|Author: Clair (---.hsd1.wa.comcast.net)|
LORIE, LET ME START OUT BY SAYING THAT I DON'T,
EITHER, BELIEVE IN PSYCHIC CHILDREN AS DESCRIBED BY THE
BELOVED COMMUNITY. NOR DO I BELIEVE THAT MY CHRISTIAN
NEIGHBORS' CHILDREN WILL BE TRANSFORMED INTO A KINGDOM OF
HEAVEN BECAUSE THEY ARE MORE SPECIAL THAN NON-CHRISTIANS, YET
THEIR PARENTS TELL THEM THIS EVERY DAY, AND THEY BELIEVE IT.
WHY DON'T YOU GO AFTER THEM, ALSO?
And here is the actual context of the quote:
"Skeptics point out that there's no scientific research
backing up the existence of these children, and Twyman, 43,
knows that's true. 'Certainly in the scientific realm, this is
just a bunch of New Age nonsense,' says Twyman, a writer and
musician known as a "peace troubadour" in his hometown of
Ashland, Ore. 'But I think anyone with an inquisitive and
rational mind can look at many children out there today and
say there's something about them."
THE ENTIRE QUOTE AS YOU DID HERE APPEARS LESS DECEPTIVE THAT
HIGHLIGHTING JUST THE COMMENT ABOUT HOW HE THINKS THE OTHERS
IN THE SCIENTIFIC REALM FEEL ABOUT PSYCHIC
The thrust of my Indigo commentary is
that Twyman has sponsored (through Ilchi Lee, and for a fee)
seemingly "scientific" experiments
SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENTS CONDUCTED BY TWYMAN HAS NOTHING TO DO
WITH TWYMAN'S STATEMENT ABOUT WHAT THE REST OF THE SCIENTIFIC
REALM FEELS ABOUT THIS.
Now, we see that
Twyman is quoted in a USA Today article entitled "Indigo Kids
- Does the Science Fly," as saying no, the science does not
NO, HE'S SAYING SCIENTISTS HAVEN'T YET DONE THEIR
OWN EXPERIMENTS,HE'S NOT CHANGING HIS MIND ABOUT HIS OWN
THE ACTUAL SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENTS ON ALL
RELIGIONS ARE JUST NOW BEGINNING.
FOR 2000 YEARS
CHRISTIANS HAVE SAID THAT PRAYER WORKS. NOW, AT LAST, THERE'S
SCIENTIFIC PROOF. IT TOOK 2000 YEARS FOR AN AUTHENTIC, RATHER
THAN "MONEY REWARD DRIVEN SENSATIONALISM" TYPE OF "PROOF" TO
FINALLY TAKE PLACE ABOUT PRAYER.
AS FOR THE OFFER FOR
$$$$ TO PROVE THIS WHICH IS OFTEN MENTIONED ON THIS FORUM,
JESUS HIMSELF REFUSED PEOPLE WHO OFFERED LARGE AMOUNTS OF
MONEY TO "PROVE" THAT GOD EXISTS. SO DO OTHERS IN THIS FIELD.
THEY ARE WAITING FOR THE FUNDS AND SUPPORT FOR
AUTHENTIC SCIENTIFIC PROOF. BUT THEY DON'T DROP THEIR FAITH IN
THE MEANTIME. THAT'S THEIR RIGHT, AND THEIR RIGHT TO MAKE IT
PUBLIC, AND THEIR RIGHT TO TEACH THEIR CHHILDREN ANYTHING THEY
WANT TO TEACH THEM.
PERSONALLY, I'M APPALLED THAT
MORMONS TEACH THEIR GIRLS THAT BOYS ARE SUPERIOR. AT ONE TIME
IN MY LIFE I HATED THEM, AND ATTACKED THEM (LEGALLY AND
VERBALLY) AND FOUND IT ONLY EMPOWERED
Suddenly there is no mention of UCI
proving psychic children and no mention of the "Brain
Respiration" experiments he sponsored. Now he says he bases
his contentions on "something about them."
PROFESSIONAL JOURNALIST AND KNOW THAT ONE REPORTERS' ARTICLE
ONLY PROVES WHAT THAT REPORTER CHOSE TO ASK AND TO PUT INTO
THE ARTICLE. TWYMAN HAS NO INPUT, AS THE INTERVIEWEE, AS TO
WHAT QUESTIONS ARE ASKED AND WHAT IS EVENTUALLY PUT INTO THE
ARTICLE. THIS ARTICLE 'PROVES' NOTHING.
I fail to
see where I quoted him "completely out-of-context" and with
"deception," as you accuse me.
