Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

Rashida Tlaib Uninjured After Her Pager Mysteriously Explodes
Military by HatetheSwamp     September 18, 2024 12:59 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [7 views]


How long will Trump wait to dump the shares of his company...
Business by Ponderer     September 18, 2024 1:06 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [7 views]


ABC’s David Muir takes hit to ratings after performance as debate moderator
Media by HatetheSwamp     September 18, 2024 10:19 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (7 comments) [56 views]


Hezbollah pagers explode across Lebanon, causing nearly 3,000 casualties
Military by Curt_Anderson     September 17, 2024 5:27 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (15 comments) [100 views]


Important Campaign News You Don't Want to Miss
Conspiracy by Indy!     September 13, 2024 8:24 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (14 comments) [125 views]


The latest on the ABC whistle-blower
Media by HatetheSwamp     September 18, 2024 3:53 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (19 comments) [119 views]


How MAGA saw the Presidential Debate
Politics by Curt_Anderson     September 18, 2024 12:46 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [4 views]


Billy Eilish endorses Kamala Harris
Entertainment by Indy!     September 17, 2024 6:24 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (6 comments) [38 views]


Gallup: Kammy's approval is EFFINtanking!
Media by HatetheSwamp     September 18, 2024 9:27 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [12 views]


DONNA - RED ALERT!
Conspiracy by Indy!     September 17, 2024 8:25 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Donna (2 comments) [32 views]


Military selectors, pages, etc.
So, Donna, SHUT THE EFF-UP!!!!!
By HatetheSwamp
July 31, 2024 3:30 am
Category: Military

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

Hamas Chief Ismail Haniyeh killed, IDF strikes Hezbollah commander Fuad Shukr

Beirut — Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh was assassinated in Iran's capital after attending the inauguration of the country's new president, Iranian officials and the militant group said early Wednesday. Hamas said it was an Israeli airstrike that killed the group's top political leader.

It was the second Israeli assassination of a senior Iran-allied militant commander in the space of just 12 hours, casting a growing shadow over U.S.-backed efforts to broker a cease-fire in the ongoing Israel-Hamas war and sharply increasing concern that the Gaza war could spread into a wider regional conflict in the Middle East, where the U.S. has thousands of troops based.


In precisely planned attacks, Israel retaliated for the shameless slaughter of twelve of its children who were playing soccer.

Only someone possessed with Nazi-like JewHate could possibly equate what Israel is doing in defense of its innocents with the historic terror being perpetrated on it.

So, don't even go there.

pb hates that this is happening, but the people of Israel are innocent victims.


Cited and related links:

  1. m.jpost.com
  2. cbsnews.com

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "So, Donna, SHUT THE EFF-UP!!!!!":

  1. by Ponderer on July 31, 2024 6:53 am

    I'm sorry, Bill. But did you just use the word "equate"? After all the effort we have made to get you to understand that you don't know what the word even means? Did you, a conservative with absolutely no comprehension or understanding of the meaning of what it means to "equate" things, just attempt to make a comparison?




    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


    No one here condones anything that Hamas is doing or has done. No one here is "on the side of Hamas". No one is justifying any of their heinous atrocities against the people of Israel. And yes, I am including Donna and myself in that.


    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .




    But for fucksake, Bill. How about if you shut thefuck up? You and your asinine attempts to equate what Hamas has done to Israel to what Israel has and is doing to a couple million Palestinian people, mostly women and children. There's actually not a lot of comparison to be made here, because the numbers are so inequitable.


    Gaza Civilians, Under Israeli Barrage, Are Being Killed at Historic Pace

    Nov. 25, 2024
    Even a conservative assessment of the reported Gaza casualty figures shows that the rate of death during Israel’s assault has few precedents in this century, experts say.


    Israel has cast the deaths of civilians in the Gaza Strip as a regrettable but unavoidable part of modern conflict, pointing to the heavy human toll from military campaigns the United States itself once waged in Iraq and Syria.

    But a review of past conflicts and interviews with casualty and weapons experts suggest that Israel’s assault is different.

    While wartime death tolls will never be exact, experts say that even a conservative reading of the casualty figures reported from Gaza shows that the pace of death during Israel’s campaign has few precedents in this century.

    People are being killed in Gaza more quickly, they say, than in even the deadliest moments of U.S.-led attacks in Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan, which were themselves widely criticized by human rights groups.

    Precise comparisons of war dead are impossible, but conflict-casualty experts have been taken aback at just how many people have been reported killed in Gaza — most of them women and children — and how rapidly.

    It is not just the scale of the strikes — Israel said it had engaged more than 15,000 targets before reaching a brief cease-fire in recent days. It is also the nature of the weaponry itself.

    Israel’s liberal use of very large weapons in dense urban areas, including U.S.-made 2,000-pound bombs that can flatten an apartment tower, is surprising, some experts say.

    “It’s beyond anything that I’ve seen in my career,” said Marc Garlasco, a military adviser for the Dutch organization PAX and a former senior intelligence analyst at the Pentagon. To find a historical comparison for so many large bombs in such a small area, he said, we may “have to go back to Vietnam, or the Second World War.”

    In fighting during this century, by contrast, U.S. military officials often believed that the most common American aerial bomb — a 500-pound weapon — was far too large for most targets when battling the Islamic State in urban areas like Mosul, Iraq, and Raqqa, Syria.


    [And this was only like 3 weeks after October 7th! They've only gotten far worse since then.]


  2. by Ponderer on July 31, 2024 6:57 am

    Israel Gaza: Checking Israel's claim to have killed 10,000 Hamas fighters

    Israel faces growing concern about the number of civilian deaths, after at least 30,000 Palestinians were reported killed in Gaza - as well as pressure to show it is eliminating Hamas as it vowed after 7 October. BBC Verify examines Israel's claims about how many of those killed were combatants.


    The Israeli military says it has killed more than 10,000 fighters in its air strikes and ground operations in response to the Hamas attack which killed about 1,200 people.

    But there are concerns about whether it is able to separate fighters from ordinary civilians. President Joe Biden said in December that Israel had the support of the world as well as the US, but "they're starting to lose that support by the indiscriminate bombing that takes place".

    The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have consistently defended their tactics, stressing that they are trying to be precise in their targeting of Hamas fighters and infrastructure, while seeking to minimize civilian deaths.

    Hamas does not provide any figures for its military fatalities. The Reuters news agency reported that an official had admitted 6,000 fighters had been killed, but Hamas denied this figure to the BBC.


  3. by Ponderer on July 31, 2024 7:09 am

    Israel has made disproportionate retaliation its calling card for many decades. Their current response is different only in scale.

    Yeah, Hamas has been despicable. But Israel has been far more despicabler.

    (Links to previous links below)

    economist.com
    nytimes.com
    bbc.com


  4. by Ponderer on July 31, 2024 7:12 am





    But please, Bill... Feel free to post all you want to show how what Hamas has done to Israel is far worse than what Israel has done to the Palestinian people of Gaza.............






  5. by HatetheSwamp on July 31, 2024 7:15 am

    po,

    On 10/7, Donna thought that the atrocity was that Israel temporarily cut off the fresh water spigot to Gaza.

    Check it out. Something else happened.


  6. by Ponderer on July 31, 2024 7:26 am

    "pb hates that this is happening, but the people of Israel are innocent victims." -Hate

    It's okay, Bill. We understand that you don't consider any Palestinian in Gaza as being "innocent". And of course you don't consider the children of Gaza to be innocent either. Only Israeli children and other Israelis are innocent victims in this by your standards. We get what an immoral, racist sociopath you are. We expect no less from you. It's why you condone and support Netanyahu's genocide against Gazans to such an obsequious degree.

    Look, Donna and I go on and on so much in here about the innocent victims in Gaza because if we didn't bring up what is happening to them, you twofucking MAGA Hats sure asfuck never would have.


  7. by Ponderer on July 31, 2024 7:30 am

    "Donna thought that the atrocity was that Israel temporarily cut off the fresh water spigot to Gaza." -Hate

    And she was completely correct that it was an atrocity. It was a flagrant war crime too.

    Meanwhile, you have never criticized the military and government of Israel for a single atrocity and war crime that it has committed against the innocent people of Gaza. They all had it coming as far as you are concerned.


  8. by HatetheSwamp on July 31, 2024 8:15 am

    po,

    I have never seen a report that I've deemed reliable of Israeli atrocities nor war crimes.

    Try sumpthin that's not the metaphorical or literature Rachel. Woke propaganda kills brain cells.


  9. by Ponderer on July 31, 2024 8:24 am

    "I have never seen a report that I've deemed reliable of Israeli atrocities nor war crimes." -Hate

    Right. Because you haven't ever looked for any. You are comfortable in your ignorance.

    If Fox doesn't drop something right in your lap, you can't be bothered to look any farther than that for any other data. We get it.



  10. by Ponderer on July 31, 2024 8:25 am

    I get pretty much nothing from Rachel about Gaza. That's why I go elsewhere for such information.


  11. by oldedude on July 31, 2024 11:06 am
    Sorry I'm late to the party. We had the 15-month old from 0900 yesterday to 4:30pm today. Things are a tad hectic.

    I'm going to answer hopefully in the same order as they were posted. My perspective is from someone that has been in area of operation several times in this terrorist war.

    1. Israel has cast the deaths of civilians in the Gaza Strip as a regrettable but unavoidable part of modern conflict, pointing to the heavy human toll from military campaigns the United States itself once waged in Iraq and Syria.
    Okay, here, you're only talking about 24 years. All done in low intensity asymmetrical warfare. Very, very different from the symmetrical of 80 years ago (an eye blink in warfare). Modern warfare is considered from 1800- present.[1] As many as three million German civilians died during World War II (not from the holocaust), and roughly 6,000,000 Soviet civilians. And don't forget the holocaust. These all come from "civilized war."

    Now we are in asymmetrical wars as the standard. Problems with asymmetrical war. 1. according to the "standard of conduct, the terrorist organizations are not considered soldiers. There are no identifiers on their uniforms, they often wear no uniform at all, they use civilians as their combatants to include those considered children in "western culture," women and others (not in uniform), etc. As far as women go, many global countries have women combatants in their militaries, Peshmerga of the Kurds, IDF, US, GB, and others. The difference is that women in radical Islam are specifically kept in their abaya is the custom.

    All that said. Prove to me who is not a combatant. If a 12-year-old has a gun and is getting ready to engage enemy forces, are they a combatant? What about a woman with a vest ready to blow up a city block? If you kill a cook in the US Military, that's a rightful kill because they're a member supporting the military. I hope you can see the problem here. Because they hold no status in the Geneva agreements, they can also murder medical staff, nurses, and doctors "legally." Which wasn't even true for the Germans and Russians in WWII. Thusly, the medics were marked. Now days, the medics have "bounties" on them. For us, it was $15K. Same for Navy Corps men(pronounced COREMEN). Radio folks? $10K. And there were a lot of others. So prove to me, who is, and who is NOT a combatant.


    2. The Israeli military says it has killed more than 10,000 fighters in its air strikes and ground operations in response to the Hamas attack which killed about 1,200 people.

    But there are concerns about whether it is able to separate fighters from ordinary civilians. President Joe Biden said in December that Israel had the support of the world as well as the US, but "they're starting to lose that support by the indiscriminate bombing that takes place".

    The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have consistently defended their tactics, stressing that they are trying to be precise in their targeting of Hamas fighters and infrastructure, while seeking to minimize civilian deaths.

    Hamas does not provide any figures for its military fatalities. The Reuters news agency reported that an official had admitted 6,000 fighters had been killed, but Hamas denied this figure to the BBC.

    You seem to have a problem with the number of HAMAS killed v. the number of Israeli's murdered. If Hamas is still fighting and not given up, they're still fair game. Obviously, I disagree with pedojoe. Is a bomb making facility inside a school or hospital a target? This is where the IDF has tried to play nice. The issue is that media will lose the "bomb factory" or Command and Control Center" in their reporting, and just look at the "innocent people" that are putting bombs together. They specifically put civilians in targeted areas ONLY to make the news and hope the sheep fall for it. Which they usually do.

