Comments posted organically
Homepage

Pam Bondi subpoenas doctors & clinics that provide trans health care
Medical by Ponderer     July 10, 2025 7:07 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (4 comments) [41 views]


Dims calling for Attacks on Federal Officers are Succeeding!
Crime by oldedude     July 10, 2025 7:00 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (19 comments) [119 views]


The case against Abrego Garcia is looking pretty shaky. The DOJ would rather avoid a trial.
Law by Curt_Anderson     July 10, 2025 8:43 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [25 views]


Iran threatens drone strike on Trump's navel
Cartoons by Indy!     July 10, 2025 8:08 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (1 comments) [18 views]


Disaster: Liberal Goes Back In Time To Kill Hitler But Now Has No One To Compare People He Disagrees With To
Science Fiction by HatetheSwamp     July 10, 2025 11:37 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [17 views]


Sen. Josh "Running Man" Hawley says he’ll make sure Medicaid cuts in Trump bill he voted for ‘never take effect’
Politics by Curt_Anderson     July 10, 2025 3:27 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [20 views]


Trump threatens Brazil with massive 50% tariff, citing "Witch Hunt" against ex-president Bolsonaro
Economy by Curt_Anderson     July 10, 2025 11:27 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (8 comments) [71 views]


"Kill 'em!" "Kill 'em!!" "Kill 'em!!!"
Wild Animals by Donna     July 9, 2025 9:06 am (Rating: 5.0) Last comment by: Indy! (33 comments) [252 views]


pb's Legal Goober #2: Biden could go to court for this
Crime by HatetheSwamp     July 10, 2025 12:44 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (6 comments) [47 views]


Over 50 nations want to start trade talks with US after tariffs, Trump officials say
International by HatetheSwamp     April 6, 2025 2:39 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (32 comments) [447 views]


International selectors, pages, etc.
Supreme Court temporarily pauses deportations under Alien Enemies Act
By Ponderer
April 19, 2025 6:45 am
Category: International
(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post & Tips.

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com



Washington, DC
The Supreme Court early Saturday morning paused the deportation of immigrants potentially subject to the Alien Enemies Act, freezing action in a fast-developing case involving a group of immigrants in Texas who say the Trump administration was working to remove them.

The court’s brief order drew dissents from conservative Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas.

Attorneys for the Venezuelans at issue in the case filed an emergency appeal at the high court on Friday, claiming they were at immediate risk of being removed from the country and had not been provided sufficient notice to challenge their deportation.

The court’s brief order on Saturday did not explain the court’s reasoning. The court ordered the Trump administration to respond to the emergency appeal once a federal appeals court in Louisiana takes action in the case.

In the meantime, the court said, “The government is directed not to remove any member of the putative class of detainees from the United States until further order of this court.”

Previously, a federal judge in Washington, DC, told lawyers for the migrants in Texas who believed the Trump administration is about to swiftly deport them under the Alien Enemies Act that he did not have the power to pause the deportations, even though he was concerned about the administration’s actions.

“I am sympathetic to everything you’re saying, I just don’t I think I have the power to do anything,” US District Judge James Boasberg told a lawyer for the migrants at an emergency hearing Friday night.



But then, if the courts don't give Trump what he put them there for, he'll just ignore them and find some other asinine way to totally misinterpret loopholes and laws for his own benefit.


Cited and related links:

  1. cnn.com

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Supreme Court temporarily pauses deportations under Alien Enemies Act":

  1. by Indy! on April 19, 2025 6:51 am

    We are officially a banana republic.


  2. by Ponderer on April 19, 2025 7:20 am

    We are The Republic of the Orange Banana.


  3. by Indy! on April 19, 2025 7:59 am

    That could be the official fruit of the U.S. - the orange banana.


  4. by HatetheSwamp on April 19, 2025 8:33 am

    "...if the courts don't give Trump what he put them there for, he'll just ignore them and find some other asinine way to totally misinterpret loopholes and laws for his own benefit."

    Deranged TrumpHate.


    Honestly, ole pb is surprised that it took this long for the Supreme Court to get involved in the Alien Enemies Act issue. Now, I'm not a former Supreme Court clerk or a law professor at an Ivy League school, but pb's Legal Goobers suggest that it's likely that Trump will prevail on his use of the Alien Enemies Act. But, we'll see.

    I still see this as a win/win for Trump under the guidance of Susie Wiles. If he loses in court, those moderate and independent common sense voters who handed him DC in 024, will be really pi$$€d at the Dems and libs who are fighting to keep murderers and rapists on the streets.


  5. by oldedude on April 19, 2025 8:57 am
    It appears SCOTUS wants to (finally) get to the bottom of what they are going to do with the "due process" piece, since deporting someone doesn't fall into the 18- series of laws, so it isn't a felony criminal case, which the libs are treating it as. I don't see it as a "huge" thing and it's part of the process because even in the Roberts decision, he said that wasn't part of "this case" but would be adjudicated later. So now it's later. I think the deportation process has enough checks and balances (which if the administration would have followed and not used the standard of the Alien Enemies Act, things would have been fine. I'm thinking the normal deportation movements will just carry over to the AEA.

