Comments posted organically
Homepage

Who dom Trump and thr GOP really workm for?
Politics by meagain (0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (5 comments)


Is Christianity "Woke"...?
Religion by Ponderer (0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (22 comments)


Since po refuses to define terms, I aksed AI po's question: Is Christianity woke?
Philosophy by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (6 comments)


MS-13 Hit Man Assassinates Ex President's Son
Crime by oldedude (0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (7 comments)


Glenn Beck puts Curt's words into action.
Health by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (6 comments)


Tim Walz and his family are being terrorized by MAGAs driving by their house and screaming the R-word at their special needs son, Gus.
Philosophy by islander (0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (39 comments)


Why is MAGA silent about Trump's Caribbean boat kills while he pardons drug kingpins?
Crime by Curt_Anderson (0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (36 comments)


"Not so fast, there, Mr Comey and Letitia," says pb's Legal Goober #2!!!!! Bahaha ha ha ha
Crime by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (12 comments)


D.C. appeals court keeps Trump’s transgender military ban in place despite one judge’s blistering dissent
Gay & Lesbian by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (7 comments)


Recently HtS asked me an honest question.
Philosophy by Curt_Anderson (0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (10 comments)


Indiana GOP rejects Trump’s map in major blow to his gerrymandering push
Politics by Curt_Anderson (0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (4 comments)


Kilmar Abrego Garcia is released from ICE custody following judge's order
Humor by Ponderer (0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (3 comments)


Military selectors, pages, etc.
43 days later, Trump's attempt to send federal troops into Portland still blocked.
By Curt_Anderson
November 8, 2025 1:39 pm
Category: Military
(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post & Tips.

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


On September 27, Trump announced on Truth Social that he had ordered the U.S. Department of Defense to deploy troops to Portland, Oregon to counter what he called "domestic terrorists" in "war-ravaged Portland". Every day that passes proves that local law enforcement can handle any anti-ICE protests.

Federal judge issues permanent injunction barring Trump from deploying National Guard to Portland
PORTLAND, Ore. — U.S. District Court Judge Karin Immergut issued a permanent injunction Friday evening barring the Trump administration from deploying National Guard troops in response to protests outside the ICE building in South Portland.

The ruling follows a preliminary injunction that Immergut issued last week and marks her final decision, but likely not the end of the case. The Trump administration is all but certain to appeal to the 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, and the case could ultimately reach the Supreme Court.



“Since that brief span of a few days in June, the protests outside the Portland ICE facility have been predominately peaceful, with only isolated and sporadic instances of relatively low-level violence, largely between protesters and counter-protesters,” the judge wrote in her 106-page order, “this Court concludes that even giving great deference to the President’s determination, the President did not have a lawful basis to federalize the National Guard.”

The permanent injunction went into effect immediately.

The decision is a setback in the Trump administration’s effort to send National Guard members to the city, and marks the fourth time the judge has blocked the deployment.



Cited and related links:

  1. kgw.com
  2. opb.org

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "43 days later, Trump's attempt to send federal troops into Portland still blocked.":

  1. by Indy! on November 8, 2025 2:23 pm

    Thank goodness we still have some judges who remember the America we once had.


  2. by oldedude on November 8, 2025 8:21 pm
    Once hailed as one of the most livable U.S. cities, Portland, Oregon, is grappling with an uncertain future as it reaches a stunning benchmark: 100 consecutive nights of "racial injustice" protests marred by vandalism, and chaos. The times I was there (several years ago obviously) I really liked the town. Food was good, lots to see. That's all changed.

    As long as they burn it to the ground, I'm okay with that. Portland wants to do that, fine. They've already murdered one person, so there's that. He was gunned down while driving. So we're aware that the assholes are armed with deadly weapons. The asshole that did it, was shot by police later. My view is the reasons to keep the military out of there are dwindling. The federal government is required to be able to defend any federal building. Four DHS officers were wounded when the mob breached the ICE building. The "mayor" keeps saying these are "peaceful" but they're crawling up to the $10MIL mark the city has had to pay in litigation tied to these morons. They're killing the city. WTF would I want to go there? It makes no sense. I wouldn't go into that section of town at any times because of these assholes. And why would I go into downtown at all?

