Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

Jake Tapper makes off-color remark to an amused Nikki Haley.
Humor by Curt_Anderson     March 4, 2024 7:23 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [5 views]


SCOTUS: There is no denying Trump is an insurrectionist and an officer of the US.
Law by Curt_Anderson     March 4, 2024 3:35 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (3 comments) [57 views]


Supreme Court puts Trump back on Colorado Republican primary ballot
Law by HatetheSwamp     March 4, 2024 7:13 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: islander (14 comments) [117 views]


There are interesting ramifications to today's SCOTUS decision.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     March 4, 2024 1:33 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (2 comments) [16 views]


"Behind closed doors, Joe is incredible"
President by HatetheSwamp     March 4, 2024 10:35 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (1 comments) [10 views]


Trump crowd goes silent as he confuses Biden and Obama again 😞
Politics by Curt_Anderson     March 3, 2024 4:04 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (10 comments) [136 views]


Republicans are forced to admit Democrats (including Joe Biden) are smarter.
Opinion by Curt_Anderson     March 3, 2024 12:11 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (6 comments) [76 views]


Would you support a No Labels Nikki Haley/Tulsi Gabbard tickets
Politics by HatetheSwamp     March 4, 2024 3:22 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (2 comments) [19 views]


Voters Doubt Bidenís Leadership and Favor Trump, Times/Siena Poll Finds
President by HatetheSwamp     March 3, 2024 4:06 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (6 comments) [76 views]


The Conservative Justices on the Supreme Court Hold the Record as the World's Most Expensive Whores...
Crime by Ponderer     February 29, 2024 10:35 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (40 comments) [382 views]


Crime selectors, pages, etc.
DOJ indicts Trump advisor
By Curt_Anderson
June 3, 2022 9:42 am
Category: Crime

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

(WaPo)Former Trump White House official Peter Navarro has been indicted on two counts of criminal contempt of Congress after refusing to comply with a subpoena from the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, the Justice Department announced Friday.


MSNBC just reported Navarro is "in custody".

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "DOJ indicts Trump advisor":

  1. by HatetheSwamp on June 3, 2022 10:05 am

    Two comments.

    First, Trump Trump Trump Trump
    Trump Trump Trump Trump
    Trump Trump Trump Trump...TRUMP!

    Second, remember when Dems pretended that no further investigation was necessary to convict Trump and impeach him for leading an insurrection? Now, a year and a half later, they're still trying to twist arms to get help in nailing Trump for anything at all! What a hoot! You Dems are so cute.

    Bahahahahahahahahahaha, ahhhhhhhhhhh.


  2. by Donna on June 3, 2022 10:41 am
    Curt - How many times do you have to see that before you catch on that he's fucking with you?


  3. by Curt_Anderson on June 3, 2022 12:25 pm
    Donna,
    Probably. But I think he actually believes for the most part the BS he spews.

    Anyway, there are a lot people who do believe what HtS espouses and many more who are unsure or uninformed. Some of them will see our give and take and hopefully consider the strengths of our respective arguments, weigh the facts then come to an intelligent conclusion.


  4. by HatetheSwamp on June 3, 2022 12:34 pm

    Please feel free to correct me. I thought that a majority of the members of the House were convinced that there was sufficient evidence to impeach OrangeMan before his term ended in January 017. Ain't?


  5. by Curt_Anderson on June 3, 2022 1:00 pm
    HtS,
    You are talking apples and oranges.

    Impeachment and even a Senate conviction are not the same as an indictment and conviction in criminal court. Other than a slightly early expulsion from office, there was no punishment (such as imprisonment or a fine) associated with Trump's second impeachment and and possible conviction.

    Obviously impeachment is a political act with "jurors" who by virtue of their involvement or victimization in the insurrection would not be allowed to sit in the jury in a criminal trial.

    Trump's second impeachment was narrow in scope. It only asked if Trump was guilty of inciting an insurrection.

    The January Sixth Committee is investigating a broader range of crimes including the various ways that Trump and his cronies attempted to illegal overturn a free and fair election. For example, they looking at Peter Novarro's plan and the plot to overturn the election called the "Green Bay Sweep".


  6. by Donna on June 3, 2022 1:07 pm
    Well then carry on, Curt.

    How come those readers almost never join in on the conversations? They can't be all that engaged. I think perhaps you're overestimating the impact of our discourse here. It certainly doesn't hurt, though, and if you enjoy it, then all the better.

    I'll continue to post here, but it'll probably be on a more limited basis and much less about politics.


  7. by Curt_Anderson on June 3, 2022 1:31 pm
    Donna,
    Maybe people prefer to be among the like-minded in an echo chamber. Nowadays, most people seem to prefer Facebook, Twitter, et cetera to express their opinions. A lot of sites are dropping their comments sections. For example, look at the bottom of article in The Hill. It now says:
    "The Hill has removed its comment section, as there are many other forums for readers to participate in the conversation. We invite you to join the discussion on Facebook and Twitter."
    thehill.com


  8. by Donna on June 3, 2022 2:07 pm
    Social media is comprised of multiple echo chambers.

    Hts is on Facebook but he never posts political commentary there.

    I used to occasionally post comments at the end of news articles, but a couple of years ago, media outlets started discontinuing their comments sections.


  9. by Curt_Anderson on June 3, 2022 2:40 pm
    Ironically, Donna, that these pages aren't flooded with comments make these pages possible. If I had to weigh through loads of comments looking for spam, bot posts and blatantly offensive comments, it wouldn't be worth my time and effort. That's probably what killed the forums on thehill.com and elsewhere. Thankfully, the participants here behave themselves.

    Btw, I ran this morning with a couple of my pals. We routinely discuss politics as we run. Both as doctors have seen carnage inflicted by guns and would both like to see strict gun control measures. That I researched the statistics and laws regarding guns and formulate my thoughts for my posts here allows me to offer informed opinions on those and other matters.


  10. by islander on June 3, 2022 2:54 pm
    Curt wrote: "Anyway, there are a lot people who do believe what HtS espouses and many more who are unsure or uninformed. Some of them will see our give and take and hopefully consider the strengths of our respective arguments, weigh the facts then come to an intelligent conclusion."

    That's what I hope as well and I think you might be right. There are usually only 3 or 4 of us who post regularly yet look at the number of views !! I suspect there are probably a lot of lurkers out there! 👍


  11. by Donna on June 3, 2022 2:54 pm
    I agree that monitoring the comments sections probably got to be too much of a headache for media companies. Social media tends to attract drunk posters, extremists, and people who are more comfortable being confrontational online than they are in-person.


  12. by HatetheSwamp on June 3, 2022 3:02 pm

    FYI, as Donna says, I am on Facebook which I use to maintain contact with relatives and friends.

    I started out at SS on the old Religion board. There were some vigorous exchanges there, then I migrated to the Politics board and found those eccentric characters.

    I do Twitter but only passively. I may "like" a few Tweets a week.


Go To Top

Comment on: "DOJ indicts Trump advisor"

* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page