Comments posted organically
Homepage

The 13yr Trump raped in 1994, spills the beans on the Predator-in-Chief
Crime by Indy! (0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (71 comments)


My new favorte band
Music by Donna (0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (4 comments)


po: "Megachurch" "pastor" responds to James Talarico's Bible claims
Government by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (20 comments)


Megyn and Stephen A on taxpayer funded boob jobs for illegal MEN,... and endorsing? Marco
Media by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (4 comments)


The Gospel according to Joy Behar
Philosophy by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (10 comments)


"English is hard...
Politics by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (22 comments)


Biden DOJ thugs abused FACE Act
Crime by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (35 comments)


Why po and Donna should dump woke Christianity and convert to Islam
Religion by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (6 comments)


Brazil seizes over 1,100 weapons and 1.5 tons of drugs from US, says official
News by Donna (0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (10 comments)


Why California is broke and Texas ain't
Government by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (7 comments)


This is for Indy, our resident RomanCatholicChurch-ophile...
Religion by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (3 comments)


Free trans stuff for illegals...
Government by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (7 comments)


Dance selectors, pages, etc.
Dem Sen. Slotkin, Forced To Admit She Can’t Name One Illegal Order
By oldedude
November 24, 2025 6:14 am
Category: Dance
(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post & Tips.

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Democratic Michigan Sen. Elissa Slotkin admitted Sunday she couldn’t identify any illegal order having been issued by President Donald Trump when pressed by “This Week” host Martha Raddatz.

When Slotkin tried to bloviate, Raddatz pressed for a yes or no, “Let’s talk right now: do you believe President Trump has issued any illegal orders?”

Slotkin and five other Democrats who served in the military or intelligence agencies appeared in a video urging fellow servicemembers to disregard “illegal” orders issued by Trump. Raddatz questioned Slotkin about her reasons for posting the video, which Trump called “sedition at the highest level” in a Truth Social post Saturday.



Cited and related links:

  1. pacificpundit.com



Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Dem Sen. Slotkin, Forced To Admit She Can’t Name One Illegal Order":

  1. by HatetheSwamp on November 24, 2025 6:20 am

    It's stunning to see Raddatz... Kaitlan Collins, too,... practice actual journalism right in the faces of big-time Dems.

    Ole pb has no idea where that's coming from.


  2. by Ponderer on November 24, 2025 7:33 am

    Right. Because it's only journalism if it targets Democrats. Got it.


  3. by HatetheSwamp on November 24, 2025 7:59 am

    huh


  4. by Curt_Anderson on November 24, 2025 8:52 am
    It is a ridiculous question to ask for a list of Trump's illegal orders. As has been pointed out in congressional testimony, Trump is like a mafia don: he doesn't explicitly say "kill so and so", but his underlings know what he wants done. Trump sets an authoritarian tone and he hires sycophants to enact his wishes.

    Slotkin did answer the question. This excerpt is from the transcript of the ABC News interview.

    RADDATZ: And be specific about that.

    Let me read you what Senator Lindsey Graham said about your video. "You owe it to the men and women in the military to be specific about what you are talking about. What these senators and House members did was unnerving and it was unconscionable to suggest that the president of the United States is issuing unlawful orders without giving an example."

    SLOTKIN: Yeah. So, for me, my primary concern is the use of U.S. military on American shores, on our city -- in our cities and in our streets. We've seen now the courts overturn the deployment of U.S. military into our streets, including here in Washington, D.C.

    When you look at these videos coming out of places like Chicago, it makes me incredibly nervous that we're about to see people in law enforcement, people in uniformed military get nervous, get stressed, shoot at American civilians. It is very -- a very, very stressful situation for these law enforcement and for the communities on the ground.

    So, it was basically a warning to say, like, if you're asked to do something particularly against American citizens, you have the ability to go to your JAG officer and push back.

