Comments posted organically
Homepage

There's a peaceful protest set for Tuesday at the federal building here...
Government by Ponderer (0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (21 comments)


Ilhan Omar faces House probe after earnings disclosure shows investments jump nearly $30M
Crime by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (9 comments)


Second lady Usha Vance announces she is pregnant with fourth child
Family by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (4 comments)


Megyn Kelly: Wassup with ugly, whining, narcissistic leftists?
Media by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (8 comments)


11 Ways To Ward Off Rioters From Your Church
Religion by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments)


When the going gets tough, Lindsay Halligan gets going. Halligan gone.
Law by Curt_Anderson (0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (1 comments)


Trump's "The 'Great' Healthcare Plan"
Mythology by Ponderer (0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (38 comments)


Oh well. ICE will 'make mistakes sometimes,' Trump says
Crime by Curt_Anderson (0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments)


Since Gutfeld invented the term, AWFL, and Megyn Kelly, the Karen Intifada, videos like these exploded among the Right
Humor by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (9 comments)


Activists interrupt Sunday church service, say pastor works for ICE
Religion by Curt_Anderson (0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (8 comments)


DOJ to charge Don Lemon under historic KKK Act DOJ plans to charge Don Lemon under KKK Act
Crime by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: myce (4 comments)


ICE Agents storm Minnesota church, disrupt service
Crime by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (22 comments)


Law selectors, pages, etc.
Could Brian Cole Jr. claim Trump's Jan. 6 pardons cover him?
By Curt_Anderson
December 6, 2025 10:45 am
Category: Law
(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post & Tips.

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Expect Cole's lawyer to argue the presidential pardon applies to his client.

Former January 6th prosecutor Mike Gordon says if he were Brian Cole Jr.'s defense attorney, he would argue that Trump's broad Jan. 6 pardons should apply to Cole. Gordon explains that the pardon language is expansive and could cover crimes like Cole's case.

BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
A PROCLAMATION
This proclamation ends a grave national injustice that has been perpetrated upon the American people over the last four years and begins a process of national reconciliation.
Acting pursuant to the grant of authority in Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution of the United States, I do hereby: grant a full, complete and unconditional pardon to all other individuals convicted of offenses related to events that occurred at or near the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021
.

The man authorities say is responsible for placing two pipe bombs near the U.S. Capitol complex in 2021 told investigators he believed conspiracy theories that the 2020 election was stolen from then-President Trump, according to a person familiar with the investigation.


Cited and related links:

  1. cnn.com
  2. whitehouse.gov
  3. npr.org

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Could Brian Cole Jr. claim Trump's Jan. 6 pardons cover him?":

  1. by HatetheSwamp on December 6, 2025 10:59 am

    I think it's a hoot that yinz are taking this story which annihilates the woke SwampDem J6 myth and hope to laugh it off. Apparently, pb was bang on in guessing that your Holy Trinity and po's The Rachel initially hoped to get away with ignoring it. That didn't work. So? Let's laugh.

    Bahahahahahahahahahaha ha ha haha ha ha. Ahh!


  2. by Curt_Anderson on December 6, 2025 11:19 am
    What myth? What ignoring? Are you saying that Brian Cole was correct in his beliefs of a rigged election?


  3. by HatetheSwamp on December 6, 2025 11:41 am

    "Are you saying that Brian Cole was correct in his beliefs of a rigged election?"

    Rigged? Apparently, that's his claim. At this point, I do think everyone with common sense and an open mind accepts that there was cheating in 020.

    No one who knows that "that feckless dementia-ridden piece of crap" received 81,000,000, uh, ballots and Hillary 66 and Cackles only 75 million votes understands there were shenanigans in 020. Remember, last November, reports of record Dem early voting and turn out on election day? Yet, mystifyingly, Cackles ended with 6,000,000 fewer votes!!!!!?

    No DemLover I know of, you included, is offering a believable explanation for that ridiculous anomaly...