I posted all of my correspondence with him,
POST THEM. NO NEED TO KEEP THEM IN HIDING.
undoubtedly accuse me of leaving out certain
MY OPINION IS THAT THIS STATEMENT IS
PRESUMPTUOUS, HYPOCRYTICAL, AND ACCUSATORY.
you: On what do you base your claim that I have previously
removed unfavorable posts from this board.
is that you based that accusation on my later statement to you
that I reserve the right to remove your falsely accusing and
personally threatening posts.
In other words, your best
evidence for that accusation was something that hasn't
happened. That was an unsubstantiated accusation.
YET HERE IT HAS HAPPENED AGAIN, I GUESS I'M A GOOD
MIND-READER, ONE OF THOSE PSYCHICS, PERHAPS: "Unless you can
discuss and argue your points without further false
accusations with malicious intent, I will ban any further
posts from my board."
IT'S VERY CLEAR, IN MY OPINION,
THAT WITH THE NAME-CALLING AND RUDE STATEMENTS YOU USE WITH
OTHERS ON THIS POST WHICH YOU SAY ARE YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL
RIGHT (PLEASE GO BACK AND COUNT THEM) THAT YOU ARE THE TYPE
THAT CAN'T TAKE WHAT YOU DISH OUT. THIS POST WILL NO DOUBT BE
REMOVED. I DO HAVE IT COPIED AND FILED, THOUGH.
CLAIR SAYS: > I'M STATING THE LAW, YOU FIND IT
I am only after the truth and transparency
from someone spear-heading a movement that makes children out
to be supernatural little "masters."
JUST AS CATHOLICS,
AS THE OTHER POST ELUDED TO, TEACH LITTLE KIDS THAT ONLY THEY
WILL BE REBORN INTO HEAVEN AS ANGELS. WHERE'S THE SCIENTIFIC
EVIDENCE OF THAT? WHY AREN'T YOU GOING AFTER
I am well aware of libel laws and have
endeavored to express only (1) the facts and truth as I can
best determine this, based on supporting evidence, and/or (2)
ONCE YOU MAKE IT PUBLIC, WITH THE
EXCEPTION OF PRIVATE LETTERS AND FORUMS, YOU CAN BE TAKEN TO
COURT FOR MAKING FALSE ACCUSATIONS THAT HAD NO PROOF THAT
CAUSED DAMAGE TO THE ONE ACCUSED.
That is my legal
right, it's called Freedom of Speech, an American
constitutionally guaranteed right.
AND IN AMERICA,
THERE'S ALSO FREEDOM OF RELIGION.
of public figures is common
SO ARE LAWSUITS THAT
RIGHTFULLY RETALIATE. THE YELLOW JOURNALISM THAT REPORTS LIES
ON MOVIE STARS IS ALWAYS BEING SLAPPED WITH LAWSUITS, AND THE
PUBLICATIONS LOSE. THE PROBLEM IS, THE PUBLICATIONS HAVE SO
MANY READERS, AND ARE SO WEALTHY WITH THEIR ADVERTISING
REVENUE, THAT THE RELATIVELY SMALL AMOUNTS, 10,000 TO 100,000
MAXIMUM THAT CAN BE RECOVERED BY THE MOVIE STARS,STILL KEEPS
THE PUBLICATIONS IN THE BLACK. PLUS, THE MOVIE STARS AND OTHER
FIGURES FINALLY JUST GIVE UP, AND THE PUBLICATIONS KNOW THIS.
IT ISN'T WORTH THEIR ENERGY, BECAUSE THERE ARE SO MANY
HUMANS WHO JUST LOVE TO FIND FILTH ABOUT OTHERS, AND WILL
SUPPORT IT. YOU HAVE AN EASY AUDIENCE.
THERE IS A HUGE,
EASY, CROWD WHO WILL FOLLOW LIKE SHEEP.
and in many ways an important means for keeping checks and
balances on public figures.
THIS IS WHAT I'M DOING WITH
YOU, YOU ARE NOW A PUBLIC FIGURE, CONSIDERED A 'CRITIC' AND
QUOTED BY OTHERS.
6. CLAIR SAYS: >I CAN START MY
Retaliation by making false accusations and
personal threats against a private citizen for exercising this
constitutionally guaranteed right is not supported by
YOU ARE NOW A PUBLIC FIGURE, AND THERE'S NOT A
SINGLE PERSONAL THREAT. THERE IS EXPRESSION OF SPIRITUAL
BELIEF: THAT WHAT IS GIVEN SHALL COME BACK TO THE GIVER. A
HOPE TO PROTECT YOU FROM THIS, NOT AN OFFER TO BE THE ONE TO
DO IT, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF STARTING MY OWN FORUM, WHICH
COULD BE ABOUT ANY TOPIC, NOT ABOUT YOU, WHICH ANYONE,
ANYWHERE, CAN DO. AND THERE ARE EXAMPLES OF WHAT IT WOULD FEEL
LIKE IF OTHERS TREATED YOU AS YOU TREAT