    From 1993 to 2003, 303 Palestinian suicide bombers attacked Israel. More than 80% of all suicide bombings occurred after the year 2000. 55% of all suicide attacks were deemed "successful" – that is, resulted in killing themselves and injuring or killing others. Suicide bombings constituted just 0.5% of Palestinian attacks against Israelis in the first two years of the Second Intifada, though this percentage accounted for half of the Israelis killed in that period.[2]


    9. "I have never seen a report that I've deemed reliable of Israeli atrocities nor war crimes." -Hate

    Right. Because you haven't ever looked for any. You are comfortable in your ignorance.

    I have actually asked a couple of times for the same thing. I'd be willing to look if you have cites that YOU know about and can articulate. Otherwise there are none. If you tell me there are millions of references, even though I am aware of them, if you don't produce them you don't have any. I think it's fair for you to have knowledge of WTF you're talking about in a discourse.

    As we speak, here's a problem. There is ZERO LEADERSHIP IN THE US. It's a who's on first, what's on second issue. If I were Israel and wasn't getting shit from a supposed ally, "screw them I'll take care of this succinctly. They won't like it, but they gave up their 'say' over me when they quit talking to me."
    en.wikipedia.org
    en.wikipedia.org


  12. by Indy! on July 31, 2024 11:41 am

    Israel is the little white blonde haired girl of the world. Everytime she cries we're supposed to wring our hands, send them more money / bombs and then turn a blind eye to their atrocities.


  13. by HatetheSwamp on July 31, 2024 12:06 pm

    OD: "I have actually asked a couple of times for the same thing. I'd be willing to look if you have cites that YOU know about and can articulate. Otherwise there are none."

    And, that's the issue. You and I are the only seekers of truth currently on SS.

    The others simply produce propaganda that feeds the preferences and prejudices that they bring with them to every moment of their lives.

    I'd love to be convinced that po and Donna and Indy ain't vile JewHaters but I have no reliable evidence.


  14. by Indy! on July 31, 2024 12:37 pm

    I'd love to be convinced that you and OD have any real concern for Israel (or Palestinians), but we all know you couldn't care less - you're just repeating Fox talking points again.


  15. by oldedude on July 31, 2024 3:01 pm
    Actually, unlike you, I spent time in Israel on missions while you were getting a degree that did you no good whatsoever. I also have a Masters in strategic intelligence (Terrorism) and have worked in the genre for 30 years. You've wasted your life completely on seeing 35 countries in a week. I've lived in countries you may be able to spell (but I doubt it). Your life has nothing to show for it. It was wasted on being a class clown and hated by most all the people that have met you.

    You also bring a fat ZERO to the discussion. Ever.

    Israel is outnumbered by adversaries roughly 15:1 (depending on the day and how the family of Saud is feeling). Everyone on three sides want them dead because the "british" and "french" are egomaniacs and couldn't actually decide on any country in the middle east. Which is about half the problem. Tribes and clans (for lack of a better term) were forced to move or split. The kurdish area is a prime example. They're hated by all three countries they're in. Had they been their own country, things would be much better.

    Back to Palestine. I know you're a big Himmler follower. That's very evident. Hoping beyond hope of a final "final solution." You're one of those that doesn't believe the Holocaust ever happened because you still support your and believe your great uncle Adolf is alive and living in Argentina. po and Donna are different. They believe Palestinians have more of a right to exist than the Israelis or the Jews per se. Big difference. We'll start with that.

    Contrary to leftist beliefs, Israel was built by the Jews, and was a major city before Christ was born, which was 300 years before Islam.

    Do I believe Muslims have a "right" to Israel? Sure. They actually started the civil war (Revolution) of 1948, right after the land was given to the Jews. Israel has been attacked by everyone but Jordan formally in war twice since the war of 1948. 1n 1967, they tried again, and Egypt got in the furthest (for a couple of hours). The Arabs lost full control of Jerusalem in that war. The Palestinians, with the help of other Arab states, has never been without war since 1976. There have always been cease fires, but no true peace.

    Knowing this, do the Palestinians have a "right" to the 12 tribes area. I would say they did at one point, but they didn't have enough sense to just STFU. They'd be a lot better off. Israel has taken all the land of Palestine at least once, and half the Sanai (almost half of Egypt) most of which they've given back a couple of times. My view is they lost their "rights" to Israel when they declared genocide of all Jews in the world. My question to po, TAFKAP, and donna. Would you have let Pol Pot loose? or maybe any of the Duvalier's? I think that's at least a global danger. Plus we know Hamas fighters train in Syria, Yemen, Iraq, Iran. They are part of the global system of terrorism. I've thought I've pretty clear on the palestanians. Everywhere in Palestine is a training ground for terrorism. For sure the camps. Which are built and supplied by UNESCO. Makes you think twice about the UN doesn't it?

    Do the Israelis have the "right" to defend itself. Yes. They use non-violent means as applicable (water, electric) which they built and maintain (since the 1990's). Like I've said before. If Hamas (and the rest of the groups) cared the same for their people as much as they care about dead Jews, this could have been negotiated long ago. But they don't. You attack Israel, you know what's going to happen.
    bing.com


  16. by oldedude on July 31, 2024 3:20 pm
    Nov. 25, 2024
    Even a conservative assessment of the reported Gaza casualty figures shows that the rate of death during Israel’s assault has few precedents in this century, experts say.


    ahhhh FYSA Nov 25, 2024 hasn't been here yet. jussayin.

    Look, Donna and I go on and on so much in here about the innocent victims in Gaza because if we didn't bring up what is happening to them, you twofucking MAGA Hats sure asfuck never would have.
    Again. show to me that Hamas doesn't lie about the civilians killed and show me they're "civilians."

    Second item. You've spent over 99% of your time supporting the terrorists. What else are we going to believe? With your words, you've put yourself in jeopardy.

    I also said this earlier, twice. The Israelis have been the best (by far) of waging war within the concept of Middle Eastern wars. Hamas has not. Israel warns the civilian population they are coming into an area, generally several days in advance. This is culturally significant. Even during the Crusades, this was done on both sides to clear innocent victims out of the range of war. Hamas has done several things. The first is they have NOT allowed civilians to leave. Not the Israelis problem. Hamas threatens families with the death of their children and will take away their homes if they do leave. Their choice. Leave and forfeit your home, land, farm, etc, or stay. So Israel has been playing by agreed upon rules. Your friends are not.



  17. by Indy! on July 31, 2024 3:34 pm
    Do you really think I care where you lived at any given time, Odorous? You want me to say "congratulations" for seeing all the shitholes of the world and helping to make them even shittier with your guns and "regime changes" that always go south the minute we show up? Congrats, bro - you took a ride on the military tour of crappy places to visit. Hope you got one of those little ribbons for your uniform to go with it and not just some depleted uranium poisoning.


  18. by oldedude on July 31, 2024 3:54 pm
    I think you do. As someone with zero global experience. You're someone that builds their "opinions" on just that. You have zero real world life experience to add to anything. This is why you're so taken in by the Cartels and Terrorists. You don't have a clue what they really do for a living. Your whole world with them is a fantasy. And I'll just double down on the rest of what I said. Since you didn't read any of the post you were replying to...


  19. by Ponderer on July 31, 2024 5:56 pm

    "Again. show to me that Hamas doesn't lie about the civilians killed and show me they're "civilians."" -olde dude

    "They're"??? Show you they were civilians???

    *blink*

    I see.

    So... in order to satisfy your request, you want me to come up with a link to some sort of compiled data or credible media reporting outlet that you will accept that proves to your satisfaction that the over twelve thousand Palestinian children killed by Israeli attacks in Gaza since this started were "civilians" and in absolutely no way were militant Hamas soldiers fighting Israeli troops or firing missiles into Kibbutz's...?





    You want me... to prove to you... that the well over twelve thousand Palestinian children murdered by Netanyahu... were civilians...???





    Well... I dunno if this will suffice. You probably hate this organization. But it proves my point if not yours.

    (*Please forgive that this is like four months old. So in all fairness, I won't address the possible military status of the thousands of Palestinian children Bibi's murdered since then...)


    Gaza: Number of children killed higher than from four years of world conflict

    “This war is a war on children. It is a war on their childhood and their future,” said UNRWA Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini, who described as “staggering” the latest Gaza health authority data indicating that at least 12,300 youngsters have died in the enclave in the last four months, compared with 12,193 globally between 2019 and 2022.



    news.un.org


  20. by Indy! on July 31, 2024 6:55 pm

    I live in the real world, OD. The gov't never provided me with 3 hots and a cot or a check every month for the brief time I served before Reagan was president. That aint "reality" - that's you - a ward of the state.


  21. by oldedude on July 31, 2024 7:00 pm
    You got a cot? Your meals were hot? Oh. Yeah. That was in your fantasy world military. The one you create in you (very) little head when you wish you weren't a "delicate" "man." or even a "man." instead of being a slug that lives off of everyone else and hasn't done anything to help anyone else in her life.


  22. by oldedude on August 1, 2024 7:41 am
    po- my stress with Hamas is that I know they are stupid as the day is long and extremely passive-aggressive. They throw a couple hundred rockets and missiles into Israel. They escalate poking the bear until Israel retaliates. Then I'm like "damnit!" and I know what's going to happen. Hamas claims to be the "innocent" victim. The true victims in this situation are the folks that live there (both sides).

    This has been a problem since Arafat was young. And honestly, you can track it back to 300 AD, when Islam was created. I'm sure they can go back to Abraham, but I'm not making that leap.

    I've been following these "clowns" around since the early '80's when they were using their own people to blow up busses of Victims. Jews, Druze, Muslim, anyone that generally took the transportation. Israelis treat this as a crime scene and took DNA of the bomber (once they identify the part(s). They knew where the bomber lived. The terrorist factions would get their bombers from the children of people that had "slighted" the religion, either real or imagined. What the terrorists would point out is the Israelis bulldozing the bomber's house. What they wouldn't say is the bombers' family was getting enough money to build a new house and live comfortably for the next 10 years. In addition, the family moved up on the literal food chain (since the terrorists control the flow of all the resources).

    You (and your wife) v. Lead and I are caught on sides. Speaking for myself as a Christian. We HAVE to have peace in the region. Way too many of the players have WMD and feel they have been "chosen" to use them. For me, it's not "only" about the lives of the folks in the region, it's about how and if this earth survives. That bothers me immensely. What I know is that I don't have the ability to control any part of this situation.

    I don't think any part of this, of all the countries I've named are willing to just call any sort of peace and have it stick. None of them are interested. Everyone says they have a "right" to this land. And they're like a bunch of three-year-olds. Nobody can share. These are cultures that that believe in revenge. That's a very hard thing to deal with from the outside.

    On 10/7, the Israelis took thousands of pieces of DNA. Victims, assholes, whomever. They are tracking those people down. Many have been caught.

    ANSWERS: I don't have any. This is like telling the Irish to stop. It's not going to happen.



  23. by HatetheSwamp on August 1, 2024 8:44 am

    OD,

    Years ago, I lived for most of a summer in Israel and spent a good chunk of the time working on an archeological site at Acco/ Ptolemais... near Lebanon. The rest of my time, I lived in Jerusalem. I got to know some Palestinians and lots of Jews. Most, on both sides, were very very good people, and it became clear to me, from the beginning, that peace was impossible. The best possibility was an stalemate in which there would be no war. That was right after the Yom Kippur War. Tensions were as high then as today.

    My heart goes out to the Palestinians. But, with Hamas doing its thing, I don't know what Israel can do.

    As far as po and Donna are concerned, either they are ignorant or, more likely, antisemitic. Not helpful.