    RADDATZ: And with these service members calling you, couldn't you have done a video saying just what you just said?


    abcnews.go.com


  5. by HatetheSwamp on November 24, 2025 8:57 am

    Curt,

    I saw it. She, like Hakeem, ain't no Mr Bojangles. She looked like a deer in the headlights.

    I think that even the Dem SwampMedia is concerned over the implementation that Trump's doing things that threaten the Constitution.


  6. by Indy! on November 24, 2025 10:52 am

    Even though she obviously answered the question (if not to Brown Shorts satisfaction... as if anyone cares) - she doesn't have to list anything. They were making a point - that military, cops, etc... who don't want to break the law, don't have to. That's reason enough to make the video.


  7. by HatetheSwamp on November 24, 2025 10:55 am

    Bullfernerner, Indy.

    It's the unverifiable claim that the Constitution is under attack that, to my knowledge CNN and CBS, at least, is questioning.

    Et tu, SwampMedia?


  8. by Curt_Anderson on November 24, 2025 11:15 am
    Indy,
    You're exactly right. There was a good reason that The Founders wrote the Constitution with the form of "Congress shall make no law (prohibiting, abridging, infringing upon, etc. blank) rather create a laundry list of things that Congress could or could not do.

    That HtS, JD Vance and others want a list of illegal orders that should be refused is like dealing with a kid.

    Parent to child: Finish your dinner before you have dessert.

    Child to parent: Does that include the vegetables too?

    Parent to child: Yes.

    Child to parent: Can I eat my sister's dessert before I finish my dinner?

    Parent to child: No.

    Child to parent: What if I finish some of my dinner, can eat some dessert?

    Parent to child: No.

    Child to parent: If I don't finish my dinner can I go to the store and buy a candy bar?

    Parent to child: No.

    Child to parent: My dinner is cold.







  9. by Ponderer on November 24, 2025 11:21 am

    👍😁, Curt!


  10. by oldedude on November 24, 2025 1:45 pm
    curt- It is a ridiculous question to ask for a list of Trump's illegal orders. As has been pointed out in congressional testimony, Trump is like a mafia don: he doesn't explicitly say "kill so and so", but his underlings know what he wants done.

    The answer to this thread is; The folks that did the "commercial" can't prove ANYTHING they are accusing "the Administration" of. The response to this thread is typical for those with TPS. Having psychosis against trumpster, YOU'RE willing to make up anything to prove your psychotic "stories" even "possible." And now, you realize you've been duped, and you're finally seeing what the folks who don't have TPS have been seeing for years. YOU NEED A SHRINK TO HANDLE THIS!

    I will say it's fun to watch you make shit up, and use any "reason," "justification," or "excuse" to make them "correct."




    As po would say, "YOU GOT NUTHIN!" "NUTHIN AT ALL."


  11. by Indy! on November 24, 2025 2:28 pm

    Odorous with another comically wrong take...
    The answer to this thread is; The folks that did the "commercial" can't prove ANYTHING they are accusing "the Administration" of.

    Maybe that's because they didn't accuse the administration of doing anything? 😂

    Reading is fundamental Old Dud - how many times have I offered to help you along when you're having trouble? And if not - mommy is always a second option if she's still willing to help you with anything.


  12. by Donna on November 24, 2025 4:05 pm

    Yep ^





  13. by oldedude on November 24, 2025 9:01 pm
    The answer to this thread is; The folks that did the "commercial" can't prove ANYTHING they are accusing "the Administration" of.

    First. THEY made the accusations. It is up to them to prove them. That's the way the system works. That's why slutkin didn't admit to that. She knew that in a congressional or court hearing or case, this is a deal buster for her. I figure if she's figured that out, Why the FUCK don't the rest of you can't understand what she does.

