Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

Court testimony reveals how Trump didn't hate it; he actually helped produce fake news.
News by Curt_Anderson     April 23, 2024 10:31 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (5 comments) [86 views]


Russia is even more furious over vote by Congress to support Ukraine than MTG.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 21, 2024 6:09 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (6 comments) [580 views]


Anonymous comments regarding the Presidential Candidate Selector
President by Curt_Anderson     March 19, 2024 10:10 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (24 comments) [1161 views]


The latest general election polls from this weekend reveal something interesting.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 22, 2024 11:03 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (5 comments) [349 views]


Minutes after Trump said he wouldn’t run and hide, he runs and hides.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 21, 2024 5:13 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [54 views]


I don't care what anybody says. Trump's trials won't help his poll numbers.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 21, 2024 9:46 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (11 comments) [206 views]


We don’t really know Joe Biden or Donald Trump. Maybe we should listen to those who do.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 21, 2024 1:23 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (4 comments) [187 views]


According to Frank Luntz, pb is young at heart and ahead of his time
Politics by HatetheSwamp     April 20, 2024 12:52 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (3 comments) [248 views]


The Oval Office Oaf is starting to win me over. I...DO...choose freedom over democracy.
President by HatetheSwamp     April 21, 2024 6:36 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (2 comments) [490 views]


Politifact finally gets one right...
President by HatetheSwamp     April 19, 2024 1:39 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (2 comments) [207 views]


Law selectors, pages, etc.
THE REDACTED MAR-A-LAGO AFFIDAVIT DOJ SHOULD SUBMIT
By islander
August 25, 2022 12:24 pm
Category: Law

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)


"As you may know, DOJ is ordered by Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart to submit a “suggested” redacted version of the warrant affidavit for the Mar-a-Lago search executed on August 8, 2022.

The federal magistrate judge who authorized the warrant to search Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate emphasized Monday that he “carefully reviewed” the FBI’s sworn evidence before signing off and considers the facts contained in an accompanying affidavit to be “reliable.”

Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart offered his assessment in a 13-page order memorializing his decision to consider whether to unseal portions of the affidavit, which describe the evidence the bureau relied on to justify the search of the former president’s home.

“I was — and am — satisfied that the facts sworn by the affiant are reliable,” Reinhart said in the order.

Reinhart ruled last week that he would consider unsealing portions of the affidavit after conferring with the Justice Department and determining whether proposed redactions would be sufficient to protect the ongoing criminal investigation connected to the search. But in his order, Reinhart emphasized that he may ultimately agree with prosecutors that any redactions would be so extensive that they would render the document useless.

The last sentence of that quote is the key. Unless DOJ is going to capitulate to the clicks and reads voyeurism of the overly exuberant political press, nothing whatsoever should be released unless and until charges are filed against some defendant, whether it be Trump or otherwise. Why? Because that it how it is done, and properly so.

Reinhart has received abuse and threats. Is his willingness to even entertain a “redacted version” sound under such threat? His decision will yield the answer to that question.

In the meantime, I have a proposed example of what DOJ should submit to Reinhart. Yes, this example is from CAND, not SDFL, but it is exactly what ought be handed over to Reinhart. And if Reinhart grants any “redacted version”, DOJ should appeal immediately and fully. Leave the affidavit sealed. The voyeuristic public, and press, thinks they have an interest because Trump. But they really do not. Do it the right and normal way." *

*Marcy Wheeler




Cited and related links:

  1. emptywheel.net

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "THE REDACTED MAR-A-LAGO AFFIDAVIT DOJ SHOULD SUBMIT":

  1. by islander on August 25, 2022 12:38 pm

    If you click on the link you'll find the comments at the end of the article are "excellent" ! 👍



  2. by oldedude on August 25, 2022 1:29 pm
    First, You can tell how TDS is affecting (the inclusive) your willingness to proceed in any form of legal good faith. And you've wondered why Trump would not give up his fifth amendment rights? This is exactly why. You think you're above the law. It's simple as that. You hate someone, so you're willing to not use any law whatsoever to murder them.

    Thanks for the clarification though.


  3. by HatetheSwamp on August 25, 2022 1:43 pm

    I think that Big Brother should just be able to continue to defy all history and precedent and, hey, while they're at it, just march Trump out behind Mar a Lago and hang him.


  4. by islander on August 25, 2022 1:46 pm

    old dude~I'm beginning to think you are just another one of Hate or pb's personalities. You sound just like him/them.

    You presented a nice rebottle to the article though ! 🙄


  5. by oldedude on August 25, 2022 2:06 pm
    PRECEDENT! WE DON'T NEED NO PRECEDENT!
    And we don't have to follow any them thar laws. They's just for people we hate! yaknow? Juslike them racist judges in the suprim coourt.


  6. by islander on August 25, 2022 2:35 pm

    Lol !!! I think the typo in my last comment (rebottle instead of rebuttal) was more apropo ! The bottle part ! 😁


  7. by oldedude on August 25, 2022 7:57 pm
    I thought it was a Freudian slip.


Go To Top

Comment on: "THE REDACTED MAR-A-LAGO AFFIDAVIT DOJ SHOULD SUBMIT"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page