$. keehee ha, baha You mean they paid a bribe. Notably, Trump has never sued anyone for saying he soils his pants. by Navy2711 on February 8, 2026 7:57 am Idiot, Is forcible digital penetration rape? by HatetheSwamp on February 8, 2026 8:13 am Apparently, in New York?, noop. by Navy2711 on February 8, 2026 8:37 am Idiot, I didn't say anything about New York. Answer the question, please. Is forced digital penetration rape? by HatetheSwamp on February 8, 2026 8:56 am Under the law?, noop by Navy2711 on February 8, 2026 9:17 am Didn't mention the law. Im just asking you a question. Is forced digital penetration rape? by oldedude on February 8, 2026 2:55 pm re-read the post. It's right there... by Indy! on February 8, 2026 3:00 pm by oldedude on February 7, 2026 12:01 pm concha- If I'm the one who "gets off on that" how come you're the one always posting about it? Because every time I do, you try to cover for yourself, the perfect example of what pedophiles do. Just fyi for future reference, OD - the cops won't buy that when they bust you with all that child porn on your computer or with your pants down in front of some unfortunate neighborhood child - just like no one on the board is buying it now. by Ponderer on February 9, 2026 6:48 am "Under the law?, noop" -pedophile's bitch "Didn't mention the law. Im just asking you a question. Is forced digital penetration rape?" -Navy Navy, you're forgetting that pedophile's bitch studied Constitutional law under Thurgood Marshal. The law is all that matters to pedophile's bitch. His opinion on the law is inconsequential and will never be provided. He is steadfastly open minded and by the book. His vast experience and knowledge in the legal field is all he needs to rely on. He wields his unquestionable law expertise as a Weapon of Truth to combat that which we ignorantly give credence to, and his final legal word puts us in our places where we belong. ...Unless of course the law and the Constitution are obviously and easily demonstrated to be against his side and his Golden God's wishes. In which case he becomes a drooling legal moron who knows nothing about the law and no one else is allowed to know anything more than he does, unless they received their law degree studying under someone as eminent as Thurgood Marshall. He is what's known in legal circles as a flaming, mendaciously hypocritical asshole. by HatetheSwamp on February 9, 2026 7:00 am I was watching when it happened... From AI: "Donald Trump sued ABC News and anchor George Stephanopoulos for defamation regarding a March 2024 interview where Stephanopoulos repeatedly stated that Trump had been "found liable for rape". The lawsuit claimed this was a false statement because the jury in the E. Jean Carroll civil case found him liable for sexual abuse and defamation, not rape under New York law. ABC settled the suit in December 2024 by paying $15 million to a Trump-affiliated entity and acknowledging the inaccuracy." Why was Trump, the weakest candidate ever to be elected, elected in 024? Woke lawfare and lies. Thanks, guys, for keeping the hateMyth alive. GOPs'll need all the he'p you can give them in 026, baha by Ponderer on February 9, 2026 7:32 am You were touting the law even before anything legal happened though, pedophile's bitch. Because you felt confident enough in what the law states to provide your declaration on the applicability of the law in the case and parade it around in here. And yet... We are never allowed to do that in here without your reiterating our legal "ignorance". When the Constitution says that something is illegal and Trump blatantly does it anyway, we are not permitted to present our opinions on the matter without you throwing our lack of legal degrees in our faces. Because you are a flaming, hypocritical, fuckingasshole, pedophile's bitch. by Ponderer on February 9, 2026 2:21 pm So there's that. by Navy2711 on February 9, 2026 2:31 pm Idiot, Is forced digital penetration rape? by Ponderer on February 9, 2026 3:07 pm Navy, you're drilling him for his opinion. And he doesn't share that with people. Of COURSE he actually believes that digital penetration is rape. He's just never going to admit that in here. He thinks the stipulation in the law trumps everything that any normal person's opinion on it would be, so he's just gonna stick with that and he doesn't have to go on record agreeing with everyone else. by Ponderer on February 9, 2026 3:08 pm Plus, pedophile's bitch is a flaming, hypocritical, fuckingasshole. by Ponderer on February 9, 2026 3:10 pm Correction: Of COURSE he actually believes that forced digital