Comments posted organically
Homepage

200 immigrants taken into custody along with unaccompied minors
Economy by oldedude     July 12, 2025 12:35 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (4 comments) [78 views]


Judge bars Trump administration from making indiscriminate arrests in California immigration raids
Law by Curt_Anderson     July 12, 2025 3:24 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (9 comments) [84 views]


Immigrants describe worms in food, fecal flooding at Alligator Alcatraz
News by Donna     July 12, 2025 6:01 pm (Rating: 5.0) Last comment by: Donna (3 comments) [31 views]


Sen. Josh "Running Man" Hawley says he’ll make sure Medicaid cuts in Trump bill he voted for ‘never take effect’
Politics by Curt_Anderson     July 10, 2025 3:27 pm (Rating: 5.0) Last comment by: Donna (17 comments) [246 views]


HateTheSwamp’s best friend sentenced to life in prison
Politics by ROB3RT     July 12, 2025 1:29 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Donna (8 comments) [85 views]


pb designates June as WOKE HEGEMONY IS DEAD month... 2.0
Media by HatetheSwamp     June 12, 2025 8:40 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (60 comments) [669 views]


Ag Secretary Brooke Rollins' idea: replace immigrant farm workers with Medicaid recipients.
Food & Beverages by Curt_Anderson     July 12, 2025 8:03 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (7 comments) [88 views]


Evangelicals for Harris apologizes for ripping off Billy Graham
Religion by HatetheSwamp     July 12, 2025 7:53 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [34 views]


pb's Legal Goober #3: Supreme Court Reiterates: Judges Don’t Run the Executive Branch
Law by HatetheSwamp     July 12, 2025 8:30 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [14 views]


Dims calling for Attacks on Federal Officers are Succeeding!
Crime by oldedude     July 10, 2025 7:00 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (34 comments) [250 views]


History selectors, pages, etc.
ICE raids across L.A. spark backlash; Trump officials vow to continue operations
By Ponderer
June 7, 2025 4:02 pm
Category: History
(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post & Tips.

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


You Nazi MAGA Hat motherfuckkers were begging for a civil war. I think you're gonna get one.


Fallout from a blitzkrieg of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement sweeps in downtown Los Angeles continued Saturday, with fierce pushback from protesters, open sparring between L.A. leadership and federal officials, and a chaotic scene in Paramount as federal officials warned of more arrests to come.

“As Mayor of a proud city of immigrants, who contribute to our city in so many ways, I am deeply angered by what has taken place. These tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city,” Mayor Karen Bass posted on X on Friday evening. “We will not stand for this.”

“We will,” FBI Director Kash Patel replied Saturday morning.

Patel’s response came a day after immigration officials descended on businesses around Los Angeles and arrested 44 people on suspicion of immigration violations and another for obstruction. ICE has arrested a total of 118 people in L.A. in connection with suspected immigration violations this week, according to the Department of Homeland Security.

Immigration rights advocates said conditions at the Metropolitan Detention Center downtown had become overcrowded, with 200 people packed into a facility built to hold only 100.

“They didn’t have access to food and water on a schedule. They definitely don’t have access to their medicines,” said U.S. Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-Los Angeles), who arrived at the facility to check conditions Saturday morning along with fellow representatives Luz Rivas (D-North Hollywood), Norma Torres (D-Pomona) and Lou Correa (D-Santa Ana).

“That’s not healthy for anybody,” Gomez said. “They do have a right to make sure that they’re treated fairly and that they’re allowed to see their attorney. So we’re here because federal law says that we as members of Congress can show up and do a facility check on all those different issues.”

A federal agent turned the lawmakers away and told them to come back on Monday, the group said.

“That is not what the law says,” Rivas told reporters afterward. “We should be allowed any time for an oversight visit, and that was our intention — to come in to check in on the facility and and to get a briefing.”

As advocates and families of detainees scrambled for information, federal officials made clear Saturday that more arrests were on the way.

“Federal law enforcement operations are proceeding as planned this weekend in Los Angeles County,” U.S. Atty. Bill Essayli said on X. “Anyone who obstructs federal agents will face arrest and prosecution.”

On Friday evening, crowds gathered outside the federal detention center in downtown Los Angeles. The Los Angeles Police Department declared an unlawful assembly and ordered the roughly 200 remaining protesters to disperse around 7 p.m.

Following reports of a small group of “violent individuals” throwing large pieces of concrete at officers, police authorized the use of so-called less-lethal munitions at 8 p.m., LAPD said. A citywide tactical alert was issued shortly thereafter.

As reports of new raids emerged Saturday morning, federal officials criticized protesters’ actions and warned of further consequences.

