Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

James Comer is not sure an impeachment of Biden is warranted
Politics by Curt_Anderson     March 1, 2024 4:25 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (9 comments) [63 views]


The Conservative Justices on the Supreme Court Hold the Record as the World's Most Expensive Whores...
Crime by Ponderer     February 29, 2024 10:35 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (33 comments) [311 views]


Rep. Lauren Boebert's son Tyler allegedly made a sex tape with co-defendant
Crime by Curt_Anderson     February 29, 2024 11:24 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (10 comments) [166 views]


Ex-Jim Biden business partner disputes loan testimony before Congress
Crime by HatetheSwamp     March 2, 2024 3:07 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (3 comments) [18 views]


Bad news for the Doddering Old Fool: Polls stagnant since the Hur Report
President by HatetheSwamp     March 2, 2024 4:57 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (3 comments) [23 views]


James Comer has been big on promises, short on delivery. MAGA is feeling let down.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     March 1, 2024 1:28 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (5 comments) [64 views]


So, Curt, can you still say that there's "NO EVIDENCE" that Joe was involved in the Crime Family?
Crime by HatetheSwamp     March 1, 2024 6:33 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (15 comments) [113 views]


Oversight and Judiciary Committees Release Hunter Biden Transcript
Politics by Curt_Anderson     February 29, 2024 5:51 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (13 comments) [99 views]


Is Trump going broke? Is he bringing the GOP down with him?
Politics by Curt_Anderson     February 28, 2024 5:46 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (5 comments) [114 views]


RFK Jr. Backs Sen. Rand Paul to Succeed McConnell...
Politics by HatetheSwamp     March 1, 2024 6:15 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [12 views]


Law selectors, pages, etc.
Why are TV lawyers bamboozling Trump supporting rubes into thinking thereís a legitimate case of double jeopardy?
By Curt_Anderson
December 27, 2023 9:30 am
Category: Law

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

The charges against Donald Trump in his second impeachment:
Incitement of insurrection

The Jack Smith-led charges against Donald Trump in federal court:
Conspiracy to defraud the United States
Conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding
Obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding
Conspiracy against rights

A person does not have to be a Supreme Court legal clerk or a law professor to know that recidivist can face different and multiple charges many times over the course of his criminal career.

For those who did not go to law school but not wanting to be hoodwinked by Fox News legal pundits, it helps to have paid attention in your high school American government class or to have made an effort to read the United States Constitution.

The Double Jeopardy Clause in the Fifth Amendment to the US Constitution prohibits anyone from being prosecuted twice for the SAME crime.

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Why are TV lawyers bamboozling Trump supporting rubes into thinking thereís a legitimate case of double jeopardy?":

  1. by HatetheSwamp on December 27, 2023 9:45 am

    Sorry, Curt. Remind me again. Which Supreme Court Justice did you clerk for?

    Just wondering. Because apparently you watch Fox a whole heck of a lot more than ol pb, who's saying that Trump'll get off on the Double Jeopardy scam?


  2. by Curt_Anderson on December 27, 2023 10:25 am
    No, I donít watch Fox News, but I have read your posts citing the legal pundits who appear on FOX News, NewsMax, etc. and their arguments of double jeopardy in Trumpís trials.


  3. by HatetheSwamp on December 27, 2023 10:50 am

    And, that is what you read?


  4. by Curt_Anderson on December 27, 2023 10:56 am
    Yes, I read it most recently in your comment #29 in the link below.
    selectsmart.com


  5. by HatetheSwamp on December 27, 2023 11:13 am

    Here's what pb's hearing from the Legal Goobers:

    Trump probably won't prevail on immunity...
    -#29


  6. by Curt_Anderson on December 27, 2023 11:18 am
    That's non sequitur. This thread is not about immunity. You also posted, citing your preferred legal pundits, "to charge him criminally, amounts to a type of double jeopardy."

    For the record, it not any type of double jeopardy.


  7. by Indy! on December 27, 2023 11:56 am

    Curt - have you ever watched Fox... ahem... "news"? I have - not because I want to, but because my dad is ill and when I see him, he keeps trying to get me interested in Faux. It's below idiot level. To say they are aiming for the lowest common denominator when it comes to viewers would be an insult to the lowest common denominator. They must be paying some of their "talent" a ton of money in order to get them to show up everyday because they can't all be that stupid or willing to lie all day about everything.


  8. by Curt_Anderson on December 27, 2023 12:06 pm
    Indy,
    No, I don't ever watch FOX News Channel. The closest I come is watching a video clip somewhere like on a late night comedy show or here of a ridiculous FOX News segment.

    I am convinced that Alan Dershowitz aside from whatever he is paid to make disingenuous legal arguments on TV, enjoys playing the devil's advocate---which he has history of doing.


  9. by Indy! on December 27, 2023 12:53 pm

    One thing I find very interesting is how well their propaganda works on people. Because when my father and I discuss the issues - he is generally a supporter of liberal ideas. For instance, his views on health care generally lean towards the idea of universal healthcare - but if you actually say those two words together - he claims it's "socialism which leads to communism" because he's been programmed to say it from all his Fox exposure. When you actually watch a half hour of some Fox show - The Five, Hannity, whatever... it's amazing how text book the propaganda is and how prevalent. It's in everything they say and do. The dirty word for every day is "liberal" - any and every problem of the country leads directly back to "liberals" and the "democratic party" which they believe are one and the same. Harold Ford is on one of their shows and my Dad is convinced he's a flaming lefty. 😂


  10. by HatetheSwamp on December 28, 2023 5:47 am

    When you actually watch a half hour of some Fox show - The Five, Hannity, whatever... it's amazing how text book the propaganda is and how prevalent.


    Precisely. That's significantly why I'm boycotting Fox. But, in truth, your comment is true of all of cable "news." Ain't?


Go To Top

Comment on: "Why are TV lawyers bamboozling Trump supporting rubes into thinking thereís a legitimate case of double jeopardy?"

* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page