Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

pb's prediction: Hunter Biden’s testimony before the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday
Crime by HatetheSwamp     February 27, 2024 7:49 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (7 comments) [109 views]


Clueless Sen. Tuberville 'running in circles' in response to IVF question
Politics by Curt_Anderson     February 23, 2024 12:53 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (15 comments) [210 views]


How they see the Doddering Old "feckless dementia-ridden" Fool
President by HatetheSwamp     February 27, 2024 9:54 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (1 comments) [12 views]


Pro-Palestinian advocates urge 'uncommitted' vote during Michigan presidential primary
Politics by HatetheSwamp     February 26, 2024 3:30 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (6 comments) [67 views]


EFFINUnwoke Mary Poppins now rated PG in UK
Entertainment by HatetheSwamp     February 27, 2024 6:20 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [24 views]


Biden says he hopes there’ll be a ceasefire in Gaza by next Monday
History by Ponderer     February 26, 2024 7:46 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (4 comments) [76 views]


SCOTUS to decide if the states of Florida and Texas can violate the first amendment.
Law by Curt_Anderson     February 26, 2024 9:09 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (23 comments) [153 views]


Donald Trump's Weekend Gaffes: Accidentally Endorses Biden, And More
Humor by Curt_Anderson     February 25, 2024 6:56 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (5 comments) [77 views]


Disney Stock Jumps on “Epic” Quarter
Disney by Indy!     February 24, 2024 10:55 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (11 comments) [80 views]


Republicans are terrible at investigations and prosecutions.
Government by Curt_Anderson     February 25, 2024 3:12 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (7 comments) [83 views]


Law selectors, pages, etc.
Are GOP screenshots of Hunter Biden's alleged WhatsApp conversation complete fakes?
By Curt_Anderson
June 30, 2023 3:52 pm
Category: Law

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

(Axios)[Hunter Biden's lawyer Abbe Lowell] slams [GOP committee chair Jason] Smith for posting screenshots of an alleged WhatsApp conversation, saying, "The screen-grab images you posted are not real and contain myriad of issues....In short, the images you circulated online are complete fakes."

Lowell pointed to Hunter Biden's profile picture in the message being a photo from 2022, five years after the 2017 message was allegedly sent.



Btw, Hunter Biden's photo seems to be at the wrong angle and orientation. The screenshot is from Miranda Devine's Twitter page. Next time Republicans want to create something to falsely incriminate the Bidens, they should hire Indy!. He'd create real-looking fakes.

Cited and related links:

  1. axios.com
  2. twitter.com

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Are GOP screenshots of Hunter Biden's alleged WhatsApp conversation complete fakes?":

  1. by Curt_Anderson on June 30, 2023 7:34 pm
    I did a Google image search for "Whatsapp screenshots". I didn't see any that looked like the one that the House Republicans claimed was Hunter Biden's. See link below.
    google.com


  2. by Indy! on June 30, 2023 7:40 pm

    I could use the work.


  3. by HatetheSwamp on July 1, 2023 3:55 am

    May "that feckless dementia-ridden piece of crap's" string pullers should point this out. Baha.

    On 538, the Doddering Old Fart's 3+ points below where Trump was at this point in his term.

    projects.fivethirtyeight.com


  4. by Ponderer on July 1, 2023 6:24 am

    Curt, these flaming assholes aren't even above bringing a fake case before the Supreme Court if it means taking away the civil rights of a demonic minority they have in their crosshairs. Truth and reality are disposable to them if it doesn't suit their purposes.

    They can slough off the truth like a snake sheds his skin without a hint of remorse or basic human decency or conscience. If there is no case they can use to fill their bill, well then by golly they'll just pull one that will right out of their asses.


    "The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the owner of a wedding website in Colorado can refuse to provide service to LGBTQ couples because it violates her religious beliefs.

    But an alleged request cited in the case appears to be made up.

    The website owner, Lorie Smith, said she got a request from a gay couple — "Stewart and Mike" — but The New Republic tracked down Stewart, who says he never asked her to make him a website.

    Stewart is married to a woman, The New Republic reported.

    "I wouldn't want anybody to ... make me a wedding website?" he told The New Republic. "I'm married, I have a child — I'm not really sure where that came from. But somebody's using false information in a Supreme Court filing document."

    The court's ruling in the case was 6-3, led by the [flaming asshole] conservative justices who now dominate the high court.

