Comments posted organically
Homepage

Gunman at ODU ID’d in shooting as 1 victim dead, 2 others hurt
Crime by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (3 comments)


So already, much to the shagren of the right, gas is back down to $90
Alcoholic Beverages by oldedude (0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (9 comments)


Bill Maher makes fool out of Adam Schiff
Humor by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (12 comments)


If you are a Trump flunky, don't try violating the Constitutional rights of a prestigious law school. They know the law.
Law by Curt_Anderson (0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments)


We are definitely losing. Cost of Iran conflict hits $11.3 billion for US in first week.
Military by Curt_Anderson (0.0) Last comment by: meagain (10 comments)


Charlie Sheen on Trump
Charmed by Indy! (0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments)


Trump forces Brown Short's girlfriend to kneel before him and...
Comics by Indy! (0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments)


How embarrassed are the Rs to admit they're Rs? VERY!
Politics by Indy! (0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments)


What do these Bible verses mean...?
Religion by Ponderer (0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (108 comments)


Gay Palestinian living under asylum in Israel murdered, beheaded in Hebron
Gay & Lesbian by HatetheSwamp (0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (3 comments)


Uh-oh... America loses war in Iran
Fact Check by Indy! (0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (35 comments)


The link between COVID vaxes and anxiety disorders
Medical by oldedude (0.0) Last comment by: meagain (41 comments)


History selectors, pages, etc.
The 3.5% Rule
By Ponderer
October 21, 2025 7:06 am
Category: History
(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post & Tips.

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


The 3.5% rule is a concept in political science that states that when 3.5% of the population of a country protest nonviolently against a government, that government is likely to fall from power. The rule was formulated by Erica Chenoweth in 2013. It arose out of insights originally published by political scientist Mark Lichbach in 1995 in his book The Rebel's Dilemma: Economics, Cognition, and Society.

Chenoweth and Maria Stephan studied the success rates of civil resistance efforts from 1900 to 2006, focusing on the major violent and nonviolent efforts to bring about regime change during that time. To be classified as successful, a movement had to achieve its aims within one year of peak turnout, and had to satisfy strict criteria for nonviolence. By comparing the success rates of 323 violent and nonviolent campaigns, Stephan and Chenoweth demonstrated that only 26% of violent revolts were successful, whereas 53% of nonviolent campaigns were successful.

Of the 25 largest movements they studied, 20 were nonviolent, and they found that nonviolent movements attracted, on average, four times as many participants as violent movements did. They also demonstrated that nonviolent movements tended to precede the development of more democratic regimes than did violent movements.

Chenoweth coined a rule about the level of participation necessary for a movement to succeed, calling it the "3.5% rule", based on findings originally discussed by Mark Lichbach in 1995, in The Rebel's Dilemma: Economics, Cognition, and Society. Lichbach proposed that 5% of the population could topple a government, and that no opposition movement could ever hope to surpass that number due to the free-rider problem.

In 2013, Chenoweth revisited Lichbach's proposal using the Nonviolent and Violent Campaigns and Outcomes (NAVCO) 1.1 dataset. Chenoweth found that nearly every movement with active participation from at least 3.5% of the population succeeded. All of the campaigns that achieved that threshold were nonviolent.



3.5% of the U.S. is 11,970,000.




The "Hands Off" rally a couple months before the first No Kings Rally drew over 3-million people out all over the country. The first No Kings rally had 5-million attend. And now, No Kings 2 hit over 7,000,000.

I am loving this progression. We're over halfway there!


Cited and related links:

  1. en.wikipedia.org

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "The 3.5% Rule":

  1. by oldedude on October 21, 2025 8:35 am
    First, who is saying "No Kings 2 hit over 7,000,000." Is it a figment of the libtard's imagination? or is it an estimate from a reliable, non-partisan source. If it is, let me know, I'll absolutely give you the benefit of the doubt. It sounds like the "body count" in vietnam, when commanders in the field increased their count of enemy dead, then commanders in the operations centers expanded the enemy KIA, etc. Kind of like I was talking about what Hamas does with their dead. Double counting, counting animals that died, etc.

    Secondly. As supporters of antifada, I honestly doubt it will stay "peaceful" for long. And because of the recent goings on in antifada, they'll be a legit group for long. They've already arrested several folks for assault with intent to murder or cause grave bodily harm conspiracy by being lookouts, etc. They've also closed down their flagship website because when the government said they were a "terrorist organization" that put a whole list of federal charges on the group as a whole and opened up RICO charges on them easily. It enables FBI and the Intel Agencies to work with other nations in stomping assholes globally. I honestly don't care what you do. Keeping in contact with these assholes and openly claiming you're part of them to me is more than a tad stupid.

    My guess is that when the geriatric generation that is "supporting" them now figures that out, they'll be gone.


  2. by Ponderer on October 21, 2025 8:54 am




    THE LARGEST
    SINGLE-DAY MASS PROTEST
    IN AMERICAN HISTORY.





