Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

Fact: A person who has been pardoned can't claim 5th Amendment protection
Law by HatetheSwamp     January 15, 2025 10:53 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (4 comments) [54 views]


California jumped 10 points toward GOPs in 024... BEFORE the LA fires brouhaha
Politics by HatetheSwamp     January 15, 2025 4:19 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (4 comments) [70 views]


"I created the Leahy Law. It should be applied to Israel."
International by Donna     January 14, 2025 10:33 am (Rating: 5.0) Last comment by: Indy! (28 comments) [293 views]


Israel and Hamas Agree to Gaza Cease-Fire Deal
International by Curt_Anderson     January 15, 2025 9:52 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (3 comments) [27 views]


Pete Hegseth
Government by HatetheSwamp     January 14, 2025 7:17 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (5 comments) [60 views]


Fascist America.
Politics by meagain     January 14, 2025 3:04 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (9 comments) [68 views]


Pam Bondi Hearing
Law by HatetheSwamp     January 15, 2025 7:49 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [12 views]


Oregon sends fire fighters to Los Angeles; Ashland sent a crew and equipment
Government by Curt_Anderson     January 13, 2025 10:09 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: meagain (5 comments) [132 views]


Jill Biden Prepares For Final Week As President
President by HatetheSwamp     January 14, 2025 8:37 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (5 comments) [76 views]


CA MAGA politicians flee CA to hang out with Trump at Maralago as L.A. burns
Travel by Donna     January 13, 2025 7:43 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (7 comments) [86 views]


Law selectors, pages, etc.
Durham Distances Himself From Furor in Right-Wing Media Over Filing
By Curt_Anderson
February 18, 2022 7:21 pm
Category: Law

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


The special counsel implicitly acknowledged that White House internet data he discussed, which conservative outlets have portrayed as proof of spying on the Trump White House, came from the Obama era.

(New York Times)WASHINGTON — John H. Durham, the Trump-era special counsel scrutinizing the investigation into Russia’s 2016 election interference, distanced himself on Thursday from false reports by right-wing news outlets that a motion he recently filed said Hillary Clinton’s campaign had paid to spy on Trump White House servers.

“If third parties [cough, cough Trump] or members of the media [cough, cough FOX News] have overstated, understated or otherwise misinterpreted facts contained in the government’s motion, that does not in any way undermine the valid reasons for the government’s inclusion of this information,” [Durham] wrote.

Most important, the coverage about purported spying on the Trump White House was premised on the idea that the White House network data involved came from when Mr. Trump was president. But Mr. Durham’s filing did not say when it was from.

Lawyers for a Georgia Institute of Technology data scientist who helped analyze the Yota [Russian-made YotaPhones] data said on Monday that the data came from the Obama presidency.


Cited and related links:

  1. nytimes.com

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Durham Distances Himself From Furor in Right-Wing Media Over Filing":

  1. by HatetheSwamp on February 19, 2022 5:14 am

    ...the coverage about purported spying on the Trump White House was premised on the idea that the White House network data involved came from when Mr. Trump was president. But Mr. Durham’s filing did not say when it was from.

    Ah. Got it.

    Spying on ANY fellow citizen is fine depending on when it happens. Now, that's Pulizer level reporting.

    IMO, the SwampMedia'd be better off ignoring the ongoing Durham probe. The NYT message is defensive...bashing the reporting of Durham's probe, not reporting on Durham's probe itself. Clearly, the NYT would not be doing this if Fox had not inflicted damage on the Swamp.

    Sorta makes the point that the SwampMedia is in the bag for the Dems and especially the Clintons.

    I was going to speculate, rhetorically: I wonder who Hillary's sleeping with to get that coverage?...

    But, that's...absolutely...DISGUSTING!

    Bahahahahahahahahahaha, ahhhhhhhhhhh.

    Your Swampcult SwampMedia can be so silly.

    And that you but in...

    Bahahahahahahahahahaha!


Go To Top

Comment on: "Durham Distances Himself From Furor in Right-Wing Media Over Filing"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page