Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage

From our contributors:

Display Order:

America would be better off if we got rid of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and ICE.
Opinion by Curt_Anderson     October 1, 2023 12:44 pm (Rating: 5.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (17 comments) [97 views]


Socialist Rep. Jamaal Bowman pulls fire alarm as Dems try to delay vote on GOP stopgap spending bill
Politics by HatetheSwamp     October 1, 2023 4:59 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (10 comments) [145 views]


Jasmine Crockett, Dem Rep from Texas, kicks her some asinine GOP ass!
Politics by Ponderer     September 29, 2023 7:01 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (46 comments) [298 views]


New: ProPublica Interviews Joe Biden
President by Curt_Anderson     October 1, 2023 10:28 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [27 views]


Trump Criminal Co-Defendant in Georgia Election Interference Case Pleads Guilty
Law by Curt_Anderson     September 29, 2023 1:55 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (4 comments) [54 views]


AOC rips Florida MAGA Hat to SHREDS!
Politics by Ponderer     September 29, 2023 7:22 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (18 comments) [135 views]


Jonathan Turley, "...the most quintessential violation of the public trust...a form of public corruption." "
Crime by HatetheSwamp     September 28, 2023 1:30 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (6 comments) [66 views]


"Republicans have more evidence in five months than DOJ in five years."
Crime by HatetheSwamp     September 30, 2023 3:39 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (6 comments) [139 views]


Examples of how different the Democrats are from the Republicans
Politics by Ponderer     September 21, 2023 1:46 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (103 comments) [894 views]


Nancy Mace's false claim about a supposed bribe
Politics by Curt_Anderson     September 29, 2023 1:03 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (2 comments) [29 views]


Politics selectors, pages, etc.
Do you Really Believe Your Lying Eyes? Or What He Says...
By oldedude
April 11, 2023 9:24 am
Category: Politics

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

Before he thought he would get caught...

While campaigning for president, Joe Biden claimed he did not know anything about his son Hunter's international business dealings. He repeatedly denied ever talking to his son about such issues. For example, at a campaign event in Iowa in 2019, Fox News's Peter Doocy asked Biden about any conversations he had with his son about business. Biden stated such conversations never happened.

The truth in black and white straight from the White House

Four business partners, a vice president, and two assistants at Hunter Bidenís now-defunct firm visited the White House more than 80 times when his father was vice president in the Obama administration, Fox News Digital has found.

President Biden has repeatedly insisted he had no knowledge of Hunter's business dealings amid dual criminal and congressional investigations into the first son and his family.

However, Joan Mayer, who says she was the vice president of Hunterís now-defunct investment firm Rosemont Seneca Advisors from 2008 to 2017 on Linkedin, made at least 17 visits to the White House during that time, according to visitor logs reviewed by Fox News Digital.


So for the TDS'rs out there. Which way is it? do you believe your lying eyes about pedojoe? What would you say if this were Trump? Or maybe this is like Kennedy getting hookers and Marilyn in to the White House. Maybe they were 12-14 year old girls that he sniffed the hair of? Or showered with. The possibilities are endless.




Cited and related links:

  1. washingtonexaminer.com
  2. msn.com

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Do you Really Believe Your Lying Eyes? Or What He Says...":

  1. by Curt_Anderson on April 11, 2023 5:12 pm
    When I was employed and working for various companies, my wife knew the people I worked with, the people I supervised and my bosses. My wife, my co-workers and I got together socially often. We've had work colleagues over for dinner and parties. We've been the guests of co-workers and employers. My wife often visited me in my various offices.

    Despite all the familiarity, my wife knew nothing about the contracts I signed, the size of my budgets, or any of the nuts and bolts of my work.

    So why does Joe Biden meeting the people who worked with Hunter impress you so much?


  2. by HatetheSwamp on April 11, 2023 5:30 pm

    Because "that feckless dementia-ridden piece of crap" has lied about it repeatedly. Why do you suppose he'd do that?


  3. by oldedude on April 11, 2023 5:53 pm
    Why would people you have "no connection or contact with" see you 80 times at your work? You've maintained you didn't know "anything" about pedojr's business dealings. Therefore, you have no professional or personal relationship with them. And stated so several times. Publicly. on a hot mic. and video.

    What would you say if Trump had met with a saudi company 80+ times, even though you had no personal or professional relationship with them. That doesn't make sense, does it?


  4. by Curt_Anderson on April 11, 2023 6:00 pm
    HtS,
    Contrary to the ďlieĒ claim that Joe said he never talked to Hunter about his work, I recall during the campaign that Joe said he asked Hunter if there were any ethical issues. Hunter said it was all good.


  5. by Hunter28 on April 11, 2023 6:28 pm

    So here's the bottom line. If there was any merit to these claims, the House Republicans would have already impeached Biden.

    I would encourage both of you to read the story. Yes, some folks visited the White House, but they usually met with staffers. Did any of these interactions actually involve Biden? Why would he remember an interaction that didn't happen?

    Also, many of "meetings" mentioned in the article were holiday parties and Jewish community receptions where there were probably hundreds of people.

    Good luck with your impeachment hearings.


  6. by oldedude on April 11, 2023 8:30 pm
    Here's the difference. The GOP doesn't do random impeachments like the sheeple. They are gathering information now. What he said is incriminating, but not illegal. Especially for a politician. If he changed his story only makes him a liar. That's not impeachable. The conservatives are collecting data on illegal financial dealings. THAT is criminal and impeachable. To "impeach" on BS is just that.


  7. by HatetheSwamp on April 12, 2023 2:36 am

    Hunter,

    Re: "So here's the bottom line. If there was any merit to these claims, the House Republicans would have already impeached Biden."