    Justice Neil Gorsuch, who delivered the court's opinion, wrote that the First Amendment bans Colorado from "forcing a website designer to create expressive designs speaking messages with which the designer disagrees."

    Justice Sonia Sotomayor, one of the three dissenting justices, wrote in her dissent that "today is a sad day in American constitutional law and in the lives of LGBT people."


    businessinsider.com


  5. by Ponderer on July 1, 2023 6:40 am

    There is simply nothing that the MAGA Republican party and its constituents are above lying about. They live on lies. They are based on lies. All their political successes of late totally relied on lies. They've even gotten members elected to Congress whose entire campaign and entire life stories and qualifications for the job were nothing but flaming, bald-faced lies. They don't giveashit about lying. It's as natural a thing to them as breathing.

    And they are in the process of turning this country into a hell hole of destroyed civil rights and authoritarianism based on their putrid, totally made up lies.

    If the only way that they can get anyone to vote for them or get the rulings they want is to lie their asses off, well then by gum no MAGA Republican shall be left standing with an attached ass. And they won't even blink an eye doing it either. Fuckingbigoted sociopaths.

    These people are going to be responsible for destroying this country, for turning it into the authoritarian dictatorship that the very Constitution was intended to separate and protect us from.


  6. by HatetheSwamp on July 1, 2023 7:32 am

    I'm jus sayin, po, if there was anything to this, that, by the time the case got to the Supreme Court, the attorneys for your side would have figured it out. Don't you think? Bahahahahahahahahahaha.

    You and Donna are serious devotées of baseless, yet self-serving, conspiracy theories. Eh!!!!!?

    Baha baha bahahahahahahahahahaha.

    BTW, have you seen the quote from the gay Guy Curt never heard of praising the ruling? I've quoted it twice. Baha.


  7. by Ponderer on July 1, 2023 7:45 am

    Bill, I happily await the MAGA Republican party countering this with any facts that show it to be untrue.

    Not that they'll even bother. Their mission is already accomplished. They don't giveashit about any repercussions from their lies.


  8. by HatetheSwamp on July 1, 2023 7:52 am

    po,

    The US Supreme Court has chiseled it the granite of American history. Feel free to read about it, and weep...at your convenience.

    Baha baha bahahahahahahahahahaha baha baha

    Truth. Baha bahahahahahahahahahaha baha baha!


  9. by Ponderer on July 1, 2023 7:53 am

    You are a member of a political party full of flaming, bald-faced liars, Bill. A party of selfish, sociopathic, cowardly, dishonest, gullible, greedy, treasonous racists and bigoted assholes.

    I'm sorry, but there just isn't any way to put it any nicer. You and your political party are what you are, Bill. Don't blame me.



  10. by Ponderer on July 1, 2023 7:54 am

    And the last thing you are is real Americans.


  11. by HatetheSwamp on July 1, 2023 8:29 am

    You are a member of a political party full of flaming, bald-faced liars, Bill. A party of selfish, sociopathic, cowardly, dishonest, gullible, greedy, treasonous racists and bigoted assholes.

    "Can we get along?" -Rodney King
    "God save the Queen, man." -The Doddering Old Fart


  12. by oldedude on July 1, 2023 8:30 am
    You are a member of a political party full of flaming, bald-faced liars, Bill. A party of selfish, sociopathic, cowardly, dishonest, gullible, greedy, treasonous racists and bigoted assholes.

    I'm sorry, but there just isn't any way to put it any nicer. You and your political party are what you are, Bill. Don't blame me.


    Bravo! How much more eloquent could you put your complete hatred and nonacceptance of other human beings, and citizens of America. For someone who knows nothing about the constitution and reminds us of that most of the times you write your "opinions." As we've been reminded many times, your "opinions" you accept as facts because you are the center of everyone's universe and don't need any other facts than that. Not that you're a narcissist or anything.

    You tell us we MUST be accepting of everything you say. And yet, there's no facts behind your thoughts, zero constitutional basis for your thoughts on the constitution. And your posts are nothing but hatred. And zero actual fact.


  13. by HatetheSwamp on July 1, 2023 8:43 am

    As we've been reminded many times, your "opinions" you accept as facts because you are the center of everyone's universe and don't need any other facts than that.

    I have no idea how many scores of times I've reminded po, "You center the universe." po never replies. I'm guess that's a "duh" for po. Absolutely, perfectly apparent, like the sun rises in the east.


  14. by Ponderer on July 1, 2023 1:10 pm


    "Can't we all just get along...?"


