by Indy! on June 6, 2025 10:09 am

The answer to your question is no, Brown Shorts. As always, you totally missed the point. What she is saying is the Democratic PARTY (not the people in the party - the party apparatus) do not understand that they are overlooking Democratic men and treating them as if they do not matter. That is one of the underlying messages in Anna's report there. She actually laid out the problem with the Ds pretty darn accurately right at the beginning with...

1. Her understanding that when the SAM project starts talking about "syntax" they're already worried more about the "message" than actually addressing people's real concerns. Something I have been pointing out for years, except I get right to the point - the Ds ALWAYS think the "problem" is the "message". That if they merely move the words around into the magical combination that makes everyone happy - they're going to win. Nothing could be further from the proof.

2. The way the Ds moralize everything as if we need a bunch of corrupt politicians telling us what's right and wrong and how to live our lives and treat each other. Hillary was the queen of this - I used to say her political speeches were like the times I had to visit the assistant principal in high school for one of his long winded lectures on living life right because they caught me smoking on school grounds or something.

After that she goes into a longwinded speech which basically proves she's rooted in the Democratic party by talking about nothing but the "message". Only at the end does she (accidentally?) land on a real problem - THE ECONOMY and WTF ARE Ds GOING TO DO ABOUT IT? Again - this is what I've been saying for YEARS. WHERE IS THE PLATFORM? What are you going to do to make this country a more livable space. Concentrate on that and you'll start winning elections again - not spending $20M trying to figure out how men think.