Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

NPR: Nikki Haley says she'll vote for Trump
Politics by HatetheSwamp     May 22, 2024 3:24 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (1 comments) [30 views]


Anonymous comments regarding the Presidential Candidate Selector and the election
President by Curt_Anderson     March 19, 2024 10:10 am (Rating: 2.5) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (75 comments) [2464 views]


HUFFPO (a person of Curt's Holy Trinity): Joe Biden Called Out For Numerous Corrections In White House Transcript Of Speech
Politics by HatetheSwamp     May 22, 2024 5:15 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [33 views]


Trump boldly takes on the issue of contraception; itís up to the states. Sorry Mississippi!
Law by Curt_Anderson     May 22, 2024 10:32 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [27 views]


It's weird to predict a hung jury.
Law by Curt_Anderson     May 21, 2024 11:44 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (8 comments) [88 views]


Michael Cohen says he stole tens of thousands of dollars from Trumpís company
Crime by HatetheSwamp     May 20, 2024 12:18 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (7 comments) [80 views]


How will jurors react to Donald Trump not testifying?
Law by Curt_Anderson     May 21, 2024 8:49 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (2 comments) [42 views]


KC Chiefs' anti-Biden, Christian kicker Harrison Butker? Top selling NFL jersey.
Sports by HatetheSwamp     May 17, 2024 4:11 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (20 comments) [141 views]


RCP betting average
President by HatetheSwamp     May 21, 2024 11:33 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (3 comments) [21 views]


Will the defense call Robert Costello to destroy Michael Cohen?
Crime by HatetheSwamp     May 18, 2024 4:50 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (41 comments) [328 views]


Humor selectors, pages, etc.
Trump Melts Down over "Radical Left Democrats" and "Marxists"
By Donna
December 26, 2022 3:31 pm
Category: Humor

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

"Merry Christmas to EVERYONE, including the Radical Left Marxists that are trying to destroy our Country, the Federal Bureau of Investigation that is illegally coercing & paying Social and LameStream Media to push for a mentally disabled Democrat over the Brilliant, Clairvoyant, and USA LOVING Donald J. Trump, and, of course, The Department of Injustice, which appointed a Special "Prosecutor" who, together with his wife and family, HATES "Trump" more than any other person on earth. LOVE TO ALL!"

On the afternoon of Christmas Day, Trump began attacking "Radical Left Democrats" through social media.

"Our Country is under attack by the Radical Left Democrats. They are truly seeking to DESTROY AMERICA!!!"

"THE RADICAL LEFT DEMOCRATS HAVE WEAPONIZED THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM AT A LEVEL NEVER SEEN BEFORE IN THE USA. WITH NO BORDERS AND CROOKED ELECTIONS, OUR COUNTRY IS IN THIRD WORLD TROUBLE!!!," he also wrote. "PRESIDENT TRUMP WAS 233-22 IN THE MIDTERM ELECTIONS. HE IS ALSO LEADING, BY A LOT, ALL REPUBLICANS, AND BIDEN, IN ALMOST EVERY POLL." This, despite the horrendous and never ending FAKE NEWS - Incredible statistics that people just don't want to talk about!"

Trump's post to Truth Social came shortly after he made another dig at January 6th, calling it a "HOAX" like the "other Scams that the Disinformation laden Democrats have been planting for years."

"The Unselect Committee's January 6th Report is a Hoax, no different than RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA, and all of the other Scams that the Disinformation laden Democrats have been planting for years. If I weren't leading by a lot in the Polls, against both parties, this continuation of falsehoods and lies would end quickly. I won in 2016, did much better in 2020 (RIGGED!), and the Radical Marxists don't want to run against me or MAGA in 2024. I had almost nothing to do with January 6th. FREE SPEECH!"

***

LOL! Almost all of his complaints have been voiced here by Hts and olde dude. I can't figure out why they aren't 100% behind him.



Cited and related links:

  1. newsweek.com

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Trump Melts Down over "Radical Left Democrats" and "Marxists"":

  1. by Curt_Anderson on December 26, 2022 3:53 pm
    How come the "Brilliant, Clairvoyant" Donald J. Trump didn't see all this coming and figure out what to do in advance to avoid those problems?


  2. by Donna on December 26, 2022 4:24 pm

    He tried, right?