  24. by Donna on August 1, 2024 9:05 am

    I will continue to condemn those who commit atrocities against civilians until the day I die, I will not accept any excuses for those atrocities or apologize for my condemnations, and I welcome any hatred that's directed at me for my viewpoint.

    So carry on. Actually, being told to "Shut up", makes me feel good about what I've been saying.







  25. by HatetheSwamp on August 1, 2024 9:20 am

    Donna, on 10/7 the atrocity that got your gull was Israel temporarily turning off the fresh water spigot. I didn't see you even acknowledge the unspeakable Hamas rapes, murders, tortures,and kidnappings AGAINST JEWS until OD shamed you... several days later.

    No one with a brain will believe for a minute that you give a d@ng about "atrocities against civilians."

    You are a JewHater.


  26. by Donna on August 1, 2024 9:22 am

    You're a demented old freak.


  27. by Ponderer on August 1, 2024 9:23 am

    "po- my stress with Hamas is that I know they are stupid as the day is long and extremely passive-aggressive. They throw a couple hundred rockets and missiles into Israel. They escalate poking the bear until Israel retaliates." -olde dude

    You brought up a lot of salient points in that whole post, od. I don't even generally read more than the first sentence or two of your posts, but I made an exception with this one.

    Yes, we are on different sides in this. You and Hate are on the side of Israel. Period. We get that. We are on the side of all the victims of this, Israeli and Palestinian.

    You prove what side you are on every time that you post something like that quote above, where only Hamas and the Palestinians are apparently to blame for what befalls them. You go on and on for huge paragraphs about how Hamas and the Palestinian people have brought all this on themselves. And you make valid points. But when we ask, "What about the tens of thousands of wantonly murdered Palestinian children?", you respond by ludicrously suggesting that perhaps they were terrorists and then accuse us of supporting Hamas and their terrorist attacks.


    And you aren't alone in this sort of perspective. In fact, you are in the vast majority of Americans, thanks to the most successful, long-game propaganda campaign in all of human history.

    It has apparently been an unspoken rule of American journalism for many decades that they don't report on Israeli attacks or outrages against Palestinians in the Occupied Territories until Hamas attacks them "first". Then it's all about how suddenly, out of nowhere and for no apparent reason whatsoever, Hamas launched missiles at Israel or bombed something of theirs. AND THEN of course Israel had to retaliate. That's been the template of the reporting on the Israel/Palestine conflict they've stuck with practically since Israel's inception. Like it's engraved in stone tablets.

    As you said, the history of this region has been in turmoil for centuries. But in recent decades, it's not been because Israel is just trying to live peacefully, minding its own business, when all of a sudden and out of nowhere they are getting hit by rockets for no reason at all.

    We have been locked into that narrative for decades like it's enshrined in our Constitution or something. It's suddenly big breaking news when Israel gets some sort of attack against them, but we never hear about anything that Israel might have done to Palestinians before they were attacked retaliated against. The coverage in American journalism for the most part has been seriously and grossly one-sided for decades. Propaganda mission accomplished.

    I don't support Hamas. I hate them as much as I do the Israeli government/military. Hamas does the Palestinian people no favors. But neither has the Israeli government/military for their people. They are both horrible and sociopathic at governing. They are both heinous, inhuman organizations lead by sociopathic maniacs with little to no concern for innocent human life. Both sides have made this obvious.

    So to always frame events in such a way that always makes Hamas out to be the initial antagonists is wholly inaccurate and mendaciously propagandistic. And I doubt it will ever change.


    In a land where millions of subjugated people are forced to live out their lives in abject captivity with massively brutal, inhuman control over those lives for well over half a century.... control and abuse that periodically gets far worse and wantonly murderous, as if to purposely instigate retaliation, it is certainly to be expected that there will be elements of that population who will have had enough and will fight back. Regardless of how impudent and hopeless that fight will be and what it brings upon the greater population.



    Again, I do not support Hamas at all whatsoever. I am merely pointing out facts that few like to hear.



    Here's the thing. It is absolutely possible to understand the motivations of a violent group without also supporting that group. I understand the motivations of a teenage Palestinian who throws a rock at an Israeli tank. I understand the hopeless motivations of someone driven to the point of strapping explosives to themselves and getting on an Israeli bus. I understand the motivations of those who are firing missiles into populated areas of Israel. Yet I am still able to condemn those actions, even though I understand what drove them to it.

    It has been a tragic thing for all Palestinians that the vast majority of our population do not understand the back story to what has gone on for so long. Mainly because of this unified propagandist narrative that has been fed to them for decades by our national media.

    Again, Donna and I do not condone or support Hamas's actions in any way. I simply understand what has driven these people to such desperate and hopeless actions. And for expressing my understanding of their motivations, and for caring about the innocent victims that no one else brings up, I am labeled as being in favor of Hamas and supporting what they are doing. Just like anyone who dares stand up for the genocide in Gaza have been.

    No wonder few in this country dare to stand up for the Palestinian people whose lives are destroyed on a constant basis in the occupied territories. Anyone in this country who stands up for the innocent Palestinians murdered by the tens of thousands by Israel and its military are instantly labeled as "Hamas lovers" and "terrorist supporters" (as you and Hate have done to us) when all they are doing is calling attention to the tragically ignored humanity of the hopelessly subjugated Palestinian people and how human rights should apply to them too.



  28. by Ponderer on August 1, 2024 9:27 am

    "No one with a brain will believe for a minute that you give a d@ng about "atrocities against civilians."" -Hate

    And no one with intact frontal lobes believes for a second that you aren't a fuckingtwat who needs to go fuck himself.

    Donna posted all sorts of things besides that atrocity about the water back then. Just because your dementia-ridden brain can't recall all of what she said doesn't mean that all you recall her saying was all she said.


  29. by HatetheSwamp on August 1, 2024 9:41 am

    Re:"Yes, we are on different sides in this. You and Hate are on the side of Israel. Period."

    No, po, I'm not for Israel. The reason that I disagree with your view is that I have found no data that I find trustworthy that indicates that Israel is committing atrocities.

    "You go on and on for huge paragraphs about how Hamas and the Palestinian people have brought all this on themselves."

    I'll let OD speak for himself. I don't lump together the Palestinian people and Hamas. Palestinians are culpable when they are complicit with what Hamas does. Only then.

    "...you are in the vast majority of Americans, thanks to the most successful, long-game propaganda campaign in all of human history."

    Ahhhhhhhhhhh. Sanctimony, po. So, everyone who thinks differently than you is mindnumbed!!!!!? You ain't as enlightened as you imagine.

    You'd do well not to demean people who think differently than you. Your lack of empathy for and respect for people who think differently than you has always been your problem.


  30. by Ponderer on August 1, 2024 10:01 am

    "The reason that I disagree with your view is that I have found no data that I find trustworthy that indicates that Israel is committing atrocities." -Hate

    Willfully blind, biased, blinkered pig-ignorance is no excuse for not being aware of demonstrable reality.

    You're like your Mango Messiah in that, Bill. He also refuses to acknowledge the reality that he lost the last election by declaring that he believes it was stolen from him. He refuses to acknowledge any and all credible evidence out there that would prove to him that he lost as "fake news" and all part of the Democratic plot against him.

    Likewise, you say there is no credible evidence that Israel is committing multiple heinous war crimes because you refuse to acknowledge all the credible evidence that they have.



  31. by Donna on August 1, 2024 10:11 am

    Yep, all of that, hon.

    The U.S. is very much like Russia in that respect. Over many decades, going back to the days of the Soviet Union, the US mainstream media, like their counterparts in Russia, have been censoring news that casts the actions of their own government and that of its allies in a negative light, especially during times of war.

    I'm reminded of the old adage about truth being the first casualty of war. Russian people are being propagandized about their own government's war crimes in Ukraine just as Americans have been propagandized over many decades about the Israeli government's war crimes against Palestinians, which are numerous. This propaganda campaign has been in full-swing practically my entire life, due in a large part to efforts by the incredibly well-funded pro-Israel lobbying group AIPAC.

    To say that AIPAC has been influencial in molding American attitudes towards Israel and Palestine is an understatement. AIPAC is one of the top donors to both the Democratic and Republican Parties. This is why in UN vote after UN vote, the US is almost always the only major country that has sided with Israel.



  32. by oldedude on August 1, 2024 10:45 am
    PO- Yes, we are on different sides in this. You and Hate are on the side of Israel. Period. We get that. We are on the side of all the victims of this, Israeli and Palestinian.
    Not true. At all. I have searches for international articles regarding the Middle East. I actually watch BOTH SIDES, not just being the hanger on for a terrorist group. There are several of us that actually get international information from multiple sources. I think you would be shocked to see how much you're being lied to. In not only the articles, I've also been on the classified part of this for decades. So for decades, I've looked at the classified, then read articles to see the differences and who to trust for giving more facts than bullshit. I also recognize propaganda.
    AND, I (for one) is doubtful if you give any flying fuck for any Israeli or Jew in the world, regardless if they are in Israel, Europe, or the US. Crimes against Jews have gone up 140% from 2022-2023 in the US alone. I've never heard either of you give any remark supporting old folks that have been beaten going to synagogue. That. Says volumes. Especially when you cheer on the Palestinian Protestors that are committing the crimes.

    "What about the tens of thousands of wantonly murdered Palestinian children?"
    I addressed that. I also spoke about the terrorists you love, and you don't separate them from the real victims. I'm not going to convince you, so I'm not trying any more. You're picking the fight. Just like the terrorists. You want to poke the bear. Go for it.

    It has apparently been an unspoken rule of American journalism for many decades that they don't report on Israeli attacks or outrages against Palestinians in the Occupied Territories until Hamas attacks them "first". Then it's all about how suddenly, out of nowhere and for no apparent reason whatsoever, Hamas launched missiles at Israel or bombed something of theirs. AND THEN of course Israel had to retaliate. That's been the template of the reporting on the Israel/Palestine conflict they've stuck with practically since Israel's inception. Like it's engraved in stone tablets.
    You really lost the main point of most of my post. What you just said is willful ignorance on your part. I've been watching this for decades. It's one thing to poke the bear. It's another to retaliate because one of your leaders gets vaporized by a cruise missile. Two entirely different scenarios.

    There's also a difference between completely disregarding any humanity in even the worst declared wars of the last century. NO ONE has come close to what they did minus the Japanese in Nanjing at the outset of WWII, and the holocaust. The only things that may come close is the genocides in Congo, the Balkins, and other atrocities that have been photographed and people have been charged and hung. You have completely disregarded this in your thinking. Only brought it up when pressed. Never actually spoke about other than in general "nonchalance" about the victims.

    So I'm going to ask one more time. Do you have references that would cause a nation state to behead infants as a known and authorized use of force in modern warfare? Not to mention the rape of obvious non-combatant men, women, and children. SIMPLY PUT- Would the references support a theory that would provide the US with the "right" to do the same thing?

    I don't support Hamas.
    Then why are you a willful idiot for them?


  33. by oldedude on August 1, 2024 10:47 am
    I'm a little disappointed (but not surprised at all) that really trying to "explain" a situation I've studied for decades. And there it is.


  34. by Ponderer on August 1, 2024 11:08 am

    I gave it a shot. olde dude is just going to keep lying his fuckingass off about me. I've explained my positions over and over again, but he still has to make up flaming bullshit lies about me...

    "That. Says volumes. Especially when you cheer on the Palestinian Protestors that are committing the crimes." -olde dude

    "I also spoke about the terrorists you love, and you don't separate them from the real victims." -olde dude

    All fuckinglies from afucking, bald-faced fuckingliar. And a pretty sloppy-ass one at that.


    "Then why are you a willful idiot for them?" -olde dude

    Please explain, od, in as intricate and unbridled detail as you care to, exactly how I am a "willful idiot" for Hamas by caring about the tens of thousands of children murdered by Israel in Gaza... and I will explain why everything you just said is a pile of flaming bullshit.