penetration is rape. by Navy2711 on February 9, 2026 3:44 pm Ponderer, I know he's not going to admit it. I like to ask several times to lock it in, so there's no, "Oh, I misunderstood" in the future. Let's move on to the next step ... Idiot, Now that you've refused to admit that forced digital penetration is rape, because you're scared that it would be tantamount to admitting that your Daddy is a rapist (it would), let's see if you can even admit that forced digital penetration is wrong. That's the next question: Is committing the act of forced digital penetration wrong? by Ponderer on February 9, 2026 3:48 pm "Никогда в самых смелых мечтах...!" by Ponderer on February 9, 2026 3:49 pm Well... good luck with that one, Navy. I'm rootin' for ya. by Ponderer on February 10, 2026 7:53 am "Why was Trump, the weakest candidate ever to be elected, elected in 024?" -pedophile's bitch Because enough gullible and willfully ignorant people euphorically believed all his lies. It's really that simple. by Navy2711 on February 11, 2026 4:20 am Idiot, Is committing the act of forced digital penetration wrong? by HatetheSwamp on February 11, 2026 4:57 am Of course... especially when the accuser can remember what frigginYEAR it is supposed to have happened. by HatetheSwamp on February 11, 2026 5:06 am ""Why was Trump, the weakest candidate ever to be elected, elected in 024?" -pedophile's bitch Because enough gullible and willfully all his lies." noop Because as horrible a candidate as he was, the alternative was worse. If yinz hadn't'a brainlessly lockstepped... by HatetheSwamp on February 11, 2026 6:00 am ""Why was Trump, the weakest candidate ever to be elected, elected in 024?" -pedophile's bitch Because enough gullible and willfully all his lies." Gang, Did you ever notice, with po, somehow it always comes down to: 1. po being really, really smart, 2. People who disagree with po being exceptionally stoopid, or, most likely, 3. Both. baha by myce on February 11, 2026 6:09 am Because all of the people whose lives you soulless blobs have destroyed with your stupidity and malice, they're not even really human, right HtS? by oldedude on February 11, 2026 6:27 am Again, judging on the content of a person's character. by HatetheSwamp on February 11, 2026 6:32 am "Because all of the people whose lives you soulless blobs have destroyed with your stupidity and malice, they're not even really human, right HtS?" huh by Ponderer on February 11, 2026 6:33 am "Because as horrible a candidate as he was, the alternative was worse." -pedophile's bitch Geez, you're right, pedophile's bitch [ ]. I neglected to include that. How could I forget? It really was a key factor. Too large of a portion of this country is nowhere near ready or willing to elect a woman of color as president. Period. We know that now. Given the institutional misogyny and flaming racism that this country is still infected with, it may well be several more election cycles before it is allowed to happen. If ever. Harris was a valuable example of this. She was the far superior candidate in every conceivable way compared to Trump. Far more experience. Far more competence, more understanding of the job, more sense of duty and commitment, more intelligence, more knowledge, compassion, lack of felony convictions... and she never even raped anyone. Literally the only things going against her were the facts that she was a woman, and a woman of color. That was the bridge too far for, sadly, too large of a portion of the electorate. That is what made her the "worse" candidate for millions of Americans. It brings me no joy to admit this. It was giving the American people too much credit to have expected them to elect a black woman as president. But we were in a tough place for sure. It was the only alternative we had. There was no other choice. It is for this reason that I pray that the Democrats run a white man for the office in 2028. We can't afford to lose this next one. by HatetheSwamp on February 11, 2026 6:36 am "Too large of a portion of this country is nowhere near ready or willing to elect a woman of color as president." If, in the course of time, Tulsi is the nominee? Take it to the bank. She wins in a frigginLandslide. by Ponderer on February 11, 2026 6:42 am Why? by Ponderer on February 11, 2026 6:43 am What is it that you think insulates her from the slime and corruption of every single last member of Trump's administration? by myce on February 11, 2026 6:44 am Only if the GOP rig the election to make her win. by HatetheSwamp on February 11, 2026 7:09 am Among the many qualities pb admires