  3. by Ponderer on December 26, 2022 4:31 pm

    It's really a pity that Hate and od are *no longer supporting Trump. There seriously is no other politician in America who more closely matches them politically in spirit, goal, and policies.



    *In a pig's freaking eye they ain't.


  4. by Donna on December 26, 2022 4:32 pm

    He certainly tried to remain president after he lost. In fact I had the right idea when I predicted before the election that if he lost he'd refuse to leave office. In fact I was the only one here who foresaw problems during the transfer of power.



  5. by HatetheSwamp on December 29, 2022 3:16 am

    LOL! Almost all of his complaints have been voiced here by Hts and olde dude. I can't figure out why they aren't 100% behind him.

    What's regrettable is that the significant truth of Trump's comments is lost to his narcissistic claims that he's being persecuted.

    Trump is despicable but truth is still true.


  6. by HatetheSwamp on December 29, 2022 3:34 am

    Interestingly, I tried to get into Truth Social to see what Trump really did post because you progressives regularly post lies by quoting inaccurate and exaggerated accounts of Trump from the prevaricating TDS media. Apparently, all the interest locked up the site. At any rate, I've tried a bunch of times without success.


  7. by Donna on December 29, 2022 6:00 am

    I've never posted inaccurate quotes from Trump.



  8. by HatetheSwamp on December 29, 2022 7:13 am

    I've never posted inaccurate quotes from Trump.

    Donna. More than everyone else here, you post links from progressive propaganda sites under the guise that that's objective journalism. I am inclined to think that you do it honestly. Naively. But, it's obvious you take that garbage at face value.


  9. by Donna on December 29, 2022 7:18 am

    Well you're always welcome to correct any inaccuracies I post from those articles, which you rarely do.

    I could also poke fun at some of the sources you use, but when I critique a post or article, I critique the content, not the source.




  10. by HatetheSwamp on December 29, 2022 7:25 am

    I have in the past but you don't repent. It seems obvious to me that you care about making a point, not about truth.


  11. by Donna on December 29, 2022 7:33 am

    Again, no specifics. You're a waste of my time.



  12. by HatetheSwamp on December 29, 2022 7:35 am

    BTW, Donna. Please feel free to attack my sources. When I cite questionable sources, I always acknowledge that...and I do it because the SwampMedia is ignoring the story.

    As I've said before, I always cite the source that is least sympathetic to my point of view. So. Please feel free to attack my sources.


  13. by Curt_Anderson on December 29, 2022 9:25 am
    HtS,
    Recently, you howled in disbelief when I posted that Sean Hannity did not for second believe that Trump lost because of a rigged election. Sean Hannity testified in court in a voting machine lawsuit case. Multiple sources confirm the quote. You wanted to see a right wing source reporting the same.

    You can generally determine the truth by what sources both right and left donít say. If Sean Hannity really had not said that, itís logical to assume that Sean Hannity would vociferously deny ever saying such a thing. But he didnít. Sean Hannity is not a shy man lacking for opinions so itís logical do assume he didnít deny it because itís true.

    The same goes for Donald Trump. You may not like the liberal leaning of a source that Donna cites. But unless right wing sources and Donald Trump himself claim the quote is a fabrication you can assume Donald Trump said it.


  14. by HatetheSwamp on December 29, 2022 9:59 am

    Recently, you howled in disbelief when I posted that Sean Hannity did not for second believe that Trump lost because of a rigged election. Sean Hannity testified in court in a voting machine lawsuit case.

    Do you have enuff brain power to see the error in those two sentences? pb doesn't enjoy Hannity and rarely listens to his radio program nor watch on TV but when pb listens or watches, Hannity, still, invariably rants about the stolen election. Hannity has said that he doesnít believe the voting machine hogwash. As soon as those claims were exposed to the light of day, reasonable people, such as pb himself, concluded that there's no there there. pb doesn't enjoy lumping himself with Hannity but the truth is that tens of millions continue to believe that there was significant fraud in the 020 election but who don't buy in to the voting machine silliness.

    The same goes for Donald Trump. You may not like the liberal leaning of a source that Donna cites.

    Thing is: pb's seen enuff untruth about Trump and misquotes and exaggeration by taking Trump out of context that pb never accepts SwampMedia reporting about Trump. Donna. You, too. Always do. Hence, pb tried checking on Truth Social.


