Comments posted organically Homepage
Display Order:

‘He’s more delusional than I thought’: Libertarians jeer Trump during convention speech
Politics by Curt_Anderson     May 25, 2024 11:21 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [9 views]

Kennedy blasts Biden, Trump over pandemic measures in pitch at Libertarian convention
Politics by HatetheSwamp     May 25, 2024 3:59 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (7 comments) [95 views]

Master politician Kathy Hochul calls NY voters clowns
Politics by HatetheSwamp     May 24, 2024 1:44 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (4 comments) [53 views]

Trump announces deal with his bff Vladimir Putin help him win election
Politics by Curt_Anderson     May 23, 2024 10:08 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (6 comments) [87 views]

Hey, Indy!, the Doddering Old Fool has a job for you
Government by HatetheSwamp     May 25, 2024 3:43 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (3 comments) [26 views]

Anonymous comments regarding the Presidential Candidate Selector and the election
President by Curt_Anderson     March 19, 2024 10:10 am (Rating: 2.5) Last comment by: Indy! (77 comments) [2502 views]

NPR: Nikki Haley says she'll vote for Trump
Politics by HatetheSwamp     May 22, 2024 3:24 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (10 comments) [147 views]

KC Chiefs' anti-Biden, Christian kicker Harrison Butker? Top selling NFL jersey.
Sports by HatetheSwamp     May 17, 2024 4:11 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (25 comments) [165 views]

Trump boldly takes on the issue of contraception; it’s up to the states. Sorry Mississippi!
Law by Curt_Anderson     May 22, 2024 10:32 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (11 comments) [178 views]

It's weird to predict a hung jury.
Law by Curt_Anderson     May 21, 2024 11:44 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (29 comments) [276 views]

Crime selectors, pages, etc.
DOJ opposes making public details in Mar-a-Lago search warrant's probable cause affidavit
By Curt_Anderson
August 15, 2022 7:17 pm
Category: Crime

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

"Disclosure of the government's affidavit at this stage would also likely chill future cooperation by witnesses whose assistance may be sought as* this investigation progresses, as well as in other high-profile investigations," the Justice Department wrote. "The fact that this investigation implicates highly classified materials further underscores the need to protect the integrity of the investigation and exacerbates the potential harm if information is disclosed to the public prematurely or improperly."

* That's "as" not "if". A week after the FBI seized the classified documents from Mar-a-Lago, the DOJ knows what they have.

Those witnesses who might be chilled are evidently still in Trump's orbit. The witness(es) could be somebody from his Secret Service detail, his housekeeping staff or even family members. That must be unnerving for Trump.

Comments Start Below

The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "DOJ opposes making public details in Mar-a-Lago search warrant's probable cause affidavit":

  1. by oldedude on August 15, 2022 7:52 pm
    Actually, what this does is disclose HOW they would ask for the violation of the 4th and 6th amendment. In fairness, that's what all warrants do, so that's an "assumption" on everyone in the court. The issue is; was the violation of two of the original amendments to the constitution worth the articulable facts to violate said laws.

    The issue that I said earlier, when either you or isle said they were the same, They are not the same. The affidavit are all the things that made the warrant possible "according to the law."

    My issue is the same as the sheep on this site have with not "testifying" for a affidavit. It is an integral part of the legal system. If this is not produced, and if my lawyer didn't challenge every piece and page of evidence, I would fire them on the spot. IF the prosecution knows this is going to happen, and their asses aren't wired shut on this, shit leaks. Once the preponderance of evidence isn't met. Prosecution is totally fucked.

    OOPS! silly me, I'm just "assuming" (which made an ass out of you and me) that what they wanted was actually for a criminal trial, not merely a committee inquiry which needs no legal defence.

Go To Top

Comment on: "DOJ opposes making public details in Mar-a-Lago search warrant's probable cause affidavit"

* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact | Advertise on | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:
Report spam & abuse home page