Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

Trump crowd goes silent as he confuses Biden and Obama again 😞
Politics by Curt_Anderson     March 3, 2024 4:04 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (3 comments) [75 views]


Voters Doubt Bidenís Leadership and Favor Trump, Times/Siena Poll Finds
President by HatetheSwamp     March 3, 2024 4:06 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (6 comments) [68 views]


Republicans are forced to admit Democrats (including Joe Biden) are smarter.
Opinion by Curt_Anderson     March 3, 2024 12:11 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (4 comments) [54 views]


The Conservative Justices on the Supreme Court Hold the Record as the World's Most Expensive Whores...
Crime by Ponderer     February 29, 2024 10:35 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (40 comments) [375 views]


US says Israel has agreed to the framework for a Gaza cease-fire. Hamas must now decide
Military by HatetheSwamp     March 3, 2024 3:30 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [14 views]


James Comer is not sure an impeachment of Biden is warranted
Politics by Curt_Anderson     March 1, 2024 4:25 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (12 comments) [124 views]


James Comer has been big on promises, short on delivery. MAGA is feeling let down.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     March 1, 2024 1:28 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (6 comments) [87 views]


Bad news for the Doddering Old Fool: Polls stagnant since the Hur Report
President by HatetheSwamp     March 2, 2024 4:57 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (4 comments) [37 views]


Rep. Lauren Boebert's son Tyler allegedly made a sex tape with co-defendant
Crime by Curt_Anderson     February 29, 2024 11:24 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (11 comments) [176 views]


Ex-Jim Biden business partner disputes loan testimony before Congress
Crime by HatetheSwamp     March 2, 2024 3:07 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (3 comments) [27 views]


Government selectors, pages, etc.
We could solve most of the immigration issues if the per-county caps were removed.
By Curt_Anderson
September 24, 2022 7:57 pm
Category: Government

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

Per country levels for family-sponsored and employment-based immigrants
Under the per-country cap set in the Immigration Act of 1990, no country can receive more than 7 percent of the total number of employment-based and family-sponsored preference visas in a given year.


There are about 200 countries in the world. Immigrants can come from practically any of those countries. If an equal number of the immigrants came from 14 countries, they would all be at roughly 7%. Of course, nearby countries, Mexico in particular, are more likely have citizens wishing to immigrate here that some country on the other side of the globe.

The seven percent cap strikes me as arbitrary. Why should a would-be visa-holder from Latin America be dependent up the percent of immigrants coming from other countries? More logically whether or person is allowed to immigrate into America should be decided individually regardless of their country of origin.


Cited and related links:

  1. uscode.house.gov

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "We could solve most of the immigration issues if the per-county caps were removed.":

  1. by HatetheSwamp on September 25, 2022 4:40 am

    Curt,

    The Former Truck Driver and his party have been in charge of the Federal Government for nearly two years now.

    The Flatulent Fool's answer to the immigration issue is to open the southern border, not to propose reforms like the one you suggest. It's been a disaster.

    Period.


  2. by oldedude on September 25, 2022 7:15 am
    Curt- I understand your reasoning.

    There are still many ways to get into the US legally, and without having to claim asylum. These folks are vetted, and as long as they don't commit a crime, are welcomed back into the country. They are the "H" or "L" series VISAs. It is a streamlined process that our State Department, Homeland Security, and Border Patrol love. One of the things about this is the person/ family does not have to be attempting to become a US citizen.

    For the people while they are here. They are under the same employment rules as a US citizen. Hours, pay, vacation, health care, etc. The US company does not have to worry about them and can get the same people year after year. The only requirement is for them to return to their country for 30 days each year. Their companies in their own country, then reapply for the VISA. If the person has not been in trouble, they are approved and fly back to the US. This bypasses the issues with drugs, sex slavery, terrorism, and is a LEGAL way to work here, and be able to send money back.
    travel.state.gov


Go To Top

Comment on: "We could solve most of the immigration issues if the per-county caps were removed."

* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page