    And Portland used to be a great place to go. Now it's just another POS town you shouldn't go to, and is as bad as Chicago, New York, and South Central.
    apnews.com
    nypost.com
    oregonlive.com


  3. by Indy! on November 8, 2025 8:56 pm

    NY Post... snicker. You're crying about my youtube video with people actually investigating the situation.


  4. by HatetheSwamp on November 9, 2025 3:28 am

    "U.S. Department of Defense" What's that?

    Hmmmm. I thought that the OrangeTurd was an authoritarian fascist who ignored court orders. po, please explain.

    No Kings. MAN!


  5. by HatetheSwamp on November 9, 2025 4:09 am

    "The Trump administration is all but certain to appeal to the [extremely woke] 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, and the case could ultimately reach the Supreme Court."

    IOW, the Fat Lady has yet to sing.

    However, and, understand. I ain't po. I'm not a professor at an Ivy League law school. But, I think that, if Trump takes this all the way to the Supreme Court, he may lose this'ne.

    From what I know, Portland has chosen a path that will make it appear to be a third world city, and, I don't, as isle'd say, UNDERSTAND. Still, this is the land of liberty. If that's what the people of Portland want for themselves, fine.


  6. by Donna on November 9, 2025 6:01 am

    olde dude is upset that the horrifically violent revolt situation in Portland that Trump is "responding to" is only imaginary.

    Trump thought that he could incite violence there and in the other cities that he's doing this asininity in by sending in troops that people would then protest about being there. He's literally trying to incite the violence that he wants to look like a big strong dictator man by stopping.

    The orange clown is all about the optics. It's just too bad that all the peaceful protestors are thwarting his diabolical plans to put down the violence that they refuse to accommodate him with.

    "My view is the reasons to keep the military out of there are dwindling." -olde dude

    I guess olde dude is getting as impatient with the vast amount of peacefulness that's creating all the lack of justification for sending in federal troops as Trump must be.

    Nothing happening in any of the cities that Trump targets justify sending in federal troops. None of the violence in any of these cities' protests against Trump's ICE Gestapo has ever risen to the point of the local constabulary not being able to handle it.

    Who wants to bet that the cost to the American taxpayer of sending all these nonsensically useless and unconstitutional American military troops into these cities is costing? Anyone want to bet that it's rather more than ten million dollars?


  7. by Ponderer on November 9, 2025 6:04 am
    ^ ^ ^ ^
    Mine


  8. by oldedude on November 9, 2025 6:06 am
    NY Post... snicker. You're crying about my youtube video with people actually investigating the situation.
    So you're saying that you can have an article published in the NY Post? I'm sure you post your hate on your tiktok site, and you can on youtube. The point is that you "couldn't" find any other supporting citations, which would have kept you from embarrassing yourself. And it took ma less than an hour to debunk your stupidity, which others also saw as "problematic."

    Lead, I foresee in the future the downtown area near the "opera center" as being a wasteland of empty buildings. I also think it's funny that people can't see how much this is costing portland in the short- and long-term. But as you pointed out. The mayor is on board with the riots, so there it is. My guess is the folks rioting aren't from portland (for the most part). So they don't care. And it may be too dangerous to speak against the riots. Especially because it's confirmed they're murder you. And maybe, like DC, NYC, and LA/CA, people will just leave the area/state where they can actually raise their kids without the violence.

    Maybe portland can start up a movie-making thing using portland as the backstop for "The Last of Us" or maybe instead of "Escape from New York," it could be "Escape from portland!"


  9. by HatetheSwamp on November 9, 2025 6:17 am

    "^ ^ ^ ^
    Mine"

    Big surprise, eh!


  10. by HatetheSwamp on November 9, 2025 6:29 am

    "Lead, I foresee in the future the downtown area near the "opera center" as being a wasteland of empty buildings. I also think it's funny that people can't see how much this is costing portland in the short- and long-term. But as you pointed out. The mayor is on board with the riots, so there it is. My guess is the folks rioting aren't from Portland..."

    OD,

    Exactly.

    Neither you nor I are crazy about Trump. It's possible to see Trump's weaknesses and shortcomings yet to retain sanity. It's difficult for me to understand how one can be rational and, still, reject Trump's offer of assistance. And, I have tried.

    I'd aks po or Donna to explain but I'm afraid knowing the answer could harm my mental and emotional health.