“The Left’s dangerous rhetoric against brave American law enforcement has fueled hatred and inspired violence. Democrats must immediately call on their supporters to stop the attacks on ICE officers who are simply doing their job — and have every right to do so,” White House spokesperson Abigail Johnson said in a statement. “To those who harm law enforcement officers, know this: you will be held accountable to the full extent of the law.”



Cited and related links:

  1. latimes.com

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "ICE raids across L.A. spark backlash; Trump officials vow to continue operations":

  1. by HatetheSwamp on June 7, 2025 4:29 pm

    I think we're, very possibly, facing a Civil War, in which enforcers of the laws of our democracy will be compelled to fight citizens protecting the lawless. Whatever happened to Truth, Justice and the American Way!!!!!?


    Gang,

    The po who cheered the burning of a police precinct during 020's Summer of Love is back!


  2. by Navy2711 on June 7, 2025 4:33 pm

    "They didn’t have access to food and water on a schedule. They definitely don’t have access to their medicines,”

    Right, but is ICE posting good numbers for Donnie?


  3. by oldedude on June 7, 2025 4:39 pm
    Lead- The po who cheered the burning of a police precinct during 020's Summer of Love is back!

    Don't forget support "ms" walz in opening the windows to smell the freedom of burning tires in their city!


  4. by Ponderer on June 7, 2025 4:46 pm

    Nazi brownshirts and the Gestapo operated under the law.

    MAGA Hat Hate is what was known as a "Good German". He's happy to watch the Nazis go hog-wild on the population and do whatever they want to to those he doesn't approve of.

    And how dare any of Herr Miller"s targets actually resist???

    It's one of the main reasons why MAGA Hat Hate can go fuck his anti American, Nazi self.


  5. by Ponderer on June 7, 2025 4:50 pm

    Navy, Miller has demanded 3,000 arrests per day. They don't have the manpower or infrastructure for anything like that.

    So it's easier and cheaper to just go into places and just round everyone up and sort through 'em later.


  6. by HatetheSwamp on June 7, 2025 4:50 pm

    "Don't forget support "ms" walz in opening the windows to smell the freedom of burning tires in their city!"

    Yes. I thought about that, too. Gwen Walz and po?, cut from the same cloth.


  7. by HatetheSwamp on June 7, 2025 4:55 pm

    po,

    What scares me is that people like you, rooting, AGAIN, for lawbreakers, are going to get innocent people harmed... even killed.

    It's what ICE is doing that Trump campaigned on, and won on. America, America, God she'd His grace on thee, eh!!!!!?


  8. by meagain on June 7, 2025 6:46 pm
    And crown thy good with brotherhood!

    Are the ICE raids your idea of brotherhood?


  9. by oldedude on June 7, 2025 7:59 pm
    Do I support ICE agents? Absolutely. And being a military member, they're brother and sisters just like firefighters and military.

    Do I think this is haphazard? yeah, maybe. At first, for sure. It was like a bull in a china closet. And they deserved a lot of the bad press they got.

    I think the administration got collared enough to be much more careful with arrests. They detain and check out the statuses better than they did before. And you're seeing that with the libtard trash about innocent people being detained. That means the system is working since before there wasn't that check and balance and innocent people were being wrongfully arrested, just to have charges dropped. Not a good look. If you arrest someone, you'd better be able to articulate the reason to a judge.


  10. by Ponderer on June 7, 2025 8:00 pm

    MAGA Hat Hate has a lot of nerve talking about others "rooting" for lawbreakers.

    Given that MAGA Hat Hate supports, defends, excuses, and voted three times for afucking lawbreaker. The president of all lawbreakers.

    MAGA Hat Hate is the SelectSmart Champion of Rooting for Lawbreakers.


    The projection on this guy!


  11. by Indy! on June 7, 2025 8:39 pm

    Plus he still has not said a single negative thing about the Homeless Hairdo releasing killers onto the streets of America not just once with the J6 killers - but yet again when he pardoned the drug dealers just a few days ago. That - according to OD's own standard of proof - means he supports freeing murderers and drug dealers AND drug dealer murderers onto the streets of America. 😌


  12. by Navy2711 on June 7, 2025 9:49 pm

    1. "And being a military member, they're brother and sisters just like firefighters and military." - OD

    "... unless they don't share my political views. Then I cry out in a shrill voice that they're fakes and frauds and they never served and they're not REAL police officers or REAL firemen."

    Fixed it for ya, OD.

    2. Speaking to the rest of the room, just for the record — OD doesn't speak for me. (And I'm not claiming some special status as a veteran ... I'm sure MANY people of all backgrounds and professions agree with me.) A cop is NOT my brother just because he's a cop. A servicewoman is not my sister because she served. A person is my ally, or my confidant, or, if we're close enough, my brother/sister if they share my VALUES.