    I have never said anything in support of anything Hamas has ever done. I have striven to make it absolutely clear that I do not support or condone them or any of their actions. But you will have none of it. You simply refuse to abandon this totally fictional version of me that you've created to castigate and make yourself feel good about battling.

    You're a bigger lying fuckingtwat than Hate is, od. And he's a pretty enormous one, so good job! Your need to gofuckyourself is in fact far greater than his. Please initiate the going andfucking of yourself at the earliest possible opportunity.


  35. by Indy! on August 1, 2024 11:12 am

    When it comes to Old Dud, you can get a better argument from a doorknob.


  36. by Ponderer on August 1, 2024 11:17 am

    "I'm a little disappointed (but not surprised at all) that really trying to "explain" a situation I've studied for decades. And there it is." -olde dude

    Look, olde dude. It's not my fault that you are such an abominably boring and terrible writer. I can't be blamed for all the non sequitur and irrelevant information you want to post to obfuscate and excuse the fact that tens of thousands of innocent Palestinian children and other innocents are being wantonly slaughtered by the forces of Israel in Gaza.

    Oh and by the way... You want to know why I don't make any distinction between Hamas fighters and the innocents I speak of?

    It's because when I am talking about and specifically saying "innocent civilians" and "innocent children", I am obviously not talking about the Hamas fighters, you blithering, sociopathic, bigoted, brain-dead dolt!



  37. by oldedude on August 1, 2024 1:21 pm
    Please explain, od, in as intricate and unbridled detail as you care to, exactly how I am a "willful idiot" for Hamas by caring about the tens of thousands of children murdered by Israel in Gaza... and I will explain why everything you just said is a pile of flaming bullshit.

    Look, olde dude. It's not my fault that you are such an abominably boring and terrible writer. I can't be blamed for all the non sequitur and irrelevant information you want to post to obfuscate and excuse the fact that tens of thousands of innocent Palestinian children and other innocents are being wantonly slaughtered by the forces of Israel in Gaza.

    I understand that you only believe your "thoughts" are the only "thoughts" in the world that should be listened to. NONE of that was irrelevant. It was precise if you can actually think. These things are what politicians and world leaders consider. Some mindless tramp on the streets may think differently. I don't care. You and TAFKAP together couldn't put any of that together, and you're both mindless street tramps. And failures.

    I have asked repeatedly, for your references on your numbers, which you keep diverting on. You're no better than TAFKAP. Pulling "stats" out of your sloppy ass and screaming "everyone knows that!"

    In your "argument" you completely fail to mention children being gutted. I asked you

    It's because when I am talking about and specifically saying "innocent civilians" and "innocent children", I am obviously not talking about the Hamas fighters, you blithering, sociopathic, bigoted, brain-dead dolt!/b>

    AND I'm asking you again. What do you describe as a combatant? You refuse to answer that. In your blithering, sociopathic, bigoted, brain-dead manner, you skirt the issue because to you, "no one" is actually a fighter. Hamas is a figment of the world's imagination, and nothing more.

    TAFKAP differs. He has a fantasy fixation on terrorists. He's I still think he loves their snuff films and just doesn't want to admit it. He bought them off the cartels, then he had the opportunity to buy them off Hamas. So he has to have more time in mommy's basement "inspecting them" for daddy.

    Again from #32: So I'm going to ask one more time. Do you have references that would cause a nation state to behead infants as a known and authorized use of force, given by their government in modern warfare? Not to mention the rape and intentional burning to death of obvious non-combatant men, women, and children. SIMPLY PUT- Would your references support a theory that would provide the US (or any country you like) with the "right" to do the same thing?

    I believe that is EXACTLY the question that needs to be asked. IF yes, I am all ears. Honestly. If I think it's illegal, it must be illegal for everyone.



  38. by Ponderer on August 1, 2024 2:00 pm

    Wow. So much hot air, blather and obfuscation. Just to keep from going and fuckingyourself like you dearly need to.

    I posted numbers, asshole. But as I even mentioned when I did it, you probably don't care for United Nations or other human rights organization numbers. Which again, is not my fault.


    A. You asked for numbers.

    B. I gave you numbers.

    C. You didn't like my numbers.

    D. You can gofuckyourself.

    E. Seriously. You need to gofuckyourself.



  39. by HatetheSwamp on August 1, 2024 2:12 pm

    po,

    Where are the numbers? What are their source?


  40. by oldedude on August 1, 2024 2:31 pm
    This was actually the easiest thing I could ask. The issue is that you don't have any supporting documentation. Even with your single, questionable reference, if you had supporting documentation, I'd really look at it. With this evidence...

    A. I asked for citations/ references.

    B. You gave you numbers and a single, very questionable reference. Interesting thing. There are actually some very good articles out there that speak to the issues of civilian casualties and hardships. One from Oxford, and one from the International Red Cross. The issue is interesting. NO ONE mentions the Palestinians😱...mmmmm...... The Congo, Mali, and several other regions, yes. Apparently, no one actually thinks this one rises to that level.

    C. No. Two things. I asked for support for your single "reference" Your reference is like asking TASS about what's going with Putin. They lie their asses off. You are unable to provide any reasonable supportive information for your single reference. Anything with this magnitude should have dozens of references. War crimes usually do, from numerous sources. This is what I've been looking for. I thought I was just missing them. I guess not.
    Therefore, ....

    D. You can gofuckyourself.

    E. Seriously. You need to gofuckyourself.
    and don't come up for air.

    I actually thought you and donna would come up with something substantial. I really did. And like in a couple of curt's posts, I learned something. That was cool to me. And I keep those in mind.


  41. by oldedude on August 1, 2024 8:06 pm
    Lead. the background is the left/sheeple/ limousine libtards don't have actual "FACTS" to the "issues" they claim so much about. This is nothing but disgusting. I honestly hated to say this about donna. She's usually been pretty factual. Or at least will cite. That tells me she can think. Important to me. I may disagree, but if someone brings facts, I will at least give them the respect to listen. I'll still listen to her until she proves she doesn't listen to others and can't reply in a reasonable manner. I'm hoping that's pretty quick.


  42. by oldedude on August 1, 2024 8:56 pm
    The flip side is the one's that have always proven they're full of sheite. That would be po and TFAKAP. So that's expected. In TFAKAP's case sheite floats. po is really trying through her beliefs. I really think this may be the first time she's been tried. That's a very hard road. I respect her for her views, but not so much that she refuses to listen.


  43. by oldedude on August 1, 2024 9:20 pm
    #23- Lead. Got it (although very late, my apologies, and I understand more than I can say. Godspeed to you.).
    For people who have never had to live under missile or rocket attack, it's a very foreign world. Rockets are interesting. It depends on how much Khat, meth, or other substance the loaders were given. There's no "standard" to them. So they can hit a futbul field or 25km down the road. and no one knows. Missiles are different. they are trackable and know within a 3metre range where they will hit.

    Back to where you were. Did you get to travel much? we were ground restricted. That sucked in the area. I would have loved to see the sights there. I did get in to Egypt on the ground. That's a story for the grandkids when they're older. Although I got the BEST curry powder I've ever had! I cooked with it for over a year with 500gms (yeah.... it was pretty hot....). I really hope you enjoyed your stay. We were there, and we flew a lot. And we were "visitors" so we were taken care of the way the host country wanted us to be. My best to you on that "mission." I know you don't call it that, but you know what I mean.




  44. by HatetheSwamp on August 2, 2024 4:16 am

    OD,

    I was with a small group of college students. We spent the first week or so staying in a youth hostel in Jerusalem and traveling every day. Back then, sharing a taxi was inexpensive. BTW, our taxi driver was Arab. We hit sites of many archeological digs of ancient cities and all the religious shrines in the south. Then, on the Sabbath, while at the dig, we traveled through the north.

    The post war tension was palpable. I returned with a mild case of what I now understand was PTSD.

    I was a Religion and Philosophy major at the time entering my senior year of college. I expected to come away with an deep understanding of the context of the biblical narrative, and that happened...

    ... but, today, what remains is my understanding of the conflict between Palestinians and Jews. I remember the people.

    I get it that I am particularly belligerent, especially with Donna, on the 10/7 thing. My experience among flesh and blood people is why.

    What Donna and po, and Indy, say comes across to me as brainless, off-the-shelf, cultural Marxist tripe. I'll never forget how royally pi$$ed I was at the JewHate packed into Donna's 10/7 comment about the fresh water supply. I am just as angry now as I was then.

    And, it's third-hand JewHate. Yeah, I know that I have experience that Donna and po don't have. Still, it's highly offensive to me.


  45. by Ponderer on August 2, 2024 7:41 am

    All I have been doing in here for months is saying how cataclysmically horrible it is, what is happening to tens of thousands of innocent children, women, and other innocent Palestinian victims of Israel's war on Gaza.

    But apparently, unless I can provide documentation on the documented civilian status of every Palestinian child who has been blown into chunks in Gaza, I am not justified in giving a flying fuck about a single one of them.

    Apparently, the default position for our resident MAGA Hats is that there have been no innocent children, or any other innocent Palestinian victims who have died from anything that Israel has one to the current gravel pit that was once known as Gaza.

    And apparently, by their reasoning, anyone who dares suggest that my God, in fact there have been many thousands of innocent victims of Israels atrocities in Gaza... is instantly labeled by our resident "Middle East experts" as a Jew-hating, Hamas-loving, terrorist sympathizer.

    Unless they are provided with documentation that they will accept on the non-military status of every single dead Palestinian child... and unless I provide it to them... by their reasoning, there have been no innocent Palestinian children killed by Israeli forces operating in Gaza and any statements to the contrary are Fake News.


    I am going to go on record here as disagreeing with their reasoning.


    If they want to believe away tens of thousands of heinously slaughtered human beings, many killed with weapons that we provided Israel with, and ignore the mountains of legitimate and widely corroborated data collected on Israel's war crimes which they can easily find doing two minutes of Googling, and that I am in no way obligated to steer them to, then fine. If that's what their blinkered, bloated egos fed on propagandist dogma need them to believe to allow them to live with themselves, then their ignorance is bliss I suppose.



  46. by HatetheSwamp on August 2, 2024 7:56 am

    po,

    OD and pb care about actual truth. From what pb can tell, all you need to fuel the flame of your JewHate is a juicy kernel of Islamist propaganda.

    As I noted, I care about the people... on both sides. It's difficult, anyway, for people who want more than additional reason to hate... such as Donna and you.

    And, you, in particular, are puuuuure sanctimony when others don't share your preferences and prejudices.


  47. by Ponderer on August 2, 2024 8:16 am

    "OD and pb care about actual truth." -Hate

    And your "truth" is that there have been no innocent Palestinian children slaughtered in Gaza by Israeli forces.

    I fuckingget that already. You heartless, unempathetic fuckingassholes don't have to keep grinding it into the damned dirt. To you, Palestinian children don't count as human beings. We all understand that already for fucksake...

    "[There have been no legitimately documented examples or proof of any innocent Palestinian deaths caused by Israeli aggressions since October 7th, and therefore, there have been no innocent Palestinian victims of Israel's military actions in Gaza since that time.]" -Hate and olde dude

    We get it, okay??? GEEZ!!!


  48. by HatetheSwamp on August 2, 2024 8:21 am

    "And your "truth" is that there have been no innocent Palestinian children slaughtered in Gaza by Israeli forces."

    H€ck no!

    Truth? Israel admits that there have been innocents killed!

    The Islamists, otoh, dream of 10,000 more October 7ths.



  49. by Ponderer on August 2, 2024 8:45 am

    "Truth? Israel admits that there have been innocents killed!" -Hate



    *blink*



    Umm... That's all I have been saying. So what makes me a Jew-hating antisemite for saying that?


