Comments posted organically
Homepage

Pam Bondi subpoenas doctors & clinics that provide trans health care
Medical by Ponderer     July 10, 2025 7:07 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (4 comments) [41 views]


Dims calling for Attacks on Federal Officers are Succeeding!
Crime by oldedude     July 10, 2025 7:00 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (19 comments) [119 views]


The case against Abrego Garcia is looking pretty shaky. The DOJ would rather avoid a trial.
Law by Curt_Anderson     July 10, 2025 8:43 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [25 views]


Iran threatens drone strike on Trump's navel
Cartoons by Indy!     July 10, 2025 8:08 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (1 comments) [18 views]


Disaster: Liberal Goes Back In Time To Kill Hitler But Now Has No One To Compare People He Disagrees With To
Science Fiction by HatetheSwamp     July 10, 2025 11:37 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [17 views]


Sen. Josh "Running Man" Hawley says he’ll make sure Medicaid cuts in Trump bill he voted for ‘never take effect’
Politics by Curt_Anderson     July 10, 2025 3:27 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [20 views]


Trump threatens Brazil with massive 50% tariff, citing "Witch Hunt" against ex-president Bolsonaro
Economy by Curt_Anderson     July 10, 2025 11:27 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (8 comments) [71 views]


"Kill 'em!" "Kill 'em!!" "Kill 'em!!!"
Wild Animals by Donna     July 9, 2025 9:06 am (Rating: 5.0) Last comment by: Indy! (33 comments) [252 views]


pb's Legal Goober #2: Biden could go to court for this
Crime by HatetheSwamp     July 10, 2025 12:44 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (6 comments) [47 views]


Over 50 nations want to start trade talks with US after tariffs, Trump officials say
International by HatetheSwamp     April 6, 2025 2:39 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (32 comments) [447 views]


Law selectors, pages, etc.
Montana Adult Trans Bathroom Ban Blocked In Court: "No Evidence" It Protects Women
By Ponderer
April 3, 2025 7:34 am
Category: Law
(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post & Tips.

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com



The ruling is the first such ruling to block an adult transgender bathroom ban in the United States.

On Wednesday, a Montana judge blocked the state from enforcing a bathroom ban targeting transgender and intersex adults, which would have barred them from accessing many public restrooms. The bill—one of the first major anti-trans measures to receive a hearing in any state this year—passed the Montana House of Representatives on a party-line 58–42 vote earlier this year and was signed into law by Governor Greg Gianforte on March 27. It faced intense opposition during hearings, including concerns about its direct impact on the state’s two transgender legislators, Representatives SJ Howell and Zooey Zephyr. Now, the law cannot be enforced, with the judge ruling that it was driven by anti-transgender animus and that the state failed to provide evidence it would achieve its stated goal of “protecting women.”

“Decisions about how to express a person’s gender identity are personal and private, as is information about a person’s transgender or intersex status, anatomy, genetics, and medical history,” said the judge. “The Act fails strict scrutiny because it is motivated by animus and supported by no evidence that its restrictions advance its purported purpose to protect women’s safety and privacy.”

The judge also ruled that the ban relied on an unscientific definition of sex that effectively barred intersex people from using any bathroom at all: “Under the Act, however, transgender people cannot use sex-separated facilities that correspond with their gender identity and intersex people cannot use sex-separated facilities at all.”

House Bill 121 bans transgender people from using restrooms that align with their gender identity in all “public buildings,” broadly defined as any facility “owned or leased by a public agency.” This sweeping definition includes rest stops, public colleges and universities, schools, libraries, museums, state airports, publicly owned hospitals, park restrooms, and more. The law went into effect immediately upon Governor Greg Gianforte’s signature, forcing many transgender people across the state out of public restrooms overnight.



BUT... But... can't you make a law that takes away a person's civil rights and equal protection under the law simply because it makes a tiny handful of other people feel icky...?!?!

Yeah no. You can't. Ain't constitutional. Sorry. Laws can't be based on bigoted, baseless, imaginary harm. You have to show actual harm that the law would protect people from. And there is none to show. At all. Ever From anywhere.


Cited and related links:

  1. erininthemorning.com
  2. documentcloud.org

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Montana Adult Trans Bathroom Ban Blocked In Court: "No Evidence" It Protects Women":

  1. by Donna on April 3, 2025 7:40 am

    Not only does the law not protect women - it endangers transwomen.


  2. by HatetheSwamp on April 3, 2025 7:49 am

    Decisions about how to express a person’s gender identity are personal and private, as is information about a person’s transgender or intersex status, anatomy, genetics, and medical history,” said the judge.

    Baha.

    Unless, of course, the person is either straight or anti-TQ LGB.


    Dems are for they/them. GOPs are for you. Can't wait for November 026!

    No one disregards women's safe spaces like TQ Nazis.


  3. by Donna on April 3, 2025 8:27 am

    No one makes up imaginary unsafe spaces for women like MAGA Hats.


  4. by Curt_Anderson on April 3, 2025 8:32 am
    "Can't wait for November 026!" --HtS

    Me too!


  5. by HatetheSwamp on April 3, 2025 8:36 am

    My wife does.


    As does pb's three-headed monster:

    1. Old-school feminists. (I just saw Riley Gaines... on Fox, eh, Indy?)
    2. Anti-TQ LGB groups and activists who are becoming increasingly influential and popular.
    3. Fascistic and disgusting Christian theocrat mommies and daddies and nannas and pappaps who merely want their kids to be raised free of Big Brother intrusion.


  6. by oldedude on April 3, 2025 3:22 pm
    Laws can't be based on bigoted, baseless, imaginary harm. You have to show actual harm that the law would protect people from.

    So what is your legal defense of your "position?" Many would call it bigoted, baseless, and imaginary harm. And since you have to actually SHOW harm, I'm just wondering how you defend having men use women's restrooms and showers.


  7. by HatetheSwamp on April 4, 2025 5:31 am

    Laws can't be based on bigoted, baseless, imaginary harm. You have to show actual harm that the law would protect people from.

    Laws also can't give preference and, therefore, be based on REVERSE bigoted, baseless, imaginary harm,... e.g. blacks must sit in the back of the bus.

    Here's where you lose, po. Biology is real, objectively verifiable, honest-to-goodness truth.

    Your gender science is lunacy. In the end, science will out.

    You're toast.


  8. by oldedude on April 4, 2025 6:20 am
    She won't answer. Facts don't fit in her paradigm.


  9. by Indy! on April 4, 2025 6:24 am

    You know we could join the civilized world and simply have unisex bathrooms. You know - like we have in our own houses.


  10. by HatetheSwamp on April 4, 2025 6:59 am

    Indy,

    I think we will, in time, when doing do is cost-effective. In some instances, it ain't.

    But, for now, when the Supreme Court settles this, actual god-honest science, biology, will prevail over the constraints imposed by mental illness, i.e., po's gender dysphoria and the more dangerous autogynephilia.


  11. by Indy! on April 4, 2025 7:11 am

    How can it NOT be cost-effective? It's easier and cheaper to have one bathroom instead of two.


  12. by HatetheSwamp on April 4, 2025 7:39 am

    What's the cost of two biffies each accommodating 15 v. the cost of 30 separate unisex bathrooms in, say, a high school or your neighborhood Wal-Mart?


  13. by Indy! on April 4, 2025 12:05 pm

    English. We speak English on this board.


Go To Top

Comment on: "Montana Adult Trans Bathroom Ban Blocked In Court: "No Evidence" It Protects Women"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page