    A cop who plants evidence, or subverts due process is non-aligned with me at best, and they are my enemy at worst. They are not my friend, and certainly not my brother.

    A fireman who supports the January 6th insurrection is not my friend.

    A serviceman who wants a monarchy in the United States is not my friend.

    A veteran who ... *scrolls up to OD's post* ... makes apologies for a president that wipes his ass with the Constitution and orders illegal detentions is not my friend.

    Your badge, your title, your uniform ... they mean very little if you're wearing them for the wrong reasons. Tell me what you VALUE.


  13. by oldedude on June 7, 2025 10:08 pm
    Since you're just full of shit and hanging on to stolen valor, your post is nothing but bullshit from a troll. So fuck you. And I'll double down on my statement.


  14. by Navy2711 on June 7, 2025 10:22 pm
    People who beat their chests, strut around in their uniform, and squawk a lot about being "brothers" and "sisters" often turn out to be nothing of the sort. Look how little it takes for OD to turn on a veteran.


  15. by oldedude on June 8, 2025 12:07 am
    Again, I haven't seen anything that characterizes you as a veteran. You turned on me first, troll. So don't blame me for shit you do. If you want to be "that guy" fine. Again. I respond to how I'm treated. You and princess are the trolls here. So your move. ALL on you.


  16. by Ponderer on June 8, 2025 3:58 am



    I hereby nominate:

    Post #12 by Navy2711 on this thread

    for

    SELECTSMART.COM
    BEST POST OF THE YEAR
    SO FAR









  17. by Ponderer on June 8, 2025 4:06 am

    Navy, I would add:

    A white supremacist president who has committed and has been convicted of multiple felonies and wantonly violates the Constitution of the United States of America while attempting an authoritarian overthrow its democratic principles and foundations is not my friend.



  18. by HatetheSwamp on June 8, 2025 4:46 am

    A white supremacist president who doubled black men's support and won a huuuuuuuuuge majority of Hispanic men.

    po. Please keep spewing bigoted hate speech. If you lot keep snarling, the GOP will become the party of BIPOC men and, it's possible, your Dems may never recover.

    Your White Supremacist gibe is not about Trump ultimately, it's about the people who voted for him. It's about how Trump is the weakest candidate to be elected President and, now, with your help twice.

    You need to learn how to Win Friends and Influence People. You are closed minded and bigoted.

    The GOP is the home of openness and inclusion, acceptance, tolerance, diversity and freethinking...

    ... as November 024 proved. Bahaha!


  19. by Donna on June 8, 2025 9:00 am

    The statute Trump used to unlawfully federalize the National Guard last night was 10 U.S.C. § 12406, which requires that there be an invasion by a foreign country, a rebellion, or an inability for the President to execute laws—

    AND IT ALSO REQUIRES THAT THE PRESIDENT ACT THROUGH THE GOVERNORS OF THE STATES TO FEDERALIZE THE NATIONAL GUARD.

    Clearly, Trump’s invocation of 10 U.S.C. § 12406 was unlawful.

    Nonetheless, as I write this, he is unlawfully commandeering the National Guard against people in America, and they are threatening to attack Americans with the Marines.


  20. by Donna on June 8, 2025 9:04 am

    And yes, outstanding post, Navy.


  21. by HatetheSwamp on June 8, 2025 9:13 am

    Which one, Donna?


    Y'know, Donna, and I'm thinking of creating a whole thread on this. Long ago, you opined that we'd, eventually, have a Civil War in the US.

    I poopooed you at the time. But, I'm starting to think that you may have been right.


  22. by Navy2711 on June 8, 2025 9:25 am
    Ponderer,

    "A white supremacist president who has committed ... is not my friend."

    Yes, and this is why, when Trump was elected the first time, "Not My President" was a popular saying on the left. Rightists interpreted this as hurt feelings, of fucking course, but it was about values.

    Trump doesn't represent America as it was intended at its inception. (I say that with a LOT of eye-rolling ... at its inception, the Land of the Free still legalized slavery). Unfortunately, America has become warped to the point that almost a third of us will vote for a fascist. But he doesn't represent the rest of us. He is not, and never will be, Our President. That's not feelings. It's about alignment of values.


  23. by Ponderer on June 8, 2025 9:31 am



    , Navy.





  24. by HatetheSwamp on June 8, 2025 9:43 am

    Donna,

    "The statute Trump used to unlawfully federalize the National Guard last night was 10 U.S.C. § 12406, which requires that there be an invasion by a foreign country, a rebellion,..."

    I'm not po. I don't teach at an Ivy League law school. But, if Trump is challenged in court, my guess is that, ultimately, the Supreme Court will side with Trump's definition of a rebellion.

    Be honest. Where'd you find out about 10 U.S.C. § 12406? Was it MTN?