  50. by Ponderer on August 2, 2024 8:47 am

    "The Islamists, otoh, dream of 10,000 more October 7ths." -Hate

    And far right wing Israelis, including many in government, dream of vaporizing every last Palestinian in the Occupied Territories.

    So what was your point...?


  51. by oldedude on August 2, 2024 9:02 am
    If they want to believe away tens of thousands of heinously slaughtered human beings, many killed with weapons that we provided Israel with, and ignore the mountains of legitimate and widely corroborated data collected on Israel's war crimes which they can easily find doing two minutes of Googling, and that I am in no way obligated to steer them to,

    I have done searches on it, looking for "legitimate and widely corroborated data collected on Israel's war crimes" which have pulled up very little reliable evidence, and a lot of hearsay. (you really need to actually read the post before you unleash your inner bitch) Everyone "is looking into it." Maybe. Sortakinda. someone heard from another guy who heard from another guy who heard from another guy. No evidence that (the inclusive) you would require if this were pedojoe or kammy or anyone else you little germans view as "heros."

    In every other source of genocide, there are villagers that will walk investigators to the site of where the murders were done. Show them where the killing fields are, the ditches full of bodies are. There are photographs of the investigations and it goes up the chain to the world court.

    All we get is a gofuckyourselfyoustupidassholes lather, rinse, repeat, repeat. repeat. repeat. I can do the same to all y'all. It doesn't change anything.

    My question hasn't changed. I'm going to make it really, really easy for you.
    YOU INSIST there is "tons of 'evidence'" the Israelis have murdered "thousands of children" since 10/7. If there's that amount of "evidence," you must know where it is. I am only asking for four citations, coming from independently sourced (meaning not AP/UPI rewritten "source") references. These can come from the same two or three places. There are a lot of different NGOs that have hopped on this, especially in the leftist lanes. I have found a couple, and none (read zero, zilch, nada) view palestine as the shit show you claim it is or mention it. Which is strange to me.

    I'm still waiting: Again from #32: So I'm going to ask one more time. Do you have references that would cause a nation state to behead infants as a known and authorized use of force, given by their government in modern warfare? Not to mention the rape and intentional burning to death of obvious non-combatant men, women, and children. SIMPLY PUT- Would your references support a theory that would provide the US (or any country you like) with the "right" to do the same thing?


  52. by oldedude on August 2, 2024 9:06 am
    And far right wing Israelis, including many in government, dream of vaporizing every last Palestinian in the Occupied Territories.

    So what was your point...?


    I'm sure there are. Show me Israel has done a 10/7.


  53. by Donna on August 2, 2024 9:18 am

    Are you joking? As reprehensible and grotesque as Hamas's Oct 7th attack was, what Israel has inflicted on Gazans is magnitudes worse!


  54. by Ponderer on August 2, 2024 9:25 am

    "Show me Israel has done a 10/7" -Hate

    Here's just one. There have been hundreds of scenes like this all over Gaza. Literally most, if not the vast majority of all residential areas of Gaza look like this now.


    Palestinians look at the destruction after an Israeli strike on a residential building in Nuseirat Refugee Camp, Gaza Strip, May 19, 2024. (AP)


  55. by Ponderer on August 2, 2024 9:30 am

    "pb hates that this is happening, but the people of Israel are innocent victims." -hate

    ...And the people of Gaza are not. Got it.


  56. by Donna on August 2, 2024 9:31 am

    Good Lord, even Israel back in May admitted to 16,000 civilians killed.


  57. by HatetheSwamp on August 2, 2024 9:56 am

    Donna,

    How bout a link!!!!!


  58. by Ponderer on August 2, 2024 10:03 am

    I already posted the link she got that from. But just for you, Bill, I'll post it again. Enjoy...

    msn.com


  59. by Ponderer on August 2, 2024 10:06 am

    Here's another link if you don't like that one.

    “Fourteen thousand have been killed, combatants, and, probably around sixteen thousand civilians have been killed,” he tells Dan Senor on the Call Me Back podcast.
    timesofisrael.com


  60. by Donna on August 2, 2024 10:07 am

    "In May, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said 14,000 Hamas fighters and 16,000 Palestinian civilians had been killed in the war."


  61. by HatetheSwamp on August 2, 2024 10:09 am

    Re: "Palestinian health authorities..."

    An unreliable source. I don't believe it.


  62. by Ponderer on August 2, 2024 10:38 am

    So Bill, you therefore believe that the quote attributed to Israeli Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu saying that there had been 16,000 civilian deaths is fake? You believe that he never sai any such thing?

    Gee. I guess there's no way then that we can prove to you that he said it. 😢





    Jump ahead to 17:00, you blinkered, philistine, pig-ignorant moron...


    open.spotify.com


  63. by oldedude on August 2, 2024 11:48 am
    I won't argue that many people died, although I usually cut in half the numbers given to anyone if it will aid and albeit the terrorists. In this case it is. It's not impossible, it's just in 40+ years I've never seen it. And I don't think this is a first.

    Second. The article actually states they accept that not all the deaths are at the hands of the Israelis, but in their initial numbers, they do. They may have also double/ triple counted especially in buildings. So you can't just look at the numbers, it's how they got the numbers. That makes your acceptance of the numbers more suspect.

    Third. Displaced citizens. This one usually pisses me off the most. Is it a "war crime" to assist civilians that don't want to die to leave the area that's going to get the crap kicked out of it? Or would you prefer they all die. I've been talking about this several times. This is the "accepted" and "honorable" way to wage war in the Middle East. The defender gets to choose how many of their civilians die. Or the defenders can just give up. That's always an option. The military coming in explains what methods they'll employ. Bibi told them there were going to be air strikes from several air frames. The also talked about the army coming in and clearing the cities and tunnels. Pretty much everywhere else in the world, there is no warning, so think about that. When different factions of Hamas left during to the evacuations, the Israeli's started clearing those also. Palestinian Islamic Jihad al‑Quds Brigades claimed 8 of the 12 fatalities as members, including children. So although you can't see they consider children as members, THEY DO. That's a very important distinction.

    And I'm not slamming you in this case. The fact is that westerners have a very hard time with the thought of an "innocent" 12-year-old with an AK. Or a young woman self-detonating an RPG round to martyr herself and be granted a place with Allah. What I know is that it's hard to explain. To us (inclusive and collectively) it's unheard of and vile. To them it's a way of life, which isn't as precious to them as it is us.

    msn.com
    press.un.org


  64. by HatetheSwamp on August 2, 2024 12:00 pm

    Bang on, OD, thanks!


  65. by Ponderer on August 2, 2024 12:19 pm

    "[Well gosh darn it, po. You proved me wrong. I gotta hand it to you. I didn't believe that Netanyahu could have ever said that. But you gave me proof I can't argue with that he did. Forgive olde dude and I if we just move on to other issues from here to obfuscate how little we think of the Palestinian "people".]" -Hate

    It's okay, Bill. Don't mention it.


  66. by oldedude on August 2, 2024 1:17 pm
    I'm still not whining that much. I will blame the civilian deaths in the cities on Hamas. THEY could have let them leave. THEY used them as human shields. THEY armed the kids.

    I do understand there were/are true civilian casualties. Are they "acceptable?" It's always the goal of (most) standing armies that you keep true civilian deaths to an absolute minimum. That is true within FVEY, most European militaries, Israel, Japan, etc.

    I said it before, you're putting folks into battle that just had their children gutted and beheaded, women with their clothes ripped off raped and left for dead, the military who may have seen their friends and families' bodies during the initial battle. If I saw my close friends and family brutalized like that, I'm absolutely not sure I could keep any composure whatsoever.

    Hamas proved what fucking animals they are. They trained with ISIS and other groups. They helped with chlorine gas dispersal in Syria. They murdered so many others for "fun." I think they're getting off lucky. Especially since this is just the first wave according to the groups out of Yemen, Lebanon, Iran, Syria, Russia, China and other nation states that keep these assholes going.

    And to boot, three assholes (Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Walid bin Attash and Mustafa al-Hawsawi) at Gitmo are pleading out of death penalties for 9/11, just when pedojoe and kammy "made a hostage deal." That just sounds fucked up to me.

    Lead- Sorry about the language. You and (believe it or not) curt I usually try to watch. This is just one thing that really bothers me. I'm kind of like you. When you see what this is really like, and gets put in your reality, it's hard to imagine people that can't understand it. Most of my friends are veterans, the rest just don't ask about it (which is pretty smart, 'cause they won't get much of an answer.


  67. by Indy! on August 2, 2024 4:25 pm

    I have absolutely no doubt that when OD posts things like this...

    TAFKAP differs. He has a fantasy fixation on terrorists. He's I still think he loves their snuff films and just doesn't want to admit it. He bought them off the cartels, then he had the opportunity to buy them off Hamas. So he has to have more time in mommy's basement "inspecting them" for daddy.

    ...he is definitely describing the real life events of the household and parents he grew up with. The stories are far too layered and detailed for his small mind to be imagining it or creating it on the fly. This was his life - an abused child with freakishly twisted parents who did things to him that even he can't bring himself to inflict on the young victims he's abusing now.


  68. by oldedude on August 2, 2024 7:02 pm
    Nope. My mom didn't drink much, wasn't a whore turning tricks for the cartel, and didn't turn her "son" into the bitch pass around pack at cartel parties for dope. She also didn't send anyone to go fetch 8-year-old kids when "his" mommy asked, for "his" "daddy." And I definitely don't hide inside my daddys' skirts to suck them off when I get scared.

    get your shit together failed princess. You wouldn't respond when donna and po were battling it out. You're a coward and have nothing to add from your life. You ran from people that may have thought you'd support. You just taught them a lesson. You're a coward. You're a turncoat to everyone you know. You only think about yourself.


  69. by Indy! on August 2, 2024 7:25 pm

    Tell us what you think TAFKAP means. No googling allowed.


  70. by Indy! on August 2, 2024 7:26 pm

    PS: So if not the cartels - who was your mom turning tricks for? 🤔


  71. by oldedude on August 2, 2024 8:13 pm
    The "artist" formally known as princess
    You can't insult my family. I am actually very happy with the way I was raised. So when you do that, you're wasting your time. It's YOUR mom that was selling you to the cartel (which you've never denied) and she was a crack whore (which you've never denied), and you suck your daddy's c**k (which you don't deny) I can keep going but you get the jest.

    and you're a little coward. Every time.


  72. by HatetheSwamp on August 3, 2024 3:05 am

    po,

    Re: #62

    Huh.

    I am the one who pointed out that Israel has acknowledged civilian deaths... even APOLOGIZED for them.

    But, your bogus 39,000 number!!!!!?

    You groove on Islamist JewHate propaganda. It fits you perfectly and, if you had a heart, you'd be ashamed.


  73. by Ponderer on August 3, 2024 7:51 am

    I'm comfortable with that number.

    Luckily, I don't happen to believe that the United Nations is an "Islamist JewHate propaganda" organization as you do.


  74. by oldedude on August 3, 2024 8:37 am
    So you don't know who the main players are, do you?
    Or they're voting record. Or their studies. Or the results of those studies?


  75. by HatetheSwamp on August 3, 2024 10:09 am

    po,

    The UN is as antisemitic as the KKK.


  76. by Ponderer on August 3, 2024 11:19 am

    "The UN is as antisemitic as the KKK." -Hate

    What exactly is it that makes them so "antisemitic" in your brainwashed mind? The fact that hold Israel to account for every human rights violation that they wantonly commit, as they would to any other country that could match their level of inhumanity to other human beings...?

    What? What have you got?


  77. by oldedude on August 3, 2024 11:21 am
    So you don't know who the main players are, do you?

    Or they're voting record. Or their studies. Or the results of those studies?


  78. by HatetheSwamp on August 3, 2024 11:26 am
    OD, Re: po

    Ain't none so blind as those who refuse to see.


  79. by Donna on August 3, 2024 11:34 am

    I am the one who pointed out that Israel has acknowledged civilian deaths... even APOLOGIZED for them.

