Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

The infamous FD-1023 form: Biden $10M bribe file released: Burisma chief said he was ‘coerced’ to pay Joe, ‘stupid’ Hunter in bombshell allegations
Crime by HatetheSwamp     July 20, 2023 3:47 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (27 comments) [510 views]


So we're in the market for a house...
Nonprofit by Ponderer     February 4, 2024 6:09 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (36 comments) [414 views]


Clueless Sen. Tuberville 'running in circles' in response to IVF question
Politics by Curt_Anderson     February 23, 2024 12:53 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [8 views]


Tulsi Gabbard is a transformative political leader... speaking at EFFIN CPAC
Politics by HatetheSwamp     February 23, 2024 10:04 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (5 comments) [37 views]


Joe Manchin interview: Electing Trump would be very detrimental to US, world. Biden too liberal now.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     February 22, 2024 12:48 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (2 comments) [60 views]


THE DRINKS ARE ON ME, BOYS!!!
Alcoholic Beverages by Ponderer     February 21, 2024 6:50 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (7 comments) [141 views]


Matt Gaetz says his GOP colleagues pushing the now indicted "highly credible confidential" source were a little "over-sauced".
Politics by Curt_Anderson     February 22, 2024 10:53 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (3 comments) [56 views]


What to expect from Jim Biden's testimony before the House Oversight Committee...
Government by HatetheSwamp     February 21, 2024 8:24 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (32 comments) [299 views]


To set the record straight, GOPs are stoked for impeachment after Jim Biden's lies under oath
Crime by HatetheSwamp     February 22, 2024 6:57 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [21 views]


The truth about Alexander Smirnov and the GOP push to impeach the Doddering Old Fool
Politics by HatetheSwamp     February 22, 2024 6:43 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [7 views]


Crime selectors, pages, etc.
"Republicans have more evidence in five months than DOJ in five years."
By HatetheSwamp
September 30, 2023 3:39 am
Category: Crime

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

Gang. It's a brief video. Take a look...if you care to see facts reported.

Note. The reference to the Nancy Mace/Jonathan Turley exchange.

And...oh, and pb's so bang on...to the fact that impeachment is a political, not criminal, process...

Oh, and that Hunter and Jim now have to respond to, as po'd say, EFFINsubpoenas. Keehee haha. Can you say, "Contempt of Congress?" See?, I knew you could.

Just a word to Curt. Please keep clinging to your Holy Trinity like a faithful Catholic clutches a crucifix. It's so endearing.

And, to po? Absolutely. Continue to remind us all that you center the universe and have authority to define what is and ain't "evidence" for every EFFINvoters in America, as you'd say. I promise. That'll hold until November 5, 024, baha keehee.

Yikes, gang. pb is havin fun!



Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on ""Republicans have more evidence in five months than DOJ in five years."":

  1. by Ponderer on September 30, 2023 6:48 am

    Wow. I watched that whole video, Bill. With all their talk about how there was so much evidence,












    it would have been nice if any of those experts had actually given their viewers a single, solitary example of some.











  2. by oldedude on September 30, 2023 7:55 am
    That's what happens when you're allowed to actually have a real investigation. And not be paid to not do your job. Especially to those making the decisions not to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same except if the president is crooked.

    I'm going to preempt the sheeple. This includes everyone. You're going to give me the "butt. butt. buttwhatabout" I'm including that. There is one exception, and that is Mike Flynn. His family was threatened with being chickenshitted for the rest of their lives, and having to look over their shoulder for assholes choosing to violate the phrase I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. But in all these messes, he is the sole exception.


  3. by Curt_Anderson on September 30, 2023 11:40 am
    HtS,
    Hogan Gidley, who you quoted in your headline is, to use his term, a buffoon. Gidley said that evidence the Republicans have is circumstantial, adding "all evidence is circumstantial unless you see the crime". That is just plain ignorant. There is a lot of admissible evidence that is neither circumstantial nor witness-of-crime testimony, for example fingerprints, DNA evidence, incriminating evidence collected at the suspect's home, bloodstain evidence, etc.

    The others in the panel made excuses as to why the Republicans presented no evidence in their hearing, stressing that it was only an "impeachment inquiry" and that evidence should not have been expected to be presented. That might have been believable if before the hearing James Comer had not said we will "present evidence House Republicans have uncovered to date regarding President Joe Biden's knowledge of and role in his family's domestic and international business practices".



  4. by oldedude on September 30, 2023 5:02 pm
    The others in the panel made excuses as to why the Republicans presented no evidence in their hearing, stressing that it was only an "impeachment inquiry" and that evidence should not have been expected to be presented.

    That's the simple truth of it jjpo. I know you find everything and anything "the others" do because your hatred is so rabid. And then of course, there's the little german thing going on.

    An inquiry is exactly that. an act of asking for information: an official investigation: In an inquiry, information comes in to review and see IF the appropriate laws apply, and IF they fill the predicate acts the law requires. That's all. Period.

    When the case is presented, the information is in the reverse direction of an inquiry. You state the charge and show how that charge applies, how the predicate acts are fulfilled, and how the person did these things.

    It's stupid to put your cart before the horse. If you're truly looking for truth, you don't lead suspects or witnesses. You ask the questions that you get answers (like them or not). After this, they could choose to not impeach. That's what a REAL inquiry is.
    bing.com


  5. by Curt_Anderson on September 30, 2023 7:28 pm
    OD,
    I don’t think even you believe that. Comer promised evidence would be presented at the hearing. Why have it televised only to have it roundly ridiculed—even by disappointed conservatives?


  6. by oldedude on September 30, 2023 8:56 pm
    Honestly jjpo, I don't care what they say. These are the rules of discovery and gathering a case. They're best practices that are routinely used.

    Why are they televising it? because the dims hired a company to "produce" the documentary for the anal of history for the tune of $5,428,579. Now we have to go through the painful parts. So if anything, thank shiftless for divulging sensitive information before it was supposed to be released. And some of it was classified? Remember "i have indisputable evidence" (several times) that was dropped because it was a lie?

    If you're into quickies, fine. Just say so. This is Kabuki. Nothing more. I (personally) don't waste my time on kabuki. I know how to set up a case. I know what to do with evidence. I know this is a process. I'm about done with your "arguments" that are on the verge of a third grader just learning about our legal system.


Go To Top

Comment on: ""Republicans have more evidence in five months than DOJ in five years.""

* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page