  25. by Ponderer on June 8, 2025 9:44 am

    This administration acts as if the Founders really, deep down in their secretly authoritarian hearts, actually wanted to give this country a constitution that had hidden, somewhere deep inside it, cryptic loopholes wherein an elected, authoritarian regime might someday find foothold to skew it, the entire Justice System, and the entire United States of America and its population to its treasonously anti-democratic purposes. In balance of course with said Founders' true desires.

    It's what people like MAGA Hat Hate and olde dude must think, to be going along so cavalierly with the constitutional atrocities being perpetrated on a nearly daily basis by this fascist regime.

    .


  26. by HatetheSwamp on June 8, 2025 9:45 am

    ""Not My President" was a popular saying on the left. Rightists interpreted this as hurt feelings, of fucking course, but it was about values."

    No.

    It was about fealty to the Constitution and the will of the people.


  27. by Ponderer on June 8, 2025 9:46 am

    See Curt...?

    I really wanted to take that image to Photoshop and put a MAGA Hat on George and post it here.

    😢



  28. by Ponderer on June 8, 2025 9:51 am

    "It was about fealty to the Constitution and the will of the people." -MAGA Hat Hate

    This from a flaming hypocrite who supports, defends, excuses, champions, worships, and voted three times for a president who routinely wipes his orange, corrupt, treasonous ass with the Constitution on a nearly daily basis.

    I swear, MAGA Hat Hate's cult is gonna eventually try this "the people voted for it" logic to reinstate the ban against women voting, prohibition, and slavery.


  29. by HatetheSwamp on June 8, 2025 9:57 am

    "This from a flaming hypocrite..."

    As strongly as I suspected that "that feckless dementia-ridden piece of crap" won in 020 due to Dem hijinks and shenanigans, I always said that Joe is my President.

    Fealty to the Constitution and the will of the people. God bless America, eh?


  30. by Ponderer on June 8, 2025 10:26 am

    "As strongly as I suspected that "that feckless dementia-ridden piece of crap" won in 020 due to Dem hijinks and shenanigans, I always said that Joe is my President.

    Fealty to the Constitution and the will of the people. God bless America, eh?"


    This from a flaming hypocrite who supports, defends, excuses, champions, worships, and voted three times for a president who routinely wipes his orange, corrupt, treasonous ass with the Constitution on a nearly daily basis.

    So he believes that Biden won in 2020. Yet he's fine with his Golden God going around, stirring up all manner of violent behavior and chaos by declaring the flat-out lie that the election was stolen.


  31. by oldedude on June 8, 2025 10:41 am
    wannabe-People who beat their chests, strut around in their uniform, and squawk a lot about being "brothers" and "sisters" often turn out to be nothing of the sort. Look how little it takes for OD to turn on a veteran.
    You keep stating that and nothing else. So you're just a fucking troll that requires the "support" of other's because you don't have any stones, and a wannabe. Put up or STFU. I've asked several times, you keep skirting the question. Ergo. You're a LIAR and a "delicate" wannabe.

    I know, you have a rack that has a CMOH, Navy Cross, Silver Star, Distinguished Flying Cross, USMC Combat Action Ribbon, 8 purple hearts, and a National Defense with four stars.


    Donna, I put the short version here, citations below if you want to check them out. What you cited is true, if they use Title 32 activation. No issue in what you said. The issue is that trumpster used is "The Insurrection Act of 1807." This is the one exception to your source, and hardly ever used. So far, no fault, no foul on anyone. I know this is long, but the "Insurrection Act" is used for the suppression of civil disorder, of insurrection, and of armed rebellion against the federal government of the U.S.


    Donna- AND IT ALSO REQUIRES THAT THE PRESIDENT ACT THROUGH THE GOVERNORS OF THE STATES TO FEDERALIZE THE NATIONAL GUARD.
    Partially true. Title 32 authority is the Governors' Authority and is paid by the state. This is used prior to getting federalization orders of the president. Things like natural disasters, that sort of thing. It's great for us down here, Hurricane Andrew, Helene, etc. They can preposition the units on the state level and have them ready. During NOLA, the mayor of NO, and the gov of LA refused to ask the administration for assistance, which held up aid for over a week after the storm went through, killing a lot of folks.[1][2]

    The other way is by federalizing the Guard under Title 10–this is a REQUEST for state Governors to send troops,”

    The Insurrection Act of 1807 is the U.S. federal law that empowers the president of the United States to nationally deploy the U.S. military and to federalize the National Guard units of the individual states in specific circumstances, such as the suppression of civil disorder, of insurrection, and of armed rebellion against the federal government of the U.S.

