Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

Anonymous comments regarding the Presidential Candidate Selector
President by Curt_Anderson     March 19, 2024 10:10 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (21 comments) [970 views]

NPR under fire after it suspends editor detesting newsroom partisanship: 'Hard left propaganda machine'
Media by HatetheSwamp     April 17, 2024 3:46 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (26 comments) [335 views]

I just voted in the Pennsylvania primary...mail-in
Government by HatetheSwamp     April 18, 2024 7:15 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (3 comments) [106 views]

Trump is daring judge to lock him up by intimidating jurors.
Law by Curt_Anderson     April 17, 2024 9:03 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (1 comments) [37 views]

A Playmate, a porn star, an ex-president and Mr. Pecker. Get plenty of popcorn!
Entertainment by Curt_Anderson     April 14, 2024 3:46 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (21 comments) [635 views]

Alameda County District Attorney Pamela Price Faces Recall Vote After Crime Ravages Blue County
Crime by oldedude     April 16, 2024 1:38 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (3 comments) [133 views]

NPR editor Uri Berliner resigns after essay accusing outlet of liberal bias
Media by HatetheSwamp     April 17, 2024 9:25 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [93 views]

My oral report about the Battle of Gettisberg Gettysburg by Donnie Trump
Education by Curt_Anderson     April 16, 2024 7:25 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [35 views]

How is your Trump Media Stock doing?
Business by Curt_Anderson     April 4, 2024 11:47 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (20 comments) [514 views]

News outlets say presidential debates are essential. Wrong, they are a waste of time.
President by Curt_Anderson     April 14, 2024 12:32 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (14 comments) [773 views]

Politics selectors, pages, etc.
Special Counsel Durham Reports: Hillary Clinton paid tech firm to hack into his White House and Trump Tower servers to find Russia links
By HatetheSwamp
February 13, 2022 4:26 am
Category: Politics

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post
SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

The first link is from The DAILY MAIL.

Curiously, the SwampMedia is ignoring this blockbuster story.

The only US reporting I can find is Fox, NYP and Washington Examiner.

Wanna know why pb be HatetheSwamp? Here's why.

Cited and related links:

  1. dailymail.co.uk
  2. nypost.com
  3. washingtonexaminer.com
  4. foxnews.com

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Special Counsel Durham Reports: Hillary Clinton paid tech firm to hack into his White House and Trump Tower servers to find Russia links":

  1. by Curt_Anderson on February 13, 2022 11:10 am
    Wait, are you and those Rupert Murdoch-owned news outlets saying that Trump used insecure, hackable servers in the White House and in the Trump Tower while president to conduct official government business??

    We know of the reports that Trump communicated on insecure phones while in the White House, but that the entire White House used insecure servers is too much!!

  2. by HatetheSwamp on February 13, 2022 11:47 am

    No.

    I'm saying that the SwampMedia won't report the findings of a federal Special Prosecutor who dug up Dem/Clinton shenanigans.

  3. by Curt_Anderson on February 13, 2022 12:35 pm
    The non-Trump media isn't reporting on it because it's not much of a news story. Even the Daily Mail says it's only Durham's "allegations" in his motion. I don't see that anybody is being charged or accused of illegally hacking the White House and Trump Tower servers. Durham's been on the case for years and he hasn't produced much other than the charge that a lawyer named Sussman lied to the FBI by omission.

    The real question is why did the Trump White House and Trump Tower use insecure server?

  4. by HatetheSwamp on February 14, 2022 6:40 am

    As far as I can tell, the Durham thing is the top story on FNC, the most watched cable network.

    And, leading the reporting, is the fact that the SwampMedia is silent.

  5. by Curt_Anderson on February 15, 2022 1:53 pm
    HtS, Here's why the "swamp media" didn't jump on the story that got you so excited.

    Court Filing Started a Furor in Right-Wing Outlets, but Their Narrative Is Off Track
    The latest alarmist claims about spying on Trump appeared to be flawed, but the explanation is byzantine — underlining the challenge for journalists in deciding what merits coverage.
    (New York Times)Fox News inaccurately declared that Mr. Durham had said he had evidence that Hillary Clinton’s campaign had paid a technology company to “infiltrate” a White House server. The Washington Examiner claimed that this all meant there had been spying on Mr. Trump’s White House office. And when mainstream publications held back, Mr. Trump and his allies began shaming the news media.

    “The press refuses to even mention the major crime that took place,” Mr. Trump said in a statement on Monday. “This in itself is a scandal, the fact that a story so big, so powerful and so important for the future of our nation is getting zero coverage from LameStream, is being talked about all over the world.”

    There were many problems with all this. For one, much of this was not new: The New York Times had reported in October what Mr. Sussmann had told the C.I.A. about data suggesting that Russian-made smartphones, called YotaPhones, had been connecting to networks at Trump Tower and the White House, among other places.

    The conservative media also skewed what the filing said. For example, Mr. Durham’s filing never used the word “infiltrate.” And it never claimed that Mr. Joffe’s company was being paid by the Clinton campaign.

    Most important, contrary to the reporting, the filing never said the White House data that came under scrutiny was from the Trump era. According to lawyers for David Dagon, a Georgia Institute of Technology data scientist who helped develop the Yota analysis, the data — so-called DNS logs, which are records of when computers or smartphones have prepared to communicate with servers over the internet — came from Barack Obama’s presidency.
    nytimes.com

  6. by Donna on February 15, 2022 2:20 pm
    LOL! Hts falls for another red herring!

  7. by Donna on February 15, 2022 2:25 pm
    LOL! If we had been keeping a red herring count since Hts has been posting here, it would probably have been into triple digits by now.

  8. by HatetheSwamp on February 15, 2022 2:27 pm

    There were many problems with all this. For one, much of this was not new: The New York Times had reported in October what Mr. Sussmann had told the C.I.A. about data suggesting that Russian-made smartphones, called YotaPhones, had been connecting to networks at Trump Tower and the White House, among other places.

    So, some of it was new...

    My contention all along has been about the filthiness of the SwampMedia in ignoring this.

    My sense of Fox's reporting is that it's never been focused. Based on what Fox has said, I'm still not certain of the content of Durham's filing.

    What Fox has reported is that the SwampMedia is ignoring that the Special Procesutor did move recently.

    The effin RussiaGate prosecutor did something and you know perfectly well that if what he did reflected on Trump in even an insignificant way, the SwampMedia media would have made it 24/7 headlines.

    It's interesting that the NYT reports it...but only as something barely worth mentioning.

    Can you guess why so many people hate the Swamp!!!!!?

Go To Top

Comment on: "Special Counsel Durham Reports: Hillary Clinton paid tech firm to hack into his White House and Trump Tower servers to find Russia links"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
 SelectSmart.com home page