Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

Court testimony reveals how Trump didn't hate it; he actually helped produce fake news.
News by Curt_Anderson     April 23, 2024 10:31 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (13 comments) [265 views]


So Ukraine got money.
Military by oldedude     April 24, 2024 3:58 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (3 comments) [45 views]


Russia is even more furious over vote by Congress to support Ukraine than MTG.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 21, 2024 6:09 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (8 comments) [599 views]


The latest general election polls from this weekend reveal something interesting.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 22, 2024 11:03 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (7 comments) [365 views]


Mitt Romney's quip illustrates Trump's problems.
Law by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 10:31 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [6 views]


Smokin' Joe Biden bests Sleepy Donald Trump in Pennsylvania primaries.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 23, 2024 8:55 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (3 comments) [75 views]


Anonymous comments regarding the Presidential Candidate Selector
President by Curt_Anderson     March 19, 2024 10:10 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (25 comments) [1260 views]


Minutes after Trump said he wouldn’t run and hide, he runs and hides.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 21, 2024 5:13 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [55 views]


I don't care what anybody says. Trump's trials won't help his poll numbers.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 21, 2024 9:46 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (11 comments) [207 views]


We don’t really know Joe Biden or Donald Trump. Maybe we should listen to those who do.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 21, 2024 1:23 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (4 comments) [191 views]


Weaponry selectors, pages, etc.
Joe Manchin's solution: Raise the age requirement from 18-21
By Donna
June 6, 2022 1:04 pm
Category: Weaponry

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

Psychopath alert.

18-21. That's it. To buy a weapon like the AR-15 which was designed to vaporize large numbers of people quickly. It has no other purpose. That's why many of the children at Robb Elementary were in closed caskets.

“We know we can do something that would have prevented this. Raising the age, making sure that the age at least gives us a chance to work with that person, see and evaluate if they have a little maturity to them,” Manchin said Monday.

Manchin added he’s “open to doing something that makes sense” regarding age-based restrictions, adding he believes raising the minimum age to purchase semi-automatic weapons could potentially curb gun violence.


OMG, he thinks the problem is lack of "maturity. *facepalm*

How about let's ban these weapons of war? We've banned other weapons of war - why not these?


Cited and related links:

  1. msn.com

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Joe Manchin's solution: Raise the age requirement from 18-21 ":

  1. by Curt_Anderson on June 6, 2022 1:19 pm
    I agree with Manchin. See my article below. It would save countless lives.

    Raising the age to 21 can be done without passing a constitutional amendment. Raising the age for purchase and/or possession is already done in some states. Federal law for buying a pistol is 21. Politics is the art of the possible. Manchin's suggestion is possible and could feasibly get enough congressional votes.
    selectsmart.com


  2. by HatetheSwamp on June 6, 2022 1:33 pm

    Right, Curt.

    The compelling reality in this debate is that the Second Amendment exists. I understand that Donna's frustrated but the truth is that any measure that disrespects the Constitution will be challenged and shot down by the Courts.

    I'm certain that gun control will be a small part of the measures that will be taken to address the gun violence problem but, face it Philadelphia and Chicago have very strict gun laws and oodles of gun deaths.


  3. by Curt_Anderson on June 6, 2022 2:04 pm
    "...face it Philadelphia and Chicago have very strict gun laws and oodles of gun deaths." HtS

    I know that's a common refrain among conservatives. But don't you realize how illogical that is? Those cities are not remote islands.

    Chicago for example borders Indiana where the guns are much easier to get. The mass killing in Buffalo was made possible by the shooter being able to buy the magazine and ammunition in Pennsylvania which is not allowed to be sold in New York.



  4. by Donna on June 6, 2022 2:30 pm
    So you'd stop where Manchin stopped, Curt?


  5. by Donna on June 6, 2022 2:37 pm
    We didn't need to amend the constitution to ban assault weapons before.


  6. by HatetheSwamp on June 6, 2022 3:16 pm

    It strikes me that simply banning assault weapons would be a solution. I understand that the Doddering Old Fool wants to ban 9mms, too.


  7. by Curt_Anderson on June 6, 2022 3:38 pm
    Donna,
    Why would we stop at what Manchin suggests? That legislation wouldn't preclude further legislation. As has been said about legislation, "good is not the enemy of the perfect".

    The earlier ban during Clinton's administration didn't work out well for Democrats. The west and south in particular resented it. Democrats lost control of both the Senate and House, the latter for the first time in 40 years. Al Gore lost largely because of it, losing his own state of Tennessee.

    I don't think Democrats are eager to stick their heads in a noose again. Congress outlawed Saturday Night Specials purchases by those under 21 on a bi-partisan basis.

    The assault weapon ban did not do much to reduce the incidence of gun violence overall.

    However, it did reduce the number of people killed in mass shootings. But as the graph in my article to which I link to shows, outlawing the purchase and possession by those under 21 would practically eliminate all the school shootings.

    A ban on assault weapons, no matter how inclusive, would not end murder and mayhem. The shooter in Uvalde was in that classroom for an hour. He didn't need a rapid fire weapon. But if that shooter wasn't able buy an AR-15 on his 18th birthday, as he did, chances are that 19 students and their teachers would be alive. Same goes for Buffalo.



  8. by Donna on June 6, 2022 3:39 pm
    I agree, Hts. The only purpose of an assault weapon is to completely obliterate large numbers of human beings quickly. For that reason, they shouldn't be legal.

    I haven't heard about Biden wanting to ban 9mm guns.

    But point taken by Curt. That graph says it all. Weird that <21 males account for such an overwhelming percentage of the carnage. But I also think we should go a step further and permanently ban assault weapons and create a universal background check system with no loopholes which is supported by 90% of Americans.



  9. by Donna on June 6, 2022 3:44 pm
    To Curt's commentary on the modest effects of the assault ban -

    But as Biden correctly cited, mass murders almost tripled after the 1994 - 2004 assault ban was lifted.


Go To Top

Comment on: "Joe Manchin's solution: Raise the age requirement from 18-21 "


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page