about Tulsi is that she thinks for herself. Sh'ain't an intellectual slave of the Swamp. She flourished as a Dem and has been able to function well within the Trump political culture. She's a sort of Babe for all seasons. The characteristic about the GOPs that keeps pb a GOP is that it is the home of openness and inclusion, acceptance, tolerance, diversity and freethinking. If any American politician incarnates those realities, it's Tulsi Gabbard. by myce on February 11, 2026 7:11 am Yeah yeah, you tolerate all kinds of criminality, perversion and moral depravity, and you're proud of it. by HatetheSwamp on February 11, 2026 7:13 am "Only if the GOP rig the election to make her win." Take it to the bank. If the Dems nominate someone who despairs over immigrant women being raped "by their in-laws and brothers and sisters" or a Day Drinker like Cackles, Tulsi will win in a landslide. by Ponderer on February 11, 2026 8:09 am pedophile's bitch, what is it that you think would insulate Tulsi Gabbard in the next election from the slime and corruption dripping off of her and every other member of Trump's administration? Tulsi, thinking for herself as she takes orders from Trump to violate the Constitution... by HatetheSwamp on February 11, 2026 8:24 am Describe Tulsi's slime and corruption. Be specific, sumpthin bigoted haters have trouble doing. But, educate me. I'm open minded. by Ponderer on February 11, 2026 8:46 am AI, did Tusi Gabbard have the authority to seize Georgia's ballots? Tulsi Gabbard, as Director of National Intelligence, did not have the legal authority to seize ballots; her involvement at the Fulton County FBI raid was observational and related to election security oversight rather than law enforcement. Legal Authority Limits: Tulsi Gabbard’s position as DNI primarily involves coordination and analysis of intelligence concerning national security threats, especially from foreign sources. Federal law prohibits the DNI from participating in domestic law enforcement activities, including the direct seizure of ballots or interference in state election administration. Context of the Fulton County Raid: During the FBI’s execution of a search warrant in Fulton County, Georgia, almost 700 boxes of election records from the 2020 presidential election were seized. Gabbard was present at the raid at the request of former President Trump and in her capacity to observe election security processes, but she did not direct or physically carry out the seizure. The operation itself was authorized by a federal magistrate judge and conducted by the FBI, which handles domestic law enforcement matters. Concerns and Political Reactions: Her presence drew criticism from Democratic lawmakers and election experts, who argued that it blurred the line between intelligence oversight and domestic politics. Officials emphasized that the DNI cannot lawfully conduct or command domestic law enforcement operations. Gabbard herself stated that her role was limited to coordinating intelligence on election security vulnerabilities and facilitating a brief communication during the operation, asserting that she acted within her statutory authority. Conclusion: While Tulsi Gabbard was physically present during the FBI’s raid on the Fulton County election office, she had no authority to seize ballots or interfere with the investigation. Her participation was strictly observational under the framework of overseeing intelligence related to election security, and the direct legal authority rested solely with the FBI and the issuing magistrate. This distinction is crucial for understanding the limits of her role and the legality of the operation. Okay. Well, then... AI, does the Trump administration have the authority to seize Georgia's ballots? The Trump administration does not have the legal authority to seize Georgia’s ballots; elections are administered by state and local officials under constitutional and statutory law. State Control of Elections Under the U.S. Constitution’s Elections Clause, states are responsible for administering elections, including maintaining and securing ballots and voting equipment. Federal involvement is limited to support roles such as providing cybersecurity assistance, but no federal official, including the president, can take possession of ballots or voting machines without judicial authorization. Legal Limits and the Fulton County Seizure In 2026, federal agents seized ballots from Fulton County, Georgia, under a judicially-issued search warrant amidst investigations of alleged election deficiencies. Local officials have argued in court