    I'm not figuring out wins or losses here. Whatever the court rules will be the law. Done. I anticipate this will be finished by end of week, and things will settle down to the normal dull roar.


  6. by oldedude on April 19, 2025 9:08 am
    po- Previously, a federal judge in Washington, DC, told lawyers for the migrants in Texas who believed the Trump administration is about to swiftly deport them under the Alien Enemies Act that he did not have the power to pause the deportations, even though he was concerned about the administration’s actions.

    Boasberg was playing the victim on this. Actually, he was told by SCOTUS. They were actually pretty scathing in their decision that Boasberg needs to stay in his lane and go back to law school. He has a jurisdiction (as I've pointed out a few times already), and DC has no jurisdiction to rule on immigrants in Texas. So again, I'm not upset this and expected it. I think once SCOTUS gives the guidelines, trumpster will abide by them.


  7. by Curt_Anderson on April 19, 2025 11:41 am
    I will be interested in hearing what Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito's arguments against due process will be.


  8. by meagain on April 19, 2025 11:51 am
    If the Supreme Court does side with Trump in this, then the justices should all be sent for a 'holiday' in that prison in El Salvador. It will be one of the most unconscionably political acts in its history, and a particularly brutal one.

    Almost every advanced country has a similar Act, and it is never used except in extreme emergency and national danger. In Canada, it has been used twice in the past 50 years. The last time was three years ago. The mandatory court inquiry into the use concluded that it had not been necessary and should not have been actualised. That did not amount to a real criticism of the government since, at the time, it had the appearance of being necessary. It is also in every country to be only a temporary measure to be lifted as soon as control of the situation is achieved.


  9. by oldedude on April 19, 2025 11:55 am
    We'll see how they vote. As Chief Justice Roberts pointed out a few times in the affirmative decision, that was not a question being asked for that reading. This one is. Two different questions.


  10. by Curt_Anderson on April 19, 2025 1:41 pm
    "If [Trump] loses in court, those moderate and independent common sense voters who handed him DC in 024, will be really pi$$€d at the Dems and libs who are fighting to keep murderers and rapists on the streets." --HtS

    Although America failed the collective IQ test last November, most Americans will not be that dumb forever nor are they ready to dispense with the US Constitution, especially after a social studies lesson by way of the arguments before the Supreme Court. Most Americans support the notions of due process, innocent until proven guilty, burden of proof, fair sentencing, not putting innocent people into prison, etc.

    The administration's use of the Enemy Aliens Act and their reluctance to provide any evidence against Albrego Garcia and others in actual trials with due process is a tell that they've got nothing. Btw, if there is a solid case against Albrego Garcia and/or others and he/they is/are found guilty, fine. Deport him/them or put him/them into a US prison, like other right-minded Americans I have no problem with that.


  11. by HatetheSwamp on April 19, 2025 2:21 pm

    "Although America failed the collective IQ test last November,..."

    We're on different topics.

    The IQ test failure is y'alls when y'nes lockstepped with the smoke-filled room in the conspiracy to foist the Day Drinker on voters. Those moderate and independent common sense voters who overwhelmingly broke for Trump were too smart to rubber stamp that imbicility.

    While I refuse to join you in placing a poster of Pope Kilmar on the ceiling above my bed, I continue to chagrin over Trump's gang's "error" in imprisoning the Maryland dad, you have to know that he is an adjudicated illegal whom the Trumps will immediately deport if they do successfully "facilitate" his return.

    What we have here is a comedy of Swamp errors, bahaha.


  12. by oldedude on April 19, 2025 3:33 pm
    We may have voted for trumpster or his VP. What you have to remember is that the Cackling kammie and tampon timmy were worse than them. kammie and timmy had NO platform, she seemed drunk a large part of the time and wouldn't answer questions from the press. the only thing she went on were the subjects that got trumpster the most votes. DEI, CRT, and the border that will cost us billions of dollars to unfuck.

    Your hero kilmer is good to deport according to the law. It slays me you hold a person charged not once, but twice for beating his wife so dear. When you first heard about the wife beater, you immediately went to his defense. The same way you do to human trafficking. Which to me is just fucked up. You don't care about the girls and women being raped and murdered in our streets and parks. So when the possibility of getting rid of those who are committing these crimes are found, you want to treat them far better than their victims😞.


  13. by HatetheSwamp on April 19, 2025 3:55 pm

    OD,

    This is another time that I wonder if Curt is joshing us. But, many libs are thinking what Curt thinks.


Go To Top

Comment on: "Supreme Court temporarily pauses deportations under Alien Enemies Act"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page