  15. by Ponderer on July 1, 2023 1:22 pm

    "Bravo! How much more eloquent could you put your complete hatred and nonacceptance of other human beings, and citizens of America." -olde dude

    Well, hatred for human beings that are actively trying to eradicate my community from this society. Sure.

    Why do you expect human beings to react with anything but hate towards their civil rights being legislated away by rabidly conservative, out-of-step-with-the-majority-of-Americans, MAGA Republican Supreme Court Activist Judges?

    With rapturous glee and joyful ovations to their despicable oppressors? With obsequious gratitude towards those literally trying to take away our civil rights?

    Well fuckthat!. Yes, I hate the people who are doing this to my community and the country as a whole. Am I supposed to love and adore you flaming bigoted assholes for repressing us and turning this country into an authoritarian bigotocracy? Fuckyou, od.


  16. by Ponderer on July 1, 2023 1:26 pm

    Oh my yes, we just need to quietly accept you fuckingassholes stomping all the hell over us and taking away our Constitutional rights. We just need to return your discriminatory repression of us with daises and choruses of Kumbaya?

    Fuckyousomuch, olde dude.


  17. by HatetheSwamp on July 1, 2023 2:41 pm

    ...we just need to quietly accept you fuckingassholes stomping all the hell over us and taking away our Constitutional rights.

    There you go again, po, claiming to be a constitutional scholar.

    What effin constitutional rights. To groom toddlers and children? What!!!!!?


  18. by oldedude on July 1, 2023 5:17 pm
    This is what you get when you're nice to her. I double down on my niceness.


  19. by Ponderer on July 1, 2023 6:33 pm

    "There you go again, po, claiming to be a constitutional scholar." -Hate

    And there you go again, Bill. Lying your fuckingMAGARepublican ass off about me again like the lying fuckingasshole that you are.



    "The US Supreme Court has chiseled it the granite of American history." -Hate

    No deeper than Roe was chiselled in 1973 I'll warrant.


  20. by oldedude on July 1, 2023 7:31 pm
    Well, hatred for human beings that are actively trying to eradicate my community from this society. Sure.

    So when have I done that? Simple question. Or are you too bigoted to have a truthful response.


  21. by oldedude on July 1, 2023 7:55 pm
    "The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the owner of a wedding website in Colorado can refuse to provide service to LGBTQ couples because it violates her religious beliefs.

    But an alleged request cited in the case appears to be made up.

    The website owner, Lorie Smith, said she got a request from a gay couple — "Stewart and Mike" — but The New Republic tracked down Stewart, who says he never asked her to make him a website.

    Stewart is married to a woman, The New Republic reported.


    First, the Title of the decision is: 303 CREATIVE LLC, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. AUBREY ELENIS, ET AL.

    Aubrey Elenis is a prominent Colorado attorney, an active member of the community, and a passionate defender of civil rights1. She was appointed Director of the Colorado Civil Rights Division in June 20161. Elenis is also a member of Gordon & Rees's employment practice group, where she counsels and defends clients against claims of employment discrimination, retaliation, wrongful termination, harassment, breach of contract, and other labor and employment disputes2. She is an attorney registered with Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel of the Colorado Supreme Court

    The Colorado Civil Rights Division (CCRD) is a Division of the Department of Regulatory Agencies (DORA). CCRD is charged with enforcement of the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act (CADA).


    Nothing you presumed, was true according to the decision. The decision is based clearly on the constitutionality of the Colorado Anti-Discrimination law and regulations according to the CADA Guidelines.

    "But, as this Court has long held, the opportunity to think for ourselves and to express those thoughts freely is among our most cherished liberties and part of what keeps our Republic strong," Gorsuch continued.

    "But tolerance, not coercion, is our Nation’s answer. The First Amendment envisions the United States as a rich and complex place where all persons are free to think and speak as they wish, not as the government demands. Because Colorado seeks to deny that promise, the judgment is reversed," he concluded.

    The high court's majority stated that "under Colorado’s logic, the government may compel anyone who speaks for pay on a given topic to accept all commissions on that same topic — no matter the message — if the topic somehow implicates a customer’s statutorily protected trait."

    "Taken seriously, that principle would allow the government to force all manner of artists, speechwriters, and others whose services involve speech to speak what they do not believe on pain of penalty," the opinion states.

    foxnews.com
    ccrd.colorado.gov


  22. by oldedude on July 1, 2023 7:55 pm
    "The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the owner of a wedding website in Colorado can refuse to provide service to LGBTQ couples because it violates her religious beliefs.