    ...but, if you wanna give it a shot...? By all means.


  4. by Curt_Anderson on December 6, 2025 12:27 pm
    What is it that you find suspicious about the last elections? You do know that election enthusiasm and turnout varies from election to election, right?

    In the 2020 U.S. Presidential election, Joe Biden received approximately 81.2 million popular votes. In the 2024 U.S. Presidential election, Donald Trump received approximately 77.3 million popular votes.

    The total popular votes cast in the 2020 U.S. presidential election were approximately 158.4 million, while the total popular votes in the 2024 election were around 155 million.



  5. by oldedude on December 6, 2025 12:30 pm
    just for the uneducated. Pardons, etc are done by name. Again, take a class at your local community college.


  6. by HatetheSwamp on December 6, 2025 12:40 pm

    Curt,

    You're being ridiculous.

    The ONE 08: 69 million
    The ONE 12: 66 million
    Hillary 16: 66 million
    Joe 20: 81 million
    Cackles 24: 75 million


    What's wrong with this picture!!!!!? Keehee ha.



  7. by Curt_Anderson on December 6, 2025 1:12 pm
    HTS,
    Nothing is wrong with that picture.

    OD,
    No, this pardon was not entirely done by name. Read the White House link to read this presidential pardon. A dozen are so names are listed, but for the hundreds of others, the pardon simply says, "a full, complete and unconditional pardon to all other individuals...".


  8. by Navy2711 on December 6, 2025 1:37 pm

    Just wait 'till Idiot finds out that popular vote counts GENERALLY go down as you go back in time. Reagan 43 mil. Nixon 31 mil.

    ... but not always. Eisenhower got 33 mil.

    I genuinely wonder if he can hold both:

    -- The population is always growing

    -- Not every election gets the same turn out

    ... simultaneously in his brain.


  9. by HatetheSwamp on December 6, 2025 2:52 pm

    Apparently, Navy, the US population shrank by 7.5% since 020. Eh? Bahaha ha, ahhhhhhhh!


  10. by Navy2711 on December 6, 2025 2:55 pm

    Turns out the answer is no. He only had room for "the population is always growing." "Not every election gets the same turn out" got rejected for lack of buffering space.


  11. by oldedude on December 6, 2025 3:12 pm
    No, this pardon was not entirely done by name. Read the White House link to read this presidential pardon. A dozen are so names are listed, but for the hundreds of others, the pardon simply says, "a full, complete and unconditional pardon to all other individuals...".

    Sorry, I need a cite on that.


  12. by Curt_Anderson on December 6, 2025 3:14 pm
    I cited the WhiteHouse.gov link in my initial post.


  13. by HatetheSwamp on December 6, 2025 3:30 pm

    "Turns out the answer is no. He only had room for "the population is always growing." "Not every election gets the same turn out" got rejected for lack of buffering space."

    You are such True Believer! Yeeeeeeeeeeeeha, ah!

    You're the historian. He'p me out. How many times since 1788 has the vote going to the election winner declined by 7.5% or more from one election to the next.


  14. by Curt_Anderson on December 6, 2025 5:30 pm
    HtS,
    It happens a lot. Reagan, FDR and LBJ, to name three presidents who had many more votes than the winner four years earlier. But it's hardly relevant.

    The total vote is not a steady increase. The popular vote wanes and waxes.

    1912: The total vote (6.3 million) was lower than in 1908 (7.7 million). The total vote decreased by over a million, likely due to a split in the Republican party which led to a significant drop in voter turnout as a percentage of the voting-age population.
    1924: The total vote (15.7 million) was less than in 1920 (16.1 million).
    1944: The total vote (48.0 million) was less than in 1940 (49.8 million), likely due to World War II.
    1988: The total vote (91.6 million) was less than in 1984 (92.7 million).
    1996: The total vote (96.4 million) was less than in 1992 (104.6 million).
    2012: The total vote (129.1 million) was less than in 2008 (131.4 million).
    2024: The total vote (approximately 155.2 million) was less than in 2020 (158.4 million).


