Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

Trump hits liberals where it hurts - right in the library card
Politics by Navy2711     March 22, 2025 7:18 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Navy2711 (18 comments) [87 views]


Social Security does some "cleanup"
Government by oldedude     March 22, 2025 11:28 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [6 views]


MAINE FOLDED!
Education by oldedude     March 20, 2025 9:35 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (9 comments) [170 views]


Why is OD running from me?
Politics by Navy2711     March 20, 2025 4:35 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Navy2711 (2 comments) [56 views]


Which lib journalist is the biggest hack? The RUTHLESS "Hack Madness 2025"
Journalism by HatetheSwamp     March 22, 2025 4:02 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [18 views]


One group is finally accountable for damages- Antifa next?
Crime by oldedude     March 19, 2025 9:19 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (1 comments) [54 views]


Stephen Miller strips CNN’s Kasie Hunt bare on national TV over district judge's order
Media by HatetheSwamp     March 19, 2025 3:23 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (31 comments) [286 views]


RFK Jr. is performing as expected
Politics by Navy2711     March 19, 2025 10:05 am (Rating: 5.0) Last comment by: oldedude (29 comments) [429 views]


Trump Agrees To Give Back Statue Of Liberty In Exchange For All The Land In France We Liberated In WWII
Government by HatetheSwamp     March 21, 2025 9:35 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (3 comments) [48 views]


I was wrong🤔, It's TDSrs Firebombing Teslas that are next 🤣
Politics by oldedude     March 20, 2025 10:03 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (6 comments) [106 views]


Opinion selectors, pages, etc.
Rachel Maddow is Wrong
By Donna
February 12, 2025 6:47 am
Category: Opinion

(5.0 from 2 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


MSNBC is interested in ginning up fears of a future in which there is no liberal democracy left, but in the process of ginning up those fears, it papers over the fact that liberal democracy has already been lost.

In a long, too long, segment last night, Maddow explained why Donald Trump’s attacks on the federal judiciary are a harbinger of “autocratic breakthrough,” and that if he decides to ignore courts orders against him, that “puts the US on the brink of abandoning democracy.”

Maddow listed rulings by federal judges in the past week alone that block the president’s criminal and unconstitutional plans to:

- cut scientific and medical funding,

- “buyout” federal workers,

- give Elon Musk access to classified and sensitive data,

- send “illegal” immigrants to Guantanamo Bay prison,

- release the names of FBI agents who investigated J6,

- end birthright citizenship,

- shut down the US Agency for International Development,

- freeze as much as $3 trillion in loans and grants.

She said the Trump administration’s choices are illegal and harmful, but “categorically, the most important thing here is their willingness to defy the courts, because that is the ultimate autocratic breakthrough.”

A willingness to defy the courts, Maddow said, is “a declaration that the rule of law does not apply to them, that it cannot constrain anything they want to do. That is a worse than any one outcome.”

“That is a forever-decision,” Maddow said, one that’s designed to prevent the American people from having any say about anything, ever. “That means nothing anyone else wants, and no court ruling, will ever again have any impact on what our government wants to do to us.”

We are “on the precipice,” she said, “looking over the edge.”

We’re not, though. We already over the edge, and we will never find our way back to liberal democracy if we do not accept that reality.

Maddow came close.

In the segment, she noted that federal judges have already said that the Trump administration is not complying with their orders. He is already doing what she said is “the ultimate autocratic breakthrough.”

Yet by the end of the segment, she pulled back, as if to suggest that though we are facing the abyss, we haven’t fallen into it quite yet, even though we have fallen into it. We have been falling since November.

Maddow is in good company. Lots of liberals, especially the affluent white liberals who tend to watch MSNBC, don’t want to believe the electorate handed the keys to the republic to a demented criminal president. Denial is natural, but it helps no one to encourage it.

That’s what I think is happening with segments like Maddow’s. We must accept that our beloved is dead in order to ask ourselves how to move forward, but Maddow encourages us to believe the dead are not.

Again, I think she means well, but meaning well is also in line with MSNBC’s interests. It’s better to keep viewers glued to their screens with highfalutin talk of liberal democracy being “on the precipice” than tell viewers the hard truth and risk giving them a reason to tune out.

This isn’t just about Maddow. Though hardly anyone watches her or the cable news network that employs her, together they have a commanding influence over the Democrats, and on how they think.

Rest at link.


Cited and related links:

  1. msn.com

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Rachel Maddow is Wrong":

  1. by HatetheSwamp on February 12, 2025 7:21 am

    THE SKY IS FALLING! THE SKY IS FALLING!

    Ole pb wasn't a Supreme Court clerk. He's not a Ivy League law school professor. He only has his three Legal Goobers.

    A quick note: pb's Legal Goobers can't make out that the sky is falling.

    But, pb's imagining what moderate and independent common sense voters are thinking. He suspects that they think that progressives and Dems are straight out bonkers!


  2. by meagain on February 12, 2025 7:39 am
    Liberal Democracy in America took its first setback in the McCarthy era. It was put on life support with Reagan. Trump has pushed it into the abyss where, I think since there is still resistance, it is clinging to the edge by its fingernails.

    That is why I post the international rankings that show the poor standing. I don't know how to make those cautionary facts widely known since American kids are brought up in that false belief that America is a beacon of democracy and never see the truth.


  3. by Indy! on February 12, 2025 8:57 am

    As I've said many times, this country needs a Good Earth moment. But I suspect a lot of folks on the board (or maybe all of you) have no idea what that means. 😐


  4. by Ponderer on February 12, 2025 9:40 am

    Once again, you're the smartest person in the forum, Indy!.

    A movie reference. How can anyone not have seen all the same movies that you have?

    It came up on TCM a week or so ago, but I was in no mood for such a movie from the description.


  5. by Indy! on February 12, 2025 10:21 am

    Good guess, but it actually started as a book (I've seen the movie as well - long after reading the book). You know what gets me about the smart aleck "Indy thinks he's smart" BS you folks bring up all the time? The entire country thinks Florida Man is so stupid (not me in particular - but all Floridians) - we're the butt of jokes all the time. But I went to a regular public school (nothing special - standard government operation) and somehow my reading list from school seems to be much deeper than anyone else I ever run into on the internet. Why is that? Thought you folks had better schools than us. 🙄 But reading a book you haven't read (or even knew existed until just now) doesn't make me "smarter than you" - it makes me a guy who read a book you haven't.

    The Good Earth is a novel by Pearl S. Buck that starts with a popular revolution where the poor revolt against their gov't and the wealthy (a "Good Earth moment"). The principal character of the book is a poor man who changes his life during the course of the riots in the aftermath (no spoliers here). It is well worth a read and certainly not obscure by any stretch of the imagination - it was a best seller and won the Pulitzer Prize. It was required reading in my schooling right alongside with other classics (who I am also surprised many people have not read).


  6. by Indy! on February 12, 2025 10:26 am

    Forgot... the movie does not do the novel justice.


  7. by meagain on February 12, 2025 11:53 am
    I have not seen the movie but I read the book 50 or 60 years ago. It was her best although I don't remember much about it. Abot all that I do is the setting in China and a memory of two brothers.


Go To Top

Comment on: "Rachel Maddow is Wrong"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page