Comments posted organically
Law selectors, pages, etc.
The problem with Amy Coney Barrett's judicial philosophy of Originalism

By Curt Anderson
October 12, 2020 10:56 pm
Category: Law
(2.5 from 2 votes)
SelectSmart.com    SelectSmart.com    SelectSmart.com


Share
Rules of the Post
Rate this article
(5=best, 0=poor)
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars

(Excerpted from Originalism, Amy Coney Barrett's approach to the Constitution, explained By Ian Millhiser, Vox.com. See link below)

Originalism, in [Judge Amy Coney] Barrett's words, is the belief that “constitutional text means what it did at the time it was ratified and that this original public meaning is authoritative.”

In reality, however, following the text of the Constitution is more complicated than it sounds.

For one thing, the Constitution is riddled with ambiguous language. What are the "privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States"? What makes a search or seizure "unreasonable"? If the government wants to deny "liberty," how much "process" is "due"? What's a "public use" of private property? What is the "general welfare of the United States"?

Then there's the problem of precedent...

To give one rather stark example, there was a robust debate among early Americans about whether it is constitutional for the federal government to fund "internal improvements" such as roads and canals. As president, James Madison even vetoed an 1817 bill funding such construction because he deemed it unconstitutional.

Madison's views are now widely rejected. But suppose that a Supreme Court dominated by originalists concludes that Madison was correct. Does that mean the entire federal highway system must be torn up?




Another problem with Originalism, is that the Founders were not clairvoyant. They could not envision the entire future from their 18th century perspective.

For example, the First Amendment mentions "the press" meaning newspapers and other printed matter. Radio, television and the Internet were beyond their imagination. We assume, but cannot know from their written words, that they intended to protect all of modern news media from government interference.

Likewise, in the Second Amendment, the "individual right to keep and bear arms" in an age of muskets didn't foresee the weaponry technology of the today.

When the Bill of Rights was written, only only white male adult property owners who were at least 21 years old could vote. Depending on the state, a man needed to own fifty or hundred acres of land to have the right to vote. Women and non-white people had no voting rights. Since only voters could serve on juries, most people could not truly have a jury of their peers.

That was our original voting rights and restrictions. Not many people today would advocate that we return to that era.

Cited and related links:

  1. vox.com


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments:

Be the first to comment on this article.


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:
SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page


From our contributors:
Display Order:
Liz Cheney calls out GOP for enabling spread of white nationalism
Politics by Curt_Anderson     May 16, 2022 10:12 am (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by (0 comments) [13 views]


‘Pro-Life’ Conservatives Are Mad the Government Isn’t Letting Migrant Infants Starve to Death
Politics by Curt_Anderson     May 15, 2022 11:22 am (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by Donna (13 comments) [180 views]


Show of support for abortion rights expected at US rallies
Law by HatetheSwamp     May 14, 2022 8:04 am (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by HatetheSwamp (16 comments) [421 views]


Support for abortion rights hits new high as midterm outlook stays mostly unchanged
Law by HatetheSwamp     May 15, 2022 2:33 pm (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by (0 comments) [20 views]


Alabama law criminalizing gender transition surgery, drugs for minors takes effect
Medical by HatetheSwamp     May 9, 2022 11:40 am (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by Donna (41 comments) [509 views]


Trump, GOP rivals target Barnette as she threatens to upend Pa. race
Politics by HatetheSwamp     May 15, 2022 3:51 am (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by (0 comments) [16 views]


Would You Like To See my Pride & Joy?
Family by Curt_Anderson     May 14, 2022 8:35 pm (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by Donna (1 comments) [52 views]


European countries have sensible abortion laws
Opinion by Donna     May 6, 2022 11:47 pm (Rating: 5.0)
Last comment by HatetheSwamp (99 comments) [1357 views]


Israel kills another Palestinian journalist
Crime by Donna     May 13, 2022 2:50 pm (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by (0 comments) [15 views]


Dinesh D’Souza PROVES 2020 Election Fraud...PolitiFact: "The faulty premise of the ‘2,000 mules’ trailer about voting by mail in the 2020 election"
Crime by HatetheSwamp     May 9, 2022 4:34 am (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by HatetheSwamp (2 comments) [89 views]