    The Insurrection Act provides a statutory exception to the Posse Comitatus Act (1878) that limits the president's deploying the U.S. military to enforce either civil law or criminal law within the United States.[3]







    uscode.house.gov
    usatoday.com
    law.cornell.edu


  32. by HatetheSwamp on June 8, 2025 10:46 am

    "This from a flaming hypocrite who supports, defends, excuses, champions, worships, and voted three times for a president who routinely wipes his orange, corrupt, treasonous ass..."

    So, you've seen his @$$!!!!!?


    "So he believes that Biden won in 2020..."

    Ole pb thinks that the Dems cheated, but the Flatulent Fool was pb's President.


  33. by Donna on June 8, 2025 10:50 am

    od: Do you have a link showing that Trump invoked the Insurrection Act?



  34. by Donna on June 8, 2025 10:59 am

    I'll save you time. Trump did not invoke the Insurrection Act. But...

    "An 18th-century wartime law called the Insurrection Act is the main legal mechanism that a president can use to activate the military or National Guard during times of rebellion or unrest. But Trump didn’t invoke the Insurrection Act on Saturday.

    Instead, he relied on a similar federal law that allows the president to federalize National Guard troops under certain circumstances.

    The National Guard is a hybrid entity that serves both state and federal interests. Often it operates under state command and control, using state funding. Sometimes National Guard troops will be assigned by their state to serve federal missions, remaining under state command but using federal funding.

    The law cited by Trump’s proclamation places National Guard troops under federal command. The law says that can be done under three circumstances: When the U.S. is invaded or in danger of invasion; when there is a rebellion or danger of rebellion against the authority of the U.S. government, or when the President is unable to “execute the laws of the United States,” with regular forces.

    But the law also says that orders for those purposes “shall be issued through the governors of the States.” It’s not immediately clear if the president can activate National Guard troops without the order of that state’s governor.

    Notably, Trump’s proclamation says the National Guard troops will play a supporting role by protecting ICE officers as they enforce the law, rather than having the troops perform law enforcement work.

    Steve Vladeck, a professor at the Georgetown University Law Center who specializes in military justice and national security law, says that’s because the National Guard troops can’t legally engage in ordinary law enforcement activities unless Trump first invokes the Insurrection Act.





    apnews.com


  35. by Navy2711 on June 8, 2025 11:01 am

    Hate,

    Just to confirm, who do you think won the 2020 election?


  36. by Navy2711 on June 8, 2025 11:02 am

    OD,

    "Put up or STFU. I've asked several times, you keep skirting the question."

    What question is that?


  37. by oldedude on June 8, 2025 11:06 am
    Of course!😱

    On January 20, 2025, in the "DECLARING A NATIONAL EMERGENCY AT THE SOUTHERN BORDER OF THE UNITED STATES" document, he said
    Within 90 days of the date of this proclamation, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit a joint report to the President about the conditions at the southern border of the United States and any recommendations regarding additional actions that may be necessary to obtain complete operational control of the southern border, including whether to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807.[1]

    The deployment of troops under federal authority in response to civil unrest is a rare step, one that usually requires the president to find under the Insurrection Act that they are needed to enforce the law or restore order.[2]

    Nice try at a "gotcha" or a po would say it, "are you still beating your wife?" "YES or NO"
    whitehouse.gov
    msn.com


  38. by Donna on June 8, 2025 11:09 am

    Trump didn't invoke the Insurrection Act, though. You just assumed he did. See my previous post.


  39. by oldedude on June 8, 2025 12:16 pm
    no, I already knew that. 🙄

    We operated under these exact circumstances many different times. We WERE REQUIRED to understand the laws so we could anticipate and ready units. That was my job. Also, it was in my read file yesterday.


  40. by Indy! on June 9, 2025 5:58 am

    Thought your job was planting rape trees, OD. 🤔


  41. by Ponderer on June 9, 2025 8:30 am

    This reaction in L.A. is nowhere near the worst that L.A. has seen. The police are fully up to the task. There's absolutely no reason for the National Guard, let alone the Military, to get involved. It's all so Trump can scare everyone and look like his little hero, Putin.

    Trump will eventually declare Martial Law someday. Probably soon. And there will likewise be no rational reason for it at all. He just wants to be a dictator.


  42. by HatetheSwamp on June 9, 2025 8:48 am

    The reason for the Feds to be involved is that LA isn't enforcing FEDERAL law. I just posted the briefest video from Newsmax which asserted that no Federal Judge in California will back Newsom over the National Guard issue. Now, I don't teach at an Ivy League law school, but, that makes sense to me.

    Again, I don't teach at an Ivy League law school, but, it seems to me that your beloved 14th Amendment may be your problem, po.