    So you're so stupid to say that trumpster isn't doing anything? These are the fucking accusers that ALL of the fuckheads here relied on and followed their CCP flag. So now, you're divert and excuse what they said because they CAN'T FIND ANYTHING TO SUPPORT THEIR BULLSHIT? My point is that if you say that, you're a horrible POS that fell for their ploy in the first place. IF you're that fucking stupid, you need to go back to middle school into the civics class, because you damn sure don't understand our fucking system of government. OR differentiate an economic vs. political theory. IF you are unable to understand what they are and how they "mix" you need to be in a "community college" and re-educated in a civics class with the rest of the losers that were too stoned in class the first (maybe second or third time) through the class.


  14. by Navy2711 on November 24, 2025 9:07 pm

    Is OD quoting himself and then arguing? Have we reached peak OD?

    I really can't tell. It's difficult to interpret his yip-yakkering mouth static even when you're trying, and I just don't have the energy. The dude is a certified, state-of-the-art nonsense machine.


  15. by oldedude on November 24, 2025 9:30 pm
    It would help if you could read more that the second-grade. That would be very helpful for all of us.


  16. by oldedude on November 24, 2025 9:31 pm
    Oh, cuckold, THAT WAS A QUOTE FROM YOUR MISTRESS, CONCHA post #11.


  17. by Navy2711 on November 25, 2025 12:41 am

    Okay, that makes sense. I've got Indy on block on my laptop, so I can't see his posts.

    Thanks for clearing that up, f*ckface. 👍


  18. by oldedude on November 25, 2025 4:30 am
    Okay, I didn't know that. Mea culpa.


  19. by HatetheSwamp on November 25, 2025 4:31 am
    Scott Jennings nails it. And, he may run for Mitch McConnell's seat next year. That'd be a hoot!

    View Video


  20. by Donna on November 25, 2025 9:28 am

    Navy, you had it right. It's all in post #10. Then Indy quoted olde dude in post #11. Then olde dude re-quoted his own quote and said that Indy wrote it. Either olde dude was having cognitive problems or he's lying.



  21. by oldedude on November 25, 2025 9:52 am
    Navy, how do you block on this site?


  22. by Indy! on November 25, 2025 11:08 am

    Navy has me on block? Must be because I was getting thru to him on the military charade. Now I can say whatever I want about him.


  23. by Indy! on November 25, 2025 11:08 am

    OD doesn't even realize he's quoting himself.


  24. by Navy2711 on November 25, 2025 11:41 am

    OD,

    "Navy, how do you block on this site?"

    I don't think Curt has a built-in way, but you can use a plug-in. IF you know javascript, just scan the page for posts by the desired username and replace the content in the DOM.

    Even if you don't code, nowadays you can literally just ask ChatGPT how to do it: "Can you make me a plug-in that will block certain users on a discussion website?"

    ______________________________________


    Indy,

    "Navy has me on block?"

    Only on some devices. I could never get away from you entirely, sweetheart. 😘

    ______________________________________


    To All,

    While we're talking tech stuff, I discovered another helpful hint that you can use on Curt's anemic, stuck-in-the-90s website. When you want an emoji, instead of copying and pasting from the selection down below, Windows users can hit [Windows key] + .

    To be clear, that's holding down the Windows key and then pressing the period (the punctuation mark) button.


  25. by Curt_Anderson on November 25, 2025 12:02 pm
    🌞🌼🍇
    Navy, you can also use emojis from probably most smartphones.
    🚚🩻👍


  26. by Navy2711 on November 25, 2025 12:08 pm

    Yeah, I always forget that most people are on their phones nowadays. Emojis are real easy on your phone.


  27. by oldedude on November 25, 2025 3:04 pm
    Navy, thanks, and again, mea culpa.


  28. by oldedude on November 25, 2025 3:04 pm
    Navy, thanks, and again, mea culpa.


  29. by Indy! on November 25, 2025 3:07 pm

    I'll just pretend it's all the time, Navy. Cuz we're buds. 🙂


Go To Top

Comment on: "Dem Sen. Slotkin, Forced To Admit She Can’t Name One Illegal Order"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page