that the seizure infringed on constitutional rights and exceeded federal authority, highlighting that the president cannot override state control or unilaterally seize election records. Investigations and legal actions continue, demonstrating the importance of judicial oversight in any federal access to election materials. Presidential Influence vs. Legal Authority Although President Trump expressed interest in “taking over” elections in certain states and called for federal involvement, cordoning ballots or overriding election officials would exceed his constitutional powers. Any action without proper statutory or judicial authorization could be considered illegal, potentially violating both state and federal laws. Conclusion In the United States, ballots and election administration remain under the control of state and local officials, and the president cannot legally seize or commandeer ballots at will. Federal investigations involving election records must follow judicial processes and statutory guidelines, reinforcing both election integrity and voter protection. Accessory to Slime and Corruption is still slime and corruption, pedophile's bitch. I know that she's trying to keep a low profile, but shit like this is gonna follow her forever. by oldedude on February 11, 2026 9:26 am Navy, I understand that looking up definitions is not your strong suit. Honestly, I don't think you care about the definition of anything as is seen in your posts. To the rest of us, it does make a difference to gain common ground which is essential for good communication. In this case, All rapes** ARE sexual assaults. All Sexual assaults are NOT rape.* Sexual abuse MAY NOT Be Rape ALL "forceful" rapes are Sexual abuse[1] So in this case, words actually make a difference. Especially when it actually IS a legal action we're talking about. "Stephanopoulos repeatedly stated that Trump had been found "liable for rape". The lawsuit claimed Jean Carroll civil case found him liable for "sexual abuse and defamation". Trudat. ABC settled the suit in December 2024 by paying $15 million to a Trump-affiliated entity and acknowledging the inaccuracy." *"Sexual assault is also inappropriate fondling, grabbing someone's butt and walking away. touching a woman's breast, all of those sorts of things. IF we were talking circa 1950's, there wouldn't have been a charge for this. Which is why the law was rewritten to protect victims (mostly in the workplace) that finally had a legal standing to charge employers, bosses, etc in a crime that worked it's way into HR "standards." My thought- It took them way too long to get these laws on the books. ** RAPE. is a sexual assault (or Sexual Abuse) where there is penetration, however slight by any method. As much as you wanted something different, these are the words used. IF trumpster been found guilty (it wouldn't be in a civil court) of RAPE. That would be a whole different story and something worth noting. britannica.com by Indy! on February 11, 2026 9:55 am Listen to OD - he's the one with the most experience when it comes to sexual assault and rape. 🙂 by HatetheSwamp on February 11, 2026 10:41 am "AI, did Tusi Gabbard have the authority to seize Georgia's ballots?" Huh by HatetheSwamp on February 11, 2026 10:43 am I recall that the FBI took possession of Georgia ballots... by oldedude on February 11, 2026 12:01 pm concha- Again! I shouldn't trigger you like that! I ought to have more respect for you, "right?" I'm getting way too close to outing you, aren't I. Yeah, you fall so easily into that trap.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 neurolaunch.com by Indy! on February 11, 2026 12:48 pm Please do your best to "out" me, OD. I can always use a good laugh. There is only one person on the board obsessed with pedophilia, rape and sexual assault and it aint me, bro. The old childhood has never applied better than it does here... I'm rubber, you're glue - whatever you say bounces off me and sticks to you. You've already been outed. Completely. We know who you are - you have no idea who I am. by Navy2711 on February 11, 2026 2:11 pm OD, RAPE. is a sexual assault (or Sexual Abuse) where there is penetration, however slight by any method. OD, it sounds like you would therefore agree that forced digital penetration is rape, correct? by oldedude on February 11, 2026 2:26 pm It is funny though, you are the only one that whines about it. That's VERY telling, and you can't stop yourself even though you know it gives you away. by Indy! on February 11, 2026 2:29 pm Thanks for proving my point. by Navy2711 on February 11, 2026 4:36 pm OD, Do I have that right? Do you agree that forced digital penetration is rape? by Indy! on February 11, 2026 5:55 pm Why do we have to comment on Laken Riley, OD? I mean, other than the fact you're obsessed with assaulting, raping and murdering women? These kind of crimes are (of course) horrific (and you should really stop, OD) - but the happen every day in every state in America. What makes Riley's case so special that you singled that one out for us to comment on? Did you want to confess to the crime? 