  15. by Curt_Anderson on December 29, 2022 10:45 am
    Do you really believe that Sean Hannity is more likely to speak the truth to his loyal Fox viewers than he is under oath in sworn testimony in a court room?

    In another lawsuit case Fox News told the court that Hannityís primetime partner, Tucker Carlson, is not to be believed. The judge agreed with Fox's premise, adding that the network "persuasively argues" that "given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statements he makesĒ.




  16. by HatetheSwamp on December 29, 2022 11:56 am

    Curt,

    I don't understand either paragraph of your post.


  17. by Curt_Anderson on December 29, 2022 12:26 pm
    "I don't understand either paragraph of your post." --HtS

    HtS,
    I appreciate your candor.


  18. by oldedude on December 29, 2022 7:48 pm
    Curt- I really think you are incongruent to the difference between legal and factual. It's a test of terms. Of words vs. words. Cliton argued the word "is". I didn't think that was much of any defense, but then I didn't think much of the charges. Nixon didn't really argue his terms, which were very congruent. He really didn't have a choice. It's like being pulled over by a cop when you're doing 20 over. Just nod and answer "yes officer, I was going 20 over." And you play the game to make them safe. You pull over, turn your wheels, open all your windows. Tell them if you have guns and where they are (hopefully you don't put them in your crotch, because that's a bad thing"). What you get you get. If you're wrong, pay for it. Step up and be an adult.

    I know it's a new thing to you but be accountable for what you do.


  19. by Curt_Anderson on December 29, 2022 8:21 pm
    OD,
    I am not quite sure of what you are saying, but I don't believe legal equals factual. For example a jury may find a defendant innocent when the defendant is in fact guilty---and vice versa.

    Of course, being legal and being factual certainly can be congruent.



  20. by oldedude on December 29, 2022 8:48 pm
    I'd actually agree with that. I've tried to explain that to you, po, and donna. The "facts" may be presented, but there is also "intent" and circumstances. Those are hard things to control, and hard things to convince.

    For example, if pedojoe commits a crime. The same crime that Trump is accused of. Who gets off? and who goes to Jail? Maybe "the president" touches a 10-year-olds breast. Whom do you "assume" is guilty?

    Is it Trump because you hate him? or is it pedojoe who has a history of inappropriately touching pre-pubescent girls? You would say one thing, and the law might say another.


  21. by Curt_Anderson on December 29, 2022 9:04 pm
    OD,
    You are talking about two legal phrases: actus reus and mens rea. Translated from Latin, actus reus means ďguilty act;Ē and mens rea means ďguilty mind.Ē.
    Criminal conviction generally requires proof of the illegal act and defendant's intent to commit the act.

    I don't think ten year-olds have breasts. Then again I am not an expert on that subject.


  22. by oldedude on December 30, 2022 1:36 am
    I've talked about both. And you (or your gang) have mocked both. That's why I had to say it in words a fourth grader would understand. AND, I'm not talking about "you" doing something and knowing it was either a guilty act or you did it with a guilty mind. I'm talking about you thinking how you believe each one was wrong.

    That is not inclusive about either mens rea, or actus reus. I'm talking about how YOU respond to each one of these acts through your extreme hatred and difference. Which is a very, very different hatred. YOU don't have the guilty mind (well maybe you do when looking at 10 year olds), but how you look at the crime. These are two separate issues.


  23. by oldedude on January 1, 2023 9:47 pm
    Donna,
    Honestly, you wonder why someone would want to buy a bullet a bullet in you? Think about it. You, are a splitter. You support "use vs them" theology. If they're not "us" they're "Them." You think you're a "liberator" when in fact, you're the design of the proletariat.


  24. by oldedude on January 1, 2023 9:51 pm
    ""I don't think ten year-olds have breasts. Then again I am not an expert on that subject.
    I doubt that but will leave that until you say another thing that makes me view something different.


  25. by Donna on January 1, 2023 11:43 pm

    I have no idea what you meant by what you were directing at me.


  26. by oldedude on January 2, 2023 7:31 am
    That was curt's quote. Not yours (I don't think), so you're all good.


  27. by Donna on January 2, 2023 8:15 am

    I was referring to your post before that one.


Go To Top

Comment on: "Trump Melts Down over "Radical Left Democrats" and "Marxists""


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page