Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

12 Leaked Questions From CNN’s Upcoming Presidential Debate
Media by HatetheSwamp     June 19, 2024 10:16 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (3 comments) [16 views]


Trump cancels stay at his Chicago hotel during Milwaukee Republican convention after word leaks out
Politics by Curt_Anderson     June 19, 2024 8:25 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (2 comments) [39 views]


At Turning Point: Trump Jr. Hilariously Reminds Voters of Father's Relationship With Jeffrey Epstein
Crime by Curt_Anderson     June 17, 2024 10:44 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (17 comments) [194 views]


The woke white world is paranoid about Charlie Kirk and TPUSA
Politics by HatetheSwamp     June 16, 2024 11:51 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (21 comments) [236 views]


abcNEWS: Bud Light boycott still hammers local distributors 1 year later
Business by HatetheSwamp     June 19, 2024 6:17 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [2 views]


pbGOP Lisa Murkowski on a rampage
President by HatetheSwamp     June 14, 2024 7:08 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (26 comments) [258 views]


France is on the brink of a Revolution (read civil war)
Religion by oldedude     June 16, 2024 7:08 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (6 comments) [205 views]


Violent crime is down and the US murder rate is plunging, FBI statistics show
Crime by Curt_Anderson     June 10, 2024 9:57 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (52 comments) [449 views]


Curt, thanks for the RFKJ image
Media by HatetheSwamp     June 16, 2024 12:20 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (4 comments) [43 views]


UCR Crime Stats. Too Unreliable to Cite with Conviction
Government by oldedude     June 15, 2024 8:04 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (13 comments) [88 views]


Law selectors, pages, etc.
Trump boldly takes on the issue of contraception; it’s up to the states. Sorry Mississippi!
By Curt_Anderson
May 22, 2024 10:32 am
Category: Law

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

So HE gets to wear a condom while shagging a porn star, but others maybe not…

Former President Donald Trump on Tuesday said he was open to supporting regulations on contraception and that his campaign would release a policy on the issue “very shortly,” comments that he later said were misinterpreted.

The comments, made during an interview with a Pittsburgh television station, suggested that a future Trump administration might consider imposing mandates or supporting state restrictions on such highly personal decisions as whether women can have access to birth control. During an interview with KDKA News, Trump was asked, “Do you support any restrictions on a person’s right to contraception?”

“We’re looking at that and I’m going to have a policy on that very shortly,” Trump responded, according to a video of the interview that was briefly posted online before it was supposed to air, then taken down.

The presumptive Republican presidential nominee was pressed in a follow-up question if that meant he may want to support some restrictions on contraception.

“Things really do have a lot to do with the states, and some states are going to have different policy than others,” Trump responded, before repeating that he would be releasing “a very comprehensive policy” on the issue.


Cited and related links:

  1. apnews.com

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Trump boldly takes on the issue of contraception; it’s up to the states. Sorry Mississippi!":

  1. by Indy! on May 22, 2024 11:31 am

    The American Taliban at work. Of course Trump is not a member, merely an opportunist giving the AT a stroke job for votes the same way he stroked peebs and OD on his border wall in 2016 to get their votes. But this is the reality with todays GOP - not a hair's difference from the guys in Afghanistan once you shave their beards.


  2. by oldedude on May 23, 2024 8:46 am
    This coming from the person most likely to support the Taliban, Hamas, Ebrahim Raisi, et.al. for murdering women. You've been the continual support and apologist for global terrorism. You made "excuses" for the San Berardino murderers among others. Only when "caught" do you make some other lame "excuse" of a word salad about terrorism. After 10/7, we've talked about the murders of women and children, and your answer was a fairly quiet, "Yeah, butt look at what the Israelis are doing," making you look like the arse.


  3. by Indy! on May 23, 2024 2:18 pm

    Of course - as always - nothing in that post is true. Your crazy interpretations of what I said are not the same as what I said. That's why you have never once been able to support your accusations against me with the actual posts where I (allegedly) said any of the nonsense you claim I said. But it's telling that you get mad when I point out the reality - that you voted for Trump before and you will be voting for him again. Because you - like peebs - are a Trumper. It's also telling that even you two know what a POS he is because you refuse to embrace him as your choice for president.