🤔 by oldedude on February 11, 2026 7:33 pm Navy. First, you need to turn yourself in if you don't believe that. and with your lack of (cough cough) manhood, it would be very slight "penetration." My answer to you is yes. I believe that if the asshole gets to that stage, he deserves to be in gen pop in at least a state prison, so he can be raped also. (eye for an eye justice) The other thing I believe in is in the LAW. concha- Several times now I've cited that one of the biggest "tells" of a pedophile is they revert to a couple of things. 1. They rant and yell and get really fucking indignant about NOT being a pedo. The second thing they do is minimize their desires, and counter and deflect. You are doing both of those. concha- So you haven't changed your stripes and a misogamist pig at all. Back to the 1970s when they were saying "she was wearing a short skirt! It is HER FAULT for getting beaten to death and raped! Well done. welldone. by Indy! on February 11, 2026 7:39 pm Odie... concha- Several times now I've cited that one of the biggest "tells" of a pedophile is they revert to a couple of things. 1. They rant and yell and get really fucking indignant about NOT being a pedo. The second thing they do is minimize their desires, and counter and deflect. You are doing both of those. Really? Where was that? Please quote my exact words where I did that. And just fy - you don't have to limit it to today or this week. Feel free to check every post I've ever put up to support that accusation. concha- So you haven't changed your stripes and a misogamist pig at all. Back to the 1970s when they were saying "she was wearing a short skirt! It is HER FAULT for getting beaten to death and raped! Well done. welldone. Well again... where did I say anything about anyone's short skirt? I asked you why the Laken Riley case (which took place in Georgia and really doesn't affect any of us directly as far as I know) was the one case out of thousands occurring all the time that you decided everyone on the board had to address? If anything YOU are the one minimizing all those other assaults and murders taking place by insisting we only address ONE of them. by oldedude on February 11, 2026 10:08 pm First, Where did you mention Laken Reilly? do you have some tie with the murderers? that beat her to death, stabbed her to death and then raped her while she was dying? (or after, because she wouldn't "fight back?" and you are too big of a little pussy?) The point in all my posts is that she was a warrior. but not to protect the libturd agency. by Ponderer on February 12, 2026 9:15 am "I believe that if the asshole gets to that stage, he deserves to be in gen pop in at least a state prison, so he can be raped also." -olde dude Unless of course the asshole is running for president against a black woman. In such a case, olde dude will vote for him to keep him out of prison and to keep a black woman from becoming president. It was a no brainer two-fer for olde dude. by Navy2711 on February 12, 2026 2:42 pm OD, "Navy. First, you need to turn yourself in if you don't believe that. " I'm asking you because the other conservative on the board, HtS, had difficulty answering it. In fact, he still hasn't. "and with your lack of (cough cough) manhood, it would be very slight 'penetration.' " Well, now I suspect that you're confused by the terminology. Are you aware that DIGITAL penetration involves using a finger, not a penis? If so, do you still agree that forced DIGITAL penetration is rape? by Donna on February 12, 2026 2:55 pm Call me a Luddite, but I've always preferred good ol' analog penetration. by Curt_Anderson on February 12, 2026 3:49 pm You old Luddite, LOL! by Indy! on February 12, 2026 5:58 pm by oldedude on February 11, 2026 10:08 pm First, Where did you mention Laken Reilly? do you have some tie with the murderers? that beat her to death, stabbed her to death and then raped her while she was dying? (or after, because she wouldn't "fight back?" and you are too big of a little pussy?) The point in all my posts is that she was a warrior. but not to