by HatetheSwamp on October 18, 2024 4:07 am
"During his later discussion with Hannity, Baier suggested Harris may have been seeking a confrontation."
It seems to me that that's what she had in mind. Her demeanor stunned me.
It seems to me that the one advantage Kammy has over Trump is that Trump's a belligerent @$$hole... and Kammy ain't.
The @$$hole thing matters to undecideds and moderate and independent common sense voters.
Oy.
In my first post about the interview, I noted that Kammy came across as, as Rush'd say, a "b-i-itch." The reason that I said that is that her demeanor seems to have been a choice. She didn't have to be like that. She's not always like that.
And, it seems to me, that there was intentionality about it... and, I don't get it.
Clearly, people who are on board with her approach to the Fox interview... and who also hate Fox... are all over this. Kammy already has their vote.
I think she really, really hurt herself... but toward what end? Is this supposed to have gotten her votes?
This was not Sister Souljah.
I'm honestly asking po, Donna, isle, Indy, Curt: Wassup with that?
by Ponderer on October 18, 2024 6:41 am
Wassup with it, Bill, is that you are entirely predisposed to seeing anything that Kamala does in the worst light possible, because you are a racist misogynist with Democrat Derangement Syndrome. That's how you were able to watch her superb handling of that interview and come away thinking that she somehow did damage to her campaign. You always say she did something harmful when she didn't. It's how you are driven to react, reality be damned.
I know that you are being fed a lot of bullshit nonsense from Fox which also tries to put her in the worst possible light, so you are probably just parroting crap that they told you. As you are constantly wont to do.
So this should explain wassup for you, Bill.
Happy to help!
(0.0) 
(0.0 from 0 votes)
