by oldedude on December 8, 2022 3:15 pm
I guess that since I was only a GS13 Financial Intelligence Analyst and Financial Crimes Training Manager at FinCEN for 10 years, I'm sure I wouldn't know near as much about them as you do.
I won't say they are rare at all. And what you regurgitated in your last two paragraphs are the "official" bile the government puts out created by lawyers. What I was trying to get through to you is that there is nuance to every SAR, and that ONE SAR alone is nothing to start a case on (unless there are other factors). There's also a thing in banking called Know Your Customer (KYC) financial institutions are required to have as a program. I also mentioned the AML system your "paper" got wrong.
And, like I said before, You check the SARs over. 1. is this your azzhole? 2. If it is, what does this pertain to? 3. What legit "business" is your "badguy" in? 4. What is their legitimate income vs their lifestyle vs their financial flow. 5. Are shell or shelf institutions involved? 6. Is the money flowing in, out, or through the person, account, or entity. 7. Who was the originator of the money vs who was the end recipient.
EVERYTHING I PEPPERED YOU WITH are items I must answer in my report. I take those SARs and compare them to CTRs the banks automatically produce. If needed, I also need to look at FEDWIRE, SWIFT, etc accounts.
The biggest thing with me, is that you whine that they're not valid for one person, but believe them to be iron clad in another. Pick one. Quit your dogma that runs your life. You're worse than a MAGA.
by oldedude on December 8, 2022 7:37 pm
OD, the thing is Russians admit to election meddling to help Trump.
You're a BALD FACED LIAR. From YOUR OWN POST here is what the Russians said, and your other reference said they had been doing this forever. You're a liar.
"In 2018, Prigozhin and a dozen other Russian nationals and three Russian companies were charged in the U.S. with operating a covert social media campaign aimed at fomenting discord and dividing American public opinion ahead of the 2016 presidential election won by Republican Donald Trump."
Again.
You have actually proved yourself a liar. It doesn't say they worked for Trump or to get him elected. It says this butthead and a "dozen other Russian nationals and three Russian companies were charged in the U.S. with operating a covert social media campaign aimed at fomenting discord and dividing American public opinion ahead of the 2016 presidential election" and that Trump won the election. Period. I'm going to call you on bullshit. Sorry, but this is a common thing among liberals.
If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.
Ergo, you're nothing but a pawn of the state that you lie for. вы понимаете
npr.org
en.wikipedia.org