  43. by oldedude on June 9, 2025 8:55 am
    Federal Judge in California will back Newsom over the National Guard issue.
    I think you're correct. 1. it's in the state of CA. It's a CA district judge in a federal court. So I don't see a problem with this as the starting point. Regardless of how it's decided, the loser will appeal. I don't think SCOTUS will buy off on it. We'll see if they ask for an expedited review from SCOTUS. And we'll see. At this point, I'm not laying down any money at all.


  44. by Ponderer on June 9, 2025 9:48 am

    If we've learned anything, od, it's that Trump doesn't give a flying rat's ass about what some federal court tells him if it's not what he wants to hear.


  45. by HatetheSwamp on June 9, 2025 10:00 am

    But po, but po! Trump has even complied with the Supreme Court’s order to "facilitate" St Kilmar's return to our shores! Bahahahahahahahahahaha haha, ahhhhhhhh!


  46. by Indy! on June 9, 2025 10:01 am

    Cities need to create a communication system where they alert everyone when ICE is in the area. Then businesses can shut down temporarily and lock ICE out. Just lock all the doors, turn off the lights and don't acknowledge them in any way if they knock on the door.


  47. by Donna on June 9, 2025 10:37 am

    od- You said "The issue is that trumpster used is 'The Insurrection Act of 1807.'"




  48. by meagain on June 9, 2025 12:45 pm
    I read that Trump has ordered the arrest of Newsom. I don't know whether it is true. If it is, could this be the trigger for a revolution or heightening of the secessionist movements?

    Fascism is in full operation now, so it would not surprise me.


  49. by HatetheSwamp on June 9, 2025 1:04 pm

    I think you are wrong. But, I believe that Tom Homan says that he'd support it.


  50. by oldedude on June 9, 2025 5:35 pm
    First, the "I think I read somewhere that..." is bullshit. The only people stupid enough to believe it are TPS conspiracy theorists and gossip mongers.


  51. by meagain on June 9, 2025 7:21 pm
    Apparently, Trump just endorses it.

    In recent weeks, a Democratic mayor, a Democratic U.S. House member, the staffer of a different Democratic U.S. House member, a sitting judge and a labor leader have all been criminally charged, detained or taken into custody by Trump administration officials.

    Will a Democratic governor join the list? The president apparently has an opinion on the matter.


    msnbc.com


  52. by HatetheSwamp on June 10, 2025 3:24 am

    As you know, I monitor right-wing media regularly. Every GOP I can find is talking and writing like a died in the wool MAGA. Even the Gay Guy Curt never heard of!

    For the moment, the GOP is, temporarily, not the home of openness and inclusion, acceptance, tolerance, diversity and freedom. Everyone is on-fire MAGA!!!!!


  53. by oldedude on June 10, 2025 3:44 am
    donna- od- You said "The issue is that trumpster used is 'The Insurrection Act of 1807.'"

    I did, I just need a little context of the post. Was it about #43? Just wondering and I'll answer.
    thanks


  54. by HatetheSwamp on June 10, 2025 4:06 am

    The progressive SwampMedia is waaaaaaay too funny.

    Los Angeles ABC7 News anchor Marc Brown, during his live commentary on the Los Angeles riots, said police should not escalate their action as that would lead to a major confrontation and the situation could turn very volatile. "If you move law enforcement in there in the wrong way and turn what is just a bunch of people having fun watching cars burn into a massive confrontation of altercation between officers and demonstrators," Brown said.

    Whada freakin friggin EFFINhoot! You wokesters? You, as Chicago sang,"Make we smile." Keehee ha!
    timesofindia.indiatimes.com


  55. by oldedude on June 10, 2025 11:48 am
    So my question is; I was taught that burning cars was a bad thing. And most of the shithole countries I've been in that are either in a civil war, or rebels/terrorists have taken over the government, burning tires is what the terrorists use to signal their own folks. Oh. Wait. I guess that's true in the US also. But again, libtards don't care because it's not their money.

    I think the interesting thing is that I haven't seen a burning car outside of the cartels in mexico. And their willing to burn cars in the US (they won't get dead from it and they have the support of white snowflake libtards), and the MEXICAN FLAG is becoming a defining symbol of the LA protests according to CNN (via MSN). This, of course, plays right into trumpster's hands. They are "foreign nationals attempting an insurgency or Insurrection (depending on how you look at it) in the US." PERFECT! These assholes just played RIGHT IN TO trumpster's hands and are too stoopid to realize it!

    Ya gotta love the irony!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    The funny thing about this is that if trumpster needs any money/ permission from congress, this vastly increases his chances!

    msn.com


  56. by Indy! on June 10, 2025 2:05 pm

    OD, most people have car insurance. 😌


  57. by Donna on June 10, 2025 5:56 pm

    You all should watch the disastrous partisan political speech Shitler delivered to active military personnel at Ft. Bragg. He went on and on about how we need to "liberate" Los Angeles. Essentially he's declaring war on Los Angeles. The president of the United States of America. Good fucking grief.

