Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

Republicans are forced to admit Democrats (including Joe Biden) are smarter.
Opinion by Curt_Anderson     March 3, 2024 12:11 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (1 comments) [31 views]


Voters Doubt Biden’s Leadership and Favor Trump, Times/Siena Poll Finds
President by HatetheSwamp     March 3, 2024 4:06 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (4 comments) [57 views]


The Conservative Justices on the Supreme Court Hold the Record as the World's Most Expensive Whores...
Crime by Ponderer     February 29, 2024 10:35 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (40 comments) [374 views]


US says Israel has agreed to the framework for a Gaza cease-fire. Hamas must now decide
Military by HatetheSwamp     March 3, 2024 3:30 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [12 views]


James Comer is not sure an impeachment of Biden is warranted
Politics by Curt_Anderson     March 1, 2024 4:25 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (12 comments) [124 views]


James Comer has been big on promises, short on delivery. MAGA is feeling let down.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     March 1, 2024 1:28 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (6 comments) [87 views]


Bad news for the Doddering Old Fool: Polls stagnant since the Hur Report
President by HatetheSwamp     March 2, 2024 4:57 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (4 comments) [36 views]


Rep. Lauren Boebert's son Tyler allegedly made a sex tape with co-defendant
Crime by Curt_Anderson     February 29, 2024 11:24 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (11 comments) [176 views]


Ex-Jim Biden business partner disputes loan testimony before Congress
Crime by HatetheSwamp     March 2, 2024 3:07 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (3 comments) [26 views]


So, Curt, can you still say that there's "NO EVIDENCE" that Joe was involved in the Crime Family?
Crime by HatetheSwamp     March 1, 2024 6:33 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (15 comments) [121 views]


Law selectors, pages, etc.
Is Ketanji Brown Jackson's SCOTUS nomination in trouble?
By HatetheSwamp
March 20, 2022 7:29 am
Category: Law

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

From the Washington Examiner:

Right now, senators have a moral obligation to think very carefully about President Joe Biden's new Supreme Court nominee, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, and her record in handling defendants convicted of crimes against children.

Jackson once served on the U.S. Sentencing Commission, where she advocated the abolition of mandatory minimum sentences for those caught with child pornography. Even before that, she had supported freeing such convicts from the obligation to register as sex offenders once freed from prison.

Jackson's thinking on this topic is that such potentially lifelong punishments are just examples of "stigmatization" and "revenge" against those who harm children. But this is at least 20 years behind the current thinking on this topic. The Catholic Church learned the hard way, through its own shameful child-sex scandals, that the rehabilitation of such offenders is simply impossible. And the church's belated application of that lesson (among others) has been highly effective in curbing new abuse cases.

The question that senators need to be asking right now is whether this moment, with the nation suffering from its leaders' general softness on crime and amid an organized effort to mainstream the sexualization of children, is the correct moment to send someone with Jackson's record to the Supreme Court. At the very least, Jackson needs to be asked about her puzzling and disturbing positions with respect to this timely issue.


Admittedly, that's the Washington Examiner.

Two days ago, Missouri Senator Josh Hawley noted that he's found an “alarming pattern” in Jackson’s treatment of sex offenders.

What I think is noteworthy is that the Blue MAGA SwampMedia pounced immediately.

MSNBC: "Hawley channels QAnon with attack on Ketanji Brown Jackson"

Vox: "Josh Hawley’s latest attack on Ketanji Brown Jackson is genuinely nauseating"

CNN: "GOP senators push misleading portrayal of Ketanji Brown Jackson's record on child porn cases"

And, this is the tip of a humongo iceberg.

Two thoughts:

The rapidity of the Blue MAGA response to Hawley tells a story. The Flatulent Fool's team already knew that she's vulnerable on this issue...but they nominated her anyway.

Also, the ferocity of the Blue SwampMedia's attack on anyone who'd even raise the issue makes me suspect that Ketanji Brown Jackson's confirmation may already be threatened.

pb himself had been inclined to think that Brown Jackson should be confirmed. No matter how tainted the victory of the Flatulent Fool may be, he's President. He has the right to put a qualified candidate on the Court.

pb expected that Brown Jackson would get all of the Dems' votes for confirmation plus fair-minded GOPs Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Mitt Romney and others.

Now, pb wonders.

Fair-minded GOP Ben Sasse...who voted for the OrangeMan's impeachment...was a guest today on Fox News Sunday. He's one of the GOPs pb assumed would vote to confirm Brown Jackson’s nomination. He was asked if he would vote in the affirmative. He declined to say that he would. My sense is that he's going to be cautious now that Judge Brown Jackson’s record is being questioned on such so sensitive an issue.

Initially, pb expected that Brown Jackson would receive 57ish votes for confirmation.

Now?

We know that there are two Senate Dems who don't drink the Kool-aid...

...AND, how many Senate Dems are up in 022 when everything is trending GOP? Fourteen?

As of now, pb thinks it could go either way. 57 for, or 57 against...

...though if key Dems back away, my guess is that Judge Brown Jackson will withdraw from consideration.


Cited and related links:

  1. washingtonexaminer.com

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Is Ketanji Brown Jackson's SCOTUS nomination in trouble?":

  1. by Curt_Anderson on March 21, 2022 3:03 pm
    Is Ketanji Brown Jackson's SCOTUS nomination in trouble?

    No.


  2. by HatetheSwamp on March 21, 2022 3:29 pm

    Were I betting 57 for or 57 against, I'd put my house on for.


Go To Top

Comment on: "Is Ketanji Brown Jackson's SCOTUS nomination in trouble?"

* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page