  15. by Navy2711 on December 6, 2025 8:17 pm

    Idiot,

    "You're the historian. He'p me out. How many times since blah blah blah ..."

    You're the board idiot, so I'll definitely he'p you out: How many times has some Appalachian simpleton sat on his rickety porch and theorized same moronic conspiracy, based on a single variable, disregarding everything else happening at the time of the election?


  16. by Indy! on December 6, 2025 10:11 pm

    I figured Hee Haw had somw incredibly stupid theory - but not that stupid. The answer is simple - the American public didn't want 4 more years of the orange baby man so more people turned out for Biden than Hillary, who was - at best - a flawed candidate with limited appeal to Ds. The party wanted ANYONE after enduring the first 4 disastrous years of t Rump.


  17. by HatetheSwamp on December 7, 2025 3:27 am

    "based on a single variable, disregarding everything else happening at the time of the election?"

    Single. Variable. Like the NUMBER OF BALLOTS COUNTED for a Dem... in an election... that is 6,000,000 more than any candidates before oe since.

    Exactly. That's nuthin!!!!!

    Bahahahahahahahahahaha.

    Look, bubba. "That feckless dementia-ridden piece of crap's" smoke-filled room's string-pullers got away with it...

    ... but, as time goes on. More and more people are going to see it for what it is.


  18. by HatetheSwamp on December 7, 2025 3:59 am

    Curt, Navy, Indy:

    This is precisely what Kierkegaard meant when he observed that truth is subjectivity.

    The Doddering Old Fool's "vote" was 23 friggin % higher than Hillary's four years earlier... and Hillary won the popular vote... Then Cackles' vote four years later dropped off by 6,000,000. You may think that's same old same old. That's good Good Germaning... but it ain't...

    ... and, this is what matters, Donna's low-information, pb's moderate and independent common sense voters know that you are wrong!

    Bahaha ha ahhhhhhhh.


  19. by Curt_Anderson on December 7, 2025 9:49 am
    HtS,
    Did you come up with this idiotic mathematical "evidence" on your own or is it shared within MAGA circles? Please answer the question. I'm quite curious.

    FDR had 45% more of the popular vote than did the previous Democratic candidate in 1928. By your way of thinking that's evidence that Roosevelt rigged the vote.


  20. by HatetheSwamp on December 7, 2025 10:53 am

    Curt,

    Back in November 020, I posted to friggin you that Joe getting 15,000,000 more than Hillary in 016 was unbelievable... in an honest election. You scoffed.

    "FDR had 45% more of the popular vote than did the previous Democratic candidate in 1928."

    Y'ain't that stoopid, Curt. "That feckless dementia-ridden piece of crap" received 15,000,000 ballots in 020 than the popular vote WINNER received in 016.


  21. by Curt_Anderson on December 7, 2025 11:02 am
    But you didn't answer my question. Is this your own theory or is it shared among MAGA cultists? As I said, I am sincerely curious.


  22. by HatetheSwamp on December 7, 2025 11:45 am

    It's mine, aaaaaaaaaaaall mine!!!!!


  23. by HatetheSwamp on December 7, 2025 11:46 am

    ... and, apparently, Brian Cole, Jr..


  24. by Donna on December 7, 2025 3:01 pm

    by oldedude on December 6, 2025 3:12 pm
    No, this pardon was not entirely done by name. Read the White House link to read this presidential pardon. A dozen are so names are listed, but for the hundreds of others, the pardon simply says, "a full, complete and unconditional pardon to all other individuals...".

    Sorry, I need a cite on that.

    by Curt_Anderson on December 6, 2025 3:14 pm
    I cited the WhiteHouse.gov link in my initial post.


    😅 I'm getting used to these kind of exchanges with olde dude.


Go To Top

Comment on: "Could Brian Cole Jr. claim Trump's Jan. 6 pardons cover him?"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page