    It's feeling more like Russia with each passing day now, which is exactly what he wants. He's un-American as hell.

    I don't recognize my country anymore.


  58. by Navy2711 on June 10, 2025 7:36 pm

    "I don't recognize my country anymore."

    This.


  59. by HatetheSwamp on June 11, 2025 3:49 am

    "I don't recognize my country anymore."

    No problem. Let me help. Just think back five years to the summer of love in 020. Curt can help with his memories of 020 love.

    To me, this is absolute same old, same old.

    Blue State Glory.


  60. by HatetheSwamp on June 11, 2025 3:53 am

    "You all should watch the disastrous partisan political speech Shitler delivered to active military personnel at Ft. Bragg."

    Donna,

    No one here believes that you watched the speech! Let me guess. Ben did a podcast taking selected sentences out of context.

    Am I right!!!!!?


  61. by Navy2711 on June 11, 2025 5:32 am

    "Just think back five years to the summer of love in 020. ... To me, this is absolute same old, same old."

    That's a lie.


  62. by HatetheSwamp on June 11, 2025 5:48 am

    Please splain how it's a lie. This seems eerily like 020 to ole pb.


  63. by Navy2711 on June 11, 2025 6:12 am

    If it's not a lie, then you're a complete moron. The differences are massive and self-evident.

    I HOPE you're lying.


  64. by HatetheSwamp on June 11, 2025 6:32 am

    I'm not lying. From what source(s) do you consume "news?"


  65. by Donna on June 11, 2025 7:21 am

    The way Shitler is handling the pushback agaibst UCE in L.A. is highly unpopular with Americans.

    "A YouGov poll out today shows that only 34% of American adults approve of Trump’s deployment of Marines to the Los Angeles area to respond to protests over the enforcement of immigration laws while 47% do not approve. Only 38% of American adults approve of Trump’s deployment of National Guard soldiers to L.A., while 45% disapprove. A strong majority—56%—of Americans think state and local officials should take the lead in responding to the L.A. protests, while only 25% think the federal government should.

    Strikingly, 50% of adults disapprove of the administration's handling of deportations, while only 39% approve.

    Those numbers were gathered before Pentagon comptroller Bryn MacDonnell told the House Defense Appropriations Committee today that the Pentagon estimates the cost of federalizing the National Guard and deploying the Marines to Los Angeles at $134 million."


  66. by Navy2711 on June 11, 2025 7:37 am

    "I'm not lying."

    Mmmmmm ... I really think you are. You just don't seem stupid enough to believe that this is the same old, same old. And you generally exhibit troll behavior. And that's not an accusation. When I'm on conservative forums, I troll the fuck out of those guys. I actually laugh at some of the things you say on this forum. I mean, I laugh WITH you, troll-to-troll.

    So, I think you're not fully serious.


  67. by Navy2711 on June 11, 2025 7:39 am

    Donna,

    The regret from Trump voters is really going to crank up in the next few months. (I say Trump VOTERS in the sense of, "I really hate that guy, but I think his policies are better than the Dems", as opposed to loony-toons Trump SUPPORTERS.)


  68. by HatetheSwamp on June 11, 2025 7:57 am

    Navy,

    You really have to link me to the regret from Trump voters. I monitor right-wing media regularly and, holy freakin friggin EFFINcow, man! The non MAGA GOPs... that gay Guy Curt never heard of, for instance... has become indistinguishable from a rabid MAGA. From what I'm seeing, nuthin has solidified Trump support... from his reluctant voters... more than the anarchy and chaos in the City of Angels.

    You keep making these claims, but you never substantiate them. You're becoming a po clone. That ain't good!


  69. by HatetheSwamp on June 11, 2025 7:59 am

    Donna,

    A majority in that YouGov either support the sending of marines or are unsure.

    Ole pb'd be in the unsure gang.


  70. by Donna on June 11, 2025 8:03 am

    "The regret from Trump voters is really going to crank up in the next few months." - Navy

    That regret is already showing up in the You Gov survey results I posted in comment #65. In order to get those numbers, there had to be Trump Voter regret, which will, as you say, deepen as more and more Americans come to the realization that Trump's regime is fascist and unAmerican.


  71. by HatetheSwamp on June 11, 2025 8:16 am

    Do the math for me, there, Donna. Trump got 49.8% of the vote. Over half in the poll either support the sending of marines or are unsure. That ain't regret, man!


  72. by Navy2711 on June 11, 2025 8:29 am

    "You keep making these claims, but you never substantiate them." - SelectSmart's Official Court Jester, who slips away any time he's pressed on a serious issue.




