by Ponderer on September 13, 2023 9:02 am
"What I think Kelly did was...and I think you can relate to this...issue an "indictment," i.e., produce enuff info to get a reasonable person to acknowledge that there's reason to go forward..." -Hate
Bill, I'll warrant that it is enough to hold an inquiry. But... and I know you aren't going to like this... there was nothing that she presented that qualifies as evidence of a crime having been committed. You've got several people saying stuff. People mentioning things in emails. Not under oath, btw. But none of what any of them said was itself evidence of a crime.
I agree that there is enough to have an official inquiry about to determine if a crime or crimes have been committed. But even a large portion of the Republican party doesn't think there's enough there to impeach him on or even warranting an inquiry.
If you want to have an impeachment inquiry and investigate what you think you have so far, knock yourself out. But none of what she presented in that video was, in and of itself, evidence of a crime being committed. It just wasn't.
But hey, get some of these Ukrainian guys under oath and get what you can out of them. Investigate all the banking and tax data you want to. Try and find actual evidence of a crime having been committed to your heart's content. I'm all for it.
But so far, you ain't gotshit, Bill.
by Curt_Anderson on September 13, 2023 9:09 am
I have watched one or two of the inane videos that you recommended. I am not about to waste more of my time on your other videos. If you have a case to make make the points in written form and support them with relevant links.
Sometimes you might include a video to prove that some well-known personage actually made a surprising statement: a Democrat saying something in support of Donald Trump, or a Republican saying something in support of Joe Biden, for instance.
by Ponderer on September 13, 2023 9:15 am
It was all stuff we've already heard, Curt. You ain't missin' nothin'.