I agree with you there - and disagree with Cenk, in this case. I will vote 3rd party.
But Dick's point was the Cenk is in some way biased, as thougj he hasn't been reporting on Trump and on a daily basis acknowledging and pointing out what a LOSER he is. 95%? Feck off.
Also, "mostly letting Trump slide"???
Don't comment on something you know NOTHING about, Dick (head). They've been running a DAILY segment called #LOSERDONALD, you ignorant shill.
He's probably not the best person around to give this argument since the VAST majority of his efforts have had the effect of helping Trump win. He's spent 95% of his time, as have you, trashing Hillary Clinton and mostly letting Trump slide and now at the last second he's saying "but still, in the end, you should vote for her"?
Sorry, but it doesn't work like that.
Reporting th
You mean she really fooled you that badly?
Her reaction was actually part of the gag, Sardo. Haven't you seen Between The Ferns before?
I have. Obama put on a better performance.
She's not even good at pretending to be a good sport.
Hillary doesn't need their vote. If they can't listen to Bernie or figure out on their own that Hillary would be infinitely better in representing their interests than Trump or Jill Stein (who will never be elected) then they are low information voters. Stupid people like that can't be relied upon to find their way to their polling site on election day.
If they don't live in swing state, th
To all you closet Trump supporters, you should vote directly for Trump if you want him to win, not for Stein. Voting for Stein is like only giving Trump a half vote.
I'm really sorry that you can't vote for Trump, NahWeh. It seems to be driving you crazy that you can't.
It gives Clinton an equal "half vote" if that's the case, soooo... no difference?
Still voting Green.
I dare say have 3 or 4 people in that night club been packing he would have been stopped.
Wrong again, what@jerk.
2:02 a.m.
A uniformed Orlando police officer working at the club off-duty first heard gunshots. Omar Mateen was outside with an AR-15, a handgun and an explosive device.
The officer fired at him, police said. Two more officers showed up and opened fire.
http://www.
Your first point is one I was going to make myself - I'm hardly concerned about my write in being "a vote for Trump," despite it being an all too commonly used scare tactic as of late. IMO, if Trump wins in November, it will have been because Clinton ran a campaign that amounted to a massive failure, and not because of the Bernie or Bust movement.
Your second point is a good one. I'd
A sad inability to distinguish between the two remaining major party candidates.
I don't get your point. Is that a reason not to write in Bernie over Jill?
You are that gem in a sea of crap then. Good for you.
You are that piece of crap in a sea of even more crap. Get a clue, what@nutjob. Millennials are among the hardest working generations, due to the fact that generations like your shitty one completely screwed them over and they HAVE to work harder just to make ends meet.
Hire a millennial and you will see. It's another breed of laziness I have not seen ever.
Tell that to my boss. He hasn't had a harder working tech for as long as he's owned his business, you know-nothing turd.
Yes, the correct word is debunked.
In half of the past ten presidential elections, the candidate leading in April head-to-head polls went on to lose in November.
Don't take my word for it. Ask Nate Silver. He did the research: http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/04/25/what-do-springtime-polls-tell-us-about-the-general-election/
So, you mean to say the implications gather
The head to head polls you are referring to have been debunked several times in this forum already. They have little value because Sanders has not been subjected to the same level of scrutiny as Hillary has.
At this time in 1988, Dukakis was leading Bush in the head to heads. Those polls were taken before the general election began and the Republicans started attacking him.
By "deb
If Republicans really thought Hillary was easier to beat, the would be ignoring her and attacking Sanders.
Because what Republicans think about the general says more about a candidate's electability than polling?
Sure.
You know that when Bernie says elections can be "bought," he's not talking about how much a candidate spends on their campaign, right? You do understand that the issue with money in politics is not about how much a candidate spends in a specific area, do you not?
Does it hurt to be so willfully ignorant?
Your logic is flawed.
Singh's comment is neither incorrect nor misleading.
Why are you such an asshole?
The "timeframe" that I inferred came from YOUR quote, not from Singh's, given that you call Singh's notions about presidential power "naive." I find nothing naive or misleading in what he said - had he given a timeframe, then perhaps.
As for your last statemen
Ponderer,
The author of the commentary you link to, Parminder Jeet Singh, has very naïve notions about presidential power---thinking that is not uncommon among foreigners and other who don't understand our political system.
If Bernie Sanders becomes the next president of the United States, free health, education, and a decent minimum wage – and a clear message to big business to rein
Ponderer,
The author of the commentary you link to, Parminder Jeet Singh, has very naïve notions about presidential power---thinking that is not uncommon among foreigners and other who don't understand our political system.
If Bernie Sanders becomes the next president of the United States, free health, education, and a decent minimum wage – and a clear message to big business to rein in i
