Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

Prosecution eviscerates a main defense argument.
Law by Curt_Anderson     May 28, 2024 6:15 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [7 views]


My prediction that Trump will sabotage his own defense during closing arguments.
Law by Curt_Anderson     May 27, 2024 10:38 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (10 comments) [93 views]


Judge Cannon rejects request for gag order against Donald Trump in classified docs case
Crime by HatetheSwamp     May 28, 2024 9:41 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (4 comments) [39 views]


Politico: Dems in full-blown ‘freakout’ over Biden
President by HatetheSwamp     May 28, 2024 6:44 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (7 comments) [71 views]


Anonymous comments regarding the Presidential Candidate Selector and the election
President by Curt_Anderson     March 19, 2024 10:10 am (Rating: 2.5) Last comment by: Indy! (86 comments) [2644 views]


Kennedy blasts Biden, Trump over pandemic measures in pitch at Libertarian convention
Politics by HatetheSwamp     May 25, 2024 3:59 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (28 comments) [291 views]


Chase Oliver has been added to the Presidential Candidate Selector
Politics by Curt_Anderson     May 27, 2024 6:21 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [20 views]


Chase Oliver for President
Politics by HatetheSwamp     May 27, 2024 4:07 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (9 comments) [80 views]


Libertarians reject Robert F Kennedy, Jr., Trump and Stormy Daniels as their party nominee.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     May 26, 2024 2:19 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (3 comments) [72 views]


Joe Biden is one tough, kick ass President admits cowering, whimpering Trump
Politics by Curt_Anderson     May 23, 2024 9:18 am (Rating: 5.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (7 comments) [130 views]


Law selectors, pages, etc.
Durham Distances Himself From Furor in Right-Wing Media Over Filing
By Curt_Anderson
February 18, 2022 7:21 pm
Category: Law

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

The special counsel implicitly acknowledged that White House internet data he discussed, which conservative outlets have portrayed as proof of spying on the Trump White House, came from the Obama era.

(New York Times)WASHINGTON — John H. Durham, the Trump-era special counsel scrutinizing the investigation into Russia’s 2016 election interference, distanced himself on Thursday from false reports by right-wing news outlets that a motion he recently filed said Hillary Clinton’s campaign had paid to spy on Trump White House servers.

“If third parties [cough, cough Trump] or members of the media [cough, cough FOX News] have overstated, understated or otherwise misinterpreted facts contained in the government’s motion, that does not in any way undermine the valid reasons for the government’s inclusion of this information,” [Durham] wrote.

Most important, the coverage about purported spying on the Trump White House was premised on the idea that the White House network data involved came from when Mr. Trump was president. But Mr. Durham’s filing did not say when it was from.

Lawyers for a Georgia Institute of Technology data scientist who helped analyze the Yota [Russian-made YotaPhones] data said on Monday that the data came from the Obama presidency.


Cited and related links:

  1. nytimes.com

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Durham Distances Himself From Furor in Right-Wing Media Over Filing":

  1. by HatetheSwamp on February 19, 2022 5:14 am

    ...the coverage about purported spying on the Trump White House was premised on the idea that the White House network data involved came from when Mr. Trump was president. But Mr. Durham’s filing did not say when it was from.

    Ah. Got it.

    Spying on ANY fellow citizen is fine depending on when it happens. Now, that's Pulizer level reporting.

    IMO, the SwampMedia'd be better off ignoring the ongoing Durham probe. The NYT message is defensive...bashing the reporting of Durham's probe, not reporting on Durham's probe itself. Clearly, the NYT would not be doing this if Fox had not inflicted damage on the Swamp.

    Sorta makes the point that the SwampMedia is in the bag for the Dems and especially the Clintons.

    I was going to speculate, rhetorically: I wonder who Hillary's sleeping with to get that coverage?...

    But, that's...absolutely...DISGUSTING!

    Bahahahahahahahahahaha, ahhhhhhhhhhh.

    Your Swampcult SwampMedia can be so silly.

    And that you but in...

    Bahahahahahahahahahaha!


Go To Top

Comment on: "Durham Distances Himself From Furor in Right-Wing Media Over Filing"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page