Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

Trump, Giuliani, Meadows are unindicted co-conspirators in Michigan fake elector case, hearing reveals
Law by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 4:53 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (2 comments) [12 views]


The latest general election polls from this weekend reveal something interesting.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 22, 2024 11:03 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (8 comments) [372 views]


Clearly Joe's serious about choosing freedom over democracy!
President by HatetheSwamp     April 24, 2024 4:49 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [3 views]


Arizona grand jury has indicted Trump allies for 2020 election interference
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 4:48 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [3 views]


The Oval Office Oaf calls for "Four more years. Pause."
Entertainment by HatetheSwamp     April 24, 2024 2:56 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (2 comments) [9 views]


Mitt Romney's quip illustrates Trump's problems.
Law by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 10:31 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (2 comments) [17 views]


Russia is even more furious over vote by Congress to support Ukraine than MTG.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 21, 2024 6:09 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (10 comments) [621 views]


Court testimony reveals how Trump didn't hate it; he actually helped produce fake news.
News by Curt_Anderson     April 23, 2024 10:31 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (26 comments) [343 views]


So Ukraine got money.
Military by oldedude     April 24, 2024 3:58 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (3 comments) [50 views]


Smokin' Joe Biden bests Sleepy Donald Trump in Pennsylvania primaries.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 23, 2024 8:55 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (3 comments) [80 views]


Law selectors, pages, etc.
Durham Distances Himself From Furor in Right-Wing Media Over Filing
By Curt_Anderson
February 18, 2022 7:21 pm
Category: Law

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

The special counsel implicitly acknowledged that White House internet data he discussed, which conservative outlets have portrayed as proof of spying on the Trump White House, came from the Obama era.

(New York Times)WASHINGTON — John H. Durham, the Trump-era special counsel scrutinizing the investigation into Russia’s 2016 election interference, distanced himself on Thursday from false reports by right-wing news outlets that a motion he recently filed said Hillary Clinton’s campaign had paid to spy on Trump White House servers.

“If third parties [cough, cough Trump] or members of the media [cough, cough FOX News] have overstated, understated or otherwise misinterpreted facts contained in the government’s motion, that does not in any way undermine the valid reasons for the government’s inclusion of this information,” [Durham] wrote.

Most important, the coverage about purported spying on the Trump White House was premised on the idea that the White House network data involved came from when Mr. Trump was president. But Mr. Durham’s filing did not say when it was from.

Lawyers for a Georgia Institute of Technology data scientist who helped analyze the Yota [Russian-made YotaPhones] data said on Monday that the data came from the Obama presidency.


Cited and related links:

  1. nytimes.com

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Durham Distances Himself From Furor in Right-Wing Media Over Filing":

  1. by HatetheSwamp on February 19, 2022 5:14 am

    ...the coverage about purported spying on the Trump White House was premised on the idea that the White House network data involved came from when Mr. Trump was president. But Mr. Durham’s filing did not say when it was from.

    Ah. Got it.

    Spying on ANY fellow citizen is fine depending on when it happens. Now, that's Pulizer level reporting.

    IMO, the SwampMedia'd be better off ignoring the ongoing Durham probe. The NYT message is defensive...bashing the reporting of Durham's probe, not reporting on Durham's probe itself. Clearly, the NYT would not be doing this if Fox had not inflicted damage on the Swamp.

    Sorta makes the point that the SwampMedia is in the bag for the Dems and especially the Clintons.

    I was going to speculate, rhetorically: I wonder who Hillary's sleeping with to get that coverage?...

    But, that's...absolutely...DISGUSTING!

    Bahahahahahahahahahaha, ahhhhhhhhhhh.

    Your Swampcult SwampMedia can be so silly.

    And that you but in...

    Bahahahahahahahahahaha!


Go To Top

Comment on: "Durham Distances Himself From Furor in Right-Wing Media Over Filing"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page