Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

So we're in the market for a house...
Nonprofit by Ponderer     February 4, 2024 6:09 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (14 comments) [260 views]


THE DRINKS ARE ON ME, BOYS!!!
Alcoholic Beverages by Ponderer     February 21, 2024 6:50 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (6 comments) [124 views]


What to expect from Jim Biden's testimony before the House Oversight Committee...
Government by HatetheSwamp     February 21, 2024 8:24 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (32 comments) [291 views]


Joe Manchin interview: Electing Trump would be very detrimental to US, world. Biden too liberal now.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     February 22, 2024 12:48 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (1 comments) [35 views]


To set the record straight, GOPs are stoked for impeachment after Jim Biden's lies under oath
Crime by HatetheSwamp     February 22, 2024 6:57 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [17 views]


The truth about Alexander Smirnov and the GOP push to impeach the Doddering Old Fool
Politics by HatetheSwamp     February 22, 2024 6:43 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [4 views]


So it really is Russia, Russia, Russia that helps Trump get elected
Crime by Curt_Anderson     February 20, 2024 5:42 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (10 comments) [100 views]


HouseGOP Andy Biggs-AZ says, based on evidence, James Biden lied to the Oversight Committee
Crime by HatetheSwamp     February 22, 2024 3:40 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [3 views]


Federal judge affirms MyPillow's Mike Lindell must pay $5M in election data dispute
Law by Curt_Anderson     February 21, 2024 6:02 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (1 comments) [18 views]


The Bobulinski Transcript: a lot of smoke but no fire.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     February 17, 2024 12:31 pm (Rating: 5.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (34 comments) [564 views]


Government selectors, pages, etc.
Roger Stone SLAMS J6 committee for 'categorically false' statements
By HatetheSwamp
October 14, 2022 5:39 am
Category: Government

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

Any claim or assertion that I was involved at any time in any effort of any kind by any person or group to delay, hinder or otherwise obstruct the certification of presidential electors by the Congress, pursuant to the Constitution of the United States, is also categorically false," the statement added.


Following Thursday’s January 6 Committee hearing, Roger Stone issued a statement calling out the committee for making "false" statements regarding his actions on and around January 6, 2021.

"Any claim or assertion that I knew about, either in advance about, participated in or condoned any act — by any person or group — at or anywhere near the United States Capitol or anywhere in the District of Columbia, the United States, or Planet Earth — on January 6th, or any other date, that was either unlawful, illegal, or otherwise intended in any way to cause damage or disrupt any proceedings of Congress, or any other governmental body, is categorically false," a statement from Stone read.

Stone noted a previous committee hearing, in which former Trump staff member Cassidy Hutchinson "claimed that Trump directed his Chief of Staff Mark Meadows to call both General Michael Flynn and me, purportedly to 'find out what would happen on January 6th.’"

"Hutchinson also claimed that Trump directed Meadows to make a similar call, in order to be briefed on a purported meeting held in the Willard Hotel in a supposed 'War Room.' Hutchinson further testified that these alleged calls were, in fact, completed," Stone added.

Stone called these claims "entirely false," noting that "no such phone calls ever took place," and that he wasn’t aware "of any 'War Room' in the Willard Hotel."


If you wonder why pb and HUNDREDS of millions of Americans didn't even think about watching the J6 fiasco yesterday, it's because nothing about it can be assumed to be true.

A case in point.


Cited and related links:

  1. thepostmillennial.com

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Roger Stone SLAMS J6 committee for 'categorically false' statements":

  1. by Donna on October 14, 2022 7:47 am

    And Stone should be believed because...?


  2. by oldedude on October 14, 2022 8:45 am
    He'll go to prison if he lies under oath?


  3. by HatetheSwamp on October 14, 2022 8:54 am

    Donna,

    Considering the disaster that the J6ers have been, and to be inspired by po: And, the effin J6 Committee should be believed because?

    You are such a True Believer with people on your side!


  4. by Curt_Anderson on October 14, 2022 8:55 am
    OD,
    Roger Stone made those claims after the January 6th hearing when not under oath. When he was under oath he said nothing other than pleading the Fifth Amendment.


  5. by oldedude on October 14, 2022 9:50 am
    Okay. Why should we believe Hutchinson? She lacks any integrity whatsoever.


  6. by HatetheSwamp on October 14, 2022 10:10 am

    There's is abundant reason to seriously doubt that there is an value in Ms Hutchinson's testimony. To be fair to her, Lizzie led her into questionable statements by requiring her to gossip and engage in hearsay.

    The lack of integrity, as much as anything, comes from the Committee's Show Trial and Lizzie and her TDS.


  7. by Curt_Anderson on October 14, 2022 11:05 am
    Cassidy Hutchinson made her statements under oath. Nobody willing to go under oath has refuted her. The statements she made which have the MAGA snowflakes so upset were merely recitations of things told to her by Tony Ornato. She never claimed to have witnessed the events in the presidential SUV personally.


  8. by oldedude on October 14, 2022 3:21 pm
    Okay, so what if he lies? You didn't care about ruining someone's life in a lie? Why should you care now?


  9. by HatetheSwamp on October 15, 2022 3:39 am

    Curt,

    As pb said at the moment, Ms Hutchinson gave virtually no meaningful testimony. Lizzie asked her to pass on gossip and hearsay and to pass on innuendo.

    Have you noticed that no one who refutes her is being charged with defying a J6 subpoena? Hmmmm?


Go To Top

Comment on: "Roger Stone SLAMS J6 committee for 'categorically false' statements"

* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page