It's not looking good for the NYT.
Williamsonís testimony amounted to a detailed retelling of an error in the making. She explained how the piece in question was conceptualized, researched, written, edited and in the end corrected - twice. But her testimony and the trialís evidence made clear that responsibility for the some of the most problematic parts of the editorial fell to the Timesís editorial page editor at the time, James Bennet, who is expected to testify next week...
The result, as it played out, was a meticulous reconstruction of a complicated - and ultimately tortured - editing process.
Palin is an easy target. The Times was sloppy, unacceptably biased and untruthful.
As you know, I'm a big fan of the liberties guaranteed by the Bill of Rights but, as you Swampcult Blue MAGA Big Brother fans point out, those Rights are not absolute.