Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

Good news for Kamala and the Ds
Astrology by Indy!     July 26, 2024 1:07 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (5 comments) [79 views]


So is Trump too much of a pants-pissing coward to debate Harris?
Politics by Ponderer     July 26, 2024 5:31 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (7 comments) [38 views]


Six House Dems vote with GOP to condemn Kamala Harris for 'border czar' role
Government by HatetheSwamp     July 26, 2024 4:26 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (13 comments) [108 views]


Benjamin Netanyahu's historic and heroic speech before the US Congress
Government by HatetheSwamp     July 24, 2024 12:37 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (26 comments) [203 views]


A landslide I'm still tellin' ya
Politics by Ponderer     July 26, 2024 3:39 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (2 comments) [21 views]


Usha Vance's perfect speech introducing JD
Politics by HatetheSwamp     July 18, 2024 7:50 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (14 comments) [190 views]


A better indicator than national polls and even better than swing state polls
Politics by Curt_Anderson     July 24, 2024 8:37 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (17 comments) [149 views]


Anonymous comments regarding the Presidential Candidate Selector and the election
President by Curt_Anderson     March 19, 2024 10:10 am (Rating: 2.5) Last comment by: Indy! (107 comments) [3133 views]


Did the woman behind Trump know what was going down?
Entertainment by Indy!     July 25, 2024 3:40 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (4 comments) [48 views]


538's Harris versus Trump polls
Politics by Curt_Anderson     July 25, 2024 12:45 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (4 comments) [41 views]


Law selectors, pages, etc.
Supreme Court ends Trump's efforts to hide presidential records
By Curt_Anderson
February 22, 2022 9:53 am
Category: Law

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

I'm guessing this won't be a topic of conversation today between Trump and Buck & Travis.

WASHINGTON, Feb 22 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday brought a formal end to former President Donald Trump's request to block the release of White House records sought by the Democratic-led congressional panel investigating last year's deadly attack on the Capitol by a mob of his supporters.

The court's decision to formally reject Trump's appeal follows its Jan. 19 order that led to the documents being handed over to the House of Representatives investigative committee by the federal agency that stores government and historical records.

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Supreme Court ends Trump's efforts to hide presidential records":

  1. by HatetheSwamp on February 22, 2022 10:06 am

    Good deal. Trump, who is despicable, did the right thing in taking the Separation of Powers issue all the way to the Supreme Court.

    Now, he'll comply, I'm sure.


  2. by Curt_Anderson on February 22, 2022 12:51 pm
    Trump and his layers did not make a Separation of Powers argument as for why Trump didn't want presidential records revealed. They unsuccessfully argued Executive Privilege, or really former executive privilege as reason to hide White House records.

    Yes, Trump will comply. He will obey the law only after all other alternatives are exhausted.


  3. by HatetheSwamp on February 22, 2022 1:03 pm

    You wanna splain the difference between Executive Privilege and Separation of Powers?

    Perhaps I mischaracterized Trump's claim.


  4. by Curt_Anderson on February 22, 2022 2:15 pm
    The Senate Republicans explain it in the link below. At least they try. The Supreme Court settled the matter.

    White House records are not the personal property of a former president. There is no such thing as "former executive privilege", but if there were, "current executive privilege" to release White House records carries more weight than the former guy's assertion of privilege.
    rpc.senate.gov


  5. by HatetheSwamp on February 22, 2022 3:14 pm

    Curt,

    I'm going to have to catch some fresh air and take a few deep breaths. First, you cite Tucker Carlson on Ukraine now you rely on Senate GOPs to splain Separation of Powers and Executive Privilege.

    This ain't right.


Go To Top

Comment on: "Supreme Court ends Trump's efforts to hide presidential records"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page