Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

Republicans: Do you know where your political donations are?
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 6:12 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (2 comments) [66 views]


Donna may be getting her wish granted: Gateway Pundit to file for bankruptcy
Law by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 7:28 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [9 views]


So Ukraine got money.
Military by oldedude     April 24, 2024 3:58 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (5 comments) [64 views]


James Comer hopes for divine intervention to save him from embarrassing impeachment fiasco.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 7:05 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [7 views]


Trump, Giuliani, Meadows are unindicted co-conspirators in Michigan fake elector case, hearing reveals
Law by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 4:53 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (3 comments) [32 views]


Russia is even more furious over vote by Congress to support Ukraine than MTG.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 21, 2024 6:09 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (11 comments) [630 views]


The latest general election polls from this weekend reveal something interesting.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 22, 2024 11:03 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (8 comments) [374 views]


Clearly Joe's serious about choosing freedom over democracy!
President by HatetheSwamp     April 24, 2024 4:49 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [3 views]


Arizona grand jury has indicted Trump allies for 2020 election interference
Law by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 4:48 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [7 views]


The Oval Office Oaf calls for "Four more years. Pause."
Entertainment by HatetheSwamp     April 24, 2024 2:56 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (2 comments) [9 views]


Crime selectors, pages, etc.
DOJ opposes making public details in Mar-a-Lago search warrant's probable cause affidavit
By Curt_Anderson
August 15, 2022 7:17 pm
Category: Crime

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

"Disclosure of the government's affidavit at this stage would also likely chill future cooperation by witnesses whose assistance may be sought as* this investigation progresses, as well as in other high-profile investigations," the Justice Department wrote. "The fact that this investigation implicates highly classified materials further underscores the need to protect the integrity of the investigation and exacerbates the potential harm if information is disclosed to the public prematurely or improperly."

* That's "as" not "if". A week after the FBI seized the classified documents from Mar-a-Lago, the DOJ knows what they have.

Those witnesses who might be chilled are evidently still in Trump's orbit. The witness(es) could be somebody from his Secret Service detail, his housekeeping staff or even family members. That must be unnerving for Trump.

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "DOJ opposes making public details in Mar-a-Lago search warrant's probable cause affidavit":

  1. by oldedude on August 15, 2022 7:52 pm
    Actually, what this does is disclose HOW they would ask for the violation of the 4th and 6th amendment. In fairness, that's what all warrants do, so that's an "assumption" on everyone in the court. The issue is; was the violation of two of the original amendments to the constitution worth the articulable facts to violate said laws.

    The issue that I said earlier, when either you or isle said they were the same, They are not the same. The affidavit are all the things that made the warrant possible "according to the law."

    My issue is the same as the sheep on this site have with not "testifying" for a affidavit. It is an integral part of the legal system. If this is not produced, and if my lawyer didn't challenge every piece and page of evidence, I would fire them on the spot. IF the prosecution knows this is going to happen, and their asses aren't wired shut on this, shit leaks. Once the preponderance of evidence isn't met. Prosecution is totally fucked.

    OOPS! silly me, I'm just "assuming" (which made an ass out of you and me) that what they wanted was actually for a criminal trial, not merely a committee inquiry which needs no legal defence.


Go To Top

Comment on: "DOJ opposes making public details in Mar-a-Lago search warrant's probable cause affidavit"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page