    You may be right. But, then, what's the rush? Imagine months of Committee hearings in late 023 then, a year from now, during presidential primary season, the House running impeachment hearings.

    Bang for your political buck. Eh?


  8. by oldedude on April 12, 2023 6:39 am
    They're just getting ready for the 2024 elections. Pretty good "October surprise!"


  9. by oldedude on April 12, 2023 10:29 am
    Actually, according to the SunTimes,The Democratic National Convention will take place in Chicago, Illinois, from August 19-22, 2024. The shots should start coming shortly thereafter. Especially if pedojoe's nominated. Maybe they can perp walk pedojr and the rest of the family in their underwear. I think that would be fitting.
    chicago.suntimes.com


  10. by Indy! on April 12, 2023 12:18 pm
    This is what you guys are arguing about over here? Who's going to investigate who?


  11. by HatetheSwamp on April 12, 2023 1:17 pm

    It's "investigate whom."

    Thing is, Indy, Kevin McCarthy sold his soul to the Freedom Caucus to get the Speaker chair.

    There will be manifold investigations.


  12. by Hunter28 on April 13, 2023 2:07 pm

    Did anyone actually read the Fox News article that started this thread?

    Millions of people visit the White House every year. The Fox News article mentions a handful of people and a total of 80 visits over an eight-year period of time. Ten visits a year.

    These visits were TO THE WHITE HOUSE. The article doesn't mention whether any of these were with Biden himself. A handful appear to have been with Biden staffers (again, a handful of visits over eight years).

    Here's some other useful information. The Obama White House released their visitor logs. That's called transparency. The Trump White House did not.

    This is a nothing story.

    But what do you expect from a news organization that knowingly lied about the outcome of the 2020 election for months just to goose advertising profits?


  13. by oldedude on April 13, 2023 4:05 pm
    ALL visitors have to be cleared, and checked prior to visiting the whitehouse. They have to have 10 working days. Anyone that actually "visits" the inner sanctum of the Whitehouse are pre-cleared. That takes several days to check through a couple of databases for your clearance, and then of course a background. There are several different lists. I'm on one because my last day of work before I retired for the last time, we went on the tourists' version.

    The article does say who they saw.

    So a few things. I appreciate what obomber did. Unfortunately, the "administration" didn't release the information. Secret Service did (an auspice of Dept of Treasury).

    Interesting, the Chinese handed pedojoe up by volunteering to give all the information regarding the laundered money through their bank(s). Treasury handed him up by releasing the information regarding the laundered money to the public AND they also responded to subpoenas within a month, which is unheard of for Treasury. And now this. You can say whatever you want, but someone wants pedojoe politically gone. "Time to go! I don't care if you go home, you just can't stay!"


  14. by Ponderer on April 13, 2023 4:09 pm

    "Interesting, the Chinese handed pedojoe up by volunteering to give all the information regarding the laundered money through their bank(s)." -olde dude

    olde dude!!! Is this referring to some evidence you have of Biden's criminality that you might share with the rest of the class...? I'd love to see a link to it if it actually exists in this particular dimension...



  15. by oldedude on April 13, 2023 4:30 pm
    First, neither of those articles were posted by FoxNews. The one you're talking about was posted by anti----(wait for it)--pation! MSN.com.... jussayin...

    The other one was a Washington Examiner article.

    Biden once denied knowledge of Hunterís business dealings; now, he's certain they were not illegal


    All available evidence confirms Joe Biden knew about Hunter's business dealings, and chose to do nothing about it


    Joe Biden sticking to claim he and Hunter Biden never talked about foreign business: Psaki

    New Emails Show Joe Biden Lied About His Knowledge Of His Sonís Foreign Business Interests

    washingtonexaminer.com
    washingtonexaminer.com
    nypost.com
    thefederalist.com


  16. by oldedude on April 13, 2023 4:31 pm
    olde dude!!! Is this referring to some evidence you have of Biden's criminality that you might share with the rest of the class...? I'd love to see a link to it if it actually exists in this particular dimension...

    I already did. look it up.


  17. by Hunter28 on April 13, 2023 4:32 pm

    How many of these 80 visits involved someone meeting Joe Biden?


  18. by Curt_Anderson on April 13, 2023 5:06 pm
    OD,
    Nothing that you posted addresses Pondererís request for evidence of criminality by Biden. Even if Biden liedóand I donít think he didó-thatís not a crime. If Hunter capitalized on his family name, thatís not a crime. If Hunter got an exorbitant salary, thatís not a crime. Doing business overseas is not a crime.


  19. by Ponderer on April 13, 2023 6:11 pm

    Curt, if poor olde dude's best evidence of Biden's criminality is a bunch of stuff that in no way shows any evidence of any criminality on Biden's part, at least he did his best to post something. I respect him for that.

    Good on you, od!


  20. by oldedude on April 13, 2023 6:40 pm
    Nothing that you posted addresses Pondererís request for evidence of criminality by Biden. Even if Biden liedóand I donít think he didó-thatís not a crime. If Hunter capitalized on his family name, thatís not a crime. If Hunter got an exorbitant salary, thatís not a crime. Doing business overseas is not a crime.

    You're absolutely. Obviously, you didn't read my post of not engaging in 1. something from someone who lacks any credibility whatsoever.
    2. I have posted in these "does this question make me look like a bigger ass?" threads.
    3.All she does is argue minor points and do the same thing you do. Deny anything happened when in fact, every reliable news source has jumped on that bandwagon when it wasn't cool to cover him anymore.

    I'm not wasting my time on either her or the "question."


Go To Top

Comment on: "Do you Really Believe Your Lying Eyes? Or What He Says..."

* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page