    But, your bogus 39,000 number!!!!!?

    You groove on Islamist JewHate propaganda. It fits you perfectly and, if you had a heart, you'd be ashamed. - Hate

    ***

    16,000 civilians killings is pretty much nothing then, I guess, right? Do you think that Jesus would agree?

    You have about as much compassion as a plastic spork. It actually saddens me that you're wired like that and can't help it.




  80. by HatetheSwamp on August 3, 2024 11:45 am

    Donna,

    After your outrage on 10/7 at Israel... EFFINIsrael... for cutting off fresh water, you can't even enter the compassion conversation.

    Based on the sparse reliable reporting, it's impossible to know how culpable Israel in those civilian deaths.

    I positive that all of the rape, torture, and murder breaks the heart of Jesus.


  81. by Donna on August 3, 2024 12:04 pm

    But apparently not you.

    I'm not compassionate because I condemn Israel cutting off clean water to Gazabs? Huh?

    Who on this board understands Hts's line of weird reasoning?



  82. by HatetheSwamp on August 3, 2024 12:10 pm

    Donna,

    On the day Israel temporarily cut off the fresh water supply, Hamas inflicted the equivalent of 20 of our 9/11s on Israel: Vicious rapes. Infant beheadings. Kidnaps. Torture...

    ...And, that didn't even dent your hard JewHate heart.


  83. by oldedude on August 3, 2024 12:20 pm
    As one being in the region, I want to emphasize what I said before. Please do not oversimplify the issue. All of these paragraphs are important. They all are part of the overall picture. They all relate to each other, and they all interact. This is not an easy answer. Especially after 10/7. Even if there were 2,500 civilian deaths, with most other countries, I wouldn't have been surprised. Russia, ROK, China, all African nations, Mali (specifically), Central Asia, Middle East, SE Asia, etc villages would disappear off the face of the earth like during Sadam's reign.
     
    I'm still not whining that much. I will blame the civilian deaths in the cities on Hamas. THEY could have let them leave. THEY used them as human shields. THEY armed the kids.

    I do understand there were/are true civilian casualties. Are they "acceptable?" It's always the goal of (most) standing armies that you keep true civilian deaths to an absolute minimum. That is true within FVEY, most European militaries, Israel, Japan, etc.

    I said it before, you're putting folks into battle that just had their children gutted and beheaded, women with their clothes ripped off raped and left for dead, the military who may have seen their friends and families' bodies during the initial battle. If I saw my close friends and family brutalized like that, I'm absolutely not sure I could keep any composure whatsoever.

    Hamas proved what fucking animals they are. They trained with ISIS and other groups. They helped with chlorine gas dispersal in Syria. They murdered so many others for "fun." I think they're getting off lucky. Especially since this is just the first wave according to the groups out of Yemen, Lebanon, Iran, Syria, Russia, China and other nation states that keep these assholes going.


    One of the things the US has done is to limit the number of civilian deaths at the risk of our own people. Most of the Presidents (on both sides) would rather have 3 US miliary killed than one civilian. Theat was especially true in the obomber era, who directed that every civilian casualty was to be investigated as a criminal act and charged. The result? US casualty rates went way up from before. The assholes knew they could draw the Americans into a fight, not be armed (even though they were charging the checkpoint in motorcycles, typical acts for bombers in the region). The choice for that commander? Shoot or have a half dozen of his men murdered by assholes (along with his death). He chose to go to prison to save American lives.


  84. by Indy! on August 3, 2024 12:27 pm
    The "artist" formally known as princess

    Wrong. It's the artist formerly known as Prince. Iow, the greatest musician of our time - and while I appreciate you comparing me to such an amazing talent, I have to be humble (as always) and admit Prince was a bit more talented than I. However - I accept your (unintended) compliment with grace and courtesy anyway and despite the fact you're a dirtball raised by animals.


  85. by HatetheSwamp on August 3, 2024 12:28 pm

    Re: "I'm still not whining that much. I will blame the civilian deaths in the cities on Hamas. THEY could have let them leave. THEY used them as human shields. THEY armed the kids."

    Exactly.

    Donna, Do you not know this?


  86. by Indy! on August 3, 2024 12:31 pm

    There's always the fail safe plan that would solve this "issue" overnight...



  87. by Donna on August 3, 2024 2:00 pm

    If a wanted criminal were holding hostages at gunpoint, do you Palestinian haters think that the best way to handle that would be to fire a missile into the building they were being held in?

    If civilian lives are at stake in such a situation, whether it be in New York City or Gaza City, then the police or opposing army needs to find another way to capture or kill the bad guys. Any other approach would be barbaric and immoral. I think Jesus would agree.


  88. by oldedude on August 3, 2024 2:37 pm
    You are asking two different things, donna. One is a police action, where you have time and negotiations on your side. You've got hours to get the asshole in a position to take a shot or talk them out. Which is what should be done (generally).

    Again. What I'm talking about is NEVER just "one person" shooting. It's a combination of machine guns, grenade launchers, automatic weapons where 95% of the casualties are in the first 30-45 seconds. That means an entire squad is almost eliminated in that time if they're any good at all.

    For the most part, the "civilians" know there's an ambush, the streets are generally empty when you turn the corner. Then you know you're in their kill zone. Generally speaking, the machine gunners on the top of the vehicles are shot in the head first, then the IEDs start. If they're Iranian, the molten metal goes through the armor and takes off legs as it goes through, and sometimes blows up the vehicle. The object there is NOT to kill, but to maim. They know we actually care for our wounded.

    Then all hell breaks lose. That's when the kids come out of the windows and doors along with various and sundry assholes.

    A question you refuse to answer. Is that 12-year-old a combatant? or not? You have .5 seconds to aim, make a decision and move. You decide.

    During the chaos, you see a guy peek around a door, then get back. A woman gets pushed out of the door. She looks startled but then gets pushed again towards your unit. You can see the explosives under her shawl. Make a decision now. You have .3 seconds to make the decision. Otherwise, she turns you into pink mist and your family gets a few body parts in the casket with a note "Not Recommended for Viewing."

    This just took you 4 minutes from when you turned to when a decision has been made who lived and who died. For the ones alive, you need to take care of the wounded, and care for your dead.

    There is no such thing as minutes, much less hours in a what I'm talking about.

    And Jesus believes in protecting your brothers and sisters. Especially against true evil.


  89. by Curt_Anderson on August 3, 2024 2:38 pm
    "If a wanted criminal were holding hostages at gunpoint..." --Donna

    Donna,
    Those sort of situations do happen. In this case, Hamas wants (and you suggested) Israel release Palestinian prisoners that either have been convicted or are facing trial in exchange for hostages. Which happened in a three to one exchange, with the Palestinians get the better end of the deal.

    There have been cases in American were a criminal holds hostages and attempt to bargain for the release of incarcerated confederates. I don't recall the police ever agreeing to such a proposal. Any sort of hostage/prisoner exchange is contrary to law enforcement guidelines.

    The police might not fire a missile at the criminals' but they'd employ a SWAT team and sharpshooters to kill the criminals if negotiations fail and a surrender is not worked out. The safe release of the hostages would be the priority. The criminals' associates wouldn't get the same protection from the police as the hostages.

    Sooner or later the police would bust their way in retrieve as many hostages as possible. Criminals would not be allowed to hold hostages for ten months.
    The longest hostage crisis in American happened in Sacramento. It lasted eight hours.
    ojp.gov
    en.wikipedia.org


  90. by Indy! on August 3, 2024 5:06 pm
    OD:
    "And Jesus believes in protecting your brothers and sisters. Especially against true evil."

    Does he? Wonder why he never does anything to save them. Or maybe you're talking about your cousin, Jesus - not JFC? 🤔


  91. by Donna on August 4, 2024 8:49 am

    od, Curt: Right. I'm aware of all of that.

    Could either of you personally fire a missile into a building where civilians were being used as hostages and/or human shields if your wife and kids were among the civilians being held?


  92. by oldedude on August 4, 2024 1:03 pm
    You just changed the entire scenario. Again, you're trying to "equate" a "civilian hostage negotiation," a "military firefight" (and who is or is not a civilian), and "military/political hostage taking" expecting we have "an" answer to all of them. All three are very distinct and have different desired outcomes and problems to them. It sounds to me, like you're just grabbing at straws trying to prove your point at "anything."


  93. by Indy! on August 4, 2024 1:15 pm
    So did you. Where are your examples of Jesus saving anyone (recently)?


  94. by Curt_Anderson on August 4, 2024 3:17 pm
    Donna,
    A missile wouldn't be first choice of weapons, but I would want to do something besides doing nothing. As for the human shields: are the hostages the human or are complicit civilians the human shields? My calculations would be different in those cases.

    Hamas has the hostages hidden somewhere in Gaza. Do only Hamas members and Hamas sympathizers know where the hostages are being held? That seems like something that would be hard to keep secret.


  95. by Donna on August 4, 2024 5:01 pm

    Neither of you guys answered my question, which is what I expected.



  96. by HatetheSwamp on August 4, 2024 5:19 pm

    Am I one of the guys?


  97. by Curt_Anderson on August 4, 2024 5:28 pm
    Donna,
    You asked, "Could either of you personally fire a missile into a building where civilians were being used as hostages and/or human shields if your wife and kids were among the civilians being held?"

    I answered a missile wouldn't be my first choice of weapon,. That mainly because I don't know how to use one. Obviously, your question assumes that no police are available and that I am left to my devices to free my family. After a long period of time talking and exhausting all peaceful methods to release my family I would resort to the use of deadly weapons.

    Your hypothetical doesn't say, but do I assume my family members are being held hostage in underground tunnels?

    How long would you wait in your hypothetical scenario before you responded with deadly force?

    A. Within hours
    B. 20 days.
    C. Never
    D. Other (please specify)


  98. by oldedude on August 4, 2024 6:11 pm
    Neither of you guys answered my question, which is what I expected.
    I did answer the question. It was a side slip and moronic. A "does my big ass make my ass look big" questions.

    Would I put a missile into save my family? WTF would I do that and murder them? Again. You're showing your single dimension understanding and the prison of two thoughts. Either nothing happens. Or you throw nukes at it. That makes zero sense at all. Curt- you are more "politically correct" than I am. But I wasn't paid to do that. So I acknowledge you for playing nice.

    So it's a really, really STUPID question. First. Gather Intel. These sort of things are done successfully by human beings. Not bombs, stupid. These are handcrafted solutions that are built for human beings you'll never meet. They are individuals that will die for others without regret. Not cowards. And they are very, very good at what they do. Their job is to leave the smallest footprint and get those people back.

    I'll tell you that these would be the kind of missions we would do. Our job would be to take care of hostages. Their team medics would take care of their wounded. Both teams would cross over and assist each other as needed and as available. Everyone on the teams can defend themselves. Everyone sent wants two things. FIRST- Get the hostages out. ALL of them that you come across. TWO- get your own folks out. Everyone goes home.

    My question for donna- If the 12-year-old kid starts shooting at you, do you engage? You've NEVER answered that. I'm not jesting with you. Not for fun. Don't bitch about those who do the job, if you can't do the requirements. I see this as a cowardly deflection.


  99. by HatetheSwamp on August 5, 2024 3:23 am

    My question for donna- If the 12-year-old kid starts shooting at you, do you engage? You've NEVER answered that.

    Based on Donna's last 10 months of posts, in your hypothetical, if the 12 year-old is Palestinian and Donna's a Jew (God forbid) Donna doesn't engage. Donna's an oppressor and the kid is justified, no matter what.


  100. by oldedude on August 5, 2024 4:37 am
    We just call her a liability that will get us killed. At least hostages understand who and what they've been dealing with. The systematic rapes, starvation, physical abuse, they're pretty clear. They'll actually try not to put us in jeopardy (as much as they're physically able to), which is reward in itself.