protect the libturd agency. So - as always - all you have is your third grade name calling and personal rape fantasies. by Ponderer on February 13, 2026 9:26 am Tell me, AI... is America a fascist state now? While the United States has a history of far-right movements and extremist ideologies, scholars and historians agree it is not currently a fully fascist state. Historical Context of Fascism in the U.S. Fascist movements in the U.S. have existed historically, particularly in the early-to-mid 20th century, including groups like the Ku Klux Klan, the Black Legion, and the German American Bund. These organizations promoted white supremacy, nativism, and xenophobia, and attempted to influence politics during periods of social instability. However, these groups never assumed total control over U.S. government institutions. Modern Analysis Current political discourse identifies certain tactics—such as authoritarian rhetoric, vilification of specific groups, and polarization of public opinion—that resemble historical fascist strategies. Nevertheless, academic surveys and expert analysis indicate that the U.S. retains democratic checks and balances, including judicial independence, free/media functioning, and electoral competition, which prevent it from fully constituting a fascist regime. Scholarly Consensus Experts differentiate between fascist behavior by political actors and the establishment of a fascist state. While trends in extremism or authoritarianism may merit attention and civic engagement, historians emphasize that using the term "fascist state" for the U.S. today is not generally supported by comprehensive institutional evidence. Key Takeaway Understanding fascism involves examining historical, social, and political conditions, not just isolated actions or rhetoric. Awareness and vigilance about extremism are important, but labeling U.S. institutions or the country as fully fascist does not reflect mainstream scholarly consensus. Efforts to maintain democratic norms, legal protections, and civil liberties remain central to preventing any authoritarian drift. Thanks, AI! By the way, AI. At what point did Nazi Germany become a fascist state? 1933 Nazi Germany became a fascist state in 1933 when Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party gained control, leading to the establishment of a totalitarian dictatorship. This transformation began with the Enabling Act in March 1933, which granted Hitler broad powers to govern without parliamentary consent, effectively ending democracy in Germany. The regime's authoritarian nature and centralized power marked it as a fascist state, as it prioritized the nation over individual rights and used violence to suppress political opposition. Sounding familiar...? So, we're absolutely getting there, if we're not there already. by Ponderer on February 13, 2026 9:27 am The 2026 midterms are gonna be Trump's sink-or-swim moment with full blown fascism. by oldedude on February 13, 2026 9:39 am So - as always - all you have is your third grade name calling and personal rape fantasies. She was a far better person than you could ever hope for. You keep missing that point. You're worthless to society, and nothing more than a slug with no redeeming value. by meagain on February 13, 2026 9:40 am It is a Fascist state. AI merely gives a consensus of opinion. It will be Fascist until Trump is gone. Luckily, the system does make it possible for his successor to reverse the decline. His acolytes are at the head of every part of the system. by Indy! on February 13, 2026 11:37 am OD: She was a far better person than you could ever hope for. You keep missing that point. You're worthless to society, and nothing more than a slug with no redeeming value. Well at least it's a more concise way of saying "I got nothing" than most of your perverted info dumps. by Navy2711 on February 19, 2026 2:17 pm Just wanted to remind everyone that HateTheSwamp refuses to confirm that forceful digital penetration is rape. He won't say it because to do so would be tantamount to calling Daddy a rapist. (It would be, and he is.) That is all. Carry on. by Ponderer on February 19, 2026 2:32 pm Navy, it appears that pedophile's bitch has pleaded the Fifth on that. And who could blame him? by HatetheSwamp on February 20, 2026 3:54 am Ahhhhhhhhhhh. TDS!!!!! According to a Manhattan jury, it ain't, baha. by HatetheSwamp on February 20, 2026 4:38 am And, BTW, Navy, "it's a truth universally acknowledged," that po'd be the first person on SS to join a lynch mob. Clearly, you'd be the close second. by Navy2711 on February 20, 2026 