  4. by oldedude on May 23, 2024 9:28 pm
    Actually, it is true. And I've said it before and you just shrink into your penile folds. The examples are true. Prove to me they're wrong, then I'll believe you. But you can't. You even insisted the san Bertadillo murderers weren't any sort of "radical Islam" after I told you the FBI put it on their stats as a "terrorist incident."

    You're busted lying for the what hundredth time? And you think people are too stupid to call you on it. You're nothing more than the sorriest SOB around. Too stoopid to actually understand others find it too easy to use your own words to be a liar.
    And I don't get angry at all about your lies you squirm out with. You're a liar. and you haven't got any sort of backbone to actually stand up and either admit you were wrong, or take it. You continue to hide under daddy's skirts about what you said and can never actually produce the facts (as usual).

    I don't have to make up any sort of lie to show the truth. You should work on the info lux in my morning chime


  5. by HatetheSwamp on May 24, 2024 4:36 am

    The presumptive Republican presidential nominee was pressed in a follow-up question if that meant he may want to support some restrictions on contraception.

    “Things really do have a lot to do with the states, and some states are going to have different policy than others,” Trump responded, before repeating that he would be releasing “a very comprehensive policy” on the issue.


    You really do hate federalism, don't you, Curt? You're Big Brother all the way!!!!!, eh?

    One way that I think Trump has evolved since 016 is that he understands the Constitution... and believes in it.

    His position statement on abortion a while back was federalism. It was all about the Tenth Amendment... about the power of the people... exercised in the states.

    I think that people have had enuff of the central government foisting on them from the Swamp.

    I despise Trump. But, I'm groovin on his increasing commitment to our Constitution.


  6. by oldedude on May 24, 2024 6:40 am
    Lead- this is "one of those articles that curt plucks out of some garbage pail somewhere and he "thinks" it's newsworthy because it mentions trumpster. Again, talking about "a person" instead of an idea.

    trumpster has made it clear that he agrees with SCOTUS regarding contraception being a state's rights issue. So I'm wondering why curt would use this. Although it's not well liked on this site (because of the hatred and lack of understanding of federalism), I think that is closer to the constitution than RvW.


  7. by Indy! on May 24, 2024 4:25 pm

    Good lord, OD - get a grip. The FBI puts everything on their "terrorist" list because it means more funding for them. Learn the basics - get back to me. Or not.


  8. by oldedude on May 24, 2024 7:36 pm
    Good lord, OD - get a grip. The FBI puts everything on their "terrorist" list because it means more funding for them. Learn the basics - get back to me. Or not.

    Actually, that's a bald-faced LIE only told by those who know so little about the PATRIOT Act tell other sheep to make them believe they're actually "intelligent" which is really far from the truth. There are specific guidelines regarding the watch list. Even you, with all your love of our enemies shouldn't be on it.

    What's even funnier, is there's no mention whatsoever about the PATRIOT Act. So you just look like a STUPID 10 Year-old Again.

    I did say the San Bernadino murders are considered a TERRORIST ACT. Really, really different from being on the watch list or using the PATRIOT ACT. One is about the act, the other is about being able to use surveillance techniques usually reserved for non-citizens now for US citizens. So you look double Stoopid in front of everyone. AND you proved my point of you not being able to buy a clue about reality, which any other 10-year-old could do.


  9. by Indy! on May 24, 2024 8:23 pm

    It's comical that the guy most closely associated with the gov't - the one who gets his welfare check every week from Uncle Sam - knows the least about the gov. Got news for you Odorous, Cat Stevens was on the watch list. The guy who sings Peace Train. Lesson you need to learn? The government lies.


  10. by oldedude on May 25, 2024 7:05 am
    Yes, that was open source. He also sat on the demarcation line in Iraq and pretended to stop the tanks. That proves zero. Peter, Paul, an Mary were on FBI lists, so the fuck what. My point remains. To "legally" put someone on the Terrorist watch list, the government is required to follow a list of requirements. And BTW, I've been the one arguing for years about the violations of the PATRIOT Act the obomber and pedojoe governments have used illegally. You haven't even known the violations exist. So you're dismissed now, go sit down.


  11. by Indy! on May 25, 2024 10:53 am

    Oh now it's "legally" put someone on the list. So I guess you aren't counting all the kids, grandparents and dogs (yes) that ended up on the list. How convenient for your "argument". 😂


Go To Top

Comment on: "Trump boldly takes on the issue of contraception; it’s up to the states. Sorry Mississippi!"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page