    I'll be honest. At first, I really had an issue with the title of the thread. I thought you were over-reacting to say the least. Now I get it. I'm not as frustrated as you are (I'm used to people making stupid "assumptions"), but I understand it.

    Curt- You alluded to waiting, and how long do we wait for hostage negotiations. The pedojoe administration (with kammy supporting) I think is willing to wait years, as long as the pro-Hamas demonstrators are doing their thing. I've noticed none of the dims are interested in Shapiro. He's being purposefully dropped from any ticket. BTW, he's a Jew. So the dims thought is to cater to the Muslims but not the Jews. I'm hoping the Jewish population (along with the blacks and Latinos) see the dims for what they're worth. Which is nothing to them. The dims are showing their true stripes. The Blacks were good with a handjob since the Civil War, the spicks and kikes will do the same.


  101. by HatetheSwamp on August 5, 2024 5:54 am

    I'll be honest. At first, I really had an issue with the title of the thread. I thought you were over-reacting to say the least.

    I suppose I am overreacting.

    My summer in Israel, at age 21, was a formative experience for me. And, Donna's... and po's... coldness, the unabashed and easy hate and their insensitivity to the suffering of all those innocents on 10/7, strikes me as the stuff of the Holocaust.

    And, and maybe I'm wrong. But, I think it's not merely unabashed. I sense that they applaud the terror in the way that po was gleeful over the torching of the police precinct during the 020 Summer of Love.

    Still, as I say, my response is emotional. Personal.


  102. by oldedude on August 5, 2024 6:15 am
    That's what I came to understand. You really need to focus on the next sentence. I understand it now. You're all good.

    I think it's different than the Holocaust. When the germans actually found out what the ashes were, and what was really going on, they were truly ashamed of their government and themselves.

    In today's culture, I don't see any remorse. That may be what upsets me the most. Those lives were just snuffed out and discarded like sewage. My "sliding scale" may be not right, but for me, there is no clearer form of true evil than that. As much as I would try to forgive, I'd have to be a much better person than what I am presently to do that.


  103. by HatetheSwamp on August 5, 2024 7:02 am

    I'd lump our cultural Marxists here among the Germans who perpetuated the Holocaust. As a whole nation, Germans were deeply shamed by what some Germans did but Neo-Nazis exist to this day.


  104. by Indy! on August 5, 2024 8:16 am
    So "Jesus Saves" is just another marketing campaign?


  105. by oldedude on August 5, 2024 6:01 pm
    Lead- sure. I mean the dims won't even suggest a Jew as a potential candidate. It is pretty clear to me. Remember, "Arbeit Mach Frei."


  106. by Indy! on August 5, 2024 6:50 pm
    Bernie Sanders.
    Joe Lieberman.


  107. by oldedude on August 5, 2024 6:58 pm
    IN THIS CYCLE WITH KAMMY. holyfuckyoureallydontkeepupwithnewsdoyou?


  108. by Indy! on August 6, 2024 12:16 am
    Nobody else wanted to run. Don’t YOU keep up with the news? 😌


  109. by oldedude on August 6, 2024 7:04 am
    Yeah, I do. All the professional politicians see this as a losing deal. They see kammy as a loser. The party right now is a losing deal. They're going to have enough trouble holding on to their own seats.

    And if you were actually up on news, you would have known who the Jew is. There was only one. Yes, just one. But I guess you put him out of your mind (because he's the Jew). Well done! welldone.


  110. by Ponderer on August 6, 2024 7:30 am

    "My summer in Israel, at age 21, was a formative experience for me. And, Donna's... and po's... coldness, the unabashed and easy hate and their insensitivity to the suffering of all those innocents on 10/7, strikes me as the stuff of the Holocaust." -Hate



    🤨



  111. by Ponderer on August 6, 2024 7:31 am
    .....


  112. by Ponderer on August 6, 2024 7:32 am
    .......


  113. by Ponderer on August 6, 2024 7:32 am
    .....


  114. by Ponderer on August 6, 2024 7:33 am
    .....


  115. by Ponderer on August 6, 2024 7:34 am
    .....


  116. by Ponderer on August 6, 2024 7:35 am
    .....


  117. by HatetheSwamp on August 6, 2024 7:37 am

    po,

    You haven't responded to OD's observation that Hamas uses civilians as shields.

    Curious.


  118. by Ponderer on August 6, 2024 7:37 am

    "IN THIS CYCLE WITH KAMMY. holyfuckyoureallydontkeepupwithnewsdoyou?" -olde dude

    What od means, Indy!, is that the Dems have to run a Jew every election cycle or they are wanton antisemites.


  119. by HatetheSwamp on August 6, 2024 7:48 am

    Holy freakin friggin EFFINcow, po. Blatant antisemitism.

    Unabashed!


  120. by Ponderer on August 6, 2024 8:07 am

    "You haven't responded to OD's observation that Hamas uses civilians as shields." -Hate

    I do not approve of it. I think it's heinous and deplorable. They shouldn't do that. They are absolutely wrong in doing that. It is indefensible. That is not in any way justified. Such actions are war crimes.

    Wow! Having laid that all out like that, I finally realize that Israel is absoliutely justified in bombing the livingshit out of innocent civilian Palestinians in refugee camps and hospitals and while they are hiding in rubble!

    Wow! Thanks guys! You've helped me see the Light!


    🖕🙄🖕


  121. by Ponderer on August 6, 2024 8:10 am

    "Holy freakin friggin EFFINcow, po. Blatant antisemitism.

    Unabashed!"
    -Hate


    Wow. So simply posting pictures of the damage that Israel has rained down upon Gaza is "blatant antisemitism".

    You are a demented, bigoted lunatic, Bill.


  122. by HatetheSwamp on August 6, 2024 8:16 am

    No, it's the insensitivity of your sarcasm: "Wow! Having laid that all out like that, I finally realize that Israel is absoliutely justified in bombing the livingshit out of innocent civilian Palestinians in refugee camps and hospitals and while they are hiding in rubble!"


  123. by oldedude on August 6, 2024 8:55 am
    po- I do not approve of it. I think it's heinous and deplorable. They shouldn't do that. They are absolutely wrong in doing that. It is indefensible. That is not in any way justified. Such actions are war crimes.

    I read it, agree and understand what you're saying. I'm going to go to the next level (actually two). I think these are legit questions as they've been on the battlefield for a very long time. This is what some people do. It's a known "value" (or lack thereof).

    1. Are they considered "combatants?" Honestly, a simple yes or no will do.

    2. The animal using them as a shield is killing other civilians, your people, and others. In order to stop the carnage, would you go through the civilian "hostage" in order to kill the asshole?

    Again, these are not "gotcha" questions. They're questions that on the lowest levels of all schools of land warfare are introduced and gone over a lot during the entire contract of the military member. Many times a year. So I don't think you could give me a different answer than what I've heard.


  124. by Indy! on August 6, 2024 10:04 am

    They pick candidates by religion until it doesn't work for them - then they rant about "DEI, DEI - the democrats are pushing DEI on America!!!!!"


  125. by oldedude on August 6, 2024 12:39 pm
    I do not approve of it. I think it's heinous and deplorable. They shouldn't do that. They are absolutely wrong in doing that. It is indefensible. That is not in any way justified. Such actions are war crimes.

    And there's the bigger separate issue.

    1. Is a 12-year-old boy shooting at you a combatant?

    2. Is the woman with an armed explosives vest a combatant?

    These two things are key to not only the Law of Land Warfare, but also the typical US Rules of Engagement. There's a four-hour class and a test on this every quarter in the military.

    I've been asking this for about 10 days, towit, donna and you have evaded answering.


  126. by Indy! on August 6, 2024 7:01 pm

    I'm guessing you also failed that test. 🤔



  127. by oldedude on August 6, 2024 8:27 pm
    And you don't even know what the answer is. and you are still one of the clingers.


  128. by Indy! on August 6, 2024 8:49 pm

    Ah - so you did fail. I knew it. 😌


  129. by oldedude on August 6, 2024 8:52 pm
    So what is the answer, asshole?


  130. by HatetheSwamp on August 7, 2024 3:31 am

    2. The animal using them as a shield is killing other civilians, your people, and others. In order to stop the carnage, would you go through the civilian "hostage" in order to kill the asshole?

    Bang on. And, that's why Donna and po come across to me as unthinking cultural Marxist JewHaters.

    They too easily pretend away the complex reality to do the Nazi thing and just blame the Jews... FOR EVERY EVIL AND WRONG.

    OD, Am I misunderstanding Donna and po?


  131. by oldedude on August 7, 2024 5:06 am
    First. This is a really difficult question. Especially for po and donna. What I know is that the question itself violates everything you think about as a rational human being. For them, I'm not going to harangue them, or name call or anything like that. This is an exercise in aligning one of the most difficult decisions you've ever made. It's extremely tough to think of in reality. And VERY uncomfortable. So for po and donna, if your guts' are churning over the question? Good. It shows you're human.

    TAFKAP is a different story. First, nothing in her mind is based in reality. It's based in biting humor that makes herself "feel better." And I honestly doubt if she has the balls to actually put herself out there with a decision on anything. Except she hates Israel.


  132. by Ponderer on August 7, 2024 7:31 am

    1. Is a 12-year-old boy shooting at you a combatant?

    Yes. Anyone shooting at soldiers can be considered an "enemy combatant".


    2. Is the woman with an armed explosives vest a combatant?

    Yes. Anyone attempting to blow up soldiers can be considered an "enemy combatant".


    Happy?

    Now here's a couple for you:


    1. Is any and every 12-year-old boy hiding in a basement along with his whole family and several other innocent refugees to blithely be considered enemy combatants when the entire city block is blown to smithereens by an Israeli missile specifically targeting what's left of that residential city block?

    2. Are any and all women trying to survive in a vastly overcrowded refugee camp, along with their entire families, to blithely be considered enemy combatants when the whole refugee camp is blown to bits by an Israeli bomb specifically targeting that refugee camp?



    🙄


  133. by oldedude on August 7, 2024 7:52 am
    I was really hoping for you to enter into a conversation reasonably. My hopes are eternally fading for any reasonable discussion with you.

    Obviously, with the admittance of the terrorists that they ARE using children to fight, that was the reason for the questions. The answer to your statements. Is even more obvious. And no forces in the past 25 years can be assured those people won't shoot at them when they enter. Thusly the amount of PTS, blown off limbs, and military members being shot "by civilians" has increased dramatically. Does that mean you can go in with blazing guns? Not usually. What does your intel say? Are there civilians? What is the resistance anticipated? and if it's heavy resistance, that doesn't give you a free fire zone.

    You're looking for black and white in a technicolor scenario. It's not even gray. AGAIN (for the umpteenth time), these military don't target the civilians. They are trying to kill the assholes. Some of the civilians (like yourselves and especially TAFKAP) are supporters. They could also be "convinced" to be supporters by the assholes threatening to murder their entire family. That's a common scenario in the region. So "civilians" that normally would not be, will hold their ground because they think the assholes will keep their word.


  134. by HatetheSwamp on August 7, 2024 8:09 am

    I was really hoping for you to enter into a conversation reasonably. My hopes are eternally fading for any reasonable discussion with you.

    Yeah, OD.

    This is what makes po so fascinating to me, and I've been noting this for years.

    I noticed a looooooooong time ago that po lives smack dab in the middle of po's subjectivity. The preferences and prejudices that po brings to every moment of life rule po. Tyrannically. And, po does nothing but fan the flames of those preferences and prejudices. po gets pi$$ed when even invited to set them aside...

    ...and, at po's age, I don't see it changing.

    Until 10/7, I admired po and said that I envy the total submission to subjectivity. It's the way I try to be as a Christian. But, on 10/7, I saw the ugliness of po's subjectivity... the JewHate... which is fierce, uncompromising and vicious...

    ... and, oblivious to reason.

    po brings subjectivity to this issue and has no interest in objective truth.