  11. by oldedude on November 9, 2025 6:47 am
    po- Nothing happening in any of the cities that Trump targets justify sending in federal troops. None of the violence in any of these cities' protests against Trump's ICE Gestapo has ever risen to the point of the local constabulary not being able to handle it.

    That's a really poor projection. Y
    You should have read the post instead of ASSuming. I have routinely said that I don't like the idea of bringing in troops to cities. I've said that repeatedly. We've talked about it.

    LEGALLY- he's far closer to bringing in troops than he was in other cities. The DHS building was attacked and breeched. That is where the LAW says the Feds have an obligation to protect federal property and the workers. Would it be better to have Federal Agents be deployed? Yes. The question is, how do you siphon Agents from? I don't think there are agents just standing around.

    I also know it's hard for a lot of folks to understand that my "opinion" of the law (usually supported by a reputable legal website or Colombia Law School) is just that. I may or may not "like it." And that's how the professionals interpret it.

    I'm also more inclined to use HSIs precedence for doing takedowns. I think it's far more efficient and lower risk to the agents and specifically take down true "bad guys."


  12. by Navy2711 on November 9, 2025 6:53 am


    OD: "... most people don't know WTF they're talking about. They find a "citation" from say, mother jones, rolling stone or some other rag as "fact" in a case. I choose to show what was actually said, rather than someone's "opinion" of what happened. If you want to use hearsay or fourth or fifth generation of a "story," go ahead"

    https://selectsmart.com/post/index.html?article=7514 / post #28


    Also OD: Cites NYPost, and then defends it when called out.


    This guy is such a f*cking fraud.


  13. by oldedude on November 9, 2025 7:16 am
    So you'll take a "youtube" video above a national paper that's been around for over 100 years (since 1801)?

    I find it funny that you'd prefer a youtube video over a nationally syndicated paper.

    And you've never been in the "navy" (except in a "village people" cover band. Maybe). AND there were two other citations, conchita (and you apparently) are so weak in understanding citations. Oh. Yeah. You're the f***ing moron who said "original sources" aren't valid because you can't think for yourself.

    AND his "citation" was full of shit. You didn't get that either, did you? I debunked his story. IN FULL. Next time when you want to take a shot, actually understand WTF you're talking about (oh. yeah. Less than a GED).


  14. by Ponderer on November 9, 2025 7:32 am

    "LEGALLY- he's far closer to bringing in troops than he was in other cities" -olde dude



    *sigh*



    No he isn't.

    You see, od, the reason that I pretty much never finish reading your long posts is because as soon as you say something that is entirely wrong, whatever you say about it after that is meaningless. Nothing you could say would make your incorrect statement correct, so I don't bother wasting my time on it. Plus, it's only your opinion as you say, so it's even more meaningless.


  15. by Navy2711 on November 9, 2025 7:35 am

    Thaaat's it. Keep defending your use of the NYPost. Shove your own face into the mud even harder, OD. 😎


  16. by oldedude on November 9, 2025 9:36 am
    Do you spew your complete and utter hatred towards EVERYONE? Because I haven't seen anything else from you and your "Dom" conchita. The way you are in your life, you must be the most unhappy people in the world.

    curmudgeon doesn't even start it...


  17. by Navy2711 on November 9, 2025 10:04 am

    OD,

    1. You said that people who cite "rags" don't know what they're talking about, and are "stupid"

    2. Then you cited a rag

    3. When called out, you doubled down and defended it


    There's nothing more to say. 😎


  18. by Indy! on November 9, 2025 10:32 am

    Old Dud:
    by oldedude on November 9, 2025 6:06 am
    NY Post... snicker. You're crying about my youtube video with people actually investigating the situation.
    So you're saying that you can have an article published in the NY Post? I'm sure you post your hate on your tiktok site, and you can on youtube. The point is that you "couldn't" find any other supporting citations, which would have kept you from embarrassing yourself. And it took ma less than an hour to debunk your stupidity, which others also saw as "problematic."


    Got news for you, Odorous. Not only have I been published in legitimate publications that actually tell the truth, I've also been on television multiple times as the guest expert reporting on the subject at hand. In the end? As always? Your dreams don't come anywhere near my real life experience. 😌


Go To Top

Comment on: "43 days later, Trump's attempt to send federal troops into Portland still blocked."


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page