Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

You don't have to be crazy to attend CPAC ...okay, you pretty much do.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     February 24, 2024 10:45 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (5 comments) [47 views]


Matt Gaetz says his GOP colleagues pushing the now indicted "highly credible confidential" source were a little "over-sauced".
Politics by Curt_Anderson     February 22, 2024 10:53 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (9 comments) [118 views]


Trump’s new appeal to Black voters: I am a criminal too!
Crime by Curt_Anderson     February 24, 2024 9:08 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (3 comments) [17 views]


Clueless Sen. Tuberville 'running in circles' in response to IVF question
Politics by Curt_Anderson     February 23, 2024 12:53 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (2 comments) [16 views]


Disney Stock Jumps on “Epic” Quarter
Disney by Indy!     February 24, 2024 10:55 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (1 comments) [9 views]


So we're in the market for a house...
Nonprofit by Ponderer     February 4, 2024 6:09 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (43 comments) [501 views]


Get A Load Of These Insane Christian Nationalists Who Believed Rights Come From God And Not The Government
History by HatetheSwamp     February 24, 2024 9:01 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (5 comments) [25 views]


The infamous FD-1023 form: Biden $10M bribe file released: Burisma chief said he was ‘coerced’ to pay Joe, ‘stupid’ Hunter in bombshell allegations
Crime by HatetheSwamp     July 20, 2023 3:47 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (35 comments) [575 views]


Tulsi Gabbard is a transformative political leader... speaking at EFFIN CPAC
Politics by HatetheSwamp     February 23, 2024 10:04 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (5 comments) [38 views]


Joe Manchin interview: Electing Trump would be very detrimental to US, world. Biden too liberal now.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     February 22, 2024 12:48 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (2 comments) [65 views]


Politics selectors, pages, etc.
The House Votes for Impeachment Inquiry
By HatetheSwamp
December 13, 2023 3:09 pm
Category: Politics

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

I don't know if the video will work.

All GOPs voted for. All Dems who voted, voted against.

As we know, the GOP is the home of openness and inclusion, acceptance, diversity, tolerance and freedom. Rarely do they all follow the party line.

They did today!



Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "The House Votes for Impeachment Inquiry ":

  1. by oldedude on December 13, 2023 3:55 pm
    It is interesting some of the dims were "too busy" to vote for pedojoe. I realize it wouldn't have done any good, but to not show up and cast a vote, is actually casting a vote against. So that's interesting. Sounds like that's what little nancy could get in this vote. That's interesting.


  2. by Curt_Anderson on December 13, 2023 4:09 pm
    Actually, there was only one person not voting: Bradley Schneider (D-IL).

    I don't know if that was a "statement" or if he was sick or something.


    washingtonpost.com


  3. by oldedude on December 13, 2023 5:36 pm
    If you don't show up for a vote in congress, it's a political vote. I wish I was as naive as you.


  4. by Indy! on December 13, 2023 5:38 pm

    Well, well... looks like I finished my impeachment tutorial just in time for the latest thread on SelectSmart... fortuitous synchronicity or Indy just totally sticking the landing again? You can decide before OR after you check it out below... ENJOY!


  5. by Curt_Anderson on December 13, 2023 5:48 pm
    Perfect art and commentary, Indy!

    selectsmart.com


  6. by Curt_Anderson on December 13, 2023 6:08 pm
    "If you don't show up for a vote in congress, it's a political vote. I wish I was as naive as you." ---OD

    I am glad I am not suspicious and conspiracy-minded like you. I'll need to see some evidence that Schneider's non-vote was a "political vote" against Biden.

    Rep. Brad Schneider endorses Joe Biden --Chicago Sun Times
    Schneider refusing to co-sponsor bills with Republicans who deny Biden's victory --(Arlington Heights, IL) Daily Herald
    chicago.suntimes.com
    dailyherald.com


  7. by Indy! on December 13, 2023 8:04 pm
    Thanks, Curt. Haven't done any of these in months - it was fun to release the creative juices again.


  8. by oldedude on December 13, 2023 8:26 pm
    I am glad I am not suspicious and conspiracy-minded like you. I'll need to see some evidence that Schneider's non-vote was a "political vote" against Biden.

    He is part of the "No Labels" group of dims. So it's sure he has no love of pedojoe. That other thingie about Schneider refusing to co-sponsor bills with Republicans who deny Biden's victory is a bit phobic, but if that's what he wants, okay. Constitutionally, there are those on the other side that don't believe that, and he doesn't want to work with them. I would have a hard time too.

    He must have been with his mistress at the time. He's only missed 1% of votes. If it was a friday (when there are rarely votes) I'd give him a break. But honestly, unless you can show he was sick, I stand on what I said.

    Again, you understand so friggin' little about how DC works, it's embarrassing. sunshine, lolypops, and rainbows everywhere! (thank you Leslie!)
    I'm just a realist.



  9. by Curt_Anderson on December 13, 2023 8:54 pm
    OD,
    I said in #2 above, "I don't know if that was a 'statement' or if he was sick or something." You are the one who insists, "it's a political vote". I just asked you for some evidence, maybe Rep. Schneider explaining his non-vote. Until then I withhold judgment.


  10. by Curt_Anderson on December 13, 2023 9:14 pm
    OD,
    The case wasn't a rape case; it was a defamation case. As with any case, it is the jury's job to evaluate the credibility of the witnesses. Trump did not impress them as very credible.

    Trump denied that he had ever met Carroll, accused her of trying to sell books, implied she had a political agenda, saying that Carroll was "totally lying" and that "she's not my type."

    Here is where Trump shoots himself in the foot: Trump was shown this photograph, he mistakenly identified E. Jean Carroll as his second wife, Marla Maples, despite his first wife Ivana Trump also being in the picture; upon recognizing his mistake, he protested that the photo was "very blurry" (the photo is not blurry).


  11. by oldedude on December 14, 2023 7:52 am
    You are the one who insists, "it's a political vote". I just asked you for some evidence, maybe Rep. Schneider explaining his non-vote. Until then I withhold judgment.
    Talking to you is like reading the neverending story and expecting an end. Someday.


Go To Top

Comment on: "The House Votes for Impeachment Inquiry "

* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page