Comments posted organically
History selectors, pages, etc.
Californians understandably gripe about having ''only'' two US senators, but...

By Curt_Anderson
October 6, 2021 11:01 am
Category: History
(0.0 from 0 votes)
SelectSmart.com    SelectSmart.com    SelectSmart.com


Share
Rules of the Post
Rate this article
(5=best, 0=poor)
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars

if our Founders hadn't reached a compromise between small and large states (by a single vote), there wouldn't be an American democracy in which to discuss the issue.

A Great Compromise
July 16, 1987, began with a light breeze, a cloudless sky, and a spirit of celebration. On that day, 200 senators and representatives boarded a special train for a journey to Philadelphia to celebrate a singular congressional anniversary.

Exactly 200 years earlier, the framers of the U.S. Constitution, meeting at Independence Hall, had reached a supremely important agreement. Their so-called Great Compromise (or Connecticut Compromise in honor of its architects, Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth) provided a dual system of congressional representation. In the House of Representatives each state would be assigned a number of seats in proportion to its population. In the Senate, all states would have the same number of seats. Today, we take this arrangement for granted; in the wilting-hot summer of 1787, it was a new idea.

In the weeks before July 16, 1787, the framers had made several important decisions about the Senate’s structure. They turned aside a proposal to have the House of Representatives elect senators from lists submitted by the individual state legislatures and agreed that those legislatures should elect their own senators.

By July 16, the convention had already set the minimum age for senators at 30 and the term length at six years, as opposed to 25 for House members, with two-year terms. James Madison explained that these distinctions, based on “the nature of the senatorial trust, which requires greater extent of information and stability of character,” would allow the Senate “to proceed with more coolness, with more system, and with more wisdom than the popular[ly elected] branch.”

The issue of representation, however, threatened to destroy the seven-week-old convention. Delegates from the large states believed that because their states contributed proportionally more to the nation’s financial and defensive resources, they should enjoy proportionally greater representation in the Senate as well as in the House. Small-state delegates demanded, with comparable intensity, that all states be equally represented in both houses. When Sherman proposed the compromise, Benjamin Franklin agreed that each state should have an equal vote in the Senate in all matters—except those involving money.

Over the Fourth of July holiday, delegates worked out a compromise plan that sidetracked Franklin’s proposal. On July 16, the convention adopted the Great Compromise by a heart-stopping margin of one vote. As the 1987 celebrants duly noted, without that vote, there would likely have been no Constitution.


Cited and related links:

  1. senate.gov


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments:

  1. by Donna on October 7, 2021 7:08 am
    So our country should be stuck forever with a 234-year old decision that has outlived its purpose and now undermines the very democracy it was designed to create?


  2. by Ponderer on October 7, 2021 8:34 am

    I doubt that the Framers ever imagined the overwhelmingly massive disparity of just one county in one state having a larger population than several other entire states combined.

    We need a Constitutional Modernization.

    Unfortunately, the Republicans will somehow manage to be the ones who oversee it.


  3. by Curt_Anderson on October 7, 2021 8:40 am
    There are two solutions to your two Senator problem:
    1. Pass a constitutional amendment allowing for a proportional number of senators per state.
    2. Divide California into two or more states.


  4. by Donna on October 7, 2021 10:02 am
    1 will not happen.

    2 is highly unlikely.

    So I guess we're just going to get used to minority rule by red states and watch the rest of the free world enjoy things that we'll never be allowed to have.


  5. by Donna on October 7, 2021 10:05 am
    I meant to type "I guess we're just going to have to get used to minority rule by red states..."




* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:
SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page


From our contributors:
Display Order:
11.6...I say 11.6% of Americans Support the Dems' position in their Women's Health Protection Act!!!!
Health by HatetheSwamp     May 18, 2022 12:40 pm (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by HatetheSwamp (12 comments) [98 views]


Livestream of Tuesday's Congressional UAP hearing
Metaphysical by Donna     May 19, 2022 1:52 pm (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by (0 comments) [9 views]


Biden’s polls have tanked...SINCE THE ALITO OPINION LEAKED
Government by HatetheSwamp     May 19, 2022 1:48 pm (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by (0 comments) [3 views]


Partial birth abortion has been illegal since 2007
Medical by Curt_Anderson     May 19, 2022 1:44 pm (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by (0 comments) [11 views]


"Significant" uptick in abortion-related violent threats after Supreme Court draft opinion leak, DHS warns
Government by HatetheSwamp     May 19, 2022 5:24 am (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by Donna (9 comments) [63 views]


European countries have sensible abortion laws
Opinion by Donna     May 6, 2022 11:47 pm (Rating: 5.0)
Last comment by Donna (110 comments) [1605 views]


Joe Biden's such moron: Georgia early voting shatters records despite election reforms Dems labeled 'voter suppression'
Government by HatetheSwamp     May 19, 2022 4:44 am (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by Curt_Anderson (5 comments) [91 views]


Too Funny: Democrat strategist tells MSNBC that candidates should run on Biden economic record: ‘A lot to be proud of’
Politics by HatetheSwamp     May 18, 2022 4:15 pm (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by (0 comments) [104 views]


Which administration was helped/hurt by the media more?
Media by Curt_Anderson     May 18, 2022 1:11 pm (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by (0 comments) [67 views]


Putin's gambit blows up in his face
Military by Curt_Anderson     May 18, 2022 12:33 pm (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by HatetheSwamp (1 comments) [24 views]