    But an alleged request cited in the case appears to be made up.

    The website owner, Lorie Smith, said she got a request from a gay couple — "Stewart and Mike" — but The New Republic tracked down Stewart, who says he never asked her to make him a website.

    Stewart is married to a woman, The New Republic reported.


    First, the Title of the decision is: 303 CREATIVE LLC, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. AUBREY ELENIS, ET AL.

    Aubrey Elenis is a prominent Colorado attorney, an active member of the community, and a passionate defender of civil rights1. She was appointed Director of the Colorado Civil Rights Division in June 20161. Elenis is also a member of Gordon & Rees's employment practice group, where she counsels and defends clients against claims of employment discrimination, retaliation, wrongful termination, harassment, breach of contract, and other labor and employment disputes2. She is an attorney registered with Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel of the Colorado Supreme Court

    The Colorado Civil Rights Division (CCRD) is a Division of the Department of Regulatory Agencies (DORA). CCRD is charged with enforcement of the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act (CADA).


    Nothing you presumed, was true according to the decision. The decision is based clearly on the constitutionality of the Colorado Anti-Discrimination law and regulations according to the CADA Guidelines.

    "But, as this Court has long held, the opportunity to think for ourselves and to express those thoughts freely is among our most cherished liberties and part of what keeps our Republic strong," Gorsuch continued.

    "But tolerance, not coercion, is our Nation’s answer. The First Amendment envisions the United States as a rich and complex place where all persons are free to think and speak as they wish, not as the government demands. Because Colorado seeks to deny that promise, the judgment is reversed," he concluded.

    The high court's majority stated that "under Colorado’s logic, the government may compel anyone who speaks for pay on a given topic to accept all commissions on that same topic — no matter the message — if the topic somehow implicates a customer’s statutorily protected trait."

    "Taken seriously, that principle would allow the government to force all manner of artists, speechwriters, and others whose services involve speech to speak what they do not believe on pain of penalty," the opinion states.

    foxnews.com
    ccrd.colorado.gov


  23. by oldedude on July 1, 2023 7:55 pm
    "The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the owner of a wedding website in Colorado can refuse to provide service to LGBTQ couples because it violates her religious beliefs.

    But an alleged request cited in the case appears to be made up.

    The website owner, Lorie Smith, said she got a request from a gay couple — "Stewart and Mike" — but The New Republic tracked down Stewart, who says he never asked her to make him a website.

    Stewart is married to a woman, The New Republic reported.


    First, the Title of the decision is: 303 CREATIVE LLC, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. AUBREY ELENIS, ET AL.

    Aubrey Elenis is a prominent Colorado attorney, an active member of the community, and a passionate defender of civil rights1. She was appointed Director of the Colorado Civil Rights Division in June 20161. Elenis is also a member of Gordon & Rees's employment practice group, where she counsels and defends clients against claims of employment discrimination, retaliation, wrongful termination, harassment, breach of contract, and other labor and employment disputes2. She is an attorney registered with Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel of the Colorado Supreme Court

    The Colorado Civil Rights Division (CCRD) is a Division of the Department of Regulatory Agencies (DORA). CCRD is charged with enforcement of the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act (CADA).


    Nothing you presumed, was true according to the decision. The decision is based clearly on the constitutionality of the Colorado Anti-Discrimination law and regulations according to the CADA Guidelines.

    "But, as this Court has long held, the opportunity to think for ourselves and to express those thoughts freely is among our most cherished liberties and part of what keeps our Republic strong," Gorsuch continued.

    "But tolerance, not coercion, is our Nation’s answer. The First Amendment envisions the United States as a rich and complex place where all persons are free to think and speak as they wish, not as the government demands. Because Colorado seeks to deny that promise, the judgment is reversed," he concluded.

    The high court's majority stated that "under Colorado’s logic, the government may compel anyone who speaks for pay on a given topic to accept all commissions on that same topic — no matter the message — if the topic somehow implicates a customer’s statutorily protected trait."

    "Taken seriously, that principle would allow the government to force all manner of artists, speechwriters, and others whose services involve speech to speak what they do not believe on pain of penalty," the opinion states.

    foxnews.com
    ccrd.colorado.gov


  24. by oldedude on July 1, 2023 7:57 pm
    Sorry, wrong thread. Disregard and please go the correct thread.


Go To Top

Comment on: "Are GOP screenshots of Hunter Biden's alleged WhatsApp conversation complete fakes?"

* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page