  73. by HatetheSwamp on June 11, 2025 8:29 am

    huh


  74. by Indy! on June 11, 2025 10:01 am

    The 30+% of supporters of all this illegal activity by Trump are the hardcore MAGAts. OD and Brown Shorts approve as well - ergo OD and Brown Shorts are hardcore MAGAts too.



  75. by Donna on June 11, 2025 11:23 am

    Either Hts has completely lost his reading comprehension skills, or he's what we call in the math world an "innumerate".

    "A YouGov poll out today shows that only 34% of American adults approve of Trump’s deployment of Marines to the Los Angeles area to respond to protests over the enforcement of immigration laws while 47% do not approve.>/b> Only 38% of American adults approve of Trump’s deployment of National Guard soldiers to L.A., while 45% disapprove. A strong majority—56%—of Americans think state and local officials should take the lead in responding to the L.A. protests, while only 25% think the federal government should."


  76. by oldedude on June 11, 2025 12:24 pm
    Indy- OD, most people have car insurance. 😌
    Obviously you don't. Because if your car gets burned up, it's a total loss to the insurance, and your rates skyrocket.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 With your "summer of Love" lie, that was the common thought among that are too stupid to breathe. That's why people and anchor stores left those areas. And for many of the small businesses, they don't have that type of insurance because it's too costly. So their shit gets burned, they're out of business because they don't have the money to pay any rent, while they scrape up the money to pay for construction.
    And if you're so self absorbed to believe that it's not a crime, you need to go ask your cartel buddies.
    Welcome to the real fucking world!


    donna- Essentially he's declaring war on Los Angeles.
    No, this is just trying to get rid of the gangsters and dope dealers. Shall I say it yet again? Because you just supported them. Yet again🙄


    Lead-To me, this is absolute same old, same old.
    Yup. The libtards are supporting an insurrection. Watch what happens during multi city "peaceful protests." The mayor's concerned. She put a curfew in the city, making it easier for LEAs to arrest agitators, except they won't be there supporting their useful idiots, and firebombing cars. If it didn't happen today, it will be soon that they'll start throwing quart sized cups of cement at the LEAs. Because they're not going to let go of it. This has a daily exponential increased possibility of firebombs being thrown at buildings, LEAs, government buildings and businesses (see above about the damage that libtards don't think matters).

    Lead- "Just think back five years to the summer of love in 020. ... To me, this is absolute same old, same old."
    Wellllll............ lessee. Their order of battle is the same. Thousands of useful idiots, lies (don't forget that one),

    Escalation is a known everytime these assholes are doing this. They weren't happy with just assaulting and murdering jews. Those were just practice runs. So like Radical Islamic fighters, they'll do a couple of tests (2020/2022/2023) before they attack (10/7). My guess is that donna and po would be harboring and aiding fugitives if they were closer. Or maybe they did already on the way in.

    donna-The way Shitler is handling the pushback agaibst UCE in L.A. is highly unpopular with Americans.
    I think the issue is more about your "summer of love" events and people that were just trying to go about their lives and got caught up in your bullshit.

    I am one of those as I've repeatedly said, that immigration law needs to be unfucked. There's no other way around it. It's too hard for folks wanting the dream stay and yet way to easy for your buddies to stay. That needs to be unfucked. To be fair. Neither side has decided to do anything with it for the past, what 40 years? And yes, I do have a vested interest in this, as two people in my family are/were affected by immigration law. And I listen to both sides.

    donna- A strong majority—56%—of Americans think state and local officials should take the lead in responding to the L.A. protests, while only 25% think the federal government should."
    My view is they should let the fucking place burn down and leave ashes. Kind of like Sodom and Gamora. Turn a couple of million to salt. That will at least fix one problem.

    navy, look at the two responses I had for Lead.


  77. by meagain on June 11, 2025 12:57 pm
    "No, this is just trying to get rid of the gangsters and dope dealers."

    Same old argument for argument's sake. You kniow damned well that is not so.


  78. by Indy! on June 11, 2025 1:21 pm

    Ummm... OD? Car insurance is mandatory in Florida. So I guess you also lied about living here since you didn't know that. Busted again. You're making this too easy for me, queenie.


  79. by oldedude on June 11, 2025 5:26 pm
    You're ASSuming that CA laws are the same as FL because you think the world revolves around you and your meaningless "life." I'm not, AND I'm not assuming that everyone in any state has insurance.

    In the "REAL WORLD" people aren't as "perfect" as your cartel buddies. AND you didn't read "the rest of the story."

    Thirdly, if someone were to enter your tent and destroy all your computers and equipment, would that be an issue with you? Of course not! You have "insurance" and that covers everything, right? And there's no waiting, or the company giving you dime on the dollar for your old equipment, right?


Go To Top

Comment on: "ICE raids across L.A. spark backlash; Trump officials vow to continue operations"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page