    And all protesting one man and what he is doing to this once great nation. Deal with it, od. Or else present your "reliable source" that proves otherwise.






  3. by Ponderer on October 21, 2025 8:57 am

    "Secondly. As supporters of antifada, I honestly doubt it will stay "peaceful" for long." -olde dude


    Indy!, cue the dancer...



  4. by oldedude on October 21, 2025 10:59 am
    And all protesting one man and what he is doing to this once great nation. Deal with it, od. Or else present your "reliable source" that proves otherwise.

    Okay, I'll take your 7 BAZILLION and call your bullshit.


  5. by Indy! on October 21, 2025 11:15 am

    Personally, I also suspect (like Odorous) that the oligarchs/MAGA/Trump will start inserting agent provocateurs into the upcoming peaceful protests in the same way they did with the George Floyd protests to make them appear to be violent. It's their standard procedure. But in the meantime...

    DID SOMEONE SAY ANTIFADA?


    Antifada, Antifada, Antifada... la-la-la
    Antifada, Antifada, Antifada... ha-ha-ha

    Antifada, Antifada, Antifada... la-la-la
    Antifada, Antifada, Antifada... (clap,) (clap), (clap)





  6. by Indy! on October 21, 2025 11:16 am

    Forgot - nice post, Pondy. Very interesting and seems to track with my eye test.


  7. by Ponderer on October 21, 2025 12:15 pm

    "Okay, I'll take your 7 BAZILLION and call your bullshit." -olde dude

    Great! Thanks!

    By the way, the only number I mentioned was 7,000,000 (seven million). A "million" is a common number taught in most 3rd grade math classes. It's a thousand thousand...! I'm kinda surprised that you're not familiar with it.



  8. by oldedude on October 21, 2025 1:33 pm
    I used BAZILLION because like your number, it doesn't exist. I'm shocked you didn't catch that with all your "knowledge" you got in the fifth grade.


  9. by Ponderer on October 21, 2025 1:43 pm

    From all accounts I have been able to gather, I feel confident that "around seven million" is a reliably accurate number.

    Again, feel unincumbered from presenting any data to the otherwise.


  10. by Indy! on October 21, 2025 2:31 pm

    From what I've seen it's sounds very reasonable - perhaps even an under count. There are a couple colleges working on an estimate.


  11. by oldedude on October 21, 2025 3:15 pm
    From all accounts I have been able to gather, I feel confident that "around seven million" is a reliably accurate number.

    Said by people who triple count every person. If that's the case, the maybe 100 of people I witnessed were 2,000. When you actually have facts, let me know. Either of you.


  12. by Ponderer on October 21, 2025 5:49 pm

    Where are the facts to back up anything you said? I have seen reports in many media sites that have the numbers pretty well corroborated and published. They weren't hard to find. You come here with nothing. Bullshit that you pulled out of your own ass to support the bullshit you pulled out of your ass.

    Here... knock yourself out... Then come back and show me your proof that 9,000,000 Google hits are all wrong.
    bing.com


  13. by oldedude on October 21, 2025 7:08 pm
    Actually, your numbers don't have any supporting documents. You're the one claiming 7 BAZILLION PEOPLE. YOU need to prove that.


  14. by Indy! on October 22, 2025 8:28 am

    Whatever the number is, it's far larger than the 7K people who showed up for Charlie Who's memorial that you and Brown Shorts were so impressed with.


  15. by Ponderer on October 22, 2025 8:50 am

    He couldn't find a single "credible" source out of nine million hits on Google.

    It is time for olde dude to reconsider what he believes the word "credible" to mean.

    Meanwhile, he has presented precisely nothing to contradict anything that I or any of those 9,000,000 sources say.


  16. by oldedude on October 22, 2025 8:58 am
    You consider ticktok a valid news source. I don't consider that credible.


  17. by Ponderer on October 22, 2025 9:08 am

    olde dude, click on this link below and go through at least twenty pages of the hits on there and then come back and tell me that there were no credible sources anywhere in there...

    google.com


  18. by Ponderer on October 22, 2025 9:33 am

    And I don't consider TikTok a source for anything. I don't even have a TikTok account. Why do you have to lie so much?


  19. by Ponderer on October 22, 2025 9:42 am



    We shall cram the gears
    of this fascist takeover
    with our own bodies if
    that's what it takes.






  20. by oldedude on October 22, 2025 9:48 am
    Because you don't tell the truth about me? You bend my words, use "selective" "quotes" ect. Same thing with conchita.


  21. by Ponderer on October 22, 2025 10:00 am

    olde dude, I describe exactly what you are saying and doing and I quote you directly.

    You make up baselessshit about me and Indy! and declare it like it's proven fact.

    Bit of a difference there.


  22. by Indy! on October 22, 2025 10:36 am

    He claims I watch TikTok for my news too - which is kind of funny when you think it through... We (allegedly) get our news from TikTok - and yet we're still better informed than he is because he gets his "news" from Fox.


Go To Top

Comment on: "The 3.5% Rule"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page