4:42 am ^^^ This is how HateTheSwamp dodges the question. No one asked what a Manhatten jury thinks. The question was directed at HIM, and he REFUSES to answer. He REFUSES to take such an obvious moral stance as saying that yes, it IS rape, because doing so would be calling Trump a rapist. (It would be, and he is.) by HatetheSwamp on February 20, 2026 4:50 am And, that's why you'd be right on po's heels in joining the lynch mob. You both seem to believe that MAGAs are the new n!ggers. by myce on February 20, 2026 5:06 am Well yeah, if we could round up all of the MAGAs instead of immigrants and put them into concentration camps, deport them or sell them into slavery, that would make America better. by Ponderer on February 20, 2026 5:11 am "And, that's why you'd be right on po's heels in joining the lynch mob. You both seem to believe that MAGAs are the new n!ggers." -pedophile's bitch M'kay, two things: 1. Who is it that you think I'd be so happy to join a lynch mob against? (I have a huuuuge bet going about what your response is going to be). 2. I have been quite clear about this for some time now and have expressed it many times already; Far from believing that MAGA Hats are the new n-words, I have stated quite succinctly and specifically that I believe that the MAGA Hats are the new Nazis. by Navy2711 on February 20, 2026 6:09 am "You both seem to believe that MAGAs are the new n!ggers." Add this to the list of things that HateTheSwamp WILL say, while he's busy REFUSING to admit that forceful digital penetration is rape - something that is OBVIOUS to anyone with a conscience - since he's afraid that doing so would be admitting that his daddy is a rapist. (It would be, and he is.) by Ponderer on February 20, 2026 7:18 am Navy, I think this all has something to do with how pedophile's bitch will never admit that he's wrong. Like how he'll never admit that he was wrong to ever vote for Trump or how he was wrong to wipe his ass with the teachings of Jesus. by Ponderer on February 20, 2026 1:31 pm If I hadn't made this myself, I wouldn't doubt that it was real... by Donna on February 20, 2026 1:36 pm South Korea just sentenced its ex-President to life in prison with hard labor for basically doing what Trump did in 2020-2021. In 2024 he tried to subvert the Constitutional order and prevent their legislature from meeting. He was forced out of office and tried and convicted of insurrection. It took them just about a year to produce that result. Brazil got rid of their trump the day after he tried to pull off a Jan 6. Our system of justice sucks. by Navy2711 on February 20, 2026 1:49 pm Exactly, Donna. When I see stories like that, it makes me cringe, thinking how our system was clearly designed to do exactly that, and yet we can't. Our system is just too corrupted, in MANY ways. by Indy! on February 20, 2026 7:09 pm We have no system of justice whatsoever at this time outside of fake laws used to oppress the poor. by oldedude on February 21, 2026 3:39 am Thusly is the reason your pedopresident never got arrested. by Ponderer on February 21, 2026 8:17 am "Thusly is the reason your pedopresident never got arrested." -olde dude olde dude, you and pedophile's bitch are the only ones here who support a pedophile president. Trump was never our pedopresident. He's yours. And you have to asininely project like this just to keep from facing that reality. by Indy! on February 21, 2026 10:00 am Again, Señorita Welfare - I did not vote for Joe Biden - I voted for Howie Hawkins, the Green Party candidate. You are the one who actually voted for a pedophile candidate three times (and will do it a 4th time if you get the opportunity). As always, you are the one involved in supporting, participating in and enjoying pedophilia - not me. 😌 by Navy2711 on February 24, 2026 4:10 pm Bump. HateTheSwamp refuses to admit that forceful digital penetration is rape, since he's afraid that doing so would be admitting that his daddy is a rapist. (It would be, and he is.) by Navy2711 on February 26, 2026 3:32 pm Bump. by oldedude on February 26, 2026 10:27 pm Hairless clam- So you're a loser that voted for a loser (as usual). Welcome to an "comical" "art" "school" epic failure in life and work. Not that your support of pedojoe would have done any good in the election, but still. It's funny you haven't figured out your own political system. Go To Top

Find old posts & articles

Show Most Recent Articles Articles by category: Politics+ Religion+ Law & Crime Military News Media History Health Sports+ Humor Entertainment Misc.

Report spam & abuse SelectSmart.com home page