    The preferences and prejudices po brings are all that will ever matter to po.


  135. by oldedude on August 7, 2024 8:20 am
    po- As I have also said, there may be also more killing than usual by IDF. Honestly, I think Israel has taken an aggressive stand with the IDF to try to prevent that. While you have dismissed 10/7, you're asking the military who witnessed the genocide and war crimes to "just forget that it happened." That's impossible.

    The fact that rogue units didn't eliminate entire villages is actually a credit to the IDF. "Assuming" the IDF are motherless children without any feelings is your fundamental error in this situation. Honestly, other than Sadaam getting rid of villages prior to GULF I (maybe) this is THE most horrendous violation of all the rules of war and is THE best description of genocide (included Mali and the Congo) we have seen in the past 30 years. And you continually dismiss it all. You "say" you're against it, then immediately jump to the Hamas side they want you on. So honestly, I just dismiss you the same way you dismiss genocide.


  136. by Indy! on August 7, 2024 10:47 am

    Don't encourage OD's sickness by engaging him in talk about killing and dismembering other human beings. He really needs to see a psychiatrist... preferrably full time and from the other side of a glass room he's locked inside.


  137. by Ponderer on August 7, 2024 10:57 am

    "[Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah...]" -olde dude

    We get it, od. Given everything that you know and understand in your vast and extensive knowledge of the Middle East and War and Terrorists, you believe that Israel is simply justified by all rules of war and conflict in obliterating every last Palestinian in Gaza in any way that proves most expedient for them. Those innocent "people" just have to be killed as far as you are concerned.

    WE GET IT ALREADY!!!

    You don't have to get all carpal tunnelly typing your fingers off trying to justify your bigoted and inhuman perspective on the humanity of Palestinians in Gaza!

    GEEZ!



  138. by oldedude on August 7, 2024 3:57 pm
    We get it, od.🤣
    Obviously, you don't. You can't buy a clue how biased you are for Hamas. This is an observation only. It's what YOU'VE posted. Not my fault. Everything I have said is not out of malice. It's a response in this subject. I won't change a word. I may have started earlier is all. I'm treating you like you have treated me for years. Telling you what I think and what I believe. With a psycotic/ paranoid rant attached. And yes, you and princess don't understand WTF you're talking about. I said I was giving you that. I expected a reasonable answer. As usual you went into your psychotic rage. Okay. Welcome to my world. If you (and princess) want to do it, don't think turnaround isn't going to happen.


  139. by Indy! on August 7, 2024 5:39 pm

    Long ago - on the old board days - OD admitted he had never even seen live action in the military. So all he's doing now is trying to impress PB by reciting from books he's read and old Janes magazines he probably found after playing "service man" (😉) with real members of the military. JD Vance and Pete Buttigieg probably have more "military experience" than Old Dud. 😂


  140. by oldedude on August 7, 2024 6:11 pm
    Proof? I've always been honest, especially about that. I didn't disclose much because I don't trust most of the people on this site not to get doxxed. And you live in a fantasyland anyway, and can't get off the acid, meth, and crack, so I'm not thinking you can think straight anyway. And you're a dikead that will say anything to keep yourself feeling better about yourself. So there's that. So you just keep on being the circle jerk guy at the Hamas parties to make yourself "feel" like someone "loves" you (welcome to Manlove Thursdays!).


  141. by Indy! on August 7, 2024 9:02 pm

    Acid is a young man's game, OD.


  142. by HatetheSwamp on August 8, 2024 3:43 am

    "...because I don't trust most of the people on this site not to get doxxed."

    As po has done to ole pb several times. Good thinkin OD!


  143. by oldedude on August 8, 2024 5:50 am
    Rephrase: I've always been honest about my military time, I don't know where you're getting that.


  144. by HatetheSwamp on August 8, 2024 7:52 am

    Sometimes it's best to let Indy's inanity roll off your back.


    Tampon Tim's problem with the military lies is that people who have served, almost universally, downplay what they've done. What he's been busted for, will hurt him... them.

    I didn't serve. I got to draft age when Vietnam was winding down and my draft lottery number was 320.

    But, my dad quit school to fight in WWII. He was so closed-mouthed about his time in the war that he said next to nothing until he was in his 80s and then only after we asked him about some old photos of him in uniform. I am so very proud of his service. I resent Tampon all the more because of my dad's silent heroism.

    I don't think Walz will be dumped by Kammy. But, this will hurt the campaign.


  145. by oldedude on August 8, 2024 10:01 am
    Yeah... I tried to give him the benefit of doubt. Trying to defend the guy at least a little. He was in a Field Artillery brigade (sounds like an HQ unit). But he's not giving out any information (strange). During the summer of love, trumpster offered him money to federalize the National Guard. His response was "they're just a bunch of cooks anyway." All of a sudden, he's indy's dad. I was expecting to hear something that he's a politician and "invent" a reason not to activate them. And he insults them? Chalk up another stupid quote from him. And politically, he's supposed to be able to get along with the Guard. They are a permanent part of his cabinet. He was a member of them.

    But the more I find out about him, the less I like, or even appreciate him as a politician. And this is a very small part of it. What came out over the summer of love event is disgusting. Especially his wife. And she said it in public. Zero sense of the human beings they're "supposed" to be supporting. Their whole tenure seems to just be a bag of crap. And it's not due to any external issues. It's things they've done themselves. And I'm still aware the sheeple rejoice that he's running. They love the things he's done. So be prepared to get a lot of "colorful" language from po.


  146. by Ponderer on August 8, 2024 10:05 am

    "Tampon Tim" is pretty good! I'll give you that one. Nice.

    You guys should really run with that one. If it catches on, I'm sure it will be golden for Divan Vance and Felonious Trump.



  147. by HatetheSwamp on August 8, 2024 10:06 am

    Yeah, he's going to taint Kammy... seriously. He was not properly vetted... and, the Dems will have to overcome his many flaws if they're going to win...

    And, I don't think he'll help Kammy in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin.


  148. by oldedude on August 8, 2024 10:09 am
    I think that was part of the deal. They obviously want her to fail. They'll see how they get beat and on what points then work on that later on.


  149. by Ponderer on August 8, 2024 10:11 am

    You just think whatever your tiny little dementia-ridden mind makes you to think, Bill. You do whatever you gotta do to mentally deal with the impending cataclysmic doom of your Holy Orange Messiah. We understand it's gotta be hard for you.




  150. by HatetheSwamp on August 8, 2024 11:04 am

    po,

    I'm not predicting that the Orange Turd is going to win. But, watch the first few minutes of the GUTFELD! monolog I posted. He noted what?, about 10 issues that put the focus on TT when Dems want to be making Trump the focus of the campaign.

    Kammy can NOT have wanted this.


  151. by Indy! on August 8, 2024 11:12 am

    Gutfart. LOL! His hold over you is comical. Meanwhile irl nobody knows him.


  152. by Ponderer on August 8, 2024 1:09 pm

    (SSHHH! Indy!... Hate thinks gutfield is news...!)


  153. by Ponderer on August 8, 2024 1:10 pm

    (And he thinks Dems watch gutfield...!)


  154. by Indy! on August 8, 2024 1:36 pm

    The clip he posted earlier was downright embarrassing for both Gutfeld AND Fox. It's uncomfortable for ME to watch him try to be funny - I can't imagine being the wingdings sitting on stage with him. Must take every ounce of strength in their bodies to pretend to laugh because there is NOTHING coming from the audience.


  155. by HatetheSwamp on August 9, 2024 8:29 am

    "(SSHHH! Indy!... Hate thinks gutfield is news...!)"

    Gang,

    GUTFELD! is killing in it in the ratings. And, why? Even he doesn't pretend he reports news.

    My theory is that he's a very precise barometer of what causes tension in people's, uh, no pun intended, guts.

    Whatever. You can't deny the ratings. And, he succinctly described the issues that have right-wingers guffawing over Kammy's choice of Tampon Tim!

    Baha


  156. by Indy! on August 9, 2024 12:22 pm

    That's true - can't deny the ratings - however I can (again) explain them. However, as always - there is no guarantee (or even hope) that you will be able to understand them, peebs...

    According to a quick google search, Gutfeld is averaging 2,235,000 viewers. Okay - fine.

    Current U.S. population: 333.3 million

    2.235 / 333.3M = .007

    Which would be totally cool if this were a James Bond thread. Unfortunately for Gutfart - it's a Gutfart thread...

    That's .7% of the US population who are watching.

    Or as I like to say... NOBODY.


  157. by HatetheSwamp on August 10, 2024 3:45 am

    That's of any particular show. The total number of regular viewers of GUTFELD is what, ten times that?

    And, ole pb never watches live. He only watches on YouTube video. No. Many millions of Americans laugh at progressives via GUTFELD... and, enjoy it.


  158. by Indy! on August 10, 2024 10:00 am

    Again - not how it works. Gutfart is not get 2.5M NEW viewers every night. He's getting the same 2.5M bigots viewers he gets every night. That's the grand total number - 2.5M


  159. by Donna on August 10, 2024 10:46 am

    Amusing that that actually needed to be explained to Hts.





  160. by Indy! on August 10, 2024 11:42 am

    I remember he also believed Rush was getting 20M listeners per week when it was really about 4M.


  161. by HatetheSwamp on August 10, 2024 2:01 pm

    So you're saying that, since the show first aired, a total of 2.2 million people have viewed it, that's the total headcount?

    Don't think so.


  162. by Indy! on August 10, 2024 9:14 pm

    No, I'm saying he probably has around 3M viewers - about 2.5M (you didn't even get my number right) of whom tune in on any given night.


  163. by Indy! on August 10, 2024 9:15 pm

    BTW, total "head count" the way you're describing doesn't mean anything to advertisers or networks except from maybe a trivia standpoint. For advertising or billing for ad time? Totally meaningless.


  164. by HatetheSwamp on August 11, 2024 3:38 am

    Fine. I just wanted to clarify. Still, I think you're living in the past. As I said, I watch about three times a week... but never on TV. There are several YouTube channels that post GUTFELD videos of the whole show... and Fox and other YouTube channels carry clips. Sometimes I watch on X.

    He's got more viewership than you're accounting for. IMO.


  165. by oldedude on August 11, 2024 5:51 am
    I think people working in the genre, DO watch the listeners. EVERY DAY. Because the networks do. They watch about each participant on the show. when ratings drop, how they drop. What was (or wasn't said) by both the person onscreen and the viewers. Look at how many times CNN and MSN have let people go because of what they've said. Or how "messaging" changes. How many times the sheep were told about pedojr's computer being part of the "russian collusion hoax" or the YEARS they talked bout the Steele dossier (which curt STILL reads like a seminary student reads their bible). Then all of a sudden, "oops" "we were wrong."


  166. by Indy! on August 11, 2024 1:49 pm

    Gotta say it's always fun reading you two's attempts at being experts on something. First off, peebs - Indy is not accounting for anything. I'm simply reporting the numbers that apply to any given situation. And I know you thought I was the one living in the past, but no - it's actually you. Nielsen started accounting for youtube views quite awhile back...

    Hulu and Youtube TV Viewing Are Now Included in TV Ratings
    July 2017


    We are excited to announce that viewing from Hulu and Youtube TV will now be measured and reported through Digital in TV Ratings (DTVR), contributing to C3/C7 currency. DTVR launched in 2015 and provides a method for programmers and buyers to account for all viewers across desktop and mobile devices.

    DTVR combines the digital viewing of Live, DVR and On-Demand TV with the traditional linear TV audience metrics, which will enable us to measure audiences watching linear TV through Hulu and YouTube TV on desktops, tablets and smartphones.


    nielsen.com


  167. by oldedude on August 11, 2024 9:12 pm
    And you're an "expert?" I thought you were nothing but a failure at being an "artist."


Go To Top

Comment on: "So, Donna, SHUT THE EFF-UP!!!!!"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page